Curriculum: Induction Program for IMG for Army Medical Core: On site training (with supplemental e- learning) Group I

Duration of Course: One month

C-I C-II C-III C-IV C-V

I. Need Goal Competenc LO TL Assessment Organisation, Curriculum

Identification y criteria and Implementation, Handling
Experience Evaluation
suggested
-Medical officers
tools
serving for armed
forces need to have After this a) Having At the end a) Lectures a) Pre- and Identification of resources: Outcome
some special training knowledge of induction with AV Post- Identification:
-Collaboration with the
knowledge and IMG of common program, aids, assessment
training institute -Infrastructural
skills to manage should be types of war the including using MCQ’s
adequacy
war trauma etc able to related participants video clips and checklist -List of resource persons
deal with trauma and should be -Quantity of staff and
-Lack of skilled b) E- b) Fill in the Obtaining support for
trauma injuries, and able to: faculty
medical learning and blanks, single curriculum:
situation their
professionals in a) Identify hybrid answer type -Quality of sessions
and other consequenc -Project funding from
Army core for and learning i.e. questions,
special es (KH) Ministry/Forces or other -Sufficiency of funds
helping in warfare describe the Synchronou case-based
health funding agencies
and disaster b) type of s google scenarios -Curriculum Impact
issues
situations Effectively injuries class- Administration of
related to c) Reflections (Performance of
manage the during rooms, curriculum:
1. Identify the armed trainees while in
injuries in warfare. zoom d) Practical
health problem: forces -Permission from concerned service)
army meeting, demonstratio
---By collecting personnel. b) authorities
professional moodle. n, OSCE and
data regarding Demonstrat
during war OSPE -Scheduling the program
trauma during e and c) Select the
and during dates
warfare from the perform all Simulation e) E- measurement
peace (SH)
hospital records types of d) Skill lab assessment, -Collaboration with the method/identify the
and war statistics c) Should suturing and Kahoot, faculty and participants instrument
be able to trauma Mentimeter,
-Interviews of the -Implement -Feedback forms from
identify and managemen
soldiers and participants
refer cases t required Anticipating barriers:
beneficiaries. at for injuries -Availability of the faculty -3600 feedback
appropriate likely to be and the support staff
-Focussed group -Group discussion with
facilities acquired by
discussions -Co-ordination faculty members
(KH) armed
2. Ideal Approach: forces -Inadequacy of Funding -Feedback from support
d) Should
How? personnel staff
be able to Introducing Curriculum:
A Structured training use the c) Identify -Structured interviews
-Communicating the
module (Pre- safety gears and with administrators
participants and their
service) , focussed for difficult describe the
institutes. -External Audit
group discussion environmen conditions
ts (SH) for referral -Mandate from the -Log book/reflections
during controlling organization
3. Key differences warfare.
-Inauguration and
between the ideal
d) Implementation
and current
Demonstrat
approach
e the use of
-Gap analysis safety gears
for different
-Induction pack
environmen
(current) vs
ts
structured dedicated
appropriatel
training (ideal)
y

II. Learner? &

Needs assessment of
targeted learners
Target learner: IMG
selected to serve in
armed forces
-IMG surveys,
questionnaire
- Interviews of the
army medical doctors
already serving in
senior position