NOTEBOOKS ESSAYS PORTRAITS REVIEWS PODCASTS ABOUT CONTACT SUBSCRIBE

Notebooks

Against pasta: remembering The Manifesto

of Futurist Cooking
MAY 13, 2022 JOSH MCLOUGHLIN

Although tainted by the history of Fascism, the Manifesto and La cucina

futurista deserve to be remembered as a brave, bizarre and fascinating attempt to
aestheticise gastronomy – even if the ‘abolition of pasta’ was always doomed to fail.

A railway station restaurant in Milan, 1931. Credit: MARKA / Alamy Stock Photo.

In November 1930, Filippo Tommaso Marinetti and Luigi Colombo (known as ‘Fillìa’) sat down to
eat at the Penna d’Oca restaurant in Milan. But this was no ordinary dinner. The menu included ‘ice
cream on the moon’, ‘consumato of roses and sunshine’, and ‘roast lamb in lion sauce’ among other
eccentric dishes. Inspired, Marinetti rose to deliver a rousing speech. ‘I hereby announce the
imminent launch of Futurist Cooking’, he said, ‘to renew totally the Italian way of eating and fit it as
quickly as possible to producing new heroic and dynamic strengths of the race’. Then came his most
provocative statement: ‘Futurist cooking will be free of the old obsession with volume and weight
and will have as one of its principles the abolition of pasta’.

On 28 December, Gazetta del Popolo published Manifesto della cucina futurista (The Manifesto of Futurist
Cooking), a radical plan to reform, politicicise and aestheticise food according to the principles of
Futurism:

Having enlarged sculptural possibility with anti-realism, having created geometric architectonic splendour
without decorativism and made cinematography abstract, we will now establish the way of eating best suited
an ever more high speed, airborne life.

Announcing that ‘men think, dream and act according to what they eat and drink’, Marinetti and
Fillìa called on their compatriots to ‘stop the Italian male from becoming a solid leaden block of blind
and opaque density’. Their rallying cry struck at the very heart of the culinary tradition: ‘Against
pasta’, they cried: ‘an absurd Italian gastronomic religion’.

It was not the first time Marinetti had launched an iconoclastic manifesto. The Manifesto del
Futurismo (1909) ‘declare[d] that the splendour of the world has been enriched with a new form of
beauty, the beauty of speed’ and valorised motor and aeronautical engineering above the ‘glorified
thoughtful immobility, ecstasy and slumber’ of classical art and literature.

The original Manifesto sought to ‘glorify war — the only true hygiene of the world — militarism,
patriotism, the destructive gesture of anarchist, the beautiful Ideas which kill’. Marinetti called
the Battle of Vittorio Veneto, for instance, (in which he fought in October–November 1918) an
‘Italian masterpiece […] greater than [Dante’s] Divine Comedy’.

No surprise, then, that Marinetti’s attempt to overhaul Italian food echoed the tenets of the
original Manifesto: ‘Since everything in modern civilisation tends towards elimination of weight, and
increased speed’, he said, ‘the cooking of the future must conform to the ends of evolution’.
Marinetti called for a ‘battery of scientific instruments in the kitchen’, ‘a consistent lightening of
weight and reduction of volume of foodstuffs’, and ‘the abolition of traditional mixtures in favour of
experimentation with new, apparently absurd mixtures’.

The cooking Manifesto was an immediate sensation, reported in the New York Times and
the Chicago Tribune (under the wonderfully journalese headline ‘Italy May Down Spaghetti’). In
Europe, the event was covered in Le Petit Marseillais, the London Times, and dailies in Germany, the
Netherlands, and Hungary.

Furious debate broke out across Italy. The Duke of Bovino, Mayor of Naples, claimed that ‘the
Angels in Paradise eat nothing but vermicelli al pomodoro’. Marinetti replied that this merely
‘consecrates the unappetising monotony of Paradise and the life of the Angels’. The Fascist theatre
critic Marco Ramperti came out in support of Marinetti: ‘pasta is like our rhetoric’, he wrote, ‘only
good for filling up our mouths’.

In December 1931, a special edition of La settimana modenese published cartoons lampooning

Marinetti as half-man, half-aeroplane, alongside a poetic defence of tagliatelle condemning Futurists
as ‘past their proper cooking time’. The French poet Gabriel Audisio waded in, calling pasta a
‘dictatorship of the stomach’ and condemning its ‘insidious, slow process of rumination […] the
unctuous conciliatory rhythm of the sloth’.

Neopolitans protested violently in support of pasta. In San Francisco, a riot sparked at an Italian
restaurant caused several casualties. Meanwhile, Marinetti travelled across Europe, stoking
controversy by giving lectures on the new cuisine.

In March 1931, Fillìa put theory into practice, opening La Taverna Santopalato (‘The Holy Palate’) in
Turin with a model Futurist banquet of fourteen new dishes and a dining area decorated in
‘shimmering Italian Aluminium’.

The plan was that ‘the tavern will not be a simple, ordinary restaurant’ but a sort of salon that ‘will
take on the character of an arts centre holding competitions and organising Futurist
poetry evenings, art exhibitions, and fashion shows, instead of the usual post-prandial coffee
evenings or dances’.

The centrepiece was Fillìa’s ‘sculpted meat’: ‘a symbolic interpretation of the Italian regions,
composed of a large cylindrical risole of minced veal […] supported at the base by a ring of sausages
resting on three golden spheres of chicken meat’. Other dishes included ‘totalrice’(rice seasoned with
wine and beer) and ‘cooked salami served immersed in a concentrated solution of strong black coffee
and flavoured with eau-de-Cologne’. A dish created by the painter Enrico Prampolini expressed the
Futurist obsession with air travel:

an equatorial sea of poached egg yolks seasoned like oysters with pepper, salt and lemon. In the centre emerges
a cone of irmly whipped egg white full of orange segments looking like juicy sections of the sun. The peak of
the cone is strewn with pieces of black trule cut in the form of black aeroplanes conquering the zenith.

Asked what would remain of the old cuisine, Fillìa said: ‘Nothing, not even the saucepans’.

In 1932, Marinetti published La cucina futurista (The Futurist Cookbook), a Futurist recipe book
accompanied by a metanarrative account of famous Futurist dinners across Italy and the political and
culinary controversies surrounding the Futurist food revolution.

The movement was not quite as radical as Marinetti claimed, however. The French chef Jules
Maincave published La cuisine futuriste in 1913, calling for a complete harmony between the table
(including crockery, glassware, and decoration) and the application of ‘the latest concepts of science’,
anticipating Marinetti’s multi-sensory dining experience by more than a decade.

More importantly, the Manifesto and Cookbook must be understood in the context of Italy’s long
history of culinary treatises and recipe books. Cristoforo Messisbugo’s extremely influential Banchetti,
Composizioni di vivande et apparecchio generale (Banquets, Compositions of Courses, and General Table
Design) (1549) was a bastion of the culinary traditionalism that Marinetti rejected — but it was also a
major inspiration.

Messisbugo catalogued everything needed for a lavish court feast. His attention to detail — including
not only spectacular food sculptures and eccentric flavour combinations of which Marinetti and
Fillìa would have approved, but decoration, music, poetry, theatre and games — created a total
dining experience that anticipated the all-encompassing artistic and culinary event of the
Futurist banchetto.

Marinetti’s explicit target, however, was Pellegrino Artusi’s La scienza in cucina e l’arte di mangiar
bene (Science in the Kitchen and the Art of Eating Well) (1891). This collection of traditional recipes
quickly became the quintessential canon of Italian cuisine, representing everything
the Manifesto despised. But one of Artusi’s aims was to push back against the dominance of French
cuisine, part of a wider French cultural hegemony permeating across Europe since the eighteenth
century. Writing a cookbook in Italian, for Italians, Artusi provided a nationalist culinary model and
a belated contribution to the Risorgimento (1848–1871) by restoring native pride in Italian food. For
all his repudiation of the traditionalist, bourgeois values underpinning L’arte di mangiar bene,
Marinetti adopted Artusi’s gastro-nationalism throughout his adventures in Futurist cooking.

Of course, the cooking Manifesto, like Futurism more broadly, is irretrievably compromised by its
Fascism. The Cookbook is filled with racism, violence, and misogyny in the service of Italian
nationalism. The ‘abolition of pasta’ lent support to the Battaglia del grano (Battle for Grain), a
campaign by Benito Mussolini for national self-sufficiency in the production of wheat to protect
Italy from economic repercussions resulting from his invasion of Ethiopia in 1935.

While the long-term effects of Marinetti’s revolution on Italian cuisine were limited — the campaign
‘Against pasta’ certainly failed — contemporary dining reflects some of the key aims of the Futurist
food Manifesto. Nouvelle cuisine, though dating back to the 1730s, was only popularised in the 1960s.
Its emphasis on lightness, delicacy and fine presentation echoes the Futurist aversion to bulky, dense
meals and its celebration of food for the eye and the mind as well as the mouth.

‘Molecular gastronomy’ and the multi-sensory fine dining that gained popularity in the 2000s, with
their focus on chemistry and the use of new technologies, realise Marinetti’s dream of a ‘battery of
scientific instruments in the kitchen’.

In 2006, Ferran Adrià, Heston Blumenthal, Thomas Keller and Harold McGee published a
manifesto on the ‘new cookery’ in the Observer. Framed as an ‘international agenda for great
cooking’, it even adopted the numbered format of the original Futurist Manifesto. And like Marinetti,
it emphasised how ‘Change has come especially fast over the last decade,’ and announced that
cooking is no longer limited to ‘narrow definitions and expectations embodied in local tradition.’
The ‘new cookery’, just like La cucina futurista, ‘embrace[d] innovation – new ingredients,
techniques, appliances, information, and ideas’, and prioritises ‘the disciplines of food chemistry and
food technology’.

Futurism’s culinary experiments are now largely forgotten. The wider movement, shorn of
Marinetti’s charismatic leadership and tainted by its association with the defeated Axis powers after
the Second World War, effectively died with its founder in 1944. But together the Manifesto and La
cucina futurista deserve to be remembered as a brave, bizarre and fascinating attempt to aestheticize
gastronomy – even if the ‘abolition of pasta’ was always doomed to fail.

AUTHOR

Josh Mcloughlin
More about Josh Mcloughlin

LL ATES
ATESTT NOTEB
NOTEBOOO
OKK

MICHAEL SHERIDAN

Hong Kong’s secret world of spies

PETER STOTHARD

Did Tiberius have a grand strategy?

AGNÈS POIRIER

The bells, the bells

ARMAND D'ANGOUR

The madness of crowds

Notebooks Essays Axel and Margaret Ax:son Johnson

Foundation
Engelsberg Ideas is brought to you by The Axel and Portraits Reviews
Margaret Ax:son Johnson Foundation for Public Benefit.
Podcasts About

Contact Subscribe

PRIVACY POLICY COOKIE POLICY