Anthropology Part One
Anthropology Part One
Anthropology
- Anthropology is the study of humanity
- Anthros means human
- Anthropology is made up of
- Cultural anthropology
- Studies cultural variation among humans
- Linguistic anthropology
- Studies how humans use language to communicate with one another
- Biological anthropology
- Studies humans as biological beings
- Archaeology
- Studies human past based on what’s been left behind
- Biological anthropology
- Forensic anthropology
- Involves applying skeletal analysis and techniques in archaeology to solving
criminal cases
- Human biology
- studying modern humans
- investigating ways that humans adapt to various environments
- understanding the process of growth and development
- very often anatomists
- Paleoanthropology
- Studying fossils of humans and their ancestors
- Identifying mechanisms of evolution and adaptation
- Hominin: Humans, their ancestors up to most recent common ancestor with
chimpanzees
- Hominid: Great apes, humans, and their ancestors
- More vague than hominins
- Bioarchaeology
- The study of human remains in archaeological contexts
- Paleopathology is the study of ancient diseases
- Primatology
- Study of non-human primates
- Skeletal biology & osteology
- Osteology: the study of the skeleton
- Anthropometry: the measurement of human proportions
- Skeletal biology: development and physiology
- Anthropology: sciences or humanities?
- Observation→ hypothesis→ data collection and testing→ interpretation→ observation,
etc
- Is a cycle
- Biocultural perspectives
- Culture and biology are intertwined and inseparable
- Ex. Getting wisdom teeth out since they aren’t needed anymore
- Most modern biological anthropologists conduct research with this in mind
- Founders of the Field
- Ales Hrdlicka
- Anatomist and Founder of Physical Anthropology
- Believed that studying the skeletal remains and evolution could help modern
humans
- Also incredibly racist
- Humans had to have developed in Central Europe
- Franz Boas
- Founder of the four-field approach of anthropology
- Founding academic father to many in anthropology
- Strong proponent of humanity as a single species
- Emphasized importance of scientific method
- Early History of Physical Anthropology
- The field began with anatomists seeking to understand human physiology
- Craniometry and anthropometry were the main foci of study
- Early research led to questionable interpretations
- New physical anthropology in mid-20th Century; more holistic and scientific
- Semi-transformation in Biological Anthropology rather than the old terminology of
Physical Anthropology
- Archaeology
- The systematic study of the human past through the materials left behind
- History: the study of the human past through written documents
- Prehistory: the study of the human past before the development of writing,
using artifacts and other material evidence
- Artifacts
- Usually not a crystal skull…
- Any man-made object
- Tools, pottery, bones from animals, bones from humans
- Feature- an artifact that cannot be removed
- Building, earth mounds, post holes, hearths
- Excavation
- One level at a time
- Pedestal artifacts
- Measure and map
- Screen all dirt removed
- Highly detailed maps
- Once excavation has occurred, can never be put back
- Must be well-documented
Evolutionary Theory
- Culture
- “Man’s extrasomatic means of adaptation” - Leslie White 1959
- Beyond biology:
- Lifeways
- Belief
- “Material culture”
- Altering the landscape
- As archaeologists, all we can study are the material culture and landscape and try and
infer the lifeways and beliefs
- Evolution is biological
- Cultures DO NOT evolve
- The correct biological and anthropological definition of evolution: CHANGE in a species OVER
TIME
- Not “progress”, “improvement”, or “better than”
Ancestors and How we Know Them
- Every culture tells stories of their origins
- Epistemes: fundamental cultural ideas of how we know things
- In the west, our epistemes are:
- Naturalism
- Rationalism
- Empiricism: everything must be physical, able to measure
- Accuracy
- These came from the Enlightenment (17th century)
Early Thought
- Ancient Greeks credited with first written systematic efforts to understand the natural world
- Foundation of current western thought
- Aristotle believed things are “fixed” (fixity of species) and never change, and humans are
at the top
- Arab scholars preserved the Greek writings
- Created more reliable observations and interpretations
Division of the Natural World and Gradual Evolution
- Ibn Khaldun (1377 C.E.)
- Mineral→ plant→ animal→ monkeys→ human
- Gradual change
- Al Jahiz (8th Century) and Ibn Miskawayh (10th Century)
- Animals come from other animals through gradual changes
- Monkeys almost human, thus humans must come from monkeys
- Al Jahiz and Nasir Al-Din Al-Tusi (13th Century)
- Animals engage in a struggle for existence
- Organisms with new features gain advantage and survive
- Al Jahiz, Al-Biruni (11th Century) and Ibn Khaldun
- The environment influences new characteristics and thus new species
- Causal relationship between environment and appearance
The Roots of Western Science
- The Renaissance (14th-16th centuries)
- “Rediscovering” the Greeks and Romans (from the Arab scholars)
- The study of human anatomy
- Belief in a single creation event popular before 19th century
- James Ussher’s (17th Century) dating of the world based on biblical references to Adam,
Cain, and Abel- about 5,500 years old
Origin of Species before Darwin
- 3 main assumptions before the Enlightenment
- No such thing as Extinction
- All beings sit in the “Great Chain of Being”
- All animals come from Mount Ararat, the site of the landings of Noah’s Ark
- By 17th century, all three were in question
- Extinction observed first-hand and in fossils
- Life as a tree rather than a chain
- Biology and geography seemed correlated
Linnaeus and the Natural Scheme of Life
- Taxonomy
- John Ray
- First to use “genus” and “species” to designate types of animals and plants
- Carolus Linnaeus
- Binomial nomenclature
- Systema naturae
- Helps make sense of patterns and relationships between organisms
- Domain→Kingdom→Phylum→Class→Order→Family→Genus→Species
The Road to the Darwinian Revolution
- Georges Cuvier (1769-1832)
- Catastrophism
- Early forms of life wiped out by event such as Noah’s flood
- Believed God purposefully wipes out species
- Thomas Rubbert Malthus (1766-1834)
- Malthusian Catastrophe
- Population growth outpaces resources, population dies off, creating balance
- Jean-Baptiste Lamarck (1744-1829)
- Theory of the inheritance of acquired characteristics
- Concept of “need and use”, didn’t know genes
- Relationship between organism and environment
- But fundamental change occurs during a single lifetime
- ***Lamarckian evolution
The Uniformitarians: Hutton and Lyell
- Uniformitarianism: theory that the same gradual geological process we observe today was
operating in the past
- James Hutton (1726-1797)
- Studied rock formations
- Asserted uniformitarianism but did not apply it to the living world
- Could not rectify what he observed with his religious beliefs
- Charles Lyell (1797-1875)
- Key role in convincing public that Earth’s history could only be found in geological
changes
- Also a creationist
- Friendship with Darwin
- Principles of Geology
The Darwinian Revolution
- Charles Darwin (1809-1882)
- Studied under John Hensolow, a botanist and naturalist
- Read travels and natural history of Baron von Humboldt
- Voyage on the HMS Beagle
- 1831-1836
- Charting coasts of South America
- The Galapagos
- Variations of species
- Tortoises
- At least thirteen different finch variations
- Ornithologist John Gould later sorted them into different species
according to island
- Biogeography
- Distribution of plants and animals on Earth
- Darwin's observations
- Oceanic islands hold many species not found elsewhere
- Isolated islands lack whole groups of animals, such as large mammals
- Distinctive animals and plants resemble close relatives on the mainland even
with a vastly different environment
- Darwin’s finches: adaptive radiation of bill types
Refining the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection
- Alfred Russel Wallace
- Field biologist in Indonesia
- Own version of theory of evolution parallel to Darwin
- Darwin published On the Origin of the Species in November of 1859
- Darwin’s three observations and two deductions
- Observation 1: All organisms have the potential for explosive population growth
- Observation 2:Yet populations are roughly stable
- Deduction 1: There must be a struggle for existence
- Observation 3: Nature is full of variation
- Deduction 2: Some variations are favored while others are not
- Refining the Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection
- Properties of natural selection
- The trait in question must be inherited
- The trait in question must show variation between individuals
- The environment must exert some pressure on the trait
- Fitness- the ability to successfully reproduce
- Population- not individuals
- Mutation in the genetic sequence- raw source of variation
- Post-Darwinian Evolutionary Theory
- Darwin did not get rid of Lamarch
- Blended inheritance
- Mom has blue eyes, dad has brown eyes→ kid would have a mix to blue
and brown eyes
- Acquired characteristics to keep variation
- Somatic cells and Germ cells are different
- “A hen is just an egg’s way of making another egg” -Samuel Butler
- Darwin knew no method of inheritance
- Mendel and Genetics
- Gregor Mendel (1822-1884) observed discrete inheritance
- Ex. Kid having blue eyes when parents both present with brown eyes
- Work was re-discovered in 1900 and used to explain animal inheritance
- New studies in genetics and inheritance led to the Synthetic Theory of Evolution (aka
Evolutionary Synthesis)
- Population Genetics
- Microevolution - at the genetic level
- Macroevolution - at the anatomical level
- Modern Evolutionary Synthesis
- Combined early 20th Century finding in population genetics with Darwinian evolutionary
thought
- Natural selection:
- Malthusian Competition
- Species Variation
- Mutation
- Genetic Variation
- Mendelian Inheritance
- Post-Synthetic Evolution
- Clearly genetics and anatomy are not 1-to-1
- Background extinctions v. mass extinctions
- Diversity in number of species are not equivalent to success- species selection
- Debates on HOW and WHEN speciation happens
- Connecting genes to anatomy
- Evo-Devo
- Seek connection between microevolution and macroevolution
- Processes of development lead to phenotypic differentiation
- How processes lead to observable patterns
- Genetic Toolkit= Homeobox Genes
- Econology, Epigenetics, and mechanical stimuli
- Biocultural approach
- The human species is incredibly “plastic”
Primates
- Mammals are divided into three groups
- Prototheria, or monotremes
- Lay eggs but nurse their young
- Ex. platypuses, echidnas
- Metatheria, or marsupials
- No placenta
- Offspring born in near embryonic state
- Ex. kangaroos, koalas, opossums
- Eutheria, or placental mammals
- Primates
- Diversity of Nonhuman Primates
- 400+ species of nonhuman primates are recognized
- Size and form vary greatly
- Body shapes vary tremendously
- What Exactly is a Primate?
- Mammals with a suite of traits that distinguish them from all others
- Grasping hands
- Flattened nails
- Forward facing eyes
- Large brains
- High degree of learned behavior
- Traditional naming systems
- Prosimian-
- Lemurs, lorises, galagoes, tarsiers
- Anthropoid
- Monkeys, apes, hominins
- Two suborders of Primate
- Strepsirhini
- Includes prosimian, except tarsiers
- Haplorhini
- Tarsiers, monkeys, apes, and humans
- Primate Anatomical Traits
- Generalized body plan
- Many Strepsirhines move by vertical clinging and leaping (VCL)
- Monkeys run and leap along branches rather than swing
- Ape’s arm has full range of motion
- Petrosal bulla
- Skeleton that covers the inner ear
- Single bony trait shared by primates that occurs in no other mammalian group
- Enclosed bony orbits in the skull
- Anatomical adaptation to the importance of vision
- May better protect the eye
- Prosimians missing posterior wall
- Generalized teeth
- Infers patterns of behavior and diet
- Dental arcade includes four types of teeth
- Large Brains
- Encephalization
- Increase in volume of neocortex
- Increased surface area of the brain
- Single offspring
- Exception is marmosets and tamarins, which give birth to twins
- Investment of time and energy in a few babies
- Extended ontogeny
- Learned behaviors
- Many animals live longer than primates
- Extended stages in the life cycle
- Process of learning to live in a group
- Activity patterns
- Most haplorhines= diurnal
- Many strepsirhines= nocturnal
- Sociality
- Living in groups
- Adaptation by which a primate survives and reproduces
- Exception is orangutan
- The Nonhuman Primates
- Primate families that are anatomically similar are lumped in the same superfamily
- Subgroups of families are called subfamilies
- The Strepsirhines- Lemurs
- Strepsirhines:
- Tooth comb
- Grooming claws
- Lemurs
- Found only in Madagascar
- Lemuroidea
- Many species now extinct from hunting, including sloth lemurs\Lacked
natural predators
- Each of the four species distinct in size and social patterns
- The Strepsirhines- Lorises
- Lorises
- Lorisidae
- Galogonidae (bush baby)
- Only venomous primate
- Communicate vocally and through olfactory methods
- Nocturnal
- All are slow-moving, deliberate stalkers
- Only strepsirhines in Asia and mainland Africa
- The Haplorhines
- Process full suite of adaptations characterizing living primates
- Emphasis on vision
- Haplorhines are mostly diurnal
- Tarsiers are unique
- Most are nocturnal
- Traits mixed between prosimian and anthropoid primates
- Live in Indonesia
- Monogamous pairs
- Haplorhines- New World Monkeys
- Infraorder Platyrrhini
- Refers to the flare shape of the nose
- Superfamily Ceboidea
- Shared features
- Small body size
- Three premolar teeth
- Arboreality
- Prehensile tails
- Callitrichids (marmosets and tamarins)
- Unique among primates; traits resemble lower mammals
- In some species, a polyandrous mating system occurs
- Haplorhines- Old World Monkeys
- Infraorder Catarrhini
- Includes OWM, apes, and hominins
- Superfamily Cercopithecoidea
- Shared traits
- Ischial callosities
- Bilophodont molars
- Estrus (in some)
- Period of sexual receptivity that correspond with ovulation
- Sexual dimorphism
- Colobines and Langurs
- Leaf-eating monkeys
- Diets based on leaves
- Able to access food in highly competitive regions
- Semi-chambered foregut
- Have a distinct paunch
- Colobus are in Africa
- Langurs are in Asia
Hominoids
- Apes
- Hylobatidae
- Ponginae
- Hominane
- Shared traits with rest of primates but more extreme
- Encephalization
- Brachiation
- Extended ontogeny
- Social complexity in varying degrees
- Gibbons
- 3 genera; 16 species
- Asia, Indonesia
- Frugivorous
- Most vocal of all nonhuman primates
- Mated pairs sing together
- Socially monogamous but not necessarily reproductively monogamous
- Orangutans
- Extremely sexually dimorphic
- Bimaturism- Adults take two different forms
- 8 year interval between births and reach maturity around 15
- Both males and females leave the birth group at maturity
- Males are frequently loners holding territory
- Females will be included in the territory of a male
- Gorillas
- Largest primates and extremely sexually dimorphic
- Highly cohesive groups
- Silverback or blackback males
- Varied diets
- Mountain gorillas
- Lowland gorillas
- All prefer to eat fruit but can fall back on fibrous leaves if it is not available
- Virunga Volcano groups eat primarily leaves
- Chimpanzees
- Fission-fusion groups
- Males highly social
- Form coalitions to hunt and dominate females
- Females more independent
- To avoid feeding competition
- Highly diverse diet
- Fruit
- Plant products
- Termites
- Animal meat
- Bonobos
- Close relatives of chimpanzees
- Moderate sexual dimorphism
- Live in large, fluid social groupings with strong female bonds
- Largely fruit diet, leafy plant material
- Have been observed eating meat in some communities
- Hypersexual for social interactions
- Primate Ecology
- Ecology: study of interrelationships of animals, plants, and their physical environment
- Jane Goodall, Dian Fossey, Birute Galdikas
- Diet
- Most primates are herbivores
- Frugivores
- Folivores
- Dietary Constraints
- The energy expended to find food== quantity and quality of the food eaten
- Primates are color-vision foragers to find the most nutritious fruit
- Activity budgets
- Time animals spend per activity
- Linked to dietary quality
- Dietary and Digestive Strategies
- Digestive specializations
- Foregut of colobine monkeys that allows diet of high-fiber, low-quality leaves
- Secondary compounds
- Indigestible, toxic chemicals in plant leaves
- Defense against leaf eating animals
- Diet and Feeding Competition
- Feeding competition
- Well-defined areas of their habitat to find food and shelter
- Intragroup
- Intergroup
- Natural food shortages have a severe effect on wild populations
- Increase feeding competition
- Natural selection may favor individuals that are the best foragers
- Territories and Ranges
- Defined home ranges
- Can be limited or many square kilometers
- Must contain all resources needed by a nonhuman social groups
- Territory
- Defended against other members of the same species
- Key resources that nonhuman primate groups are willing to protect
- Predation of Primates
- Observation of predators is difficult
- Stealthy
- Nocturnal
- Solitary
- Small-bodies primates more vulnerable
- Behaviors that may have evolved in response to threat of predation
- Even humans pose a threat
- Primate Communities
- Primate communities are integral parts of tropical forest ecosystems
- Niche separation
- Occurs among all primates that are sympatric
- Makes primates highly diverse
- Primatology
- Studying sociality
- Costs and benefits of group living
- Models of group living
- Proxy for human evolution and social lives
- Field Study
- Habitat in which species evolved
Positional behavior, social interaction
- Smaller amount of research can be done
- How we Study Primates
- Captive study
- Close, personal observations
- Ability to manipulate the study group
- Animals in highly unnatural settings
- Semi-free ranging environment
- Very large enclosures or small island
- Compromise between captivity and natural field study
- The Evolution of Primate Social Behavior
- All behaviors seen in the wild have proximate causes
- Hunger, fear, sexual urges
- Hormonal and/ or physiological reasons to act
- Behaviors may be evolved strategies for reproductive success
- We’ve already talked about the forces of evolution and how natural selection works
- Examine how these forces shape primate phenotype and potentially behavior
- The Evolution of Primate Social Behavior
- Value of an evolutionary approach is to allow us to test hypotheses regarding fitness
- Mating behavior
- Physiology
- Dominance relationships
- Coalition networks
- Behavior can be seen as an adaption, phenotype
- Social system- the grouping pattern in which a primate species lives
- Including its size and composition
- Potentially evolved in response to natural and sexual selection pressures
- Philopatry
- Most female kin living together share a strong incentive to cooperate over food
resources
- When females are in fission-fusion situations, male bonds are the most effective way of
controlling females
- Social Behavior and Reproductive Asymmetry
- Females invest more energy and time in offspring and have lower reproductive potential
- Competed over by males
- Prioritize obtaining adequate food for themselves and offspring
- Female philopatry
- Females do not migrate at maturity
- Remain and breed within birth group
- Male philopatry
- Males do not migrate at maturity
- Remain and breed within birth
- Females in male-philopatric societies may not show a high degree of affiliation
- Number of males is dependent on the risk of predation
- The degree of parental investment is key in shaping the social system
- Males rarely engage in parental caregiving
- Exceptions: Tamarins and Marmosets
- Male Reproductive Strategies
- Dominance
- Established early in life through aggressive play
- Males not dominant sex in all species
- Rarely is there a linear dominance hierarchy
- Flexible in various interactions
- Cause for dominance debated
- Reproductive success results mixed
- More likely for high-ranking individual to be reproductive
- Female Reproductive Strategies
- Dominance
- Small but significant influence
- Female non humans typically competed over, but they do not always mate with the male
winner of the competition
- Choosiness over mates because of the time invested in offspring
- Sexual Receptivity and Signaling
- Restricted fertility
- Posture
- Hanuman Langurs arch their tails over their backs and shake their heads from
side to side
- Female features attract mates and may incite males to compete over them
- Estrus: During ovulation, a female’s rump may change color, swell, or emit odors to
signal males
- Swellings evolved independently at least three times in the primate order
- Do no always signal ovulation
- May serve to confuse paternity and discourage aggression
- Sexual Dimorphism and Society
- Access to mates
- Competition energy expenditure and injuries
- Intensity of competition is reflected in the level of sexual dimorphism in
primates
- Multi-female societies are more dimorphic- usually 30-40%
- Exception: Orangutans: males are 50% larger than females
- Gibbons-single pair-very little sexual dimorphism
- The Paradox of Sociality
- Group living is an evolved primate adaptation
- Benefits:
- Improved access to mates
- Improved access to food
- Protection from predation
- Costs
- Competition
- Enormous energy expense
- Sociality means culture
- Food
- Benefit of exploiting food-finding abilities of others offset by
competition once food is found
- Fighting over food, once it’s found
- Females are highly dependent on food availability due to energy
expenditure of reproduction
- Predators and Sociality
- Avoiding predators
- Little direct evidence
- Indirect evidence suggests benefits to group living for avoiding predation
- Alarm calls
- Individual’s chance of becoming the victim lowered
- Types of Primate Societies
- Social system
- The grouping pattern in which a primate species lives, including its size and
composition evolved in response to natural and sexual selection pressures
- Solitary
- Monogamy
- Polygamy
- Polygyny
- Polyandry
- Polygynandry
Solitary
- Strepsirhines and Orangutans
- Females occupy individual territories with dependent offspring
- Males occupy territory overlapping several female territories and decide whether to
allow access to transient males
- Males use scent markers to define territories (strepsirhines)
- Most solitary primates are also monogamous
Monogamy
- Male and female live in a pair bond for an extended period of time
- Gibbons
- No strict reproductive monogamy
- Sometimes they mate outside of the pair bond
- Best understood as a female reproductive strategy
- Fewer aspects of male competition
Polygny is Multi-female
- One-male polygyny
- Formerly harem, but that term implies control over females
- One male lives with many females he hopes to monopolize
- Gelada baboons- females are bonded to each other and the male hangs around hoping
to have access to them
- Gorillas-females may migrate between silverbacks. Males have anxiety that the females
will leave for another silverback
- Extra males typically reside in all-male “bachelor” groups
- Hanuman langurs
- Commonly compete for takeovers and practice infantice (kill offspring of
previous males)
Multimale polygyny
- Reduce extraneous competition but maintain largest share of females through dominance
- Dominance hierarchy to compete for priority of access to females
- Seasonal breeding leads to intense competition
- Some species exhibit both one-and multi-male polygyny
- Sexual dimorphism
Fission-fusion polygyny/ polygynandry
- Chimps, bonobos, spider monkeys
- Temporary associations of individuals- communities
- Based on foraging parties
- Only stable unit is a female and her offspring (nuclear family)
- May be an evolved response to reliance on ripe fruit
- Seasonal distribution and daily variation in fruit
- Females forage for increased access to fruit
- Males form bonds with one another to control access to females
Polyandry is multi-male
- Polyandry
- Marmosets and tamarins
- One female with multiple males
- Poorly understood and rare in primates
- Males bond together and help females rear offspring
- May be reproductively monogamous but socially polyandrous
Fossil Context & Geologic Time
- Setting the Stage
- For understanding human evolution
- Looking at geology
- Paleontology
- Understanding fossilization
- Explore conditions on earth during the Cenozoic
- Look at some of the earliest primates
- Paleontology
- The study of extinct organisms based on their fossilized remains
- Taphonomy
- The study of what happens to the remains of an animal from the time of its
death to the time of discovery
- Process of becoming a fossil
- Burial
- Carcass covered with sediment
- Interrupts decomposition
- Basics: How to Become a Fossil
- Petrification
- Skeletal remains absorb surrounding minerals that eventually replace the
organism’s inorganic tissues
- Most fossilized remains are of skeletal parts but occasionally skin; hair, or plant parts are
preserved
- Trace fossils
- Such as tracks
- Coprolites
- Fossilized feces
- The Importance of Context
- Without context, a fossil cannot be assessed for age or environment
- To a paleoanthropologist- context is everything
Established by
- Stratigraphy
- Geologic Time Scale
- Provenience- the origin or original source (as of a fossil)
- Principles of Geology
- The principle of original horizontality
- Layers are originally parallel to Earth’s gravitational field
- The principle of superposition
- Older layers are laid down first and covered by younger layers
- The principle of cross-cutting relationships
- A geological feature must exist before another feature can cut across or through
it
- Stratigraphy
- Strata are layers in rock
- Stratigraphy Tapho
- The study of the order of rock layers and the sequence of events they reflect
- The principle of faunal success
- Successive layers contain certain types of faunal communities with predictable
patterns
- Index fossils typify the animalism in a layer
- The Geologic Time Scale (GTS)
- GTS is categories of time into which the earth’s history is usually divided
- The earth is about 4.5 billion years old
- Human and primate evolution spans the last 65 million years (Cenozoic Era)
- The GTS is divided into eons, eras, periods, and epochs
- Vastly more time is represented by the Hadean, Archean, and Proterozoic (about
4 billion years) than by all of the later periods, which span only the last 540
million years
- Boundaries are points in the time scale where large shifts are evident in the
geologic column
- The Anthropocene
- The Holocene
- Began approx. 10kya
- Beginning of warming after last major ice age
- Human driven warming
- Faster than natural processes
- Significantly increased in the last 100 years
- Anthropocene
- Human driven mass extinctions and warming temperatures
- Three possible boundaries: Agriculture (5-8kya), Industrial Revolution (1760),
Nuclear Age (1950)
- Types of Fossils
- Plants
- Petrified wood
- Animal remains
- Amber
- Asphalt
- Form of crude oil often called tar
- Igneous rock
- Trace fossils
- How do we know the age?
- Relative dating techniques
- Age of a fossil only in comparison to other materials found above and below it
- Calibrated Relative Dating Techniques
- Regular processes calibrated to a chronological scale if conditions are known
- Chronometric Dating Techniques
- Estimate antiquity of an object in years before present (BP) with precision
- Relative Dating Techniques
- Lithostratigraphy
- The study of geologic deposits and their formation, relationships, and relative
time relationships
- Based on their lithologic (rock) properties
- Characteristics of rocks correlate across regions
- Teprhostratigraphy
- Identification of volcanic ash by its chemical fingerprint
- Variance of lithostratigraphy
- Biostratigraphy
- Principle of faunal succession
- Index fauna
- Rodents often good indicators
- Chemical techniques within sites
- Analysis of fluorine, uranium, and nitrogen content of the fossils themselves
-Calibrated Relative Dating
- Geomagnetic polarity
- Time scale composed of the sequence of paleomagnetic orientations of strata
through time
- Reversed polarity
- Dendrochronology
- Tree rings correspond to rate of growth over a particular period
- Those can be matched up by year to get calibrations on the date the tree was
cut down
- Up to 14kya in Northern Hemisphere
- Chronometric Data Techniques
- Radiometric dating
- Relies on natural, clocklike decay of an element or its variant form (isotopes)
- Half-life is the amount of time it takes for one-half of the original amount to decay
- Parent is the original radioactive isotope. Daughter is the product
- Isotopes
- Radiocarbon dating
- Primary technique for estimating antiquity from Pleistocene through the present
- All living organisms contain carbon
- Decay rate of 14C is half life of 5,730 years
- Limited to objects younger than 40,000 years
- Electron Trap Techniques
- Measure the effect of exposure to radioactivity
- Thermoluminescence (TL)
- Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL)
- Electron spin resonance (ESR)
- Amino Acid Racemization (AAR)
- Amino acids have two forms (isomers)
- In life, all amino acids are L-form
- After death, they flip to D-form at predictable rates
- Can be used to more than a million years ago (Mya)
- Dependent on temperature
- Must know relative temperature fluctuations
Mammals and Dinosaurs
- Placental mammals originated in Mesozoic (~250 Ma0
- Small, nocturnal, slow, and quiet
- Extinction of dinosaurs ~65 Ma
- Opened ecological niches to be filled by mammals
- Explosion of diversity in Paleocene, suddenly reduced in Eocene
Earth in the Cenozoic
- Pangea begins to break up around 200 million years ago
- The earth was divided into two major land masses during Jurassic
- Laurasia
- Present-day North America, Europe, and Asia
- Gondwanaland
- Africa, South America, Antarctica, and Australia/ India
- We can reconstruct environmental conditions from several kinds of geological and biological
evidence
Environment in the Cenozoic
- Vegetation
- Compare ancient environments to today
- Plant macrofossils
- Fossil pollens
- Presence of Phytoliths, or opaline silica bodies
- Isotopes
- Global temperatures
Plant types
- Migrations
- Animal bones can als be used to infer local environments
- Animal communities
- Preferred habitats of past animals
- Community of animals at a site, not single species
- Dietary and locomotor adaptations
- Stable carbon isotope ratios in teeth and soil
- Reconstruct vegetation in a region
- Vegetation map built from isotopes in teeth of fossil animals
- Organic carbon in soils comes from local plants
- Gives a picture of whether area was open or wooded
Climate Change and Early Primates
- Drastic environmental changes around the Oligocene
- Absence of large prey animals favored small mammals
- Enter small, primate-like mammals
Why Primates (euprimates)?
- Difficult to create an evolutionary scenario
- Suite of features rather than single feature
- 3 Hypotheses
- Arboreal
- Visual Predation
- Angiosperm-Primate Coevolution
Arboreal Hypothesis
- Many features evolved to improve locomotion in the trees
- Grasping hands and feet
- Flexible joints
- Reduced olfaction and increased vision
- Binocular vision
- Evidence:
- Extend primates are arboreal
- More “primitive” primates are arboreal
Visual Predation Hypothesis
- Developed in the 60s and 70s to counter Arboreal hypothesis
- Other arboreal animals don’t have primate traits (e.g., squirrels)
- Compared non-arboreal animals to primates
- Animals that share trait include predators
- Vision to judge distance
- Grasping to catch insects
Angiosperm-Primate Coevolution
- But many primates today are not predatory
- Primates adapted to be on small branches, but insects not there
- Counter- Evidence to Predation:
- Most insects caught on ground
- Predatory primate suse more hearing
- Most fossils seem omnivorous
- Fruit-seeking behavior
- Fruit of angiosperms (flowering) on branches
- Grasping for better hold on marginal branches
- Depth perception and color vision
- Primates evolved during angiosperm revolution (approx 65 Ma)
- Better fruit foragers= better seed dispersal
- Symbiotic coevolution
Adding Complexity
- Parallel traits between Opossums and Primates
- Opossums forage fruit AND prey on insects
- Insects also attracted to fruits and flowers
- Convenient double meal
- Other hypotheses have been proposed
- Maybe no single scenario accounts for primates
Plesiadapiforms
- Mammalian order or suborder appearing in the Paleocene Epoch
- Primate-like
- Similar molars
- Grasping hands
- But also:
- Unusual anterior teeth
- Claws, not nails
- No evidence of postorbital bar
- No evidence of auditory bulla
- Why are they considered ancestral?
- Originally, treeshrews thought to be primates
- Resemble Plesiadapiforms
- Closer to dermopterans
- Closest living relative to primate order
- Hands and feet more like primates than dermopterans
- Even have petrosal bulla
- Maybe some genera closer to primates
True Primates of the Eocene
- Two main superfamilies
- Beginning of the Eocene, declined during the Oligocene
- Adapoidea
- Omomyidae
- Adapoids (strepsirhine ancestors)
- Small to medium sized
- Slow moving arboreal quadrupeds
- Diurnal
- Diet of fruit and leaves
- Omomyoids (haplorhine ancestors)
- More denver than adapoids
- Diets of insects and fruit
- Nocturnal
- Arboreal quadrupeds
- The Strepsirhine-Haplorhine Split
- Adapoids and Omomyouids split over available food resources
- Last common ancestor of all primates was 63 Mya
- Omomyoids focused on fruit and insects, developing short snouts
- Adapoids ate fruits and leaves, relying on smell, developing long snouts
- What Favored the Origin of Anthropoids?
- Changes to mandible and eye orbits allowed for chewing toucher foods and better
protection of the eyes
- Increase in body size cause they could eat more
- Stereoscopic vision
- More leave based folivorous diets
- Evolution of Tarsiers
- Current hypothesis suggest tarsiers developed from Omomyoids
- Earliest split probably occurred 50 Ma
- Ancestors done evolving by the Eocene
- Hypotheses for Anthropoid Evolution
- As always, 3 differing hypotheses:
- Adapoing Origin
- Has been most rejected
- Omomyoid Origin
- Develop postorbital closure independently in anthropoids and tarsiers
- Tarsier Origin
- Genetic data suggests tarsiers and anthropoids are sister groups
- Omomyoids too ancient for DNA
- New World Monkeys
- Molecular evidence for NWM and OWM divergence about 40 MYA
- Apidium-like ancestor may have “rafted” over to South America from Africa
- Three premolars rather than two
- Middle Miocene shows a rich fossil record of NWM
- The Divergence of Monkeys and Apes
- Evolution of brachiation
- Early middle Miocene forests were widespread
- Knuckle-walking developed in African apes
- Dental evidence
- A dietary shift with apes eating more fruits
- Apes across the East
- Apes appear to have developed in Africa
- Middle-Late Miocene had lang bridge between Africa and Eurasia (16 Ma)
- Earliest apes were called dental apes
- Typical Y-5 molar pattern
- Lacking a tail
- Otherwise very monkeylike
- Late Miocene Apes
- Gigantopithecus
- Largest primate that ever lived
- Ouranopithecus
- Massive brow ridge, resembling a gorilla
- Dryopithecus
- Primitive anatomy like Proconsul and gibbons
- Likely closer to apes