CIT COLLEGES OF PANIQUI FOUNDATION INC.
Burgos St., Poblacion Norte, Paniqui Tarlac
FACE VALIDITY EXPERT VALIDATION TOOL
This expert validation tool is designed to assess the face validity of an instrument
intended for research or educational purposes. Face validity refers to the extent to which
an instrument appears to measure what it is intended to measure, based on expert
judgment. This validation process ensures that the content, clarity, relevance, and
structure of the instrument are appropriate for the target population. Your expertise is
essential in refining and enhancing the quality of this instrument. Your feedback will help
improve its clarity, usability, and effectiveness in accurately capturing the intended
construct.
Instructions for Experts
1. Carefully review the instrument, attached with this validation tool, considering its
purpose and target audience. Evaluate each criterion by selecting the most appropriate
rating using the 4-point scale:
4 – Strongly Agree (The criterion is fully met)
3 – Agree (The criterion is met with minor issues)
2 – Disagree (The criterion is somewhat met but requires revision)
1 – Strongly Disagree (The criterion is not met and needs significant revision)
2. Provide comments and suggestions in the last column to highlight areas for
improvement.
3. After completing the evaluation, include any additional recommendations at the end
of the checklist.
4. Sign and date the validation form.
5. Your insights and recommendations are highly valued and will be instrumental in
improving the instrument’s overall validity. Thank you for your time and expertise
CIT COLLEGES OF PANIQUI FOUNDATION INC.
Burgos St., Poblacion Norte, Paniqui Tarlac
Validation Tool
Comments and
Criteria 4 3 2 1
Suggestions
1. The instrument’s
content aligns with its
intended purpose.
2. The instructions are
clear and easy to
follow.
3. The questions/items are
relevant to the topic
being assessed.
4. The wording of the
items is clear and
unambiguous.
5. The format and
structure of the
instrument are
appropriate.
6. The number of items is
sufficient to cover the
topic.
7. The instrument avoids
bias and is fair to all
respondents.
8. The scale or response
options are appropriate
and easy to understand.
9. The instrument can be
CIT COLLEGES OF PANIQUI FOUNDATION INC.
Burgos St., Poblacion Norte, Paniqui Tarlac
understood by the
target population.
10. Overall, the instrument
appears to measure
what it is intended to
measure.
Additional Comments and Recommendations:
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Expert’s Signature: _____________________
Date: ________________________________
