Natures General Ledger

Information and Knowledge Management ISSN 2224-5758 (Paper) ISSN 2224-896X (Online) Vol 2, No.
4, 2012
www.iiste.org
NATURES GENERAL LEDGER : THE GRAND DESIGN MODEL FOR A SIMULATED UNIVERSE-A GIANT DIGITAL COMPUTER AT WORK
1
DR K N PRASANNA KUMAR, 2PROF B S KIRANAGI AND 3 PROF C S BAGEWADI
ABSTRACT: Consciousness could be thought of as the problem to which propositions belong and concomitantly correspond as they indicate particular responses ,signify instances of general solutions, with its essential configurations, rational representations conferential extrinsicness, interfacial interference, syncopated justices, heterogeneous variations testimonies,apodeictic knowledge of ideological tergiversation,sauccesful reality,sleaty sciolisms,tiurated vaticinations,anchorite aperitif anamensial alienisms and manifest subjective acts of resolution . Consciousness in its organization of singular points, series and displacements, is doubly generative; it not only engenders the logical propositions with its determinate dimensions but also its correlates. The equivocality, ambiguity, in the synchronicity of the problem and proposition both in the sets and subsets of the ontological premises and logical boundaries, error in perception arises in the field of consciousness. Far from indicating the subjective and provisional state of empirical knowledge consciousness refers to an ideational objectivity or to a structure constitutive of space and time, the knowledge and the known, the proposition and its correlates. The question of question in consciousness does not bear any resemblance to the proposition which subsumes it, but rather it determines its own conditionalities and representationalitiesof and assigns them to its constituents in various permutations and combinations, that are done with corporate signification, personalized manifestation, individual denotation and organizational individuation. Consciousness is only the shadow of the problem projected or rather constructed based on empirical propositions. It is the same illusion which does not allow it to be reduced to any empirical thesis or antithesis for that matter. Retroactive movement of consciousness based on morphemes, semitones and relational openness leads to disintegration of external relations and dysfunctional fissures in the personality domains of resolvability are relativistic in the self determination of the consciousness problem. Consciousness makes signification as the condition of truth and proposition as the conditional truth; it is necessary that we should not vie the condition as the one who is conditioned, lest the biases of internationality and subject object conflict arise. Witness consciousness is the best answer to the problems that we face in science. Static genesis sets right the aham brahasmi (I AM Brahman) and from Brahman we came problem. Consciousness thus is neutral but never the double of the propositions which express it. Events have critical points like say liquids have, or water has. in all its pristine glory and primordial mortification consciousness is just knowledge, expressed in bytes, visual field capacity is also expressed. We make an explicit assumption that the storage is measured based on the number of bytes and that ASCII is used. Further assumption in gratification deprivation is that gratification increases in arithmetic progression, and deprivation in geometric progression. More you think, more you get angry. The still more you think you go mad. Repetitive actions and thoughts which are themselves actions are assumed to be recorded. by a hypotherticalneuron DNA. We thus record everything in the general ledger of the universe. And lo! The grand design simulated by someone, with people like us with Tam rajas (dynamism) and s, sattva (the transcendental form of Tam and rajas) react. The height is the murder, mayhem calypso and s cataclysm. the depth is non reaction ability. With this we state that this universe is s grand design simulated and we are really playing our roles to fit in a virtual drama.
INTRODUCTION: We take in to considerations following parameters: (1) Consciousness(just the amount of bytes recorded and visual representations measured by Information field capacity)
45
Information and Knowledge Management ISSN 2224-5758 (Paper) ISSN 2224-896X (Online) Vol 2, No.4, 2012
www.iiste.org
(2) Perception (What we see-It is said by many people like Kant and Indian Brihadyaranyaka Sutra that what you see is not what you see; what you do not see is not what you do not see; what you see is what you do not see and what you do not see is what you see Here we assume that perception is what we see. And note in the Model we are making a case for the augmented reality or dissipated reality if the observer has consciousness, by which we mean what exactly is happening. If two crime syndicates are fighting each other, you may only see a terrible traffic and do not see anything else!) (3) Gratification (we assume that it increases, the balance increases by arithmetic progression .The more you think, the same sentences form again and can be measured by ASCII numbersToo much needless to say leads to paranoid schizophrenia. All actions are performed by people to achieve gratification or deprivation, that includes sadists and masochists) (4) Deprivation(Balance here increases by GP ;again ASCII is used) (5) Space (6) Time (7) Vacuum Energy (8) Quantum Field (9) Quantum Gravity (10) Environmental Coherence (11) Mass (12) Energy
CONSCIOUSNESS AND PERCEPTION MODULE NUMBERED ONE
46
www.iiste.org
NOTATION : : CATEGORY ONE OF PERCEPTION : CATEGORY TWO OF PERCEPTION : CATEGORY THREE OFPERCEPTION : CATEGORY ONE OF THE CONSCIOUSNESS : CATEGORY TWO OF THE CONSCIOUSNESS :CATEGORY THREE OF THE CONSCIOUSNESS
SPACE AND TIME MODULE NUMBERED TWO: ============================================================================= : CATEGORY ONE OFTIME : CATEGORY TWO OF TIME : CATEGORY THREE OF TIME :CATEGORY ONE OFSPACE : CATEGORY TWO OF SPACE : CATEGORY THREE OF SPACE GRATIFICATIONA AND DEPRIVATION(MOSTLY UNCONSERVATIVE HOLISTICALLY AND INDIVIDUALLY! WORLD IS AN EXAMPLE) MODULE NUMBERED THREE: ============================================================================= : CATEGORY ONE OF DEPRIVATION :CATEGORY TWO OF DEPRIVATION : CATEGORY THREE OF DEPRIVATION : CATEGORY ONE OF GRATIFICATION :CATEGORY TWO OF GRATIFICATION : CATEGORY THREE OF GRATIFICATION
MASS AND ENERGY:MODULE NUMBERED FOUR: ============================================================================
: CATEGORY ONE OF MATTER
47
www.iiste.org
: CATEGORY TWO OFMATTER : CATEGORY THREE OF MATTER :CATEGORY ONE OF ENERGY :CATEGORY TWO OF ENERGY : CATEGORY THREE OF ENERGY VACUUM ENERGY AND QUANTUM FIELD:MODULE NUMBERED FIVE: ============================================================================= : CATEGORY ONE OF QUANTUM FIELD : CATEGORY TWO OFQUANTUM FIELD :CATEGORY THREE OF QUANTUM FIELD :CATEGORY ONE OF VACUUM ENERGY :CATEGORY TWO OF VACUUM ENERGY :CATEGORY THREE OF VACUUM ENERGY ENVIRONMENTAL COHERENCE AND QUANTUM GRAVITY:MODULE NUMBERED SIX: ============================================================================= : CATEGORY ONE OFENVIRONMENTAL COHERENCE : CATEGORY TWO OF ENVIRONMENTAL COHERENCE : CATEGORY THREE OF ENVIRONMENTAL COHERENCE : CATEGORY ONE OF QUANTUM GRAVITY : CATEGORY TWO OF QUANTUM GRAVITY : CATEGORY THREE OF QUANTUM GRAVITY ============================================================================== = ( ( ( ( )( )( )( )(
) ) ) )
( ( ( (
)( )( )( )(
) ) ) )
( ( ( (
)( )( )( )(
) ) ) )
)( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) (
)( )(
) )
( (
)( )(
) )
( (
)( ) ( )( ) ,(
)( )(
) )
( (
)( )(
) )
( (
)( ) : )(
)
are Accentuation coefficients ( ( ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) )( )(

) )
( (
)( )(
) )
( (
)(
( )(
)(
)
)( )(
)
)( )(
)
)( ) (
48
www.iiste.org
are Dissipation coefficients The differential system of this model is now (Module Numbered one) CONSCIOUSNESS AND PERCEPTION MODULE NUMBERED ONE ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ) )( )( )( )( )( )(
)
[( [( [( [( [( [( )
)( )( )( )( )( )(
)
( ( ( ( ( (
)( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )] )] )]
)] )] )]
First augmentation factor First detritions factor
The differential system of this model is now ( Module numbered two) SPACE AND TIME MODULE NUMBERED TWO ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( )( ) ( )( ) (( )( )( )( )( )( )(
)
[( [( [( [( [( [( ) ) )
)( )( )( )( )( )(
)
( ( ( ( ( (
)( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) (( )( ) (( )( ) ((
)] )] )] ) )] ) )] ) )]
The differential system of this model is now (Module numbered three) GRATIFICATIONA AND DEPRIVATION(MOSTLY UNCONSERVATIVE HOLISTICALLY AND INDIVIDUALLY! WORLD IS AN EXAMPLE) MODULE NUMBERED THREE ( ( ( )( )( )(
)
[( [( [(
)( )( )(
( ( (
)( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) (
)] )] )]
49
www.iiste.org
( ( ( ( ( )( ) ( )( ) (
)( )( )(
[( [( [( ) )
)( )( )(
( ( (
)( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) (
)] )] )]
First augmentation factor First detritions factor MASS AND ENERGY:MODULE NUMBERED FOUR:
The differential system of this model is now (Module numbered Four) ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( )( ) ( )( ) (( )( )( )( )( )( )(

)
[( [( [( [( [( [( ) ) )
)( )( )( )( )( )(
)
( ( ( ( ( (
)( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) (( )( ) (( )( ) ((
)] )] )] ) )] ) )] ) )]
The differential system of this model is now (Module number five) VACUUM ENERGY AND QUANTUM FIELD:MODULE NUMBERED FIVE
( ( ( ( ( ( ( )( ) (
)( )( )( )( )( )(
[( [( [( [( [( [( )
)( )( )( )( )( )(
)
( ( ( ( ( (
)( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) (( )( ) (( )( ) ((
)] )] )] ) )] ) )] ) )]
First augmentation factor
50
www.iiste.org
)( ) ((
) )
First detritions factor
The differential system of this model is now (Module numbered Six) ENVIRONMENTAL COHERENCE AND QUANTUM GRAVITY:MODULE NUMBERED SIX
( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( )( ) (
)( )( )( )( )( )(
[( [( [( [( [( [( ) ) )
)( )( )( )( )( )(
)
( ( ( ( ( (
)( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) (( )( ) (( )( ) ((
)] )] )] ) )] ) )] ) )]
)( ) ((
HOLISTIC CONCATENATE SYTEMAL EQUATIONS HENCEFORTH REFERRED TO AS GLOBAL EQUATIONS

CONSCIOUSNESS AND PERCEPTION MODULE NUMBERED ONE SPACE AND TIME MODULE NUMBERED TWO GRATIFICATIONA AND DEPRIVATION(MOSTLY UNCONSERVATIVE HOLISTICALLY AND INDIVIDUALLY! WORLD IS AN EXAMPLE) MODULE NUMBERED THREE VACUUM ENERGY AND QUANTUM FIELD:MODULE NUMBERED FIVE MASS AND ENERGY:MODULE NUMBERED FOUR ENVIRONMENTAL COHERENCE AND QUANTUM GRAVITY:MODULE NUMBERED SIX
)(
( ( ( (
)(
) (
(
)
)( ) ( ( )( ) (
)
) ) ( ) ) (
( ) ( )
( (
)(
)
( ) ( )
) ( ) (
( ) ( )
)(
(
(
)
) ( ) ( ) )
) )(
(
)
)(
)(
)
)(
(
(
)
51
www.iiste.org
)(
( (
)( ) ( )( )(
)
)(
(
)
)( ) ( (
)( ) ( ( ( ) , ) ) , ( ( )( )( ( )( )(
)
) ) (
( )(
)(
)
( )
) (
)( )(
(
)
) ( )
)(
) (
Where ( ( ( ( ( ( )( )( )( )( )(
)( ) (
)
) ) , )
( ( (
) are first augmentation coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3 ( ) are second augmentation coefficient for category 1, 2 and 3 ) are third augmentation coefficient for category 1, 2 and 3
)
( (
)
) , )
)
( )(
( ( (
) , ) ), ( (
)( )( )(
)
) are fourth augmentation coefficient for category 1, 2 and 3 ) are fifth augmentation coefficient for category 1, 2 and 3 ) are sixth augmentation coefficient for category 1, 2 and 3
( (
(
)
( )
( [ ( ( ( ( (
)( )( )(
(
)
)( ) ( ( )( ) (
)
) ) ) ) ( ) ) ( (
( )( ( )( ( )(
)(
)
( )
) ( (
)( )( )( )( )( )(
(
)
) ( ) ) ]
( (
( )
( (
)(
) )
) ( ) (
(
)
)( )( )(
) ) )
)
(
)
( )
)(
(
)
)( ) ( (
)( ) ( )( )( ( ( (
)
)(
)
) ( ) (
(
)
Where ( ( ( ( ( )( )( )( )( )(
(
)
)( ) ( ( (
)
) ( ( ) ) , ) ,
( )( )( ( ( (
)( ) (
)
( ( ( ) ) , ) ,
) are first detrition coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3 ( ( )( )( )( ) are second detrition coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3 ) are third detrition coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3
)
) ) ( ( (
( (
)( )( )(
( ( (
( ( (
) are fourth detrition coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3 ) are fifth detrition coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3 ) are sixth detrition coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3
( )
( ( ( ( ( (
)(
(
)
)( ) ( ( )
) ( ) ) ( ) ) (
( )( ( )( ( )(
)(
) )
) ) ) ) ) )
( ( ( ( ( (
)( )( )( )( )( )(
(
)
) ( )
)
)( )(
)
( )
(
)
)( ) ( ( )( ) (
)
)(
) )
( (
)( )(
)
(
)
) )
)(
)(
(
)
)(
52
Information and Knowledge Management ISSN 2224-5758 (Paper) ISSN 2224-896X (Online) Vol 2, No.4, 2012 Where ( ( ( ( ( )( )( )( )( )( (
)
www.iiste.org
)( ) ( (
)
) ( ( ) ), ), ( ( (
( )( )( )( )( )(
)
)( ) ( (
)
) ) , ( ( )
( )( )( ( (
)( ) (
)
) are first augmentation coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3 ) are second augmentation coefficient for category 1, 2 and 3
) , (
)
(
)
) ( ( (
(
)
) ( ( (
) are third augmentation coefficient for category 1, 2 and 3

)
)( )( )(
(
)
) are fourth augmentation coefficient for category 1, 2 and 3 ( ( ) are fifth augmentation coefficient for category 1, 2 and 3 ) are sixth augmentation coefficient for category 1, 2 and 3
) , ) ,
)(
( ( ( ( ( (
(
)
)( )( )( )( )( )(
(
)
)( ) ( ( )( ) (
)
) ) ( ) ) ( ) ) (
( )( ( )( ( )(
)(
)
) ( ) (
)( )( )( )( )( )(
(
)
) ( )
)
(
)
)(
( (
)(
)
) ( ) (
( (
(
)
) )
)(
(
)
)( ) ( (
(
)
)(
)
) ( ) (
(
)
( ( ( ( ( ( )( )( )( )( )(
)
)( ) ( (
)
) , ( ) ( ) ) , ) ( ( ( )(
)( ) ( ) ,
)
) , ( ) )( ( ) ) , ) ,
)( ) (
) are first detrition coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3
) (
)
( )( ( ( (
) are second detrition coefficients for category 1,2 and 3

)
)( )( )( )(
(
)
(
)
) are third detrition coefficients for category 1,2 and 3 (

)
( ( (
(
)
)( )( )(
) are fourth detrition coefficients for category 1,2 and 3 ( ) are fifth detrition coefficients for category 1,2 and 3 ) are sixth detrition coefficients for category 1,2 and 3
( ( )
( )
)( )( )( )( )( )(
) )
(
)
)( ) ( ( )
) ( ) ) ( ) ) (
( )( ( )( ( )(
)(
) )
) ) ) ) ) )
( ( ( ( ( (
)( )( )( )( )( )(
) )
(
)
) ( )
)
( ( ( ( (
)(
(
)
)( ) ( ( )( ) (
)
)(
) )
( ( ( (
( (
) )
)(
)(
) )
(
)
)( ) (
),
)( ) (
),
)( ) (
) are first augmentation coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3
53
Information and Knowledge Management ISSN 2224-5758 (Paper) ISSN 2224-896X (Online) Vol 2, No.4, 2012 ( ( ( 3 ( ( )( )(
)
www.iiste.org
)( )( )(
( (
)
) ) (
( ( ) ,
)( )( (
( (
) , )
)
( (
)( )( ) (
( ( )(
) are second augmentation coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3 ) are third augmentation coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3
)
)(
) are fourth augmentation coefficients for category 1, 2 and
( (
) )
( (
)( )(
( (
) )
( (
)( )(
( (
) are fifth augmentation coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3 ) are sixth augmentation coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3
)(
( ( ( ( ( (
)( )( )( )( )( )(
)
)
(
)
)( ) ( ( )( ) (
)
) ( ) ( )(
)(
)
) ( ) (
)( )( )( )( )( )(
(
)
) ( )
)
( (
)(
( (
) ( ) ( )(
)(
) )
) ( ) (
( (
(
)
) )
)(
[
)( ) ( ( ( ) )( ( ) ) ( ( )(
(
)
)( ) ( ( )
) ( ( )(
)(
)
) ( ) (
(
)
( ( ( ( ( (
)( ) ( )( )( )( )( )(
)
) ( (
)
( ) , )
( ) , ) ,
)
)( ) ( ( )( ) ( ) ) ( )(
)
) are first detrition coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3

)
) are second detrition coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3 ) are third detrition coefficients for category 1,2 and 3
( (
)
(
)
)( )( )(
( (
)( )( )(
(
)
) are fourth detrition coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3 ( ) are fifth detrition coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3 ) are sixth detrition coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3
)(
( ( ( ( ( (
)(
(
)
)( ) ( ( )( ) (
)
) ) ( ) ) ( ) ) (
( )( ( )( ( )(
)(
)
( ) ( ) ( )
) ( ) ( ) (
)( )(
(
)
) ) )
)( )(
)
(
)
)(
)(
)
)( )(
(
)
)( )(
)
( )( ) (
(
)
) ) )
)(
(
)
)(
)
( )(
)(
( (
)(
54
www.iiste.org
( ( ( ( ( ( )( )( )( )( )(
)
)( ) ( ( (
)
) ) ) ( ( ) ), ),
( )( )( ( ( (
)( ) (
)
) ) )
)
( ( ( ) ) ),
)( ) ( )( )( ( ( (
)
) ( (
)
( ( ( ( (
) ) ( ( ( ) are fourth augmentation coefficients for category 1, 2,and 3 ) are fifth augmentation coefficients for category 1, 2,and 3 ) are sixth augmentation coefficients for category 1, 2,and 3
( ( (
)( )( )(
)( )( )(
)(
)( (
( )(
)( ) (
)
) ) ( ) ) ( ) )
)( ) (
)
( )( ( )( ( )(
) ) )
)(
)
) ( ) ( )(
)(
) )
) ) ) ) ) )
(
)
( ( ( (
)(
)( (
( )(
)( ) (
)
)(
)
) ( ) ( )(
)(
) )
(
)
)(
)( (
( )(
) ) ) ( ( ( ),
)( ) (
)
)(
)
) ( ) ( )(
)(
) )
(
( )( )( )( (
( ( ( ( ( ( )( )( )( )( )(
)
)( ) ( ( (
)
) ( ( ( ), ( )( )( )(
(
)
)( ) ( ( (
)
) ) ( ( )
( (
)
(
)
) , (
(
)
) ( ) )
)( )(
)( )(
)
) (
) (
)(
( ( ( ( (
)( )
) (
(
)
)( ) ( ( )( ) (
)
) ) ( ) ) ( ) ) (
)
( )
(
)(
) )
) )
( (
)( )
(
(
)
) ( )
)
(
) )
)(
)( ) )( (
) (
( ) ( )(
(
)(
) ) ) )
( ( ( (
)( )
(
( (
( )( ) (
( (
) )
(
)
)(
) )
)( )(
(
)
( )
)(
)
)( ) (
)( ) (
)( ) (
55
Information and Knowledge Management ISSN 2224-5758 (Paper) ISSN 2224-896X (Online) Vol 2, No.4, 2012 ( ( ( ( ( )( )( )( )( )(
) )
www.iiste.org
( )
) ( ) ) ) ( ( (
( )( )( )( )(
)(
)
( )
)
) ( ) ) )
( )( ( ( (
)(
)
( )
)
(
)
( ( ( (
( ( (
)( )( )(
( ( (
) are fourth augmentation coefficients for category 1,2, and 3 ) are fifth augmentation coefficients for category 1,2,and 3 ) are sixth augmentation coefficients for category 1,2, 3
)(
( ( ( ( ( (
(
)(
)( ) (
)
) ) ( ) ) ( ) )
)( ) (
)
( )( ( )( ( )(
)
)(
)
) ( ) (
)( )( )( )( )( )(
(
)
) ( ) ( ) ) ( ) )
)( )(
)
(
)
)(
)( ) (
)
)(
)
) ( ) (
(
)
)( )(
)
(
)
)(
)( ) (
)
)(
)
) ( ) (
(
)
)(
)( ) ( ) )
)
(
( )(
( ( ( ( ( ( )( )( )( )( )(
)
)( ) ( (
)
) ( ( ( ) ( )(
) )
)
( (
)
( ) (
(
)
) (
)
( ( (
)( )( )( )(
)( ( )( (
) (
)
(
)
) ( ( )
) are fourth detrition coefficients for category 1,2, and 3 ( ( ) are fifth detrition coefficients for category 1,2, and 3 ) are sixth detrition coefficients for category 1,2, and 3
)( )(
) , (
) (
)(
( ( ( ( ( (
)
)
)( )( )( )( )( )(
(
(
)
)( ) ( ( )( ) (
)
) ) ( ) ) ( ) ) (
( )( ( )( ( )(
)(
) )
( ( ( ( ( (
) ) ) ) ) )
( ( ( ( ( (
)( )( )( )( )( )(
(
)
) ( )
)
)(
)(
) )
( (
( )( ) (
) )
)(
(
)
)(
) )
(
)
(
) )( )(
)
( ( (
)( ) ( )( )(
)
) ( ( ) )
( (
)( ) ( )( )(
)( ) ( ( (
(
)
) )
(
)
) ( )
56
Information and Knowledge Management ISSN 2224-5758 (Paper) ISSN 2224-896X (Online) Vol 2, No.4, 2012 ( ( ( )( )( )(
)
www.iiste.org
( ( (
) ) ),
( ( (
)( )( )(
( ( (
) ) )
( ( (
)( )( )(
( ( (
) - are fourth augmentation coefficients ) - fifth augmentation coefficients ) sixth augmentation coefficients
)(
( ( ( ( ( (
)( )( )( )( )( )(
)
)
)( ) (
)
) ( ) ( )(
)(
) )
) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) (
)( )( )( )( )( )(
(
)
) ( )
)
( (
)(
)( ) (
)
) ( ) ( )(
)(
) )
( (
( (
) )
)(
[
)( ) ( ( ( ) ), ( ( )( )(
)( ) (
)
) ( )
)
)(
) )
(
)
)(
( ( ( ( ( (
)( ) ( )( )( )( )( )(
)
) ( (
)
( ) )
( ) )
)
)( ) ( ( ( ) ( ) )( )( )( (
(
)
(
)
) (
)
( (
) (
)
( (
)( )( )(
) (
are fourth detrition coefficients for category 1, 2, and 3 ) are fifth detrition coefficients for category 1, 2, and 3 ) are sixth detrition coefficients for category 1, 2, and 3
)( )(
), (
) (
Where we suppose (A) ( )(

)
( )(
)(
( )(
( )(
)(
(B)
The functions (
)
)(
)( ) are positive continuous increasing and bounded.
Definition of ( )( ( ( (C) ( Definition of ( Where ( )( ) ( )( ) ( (
( )( ) : ) ( )( ( )( )( ) (
) )
( ( )(
)
)(
(
)
)(
) )
( )( ( )(
)
)( ) ( )(
)
(
)
)( ) : )(
)
)(
( )(
( )(
are positive constants and
57
www.iiste.org
They satisfy Lipschitz condition: ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ) ) ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ) ) ( ( )(

)
)(
) (
( )( )
)( )
With the Lipschitz condition, we place a restriction on the behavior of functions ) and( )( ) ( ) ( ) and ( ) are points belonging to the interval ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ] . It is to be noted that ( )( ) ( ) is uniformly continuous. In the eventuality of the [( ) , the first augmentation coefficient WOULD be fact, that if ( )( ) then the function ( )( ) ( absolutely continuous. Definition of ( (D) ( )(
)
)( (
( )(
)
)( ) : are positive constants
( )( ) ( )( )
( )( ) ( )( ) )
Definition of ( )( (E)
)( ) : )( ) which together )( ) and the constants
There exists two constants ( )( ) and ( with ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) and ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( satisfy the inequalities
( )( )
( )( ( )(
( )( ( )(
( (
)( )(
( )( ) ( ( )(
)
)(
)( )
)(
Where we suppose (F) (G) ( )(

)
( )(
)( )(
)
( )(
( )(
)(
The functions (
)
Definition of ( )( ( ( (H) )( ) ( )( ) ( ( ( Definition of ( Where ( )(

)
( )( ) : ) ) )( ) ( )( ) (( ( )( ( )( ) ) ) )( ) : ( )(
) ) )
( ( )( ( )(
)
( )
)(
( )(
)( (
( )(
)
( )( ) are positive constants and
They satisfy Lipschitz condition: ( ( )( ) ( )( ) (( ) ) ( ) )( ) ( ( )( ) (( ) ( ) ) )( (

) ( )( )
)(
)( )
58
www.iiste.org
) With the Lipschitz condition, we place a restriction on the behavior of functions ( )( ) ( ) .( ) and ( ) are points belonging to the interval [( )( ) ( )( ) ] . It is to and( )( ) ( ) is uniformly continuous. In the eventuality of the fact, that if ( )( ) be noted that ( )( ) ( then ( ) ) , the SECOND augmentation coefficient would be absolutely continuous. the function ( ) ( Definition of ( (I) ( )(
)
)( (
( )(
)
)( ) : are positive constants
( )( ) ( )( )
( )( ) ( )( ) )
Definition of ( )(
)( ) :
There exists two constants ( )( ) and ( )( ) which together with ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) and the constants ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) satisfy the inequalities
( )( )
( )( ( )(
( )( ( )(
(
)
)( )(
( )( ) ( ( )(
)
)(
)( )
)(
Where we suppose (J) ( )(

)
( )( )(
) )
)(
( )(
( )(
)(
The functions (
Definition of ( )( ( ( ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) (
( )( ) : ) ) ) ) ( )( ( )( ( )( ( )( ( )(
) ) ) ) )
)(
)
( )(
)(
Definition of ( Where ( )(
)
)( (
)( ) : ( )(
)
( )(
They satisfy Lipschitz condition: ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ) ) ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ) ) ( ( )(

) ) ( )( ) ( )( )
)(
) With the Lipschitz condition, we place a restriction on the behavior of functions ( )( ) ( ) .( ) And ( ) are points belonging to the interval [( )( ) ( )( ) ] . It is to and( )( ) ( ) is uniformly continuous. In the eventuality of the fact, that if ( )( ) be noted that ( )( ) ( then ( ) ) , the THIRD augmentation coefficient, would be absolutely continuous. the function ( ) ( Definition of ( )(
)
)( ) :
59
www.iiste.org
(K)
)(
)(
are positive constants
( )( ) ( )( )
( )( ) ( )( )
There exists two constants There exists two constants ( )( ) and ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) and the constants ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) satisfy the inequalities
( )( )
)( ) which together with
( )( ( )(
( )( ( )(
( (
)( )(
( (
)( ) ( )(
)
)(
)( )
)(
Where we suppose (L) (M) ( )(

)
( )(
)(
( )(
)
( )(
)(
The functions (
)
)(
Definition of ( )( ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ((
( )( ) : ) ) ) ( )(
) )
)( ( )(
) )
( )(
)(
(N)
( )( ) ( ( )( ) (( )( (
)
( )( ) ) ) ( )( ) )( ) : ( )(
)
Definition of ( Where ( )(
)
( )(
)
( )(

) ( )( ) ( )( )
)(
With the Lipschitz condition, we place a restriction on the behavior of functions ( )( ) ( ) .( ) and ( ) are points belonging to the interval [( )( ) ( and( )( ) ( be noted that ( the function ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( )(
) )
) )( ) ] . It is to
) is uniformly continuous. In the eventuality of the fact, that if ( )( ) then ) , the FOURTH augmentation coefficient WOULD be absolutely continuous. ( )( ) :
Definition of ( (O) (P) ( )(

)
( )( ) ( )( )
( )( ) ( )( )
60
www.iiste.org
Definition of ( (Q)
)(
)( ) :
There exists two constants ( )( ) and ( )( ) which together with ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) and the constants ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) satisfy the inequalities
)( )
( )(
( )(
)
(
)
)( (
( )(
)
)( ) ( ( )(
)
)(
)( )
( )(
( )(
)(
Where we suppose (R) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) (S) The functions ( )( ) ( )( ) are positive continuous increasing and bounded. Definition of ( )( ) ( )( ) : ( ( )( ) ( )( ) (( ) ) ) ( )(
) )
)( ( )(
) )
( )(
)(
(T) ( Definition of ( Where ( )(

)
)( ) ( ) (
( )
) ) )( ) : ( )(
)
( )( ) ( )( )
)( (
( )(
)
( )(
They satisfy Lipschitz condition: ( ( )( ) ( )( ) (( ) ) ) ( ( )( ) ( )( ) (( ) ( ) ) )( (

) ( )( ) ( )( )
)(
With the Lipschitz condition, we place a restriction on the behavior of functions ( )( ) ( ) .( ) and ( ) are points belonging to the interval [( )( ) ( and( )( ) ( be noted that ( the function ( continuous. )( ) ( )( ) (
) )( ) ] . It is to then
) is uniformly continuous. In the eventuality of the fact, that if ( )( ) ) , theFIFTH augmentation coefficient attributable would be absolutely (
Definition of ( (U) (
( )( ) ( )( )
)( )(
) )
)( ) :
)(
( )( ) ( )( )
Definition of ( (V)
)(
)( ) :
There exists two constants ( )( ) and ( )( ) which together with ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) and the constants ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) satisfy the inequalities
61
www.iiste.org
)( )
( )( ( )(
( )( ( )(
( (
)( )(
( (
)( ) ( )(
)
)(
)( )
)(
Where we suppose ( )( (W)

)
( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) The functions ( )( ) ( )( ) are positive continuous increasing and bounded. Definition of ( )( ) ( )( ) : ( ( )( ) ( )( ) (( ) ) ) ( )(

) )
)(
) )
( )(
( )(
)(
(X) ( Definition of (
)( ) ( ) ( ) ) (( ) ) )(
)
( )( ) ( )( )
(
)
)( ) : )(
)
Where (
)(
( )(
( )(

) ( )( ) ( )( )
)(
With the Lipschitz condition, we place a restriction on the behavior of functions ( )( ) ( ) .( ) and ( ) are points belonging to the interval [( )( ) ( and( )( ) ( be noted that ( the function ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )(
) )
) )( ) ] . It is to then
) is uniformly continuous. In the eventuality of the fact, that if ( )( ) ) , the SIXTH augmentation coefficient would be absolutely continuous. ( )( ) :
Definition of ( ( )(
)
(
)( ) )( )
)(
( (
( )( ) ( )( )
Definition of (
)(
)( ) :
There exists two constants ( )( ) and ( )( ) which together with ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) and the constants ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) satisfy the inequalities
( )( )
( )( ( )(
( )( ( )(
( (
)( )(
( (
)( ) ( )(
)
)(
)( )
)(
62
www.iiste.org
Theorem 1: if the conditions IN THE FOREGOING above are fulfilled, there exists a solution satisfying the conditions Definition of ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ( )
( ) (
( ):
)( ) )( )
, ,
( ) ( )
)(
) (
Definition of ( ) ( ) ( )( ( )(
( )
) ( ) (
( )
)( ) )( )
, ,
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
( (
)( )(
) ( ) (
)( ) )( )
, ,
( ) ( )
Definition of ( ) ( ) ( ( )
( )
( ) (
( ):
)( )
, ,
( ) ( )
)(
) (
)( )
( )
( ) (
( ):
)( )
, ,
( ) ( )
)(
) (
)( )
( )
( ) (
( ):
)( )
, ,
( )
( ) ( ) defined on the space of sextuples of continuous functions
)(
) (
)( )
Proof: Consider operator which satisfy ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )(
( )(
) ( )( )
)(
63
www.iiste.org
( ) By ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) () Where
( )
)(
) (
)( )
[( [( [( [( [( [(
)( )( )( )( )( )(
)
( ( ( ( ( (
(
)) )) )) )) )) ))
(( (( (( (( (( ((
)( )( )( )( )( )(
)( ) ( ( ( ( ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ( )( ) ( ( )( ) ( (
( ( (
(
)) )) )) )) )) ))
) )) ) )) ) )) ) )) ) )) ) ))
( ( ( ( ( (
(
) )] ) )] ) )]
) )] ) )] ) )]
is the integrand that is integrated over an interval (
Proof: Consider operator satisfy ( ) ( ) ( ) By ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Where

( ) ( )
defined on the space of sextuples of continuous functions ( )(

) ( ) ( )( ) )( ) )
which
( ) ( )( ( )(
)(
[( [( [( [( [( [(
)( )( )( )( )( )(
( ( ( ( ( (
(
)) )) )) )) )) ))
(( (( (( (( (( ((
)( )( )( )( )( )(
)
)( ) ( ( ( ( ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ( )( ) ( ( )( ) ( (
( ( (
(
)) )) )) )) )) ))
) )) ) )) ) )) ) )) ) )) ) ))
( ( ( ( ( (
(
) )] ) )] ) )]
) )] ) )] ) )]
Proof: Consider operator satisfy

( )
defined on the space of sextuples of continuous functions
which
64
www.iiste.org
( ) ( ) ( ) By ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) () Where
( )
( ) ( ( )( )(
) ( ) (
(
)( ) )( )
)(
)(
[( [( [( [( [( [(
)( )( )( )( )( )(
)
( ( ( ( ( (
(
)) )) )) )) )) ))
(( (( (( (( (( ((
)( )( )( )( )( )(
)( ) ( ( ( ( ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ( )( ) ( ( )( ) ( (
( ( (
(
)) )) )) )) )) ))
) )) ) )) ) )) ) )) ) )) ) ))
( ( ( ( ( (
(
) )] ) )] ) )]
) )] ) )] ) )]

( )
) which
Consider operator satisfy ( ) ( ) ( ) By ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) () Where

( )
( ) ( ( )( )(
) ( ) (
(
)( ) )( )
)(
)(
[( [( [( [( [( [(
)( )( )( )( )( )(
( ( ( ( ( (
(
)) )) )) )) )) ))
(( (( (( (( (( ((
)( )( )( )( )( )(
)( ) ( ( ( ( ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ( )( ) ( ( )( ) ( (
( ( (
(
)) )) )) )) )) ))
) )) ) )) ) )) ) )) ) )) ) ))
( ( ( ( ( (
(
) )] ) )] ) )]
) )] ) )] ) )]

( )
) which
Consider operator satisfy
65
www.iiste.org
( ) ( ) ( ) By ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) () Where
( )
( ) ( ( )( )(
) ( ) (
(
)( ) )( )
)(
)(
[( [( [( [( [( [(
)( )( )( )( )( )(
( ( ( ( ( (
(
)) )) )) )) )) ))
(( (( (( (( (( ((
)( )( )( )( )( )(
)( ) ( ( ( ( ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ( )( ) ( ( )( ) ( (
( ( (
(
)) )) )) )) )) ))
) )) ) )) ) )) ) )) ) )) ) ))
( ( ( ( ( (
(
) )] ) )] ) )]
) )] ) )] ) )]
Consider operator satisfy ( ) ( ) ( ) By ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) () Where

( )
( )
defined on the space of sextuples of continuous functions ( )( )(

) ( ) ( )( ) )( )
which
( ) ( (
)(
)(
[( [( [( [( [( [(
)( )( )( )( )( )(
( ( ( ( ( (
(
)) )) )) )) )) ))
(( (( (( (( (( ((
)( )( )( )( )( )(
)( ) ( ( ( ( ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ( )( ) ( ( )( ) ( (
( ( (
(
)) )) )) )) )) ))
) )) ) )) ) )) ) )) ) )) ) ))
( ( ( ( ( (
(
) )] ) )] ) )]
) )] ) )] ) )]
66
www.iiste.org
(a) The operator is obvious that ( ) (
( )
maps the space of functions satisfying GLOBAL EQUATIONS into itself .Indeed it )( ) (
)
[( ( )(
( )(
(
) (
)( ) (
)]
)( ) ( )( ) ( ( ( )( )
)( )
From which it follows that ( ( ( ) )

( )( ) ( ( )( ) )(
)( ) [((
)( )
( )( ) ]
) is as defined in the statement of theorem 1
Analogous inequalities hold also for (b) The operator is obvious that ( ) ( ( )(
) ( )
maps the space of functions satisfying GLOBAL EQUATIONS into itself .Indeed it )( ) ( ( )( (
( ) ( )( ) )( ) (
[( )
(
)]
)( ) ( )( ) ( )( )
From which it follows that ( ( ) )

( )( ) ( ( )( ) )(
)( ) [((
)( )
( )( ) ]
Analogous inequalities hold also for (a) The operator is obvious that ( ) ( (
( )
maps the space of functions satisfying GLOBAL EQUATIONS into itself .Indeed it )( ) (
)
[( )(
(
(
)(
) (
)( ) (
)] )
)( ) ( )( ) ( ( ( )( )
)( )
From which it follows that ( ( ) )

( )( ) ( ( )( ) )(
) [((
( )
)( )
)( ) ]
Analogous inequalities hold also for (b) The operator ( ) maps the space of functions satisfying GLOBAL EQUATIONS into itself .Indeed it is obvious that )( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )] ( ) [( )( ) ( ( ( )(
)
)( ) ( )( ) ( ( ( )( )
)( )
From which it follows that
67
)( ) )( (
( )( )
www.iiste.org
( ) (
)( )
( (
) [((
( )
)( ) ]
(c) The operator ( ) maps the space of functions satisfying GLOBAL EQUATIONS into itself .Indeed it is obvious that )( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )] ( ) [( )( ) ( ( ( )(
)
)( ) ( )( ) ( ( ( )( )
)( )
From which it follows that ( ( ( ) )

( )( ) ( ( )( )
[(( )( )
( )
)( )
)( ) ]

( )
(d) The operator is obvious that
maps the space of functions satisfying GLOBAL EQUATIONS into itself .Indeed it
( ) ( (
[( )(
)
)( ) ( )
(
)(
) (
)( ) (
)] )
)( ) ( )( ) ( ( ( )( )
)( )
From which it follows that ( ( ) ( )

( )( ) ( ( )( ) )(
) [((
)(
)( )
)( ) ]
Analogous inequalities hold also for
It is now sufficient to take ( )(

)
( )( ) ( )( )
( )( ) ( )( )
and to choose
(
( )
)(
large to have
) (
( )( )
( )( ) [( ( )( )
(( )(
)
( )( )
( )(
( )( ) [(( ( )( )
)(
)( ) ]
)(
68
www.iiste.org
In order that the operator EQUATIONS into itself The operator ((

( ) ( ) ( )
( )
transforms the space of sextuples of functions
satisfying GLOBAL
is a contraction with respect to the metric

( ) ( )
)(
))
( )( )
( )
( )
( )
( )|
( )
( )
( )
( )|
)( )
Indeed if we denote Definition of : ( ) It results |

( ) ( )
( )| )( ) |
( )
)( ) |
( )
( )
( )
)( ) ( )( ) ( (
)( ) (
( (
( )
)( ) ( ( )
( )( ) ( ( )
)( ) ( (
(
( )
) )|
( )
)( ) ( (
)( ) (
)
( )
))
)( ) (
))
)( ) (
)( ) (
Where
represents integrand that is integrated over the interval
From the hypotheses it follows |

( ( ) ( )
| )(
( )
)( )
(( )( )
)(
( )(
( )( ) ( )( ) ) ((
( )
( )
( )
( )
))
And analogous inequalities for
. Taking into account the hypothesis the result follows
Remark 1: The fact that we supposed ( )( ) ( )( ) depending also on can be considered as not conformal with the reality, however we have put this hypothesis ,in order that we can postulate condition ( ) ( ) necessary to prove the uniqueness of the solution bounded by ( )( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( ) respectively of If instead of proving the existence of the solution on , we have to prove it only on a compact then it suffices to consider that ( )( ) ( )( ) depend only on and respectively on ( ) and hypothesis can replaced by a usual Lipschitz condition. Remark 2: There does not exist any From 19 to 24 it results ( ) ( )
[ {( ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ( (
)) ( ) )} ( )]
where
( )
( )
)( ) )
for (( )( ) ) : . indeed if
Definition of (( )( ) ) (( )( ) ) Remark 3: if
is bounded, the same property have also
69
www.iiste.org
( )( ) it follows (( )( ) ) (
(( )( ) )
)(
and by integrating
)
)( ) (( )( ) ) (
)(
In the same way , one can obtain (( )( ) ) If ( )( ) (( )( ) ) ( )(

)
is bounded, the same property follows for
and
respectively.
Remark 4: If bounded, from below, the same property holds for The proof is analogous with the preceding one. An analogous property is true if is bounded from below. Remark 5: If Definition of ( )( Indeed let ( )(
)
is bounded from below and

)
((
)( ) ( ( ) ))
)( ) then
be so that for ( )( ) ( ( ) ) ( )( ) ( )( )( ) if
)
( )
( )(
Then ( (
(
which leads to ) If we take By taking now ( )

( )
)( ) ( )( )
such that
it results is unbounded.
)( ) ( )( )
sufficiently small one sees that ( ( ) ) ( )

( )
The same property holds for
We now state a more precise theorem about the behaviors at infinity of the solutions

( ( )( ) )( )
( )( ) ( )( )
( )( ) ( )( )
and to choose
(
)
)(
large to have
) (
( )( )
)( ) [(
(( )(
( )(
( )( ) [(( ( )( )
)(
)( )
)( ) ]
)(
In order that the operator The operator ((( )( |

) ( )
( )
satisfying
is a contraction with respect to the metric )( ( )|

)
(
( )
)( ) ) (( ( )
( )
)( ) ))
)( )
( )
( )
( )
( )|
)( )
70
www.iiste.org
Indeed if we denote Definition of : ( ) It results |

( ) ( )
( )| )( ) |
( )
)( ) |
( )
( )
( )
)( ) ( )( ) ( (
)( ) (
( (
( )
)( ) ( ( )
( )( ) ( ( )
)( ) ( (
(
( )
) )|
( )
)( ) ( (
)( ) (
)
( )
))
)( ) (
))
)( ) (
)( ) (
Where
From the hypotheses it follows |(

(
)(
( )(
)( ) |
)
)( ) )
(( )( )
)(
( )(
( )( ) ( )( ) ) (((
)(
)(
)(
)( ) ))
Remark 1: The fact that we supposed ( )( ) ( )( ) depending also on can be considered as not conformal with the reality, however we have put this hypothesis ,in order that we can postulate condition )( ) )( ) necessary to prove the uniqueness of the solution bounded by ( )( ) ( ( )( ) ( respectively of If instead of proving the existence of the solution on , we have to prove it only on a compact then it suffices to consider that ( )( ) ( )( ) depend only on and respectively on ( )( ) and hypothesis can replaced by a usual Lipschitz condition. Remark 2: There does not exist any From 19 to 24 it results () ()
[ {( )( ) ( )( ) ( ( (
)) ( ) )} ( )]
where
()
()
( (
)( ) )
for (( )( ) ) : . indeed if and by integrating

)
is bounded, the same property have also (( )( ) ) ( ( )(

)
( )( ) it follows (( )( ) )
)( ) (( )( ) ) (
)(

)
and
respectively.
Remark 4: If bounded, from below, the same property holds for The proof is analogous with the preceding one. An analogous property is true if is bounded from below.
71
www.iiste.org
Remark 5: If Definition of ( )( Indeed let ( )(

)

)
((
)( ) ((
)( ) ))
)( ) then
be so that for ( )( ) (( ( )( ) )
)
()
( )(
Then ( (
(
)( ) ( ) ( )(
which leads to ) If we take By taking now such that it results is unbounded. The
)( ) ( )( )
)( ) ( )( )
) if
sufficiently small one sees that )( ) ) ( )

( )
same property holds for
( )
((

)
( )( ) ( )( )
( )( ) ( )( )
and to choose
( )(
)
)( ) large to have (( )(
) (
( )( )
( )( ) [( ( )( )
)
( )( )
)(
( )( ) [(( ( )( )
( )
)( ) ]
)(

) ( )
( )
into itself

)
(
( )
)( ) ) (( ( )
( )
)( ) ))
)( )
( )
( )
( )
( )|
)( )
Indeed if we denote Definition of :( () ( ) ) It results | ( (

( ) ( ) ( )
((
)(
))
( )|
( )
(
( )
)( ) |
(
( )
( )
( )( ) ( (
)( ) (
)( ) (
)( ) | )( ) ( (
( )
)( ) ( ( )
( )( ) ( ( )
) )|
( )
)( ) ( (
)( ) (
( )
))
)( ) (
))
)( ) (
)( ) (
72
www.iiste.org
Where
From the hypotheses it follows |

( ( ) ( )
| )(
( )
)( )
(( )( )
)(
)(
( )( ) ( )( ) ) (((
)(
)(
)(
)( ) ))
Remark 1: The fact that we supposed ( )( ) ( )( ) depending also on can be considered as not conformal with the reality, however we have put this hypothesis ,in order that we can postulate condition ( ) ( ) necessary to prove the uniqueness of the solution bounded by ( )( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( ) respectively of If instead of proving the existence of the solution on , we have to prove it only on a compact then it suffices to consider that ( )( ) ( )( ) depend only on and respectively on ( )( ) and hypothesis can replaced by a usual Lipschitz condition. Remark 2: There does not exist any From 19 to 24 it results ( ) ( )
[ {( )( ) ( )( ) ( ( (
)) ( ) )} ( )]
where
( )
( )
( (
)( ) )

)

)
( )( ) it follows (( )( ) )
)( ) (( )( ) ) (
)(

)
and
respectively.
Remark 4: If bounded, from below, the same property holds for The proof is analogous with the preceding one. An analogous property is true if is bounded from below. Remark 5: If Definition of ( )( Indeed let ( )(
)

)
((
)( ) ((
)( ) ))
)( ) then
be so that for ( )( ) (( ( )( ) )
)
( )
( )(
Then ( (
(
)( ) ( ) ( )( )
which leads to ) If we take By taking now such that it results is unbounded.
)( ) ( )( )
)( ) ( )( )
sufficiently small one sees that
73
www.iiste.org
if
)( ) ((
)( ) )
)(

)
( )( ) ( )( )
( )( ) ( )( )
and to choose
)( ) large to have
(
( )( )
( )( ) [( ( )( )
( )
((
( )
)
)( )
)(
( )( ) [(( ( )( )
( )
)( ) ]
)(

) ( )
( )
satisfying IN to itself

)
(
( )
)( ) ) (( ( )
( )
)( ) ))
)( )
( )
( )
( )
( )|
)( )
Indeed if we denote Definition of () ( ) : ( () ( ) ) It results |

( ) ( )
((
)(
))
( )| )( ) |
(
( )
)( ) |
( )
( )
( )
)( ) ( )( ) (
)( ) (
( (
)( ) (
)( ) (
( )
) )|
( )
( )
)( ) (
)( ) (
( )
)( ) (
( )
))
)( ) (
( )
))
)( ) (
)( ) (
Where

(
)(
( )(
)( ) |
)
)( ) )
(( )( )
)(
)(
( )( ) ( )( ) ) (((
)(
)(
)(
)( ) ))
Remark 1: The fact that we supposed ( )( ) ( )( ) depending also on can be considered as not conformal with the reality, however we have put this hypothesis ,in order that we can postulate condition
74
www.iiste.org
necessary to prove the uniqueness of the solution bounded by ( )( respectively of
) (
)( )
( )(
) (
)( )
If instead of proving the existence of the solution on , we have to prove it only on a compact then it suffices to consider that ( )( ) ( )( ) depend only on and respectively on ( )( ) and hypothesis can replaced by a usual Lipschitz condition. Remark 2: There does not exist any From 19 to 24 it results ( ) ( )
[ {( )( ) ( )( ) ( ( (
)) ( ) )} ( )]
where
( )
( )
( (
)( ) )

)

)
( )( ) it follows (( )( ) )
)( ) (( )( ) ) (
)(

)
and
respectively.
Remark 4: If bounded, from below, the same property holds for The proof is analogous with the preceding one. An analogous property is true if is bounded from below. Remark 5: If is bounded from below and
)
((
)( ) ((
)( ) ))
)( ) then
Definition of ( )( Indeed let ( )(

)
be so that for ( )( ) (( ( )( ) )
)
( )
( )(
Then ( (
(
)( ) ( ) ( )( )
which leads to ) If we take By taking now if ( )( ) (( such that it results is unbounded.
)( ) ( )( )
)( ) ( )( )
sufficiently small one sees that )( ) ) ( )(

)
We now state a more precise theorem about the behaviors at infinity of the solutions ANALOGOUS inequalities hold also for
75
( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( )
www.iiste.org

)
and to choose
)( ) large to have
( )( ) [( ( )( )
)(
((
)(
)( )
)(
( )( ) [(( ( )( )
)(
)( )
)( ) ]
)(

) ( )
( )
into itself

)
(
( )
)( ) ) (( ( )
( )
)( ) ))
)( )
( )
( )
( )
( )|
)( )

( ) ( )
((
)(
))
( )| )( ) |
(
( )
)( ) |
( )
( )
( )
)( ) ( )( ) (
)( ) (
( (
( )
)( ) (
)( ) ( (
(
( )
) )|
( )
( )
)( ) ( ( )
)( ) ( (
)( ) (
)
( )
))
)( ) (
))
)( ) (
)( ) (
Where

(
)(
( )(
)( ) |
)
)( ) )
(( )( )
)(
)(
( )( ) ( )( ) ) (((
)(
)(
)(
)( ) ))
. Taking into account the hypothesis (35,35,36) the result follows
Remark 1: The fact that we supposed ( )( ) ( )( ) depending also on can be considered as not conformal with the reality, however we have put this hypothesis ,in order that we can postulate condition ( ) ( ) necessary to prove the uniqueness of the solution bounded by ( )( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( ) respectively of If instead of proving the existence of the solution on , we have to prove it only on a compact then it
76
www.iiste.org
suffices to consider that ( )( ) ( )( ) depend only on ( )( ) and hypothesis can replaced by a usual Lipschitz condition. Remark 2: There does not exist any where ( ) ( )
and respectively on
From GLOBAL EQUATIONS it results ( ) ( )

[ {( )( ) ( )( ) ( ( (
)) ( ) )} ( )]
( (
)( ) )

)

)
( )( ) it follows (( )( ) )
)( ) (( )( ) ) (
)(

)
and
respectively.
)
((
)( ) ((
)( ) ))
)( ) then
Definition of ( )( Indeed let
be so that for
( Then ( (
(
)(
)( ) ((
)( ) )
( )
( )(
)( ) ( )( )( )
which leads to ) If we take By taking now if ( )

( )
)( ) ( )( )
such that
it results is unbounded.
)( ) ( )( )
sufficiently small one sees that (( )( ) ) ( )

( )
We now state a more precise theorem about the behaviors at infinity of the solutions Analogous inequalities hold also for
77
( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( )
www.iiste.org

)
and to choose
)( ) large to have ((
(
( )( )
( )( ) [( ( )( )
)(
)(
)(
( )( ) [(( ( )( )
)(
)( )
)( ) ]
)(

) ( )
( )
into itself

)
(
( )
)( ) ) (( ( )
( )
)( ) ))
)( )
( )
( )
( )
( )|
)( )

( ) ( )
((
)(
))
( )| )( ) |
(
( )
)( ) |
( )
( )
( )
)( ) ( )( ) (
)( ) (
( (
( )
)( ) (
)( ) ( (
(
( )
) )|
( )
( )
)( ) ( ( )
)( ) ( (
)( ) (
)
( )
))
)( ) (
))
)( ) (
)( ) (
Where

(
)(
( )(
)( ) |
)
)( ) )
(( )( )
)(
)(
( )( ) ( )( ) ) (((
)(
)(
)(
)( ) ))
Remark 1: The fact that we supposed ( )( ) ( )( ) depending also on can be considered as not conformal with the reality, however we have put this hypothesis ,in order that we can postulate condition ( ) ( ) necessary to prove the uniqueness of the solution bounded by ( )( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( ) respectively of If instead of proving the existence of the solution on suffices to consider that ( )( ) ( )( ) , we have to prove it only on a compact then it depend only on and respectively on
78
www.iiste.org
)(
) and hypothesis can replaced by a usual Lipschitz condition. where ( ) ( )
Remark 2: There does not exist any From 69 to 32 it results ( ) ( )

[ {( )( ) ( )( ) ( ( (
)) (
) )}
)]
( (
)( ) )

)

)
( )( ) it follows (( )( ) )
)( ) (( )( ) ) (
)(

)
and
respectively.
)
((
)( ) ((
)( ) ))
)( ) then
Definition of ( )( Indeed let
be so that for
( Then ( (
(
)(
)( ) ((
)( ) )
( )
( )(
)( ) ( ) ( )( )
which leads to ) If we take By taking now if ( )( ) (( such that it results is unbounded.
)( ) ( )( )
)( ) ( )( )
sufficiently small one sees that )( ) ( ) ) ( )(

)
Behavior of the solutions If we denote and define Definition of ( )(

)
( )(
( )(
( )( ) :
79
www.iiste.org
(a)
)(
) )
( )( ( (
( )(
) ) )
( )( )( )(
) ) ) )
four constants satisfying ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ( )(

)
( )( ( )(
)( )(
( ( ( )( ( )(
) )
( )
( (
( )
)( ) ( )( ) ( :
)
) )
( )( ( )(
)
Definition of ( )( (b) By ( )( ( )
( ) ) ( )
)(
and respectively ( (
)
)(
( )
( )
)( )
the roots of ( )(
) ( )
the equations )(
)
)
)
( )
( ) ( ) )
( )
and (
( )
Definition of ( )( By ( )( ( )
( ) ) ( )
( )(
) ( ) ( )
( )(
( )( ) :
)
( )( ) ( ) )(
)
and respectively ( )( (
)
( )( )
( )
the roots of the equations ( )

( ) ( )
( ) )
and ( ( )(
) )
( )
)(
Definition of ( (c) If we define ( ( ( )( )(

) )
(
)
)( ( )( )(
)
( )(
)
( )( ) :) ) )
)(
) )
)(
( )(
) )
( )(
by ( )( ( )(
) )
( )( ( )(
)
( (
( )( ( )(
( )( ( )(
( )(
and ( )( ( )(
)
( )(
)(
( )(
( )(
( )(
and analogously ( )( ( )(
) )
( ( )(
)
)( )(
)
( )(
)
)(
)
( (
)( )(
)
( (
)( )(
)
( )(
( )(
( )(
and ( ( )(
)
( )(
( )(
)(
( )(
)(
where (
)(
( )(
are defined respectively Then the solution satisfies the inequalities

(( )( ) ( )( ) )
( )
)( )
where ( )( ) is defined
( )( ) ( ( )( ) (( ( ( )( ) (( ( (( )( ) ( )( ) )
( )
(( )( ) ( ( )( )
)( ) (
)( )
)( ) )( ) ( )( ) ) (
)( ) ( )( ) )( ) (
[ )( ) )
)( )
)( ) )
)( ) )( )
] )
)( )
( )
)( )
( )
((
)( ) (
)( ) )
80
( )( )
www.iiste.org
)( ) (
( ) [ )( ) )
( )( )
)( ) (
((
)( ) (
)( ) )
)( ) )( ) ( (
)( ) ((
)( )
]
(
)( )
( )
( )( )
)( ) ((
)( ) )( ) ( )( ) (
[ )( ) )
((
)( ) (
)( ) )
)( )
Definition of ( )( Where ( )( ( )( ( ( )( )(
) )
( )( ( (
)( )( (
) )
)( ) :( )(
)
)( ) ( )(
)
)( )(
)
) )
( (
)( ) ( )(
)
(
)
)(
)(
Behavior of the solutions If we denote and define Definition of ( (d) ( )( )(

) ) )
)(
)
)(
)
( )(
)
( )( ) :
( ( (
)(
( )(
) ) )
( )( )( )(
) ) )
four constants satisfying ( )( ) ( )( ) (( ( )( ) : )(

) ( ) )
)( )(
( ( ( )(
)
) ) )
( (
)( ) ( )( ) ((
) ) )
)(
) )
( )(
( )(
)
( )(
Definition of ( )( By ( )( (e) of
)
( )(
and respectively ( )( ) ( ( )(
) ( )
( ( and )(
)(
)
the roots
the equations ( )( ) (
( ) )
( (
)( )(
and (
) ( ) )
Definition of ( )( By ( )(
)
( )(
)
( )(
( )( ) :
)
( )(
and respectively ( )( )( ) (
( )
( )( ( )(
)
the
roots of the equations ( and ( )( ) (

( )
) (
)
( )(
)(
)
) ( )
) )(
)
( )( (
)
) ( ) )
Definition of ( (f) If we define ( ( ( )( )(

) )
)( (
) )
( )(
)
( )( ) :)
)( ( (
)(
( )(
) )
( )(
) )
by ( )( ( )(
) )
( )( ( )(
)
) )
)( )(
( )( ( )(
( )( ( )(
( )(
and ( )(
81
www.iiste.org
)(
( )(
)(
( )(
( )(
( )(
and analogously ( )(
) )
( ( )(
)
)( )(
) )
( )( ( )(
) )
)(
) )
( (
)( )(
) )
( (
)( )(
) )
( )( and ( ( )(
( )(
( )(
( )(
( )(
)(
( )(
)(
Then the solution satisfies the inequalities

(( )( ) ( )( ) )
( )
)( )
( )( ) is defined
( )( ) ( ( )( ) (( ( )( ) (( ( (( )( ) ( )( ) )
( )
(( )( ) ( ( )( )
)( ) )( ) ) (
)( )
(
(
)( ) )( ) ( )( ) ) (
)( ) ( )( ) )( ) (
[ )( ) )
)( )
)( ) )( )
] )
)( )
( )
)( ) )( )
( ) ( ) [ )( ) )
( )( )
((
)( ) (
)( ) ) )( ) ( )( ) )
)( ) ( )( ) ((
)( ) (
((
)( ) )( ) ( (
)( )
]
(
)( )
( )
( )( )
)( ) ((
)( ) )( ) ( )( ) (
[ )( ) )
)
((
)( ) (
)( ) )
)( )
Definition of ( )( Where ( )( ( )( ( (
) )
( )( ( (
)( )( (
) )
)( ) :( )(
)
)( ) ( )( ( (
)
)(
)
)( )(
) )
)( ) ( )( )(
)
(
)
)(
)(
Behavior of the solutions If we denote and define Definition of ( )( (a) )(

) ) )
( )(
)
( )(
)
( )( ) :
( )( (
( )(
)
( )( )(
)
four constants satisfying ( )( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( )(

)
( )(
)(
82
www.iiste.org
( )(
)(
)
( ( )(
)
)( (
( )(
)
)( ) ( ( )( ) :
)( ) ((
) )
( )(
Definition of ( )( (b) By ( )( ( )( ) ( and ( By ( )(

) ( )
( )( ) ( )( )
( )
( )
and respectively ( ( )( )
) ( )
)(
)(
the roots of
the equations
)( ) (
)
( )(
)
)(
and
)
( )(
and respectively ( )( )( ) (
( )
( )( )(
)
the
roots of the equations ( and ( )( ) (

( )
) (
)
( )( )(
)
) ( )
)
)
( )( (
)
) ( )
Definition of ( (c) If we define ( ( ( )( )(

) )
)(
)( ( )( )(
)
( )(
)
( )( ) :)
)(
) )
)(
( )(
) )
( )(
) ) )
by ( )( ( )(
) )
( )( ( )(
)
( (
( )( ( )(
( )( ( )(
( )(
and ( )( ( )(
)
( )(
)(
( )(
( )(
( )(
and analogously ( )( ( )( ( )(
)
( ( (
)( )( )(
( )( ( )( ( )(
)(
( (
)( )(
( )( ( ( )( )(
( )( ( )(
( )(
and (
)(
( )(

(( )( ) ( )( ) )
( )
)( )
( )( ) is defined
( )( ) ( ( )( ) (( ( )( ) (( ( (( )( ) ( )( ) )
( )
(( )( ) ( ( )( )
)( ) (
)( )
(
(
)( ) )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ) (
[ )( ) )
)( )
)( ) )
)( ) )( )
] )
)( )
( )
)( ) )( ) ( )( ) )( )
( ) ( ) [ )( ) )
( )( ) (
((
)( ) (
)( ) ) )( ) ( )( ) )
)( ) ( )( ) ((
)( ) (
((
)( ) )( ) (
)( )
)( )
( )
83
( ( )( ) (( )( ) )( ) ( )( ) ( )
www.iiste.org
[ )( ) ) ( )( (
)
((
)( ) (
)( ) )
)( )
)( )
) )
)( )( (
) )
)( ) :( )(
)
)( ) ( )(
)
(
) )
)( )( (
)
( (
)( ) ( )(
)
( )(
)
)(
Behavior of the solutions If we denote and define Definition of ( )( (d) ( )( ( )( ( )(

) ) ) )
( )(
)
( )(
)
( )( ) :
( )( ( (
( )(
) ) )
( )( )( )(
) ) ) )
four constants satisfying )( ) ( )( ) (( ( )(

)
)( )(
( ( ( )( ( )(
( ( )(
)
) ) )
( )
( ( :
)
)( ) ( )( ) ((
) ) )
( )(
) )
( )(
Definition of ( )( (e) By ( )( ( )
( ) ) ( )
( )
and respectively ( ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) )
)(
)(
the roots of
the equations
( )
)
( ) )
( ) )
( ) ( )
and (
( )
( )
)
)(
and
)
( )(
)
( )(
( )( ) :
)
( )(
( )
and respectively ( )( )
( )
( )( )
( )
the
roots of the equations (

( )
( )
( )
( ) )
( ) ( )
and ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Definition of ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( (f) If we define ( ( ( )( )(

) )
( ) ( )
( )( ) :) ) )
)(
) )
( )( )(
)
)(
( )(
) )
( )(
by ( )( ( )(
) )
( )( ( )(
)
( (
( )( ( )(
( )( ( )(
( )(
and ( )( ( )(
)
( )(
)(
( )(
( )(
( )(
and analogously ( )( ( )(
) )
( (
)( )(
) )
( )( ( )(
) )
)(
) )
( (
)( )(
) )
( (
)( )(
) )
( )(
( )(
84
www.iiste.org
and (
)(
( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) are defined by 59 and 64 respectively Then the solution satisfies the inequalities
(( )( ) ( )( ) )
( )(
)(
where ( )(
( )(
( )
)( )
)( ) ( )( ) (( ( )( ) (( (
((
)( ) (
)( ) )
( )
(( )( ) ( ( )( )
)( ) (
)( )
(
(
)( ) )( ) ( )( ) (
[ )( ) )
( )( )
)( ) )
)( ) (
] )
)( )
( )
)( ) )( ) ( )( )
[ )( ) ) ( )
)( )
((
)( ) (
)( ) )
)( ) ( )( ) ((
)( )
( ) [ )( ) )
( )( )
)( ) (
((
)( ) (
)( ) )
)( ) )( ) ( (
)( )
]
(
)( )
( )
( )( )
)( ) ((
)( ) )( ) ( )( ) ( )
[ )( ) ) ( )( (
)
((
)( ) (
)( ) )
)( )
Definition of ( )( Where ( )( ( )( ( ( )(
) )
)( )( (
) )
)( ) :( )(
)
)( ) ( )( ( ( )(
)
(
)
)(
)
)(
)
)( ) ( )(
)
(
)
)(
)(
Behavior of the solutions If we denote and define Definition of ( )( (g) ( )( ( )( ( )(

) ) ) )
( )(
)
( )(
)
( )( ) :
( )( ( (
( )(
) ) )
( )( )( )(
) ) )

)
)( )(
( ( ( )(
( ( )(
)
) ) )
( )
( ( :
)
)( ) ( )( ) ((
) ) )
( )(
) )
( )(
Definition of ( )( (h) By ( )( ( )( ) (
) ( )
( )
( )( ) ( )( )
( )
and respectively ( ( )( )
)(
)(
the roots of
the equations
85
www.iiste.org
and (
)( ) (
( ) )
( )(
)
) ( ) )
)(
and
)
( )(
)
( )(
( )( ) :
)
( )(
( )
( )
( )( )
( )
the

( )
( )
( )
( ) )
( ) ( )
and ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Definition of ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( (i) If we define ( ( ( )( )(

) )
( ) ( )
( )( ) :) ) )
)(
) )
( )( )(
)
)(
( )(
) )
( )(
by ( )( ( )(
) )
( )( ( )(
)
( (
( )( ( )(
( )( ( )(
( )(
and ( )( ( )(
)
( )(
)(
( )(
( )(
( )(
and analogously ( )( ( )( and (

) )
( ( )(
)
)( )(
) )
( )( ( )(
) )
)(
) )
( (
)( )(
) )
( (
)( )(
) )
( )(
( )(
( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( are defined respectively
)(
( )(
)(
where ( )(
( )(

(( )( ) ( )( ) )
( )
)( ) )
)( )
( )( ) ( )( ) (( ( )( ) (( ( (( )( ) (
( )
(( )( ) ( ( )( )
)( ) (
)( )
(
(
)( ) )( ) (
)( ) ( )( ) )( ) (
[ )( ) )
( )( )
)( ) )
)( ) (
] )
)( )
( )
[ )( ) ) ( )
)( )
)( )
((
)( ) (
)( ) )
)( ) (
)( )
( ) [ )( ) )
( )( )
)( ) (
((
)( ) (
)( ) )
)( ) )( ) ( (
)( ) ((
)( )
]
(
)( )
( )
( )( )
)( ) ((
)( ) )( ) ( )( ) ( )
[ )( ) ) ( )( (
)
((
)( ) (
)( ) )
)( )
Definition of ( )( Where ( )(
)
)( )(
) )
)( ) :( )(
)
)( ) (
86
www.iiste.org
( )( ( ( )(
(
)
)( (
)(
)
)(
)
)( ) ( )( )(
)
(
)
)(
)(
Behavior of the solutions If we denote and define Definition of ( )( (j) ( )( ( )( ( )(

) ) ) )
( )(
)
( )(
)
( )( ) :
( )( ( (
( )(
) ) )
( )( )( )(
) ) ) )

)
)( )(
( ( ( )( ( )(
( ( )(
)
) ) )
( )
( ( :
)
)( ) ( )( ) ((
) ) )
( )(
) )
( )(
Definition of ( )( (k) By ( )( ( )
( ) ) ( )
( )
and respectively ( ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) )
)(
)(
the roots of
the equations
( )
)
( ) )
( ) )
( ) ( )
and (
( )
( )
)
)(
and
)
( )(
)
( )(
( )( ) :
)
( )(
( )
( )
( )( )
( )
the

( )
( )
( )
( ) )
( ) ( )
and ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Definition of ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( (l) If we define ( ( ( )( )(

) )
( ) ( )
( )( ) :) ) )
)(
) )
( )( )(
)
)(
( )(
) )
( )(
by ( )( ( )(
) )
( )( ( )(
)
( (
( )( ( )(
( )( ( )(
( )(
and ( )( ( )(
)
( )(
)(
( )(
( )(
( )(
and analogously ( )( ( )( and (

) )
( ( )(
)
)( )(
) )
( )( ( )(
) )
)(
) )
( (
)( )(
) )
( (
)( )(
) )
( )(
( )(
( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( are defined respectively
)(
( )(
)(
where ( )(
( )(

(( )( ) ( )( ) )
( )
)( )
87
www.iiste.org
( )( ) ( )( ) (( ( )( ) (( ( (( )( ) ( )( ) )
( )
(( )( ) ( ( )( )
)( ) (
)( )
(
(
)( ) )( ) (
)( ) ( ( ) ) )( ) (
[ )( ) )
( )( )
)( ) )
)( ) (
] )
)( )
( )
[ )( ) ) ( )
)( )
)( )
((
)( ) (
)( ) )
)( ) (
)( )
( ) [ )( ) )
( )( )
)( ) (
((
)( ) (
)( ) )
)( ) )( ) ( (
)( ) ((
)( )
]
(
)( )
( )
( )( )
)( ) ((
)( ) )( ) ( )( ) ( )
[ )( ) ) ( )( (
)
((
)( ) (
)( ) )
)( )
) ) ) )
)( )( (
) )
)( ) :( )(
)
)( ) ( )(
)
( ( (
)(
)
)( ) ( )(
)
)( (
( )(
)
)(
Proof : From GLOBAL EQUATIONS we obtain

( )
)(
) ( )
(( :-
)(
) ( )
)(
)( ) (
))
)( ) (
( )
)(
) ( )
Definition of It follows (( )( ) (
( )
( )(
) ( )
)( ) )
( )
((
)( ) (
( )
( )(
) ( )
)( ) )
From which one obtains Definition of ( )(

)
( )( ) :-
(a) For
( )
( )(
(
( )(
[ ( )( )
( )(
)( ) (( )( ) (
( )
)( ) ( )( ) (
)( ) (
)( ) ) ]
[ ( ( )( )
)( ) ((
)( ) ) ]
,
) ( )
( )( ( )
( (
)( ) ( )( ) ( )
)( ) )( )
( )(
( )(
88
www.iiste.org
In the same manner , we get

( )
( )
[ ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) [ ( ( )( )
)( )(( )( ) ( )( ) ) ]
)( )(( )( ) ( )( ) ) ]
, ( )(
)
( )( ) ( (
)( )
)( ) ( )( )
From which we deduce ( )(
( )
( )
( )(
(b) If
( )(
( )(
( )(
we find like in the previous case,
( )(
)( ) ( )( ) (
[ ( )( ) )( ) ((
)( ) (( )( ) (
)( ) (
)( ) ) ]
[ ( ( )( )
)( ) ) ]
( )
( )
[ ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) [ ( ( )( )
)( )(( )( ) ( )( ) ) ]
)( )(( )( ) ( )( ) ) ]
( )(
(c) If ( )(
( )(
)
( )(
( )(
, we obtain
)( ) (( )( ) ( )( )) ]
( )
( )
[ ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) [ ( ( )( )
)( ) (( )( ) ( )( )) ]
( )(
And so with the notation of the first part of condition (c) , we have Definition of ( )(
) ( )
( ) :( ) ( )( ) ,
( )
( )
( )
( ) ( )
In a completely analogous way, we obtain Definition of ( )(

) ( ) ( )
( ) :( )( ) ,
( )
( )
( )
( ) ( )
Now, using this result and replacing it in GLOBAL EQUATIONS we get easily the result stated in the theorem. Particular case : If ( )( ) ( )( ( )( ) then ( ) ( ) special case Analogously if (
)
( )( ) ( )( ) and in this case ( )( ) ( ) and as a consequence ( ) ( )( )

( ) )
( )( ) if in addition ( )( ) ( ) this also defines ( )( ) for the
)(
)(
( )(
( )( ) and then
)
( )( ) ( )( ) if in addition ( )( ) ( )( ) then consequence of the relation between ( )( ) and ( )(
( ) ( )( ) ( ) This is an important and definition of ( )( )
we obtain
89
( )
www.iiste.org
)(
(( :-
)(
)(
)( ) (
))
)( ) (
( )
)(
) ( )
( )
( )
( )
)(
) ( )
)( ) )
( )
((
)( ) (
( )
( )(
) ( )
)( ) )
From which one obtains Definition of ( )( (d) For

( ) )
( )( ) :( )(
[ ( )( ) )( )((
( )(
(
( )(
)( )(( )( ) (
( )
)( ) ( )( ) (
)( ) (
)( ) ) ]
[ ( ( )( )
)( ) ) ]
( )(
( (
)( ) ( )( ) (
)( ) )( )
( )(
( )
( )
( )(

( )
( )
[ ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) [ ( ( )( )
)( ) (( )( ) ( )( ) ) ]
)( ) (( )( ) ( )( ) ) ]
, ( )(
( )( ) ( (
)( )
)( ) ( )( )
From which we deduce ( )( (e) If ( )(

) (
( )
( )
)
( )(
( )(
( )(
( )(
)( ) (( )( ) ( )( ) ((

)( ) ) ]
)( ) ( )( ) (
[ ( )( )
)( ) (
[ ( ( )( )
)( ) ) ]
( )
( )
[ ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) [ ( ( )( )
)( )(( )( ) ( )( ) ) ]
)( )(( )( ) ( )( ) ) ]
( )(
(f) If
( )(
( )(
( )(
, we obtain
( )
( )
( )
( )
[ ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) [ ( ( )( )
)( )(( )( ) ( )( ) ) ]
)( )(( )( ) ( )( ) ) ]
( )(
) ( ) ( )
( ) :( )( ) ,
( )
( )
( )
( ) ( )

) ( ) ( )
( ) :( )( ) ,
( )
( )
( )
( ) ( )
90
www.iiste.org
. Particular case : If ( )( ) ( )( ( )( ) then ( ) ( ) Analogously if (

)
( )( ) ( )( ) and in this case ( )( ( ) and as a consequence ( ) ( )(

( ) )
) )
( )( ) if in addition ( )( ( )
)(
)(
( )(
( )( ) and then
)
( )
)(
( ) This is an important
From GLOBAL EQUATIONS we obtain

( )
)(
(( :-
)(
)(
)( ) (
))
)( ) (
( )
)(
) ( )
( )
( )
( )
( )(
) ( )
)( ) )
( )
((
)( ) (
( )
( )(
) ( )
)( ) )
From which one obtains (a) For ( )(

)
( )(
( )(
( )
( )
)( ) ( )( ) (
[ ( )( ) )( ) ((
)( ) (( )( ) (
)( ) (
)( ) ) ]
[ ( ( )( )
)( ) ) ]
( )(
( (
)( ) ( )( ) (
)( ) )( )
( )(
( )
( )
( )(

( )
( )
[ ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) [ ( ( )( )
)( )(( )( ) ( )( ) ) ]
)( )(( )( ) ( )( ) ) ]
, ( )(
( )( ) ( (
)( ) )( ) ( )( )
Definition of ( )( ) :From which we deduce ( )( (b) If ( )(

) ) ( )
( )
)
( )(
( )(
( )(
( )(
)( ) ( )( ) (
[ ( )( ) )( ) ((
)( ) (( )( ) (
)( ) (
)( ) ) ]
[ ( ( )( )
)( ) ) ]
( )
( )
[ ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) [ ( ( )( )
)( ) (( )( ) ( )( ) ) ]
)( ) (( )( ) ( )( ) ) ]
( )(
91
www.iiste.org
(c) If ( )(
)
( )(
( )
( )(
( )(
[ ( ( )( )
, we obtain
)( ) (( )( ) ( )( ) ) ] )( ) (( )( ) ( )( ) ) ]
( )
[ ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( )
( )(
) ( ) ( )
( ) :( )( ) ,
( )
( )
( )
( ) ( )

) ( ) ( )
( ) :( )( ) ,
( )
( )
( )
( ) ( )
Now, using this result and replacing it in GLOBAL EQUATIONS we get easily the result stated in the theorem. Particular case : If ( )( ) ( )( ( )( ) then ( ) ( ) Analogously if (
)

( ) )
) )
( )( ) if in addition ( )( ( )
)(
)(
( )(
( )( ) and then
)
( )
)(
: From GLOBAL EQUATIONS we obtain

( )
)(
((
)(
)(
)( ) (
))
)( ) (
( )
)(
) ( )
Definition of It follows
( )
:-
( )
(( )( ) ( ( ) ) ( )( From which one obtains Definition of ( )( (d) For

( )
) ( )
)( ) )
( )
((
)( ) (
( )
( )(
) ( )
)( ) )
( )( ) :( )(
[ ( )( ) )( ) ((
( )(
( )(
)( ) (
( )
( )
)( ) ( )( ) (
)( ) (( )( ) (
)( ) ) ]
[ ( ( )( )
)( ) ) ]
( )(
( (
)( ) ( )( ) (
)( ) )( )
( )(
( )
( )
( )(
92
( )
[ ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) [ ( ( )( ) )( )(( )( ) ( )( ) ) ]
www.iiste.org
( )
)( )(( )( ) ( )( ) ) ]
, ( )(
)
( )( ) ( (
)( ) )( ) ( )( )
From which we deduce ( )( (e) If ( )(

)
( )
( )
)
( )(
( )(
(
( )(
( )(
[ ( )( ) )( ) (( )( ) (( )( ) (

)( ) ) ]
)( ) ( )( ) (
)( ) (
[ ( ( )( )
)( ) ) ]
( )
( )
[ ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) [ ( ( )( )
)( )(( )( ) ( )( ) ) ]
)( )(( )( ) ( )( ) ) ]
( )(
(f) If
( )(
( )(
( )(
, we obtain
)( ) (( )( ) ( )( )) ]
( )(
( )
( )
[ ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) [ ( ( )( )
)( ) (( )( ) ( )( )) ]
( )(
And so with the notation of the first part of condition (c) , we have Definition of ( ) ( ) :( )(
) ( )
( )
)( ) ,
( )
( )
( ) ( )
In a completely analogous way, we obtain Definition of ( ) ( ) :( )(

) ( )
( )
( )( ) ,
( )
( )
( ) ( )
Now, using this result and replacing it in GLOBAL EQUATIONS we get easily the result stated in the theorem. Particular case : If ( )( ) ( )( ( )( ) then ( ) ( ) the special case .
)

( )
) )
( )( ) if in addition ( )( ) ( ) this also defines ( )( ) for
Analogously if ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) and then ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) if in addition ( ) ( )( ) then ( ) ( )( ) ( ) This is an important ( ) ( ) consequence of the relation between ( ) and ( ) and definition of ( )( ) From GLOBAL EQUATIONS we obtain
( )
)(
((
)(
)(
)( ) (
))
)( ) (
( )
)(
) ( )
( )
:-
( )
( )
( )(
) ( )
)( ) )
( )
((
)( ) (
( )
( )(
) ( )
)( ) )
93
www.iiste.org
From which one obtains Definition of ( )( (g) For ( )(

( ) )
( )( ) :( )(
[ ( )( ) )( ) ((
( )(
)( ) (( )( ) (
( )
( )
)( ) ( )( ) (
)( ) (
)( ) ) ]
[ ( ( )( )
)( ) ) ]
( )(
( (
)( ) ( )( ) (
)( ) )( )
( )(
( )
( )
( )(

( )
( )
[ ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) [ ( ( )( )
)( )(( )( ) ( )( ) ) ]
)( )(( )( ) ( )( ) ) ]
, ( )(
( )( ) ( (
)( )
)( ) ( )( )
From which we deduce ( )( (h) If ( )(

)
( )
( )
)
( )(
( )(
(
( )(
( )(
[ ( )( ) )( ) (( )( ) (( )( ) (

)( ) ) ]
)( ) ( )( ) (
)( ) (
[ ( ( )( )
)( ) ) ]
( )
( )
[ ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) [ ( ( )( )
)( )(( )( ) ( )( ) ) ]
)( )(( )( ) ( )( ) ) ]
( )(
(i) If
( )(
( )(
( )(
, we obtain
)( ) (( )( ) ( )( )) ]
( )(
( )
( )
[ ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) [ ( ( )( )
)( ) (( )( ) ( )( )) ]
( )(
) ( )
( )
)( ) ,
( )
( )
( ) ( )
In a completely analogous way, we obtain Definition of ( ) ( ) :( )(

) ( )
( )
( )( ) ,
( )
( )
( ) ( )
Now, using this result and replacing it in GLOBAL EQUATIONS we get easily the result stated in the theorem. Particular case : If ( )( ) ( )( ( )( ) then ( ) ( ) the special case .
)
( )( ) ( )( ) and in this case ( )( ) ( ) and as a consequence ( ) ( )( )

( )
( )( ) if in addition ( )( ) ( ) this also defines ( )( ) for
Analogously if ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) if in addition ( )(
( )( ) ( )( ) and then ( )( ) then ( ) ( )(
94
www.iiste.org
consequence of the relation between ( )( ) and ( )(
and definition of (
)(
we obtain
( )
)(
((
)(
)(
)( ) (
))
)( ) (
( )
)(
) ( )
( )
:-
( )
( )
( )(
) ( )
)( ) )
( )
((
)( ) (
( )
( )(
) ( )
)( ) )
From which one obtains Definition of ( )( (j) For ( )(

( ) )
( )( ) :( )(
[ ( )( ) )( ) ((
( )(
)( ) (( )( ) (
( )
( )
)( ) ( )( ) (
)( ) (
)( ) ) ]
[ ( ( )( )
)( ) ) ]
( )(
( (
)( ) ( )( ) (
)( ) )( )
( )(
( )
( )
( )(

( )
( )
[ ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) [ ( ( )( )
)( )(( )( ) ( )( ) ) ]
)( )(( )( ) ( )( ) ) ]
, ( )(
( )( ) ( (
)( )
)( ) ( )( )
From which we deduce ( )( (k) If ( )(

)
( )
( )
)
( )(
( )(
(
( )(
( )(
[ ( )( ) )( ) (( )( ) (( )( ) (

)( ) ) ]
)( ) ( )( ) (
)( ) (
[ ( ( )( )
)( ) ) ]
( )
( )
[ ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) [ ( ( )( )
)( ) (( )( ) ( )( )) ]
)( ) (( )( ) ( )( )) ]
( )(
(l) If
( )(
( )(
( )(
, we obtain
)( ) (( )( ) ( )( )) ]
( )(
( )
( )
[ ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) [ ( ( )( )
)( ) (( )( ) ( )( )) ]
( )(
) ( )
( )
)( ) ,
( )
( )
( ) ( )
In a completely analogous way, we obtain Definition of ( ) ( ) :-
95
www.iiste.org
)(
( )
( )
( )( ) ,
( )
( )
( ) ( )
Now, using this result and replacing it in GLOBAL EQUATIONS we get easily the result stated in the theorem. Particular case : If ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) and in this case ( )( ) ( )( ) if in addition ( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) and as a consequence ( ) then ( ) ( )( ) ( ) this also defines ( )( ) for the special case . Analogously if ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) and then ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) if in addition ( ) ( )( ) then ( ) ( )( ) ( ) This is an important consequence of the relation between ( )( ) and ( )( ) and definition of ( )( )
We can prove the following Theorem 3: If ( ( ( ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ( If ( ( ( ( ( )( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ( If ( ( ( ( ( )( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ( If ( )(

) ) )
)( ( ( ( (
( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) (
)( ) are independent on , and the conditions )( )( )( )(

) ) ) )
)( )( )( )( )(
)
) ) ) )
( , (
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
( (
)( ) as defined, then the system )( ) are independent on , and the conditions ( ( ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( )( )( )(

) ) ) )
)( )( )( )( )(
)
) ) ) )
( , (
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
( (
)( ) as defined are satisfied , then the system )( ) are independent on , and the conditions ( ( ( ( )(
)
)( )( )( )( )(
)
) ) ) )
)( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) (
)( )( )( )(
) ) ) )
( , (
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
( (
as defined are satisfied , then the system
)( ) are independent on , and the conditions
96
www.iiste.org
( ( ( (
)( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ( )(
)
)( )( )( )(
)
) ) ) )
( ( ( ( )(
)
)( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) (
)( )( )( )(
) ) ) )
( , (
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
( (
If ( ( ( ( (
)(
)( ) are independent on , and the conditions ( ( ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( )( )( )(

) ) ) )
)( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ( )(
)
)( )( )( )(
)
) ) ) )
( , (
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
( (
)( ) as defined satisfied , then the system )( ) are independent on , and the conditions ( ( ( ( )( )( )( )( )( )( )(
)
If ( ( ( ( (
)(
)( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ( )(
) ) ) ) ) )
)( )( )( )(
)
) ) ) )
)( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) (
)( )( )( )(
) ) ) )
( , (
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
( [( [( [( ( ( (

) ) )
( ( ( ( ( (
)( )( )( )( )( )(
( ( ( ( ( (
)( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ) )( ) ( ) )( ) ( )
)] )] )]
) ) )
has a unique positive solution , which is an equilibrium solution for the system ( ( ( ( )( )( )( )(
) ) ) )
[( [( [( (
)( )( )( )(
) ) ) )
( ( ( (
)( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) (
)] )] )] )
97
www.iiste.org
( (
)( )(
) )
( (
)( )(
) )
( (
)( ) ( )( ) (
) )
has a unique positive solution , which is an equilibrium solution for ( ( ( ( ( ( )( )( )( )( )( )(

) ) ) ) ) )
[( [( [( ( ( (
)( )( )( )( )( )(
) ) ) ) ) )
( ( ( ( ( (
)( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) (
)] )] )] ) ) )
has a unique positive solution , which is an equilibrium solution ( ( ( ( ( ( )( )( )( )( )( )(

) ) ) )
[( [( [( ( ( (
)( )( )( )( )( )(
) ) ) )
( ( ( ( ( (
)( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) (( )( ) (( )( ) ((
)] )] )] )) )) ))
has a unique positive solution , which is an equilibrium solution for the system ( ( ( ( ( ( )( )( )( )( )( )(
)
[( [( [( ( ( (
)( )( )( )( )( )(
( ( ( ( ( (
)( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) (
)] )] )] ) ) )
) )
) )
has a unique positive solution , which is an equilibrium solution for the system ( )(
)
[(
)(
)( ) (
)]
98
www.iiste.org
( ( ( ( (
)( )( )( )( )(
) )
[( [( ( ( (
)( )( )( )( )(
) )
( ( ( ( (
)( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) (
)] )] ) ) )
has a unique positive solution , which is an equilibrium solution for the system
(a) Indeed the first two equations have a nontrivial solution ( ) ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( )( )( ) (

)
if )( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )
( )
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
(a) Indeed the first two equations have a nontrivial solution ( ( ) )

( )
if )( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )
( (
)( ) ( )( ) ( )( )( ) ( )
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
(a) Indeed the first two equations have a nontrivial solution ( ( ) )

( )
if )( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )
( (
)( ) ( )( ) ( )( )( ) ( )
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
(a) Indeed the first two equations have a nontrivial solution

( ( ) )( ) ( )(
)
if
)( ) ( )( ) ( ) )( ) ( )( )( ) ( )
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)( ) (

( ( ) )
( )
if
)( ) ( )( ) ( ) )( ) ( )( )( ) ( )
)(
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)( ) (

( )
if
99
www.iiste.org
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)( ) (
)( ) (
)( ) (
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
Definition and uniqueness of After hypothesis exists a unique

[(
:and the functions ( )( ) ( ) being increasing, it follows that there ) . With this value , we obtain from the three first equations
[( ( )( ) )( ) ( )( ) ( )]
( ) ( ) for which (
)]
( )( ) )( ) ( )( ) (
, :-

[(
( ) ( ) for which (
)]
and the functions ( )( ) ( ) being increasing, it follows that there ) . With this value , we obtain from the three first equations
[( ( )( ) )( ) ( )( ) ( )]
( )( ) )( ) ( )( ) (
, :-

[(
( ) ( ) for which (
)]
[( ( )( ) )( ) ( )( ) ( )]
( )( ) )( ) ( )( ) (
, :-

( [( )( ) )( ) ( )] )( ) (
( ) ( ) for which ( , :-
( [( )( ) )( ) ( )] )( ) (

( [( )( ) )( ) ( )] )( ) (
( ) ( ) for which ( , :-
( [( )( ) )( ) ( )] )( ) (

[(
( ) ( ) for which (
)]
[( ( )( ) )( ) ( )( ) ( )]
( )( ) )( ) ( )( ) (
(e) By the same argument, the equations 92,93 admit solutions ( ) [( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ) )(

)
if
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
( )
)( ) (
)( ) ( )] (
)( ) ( )(
)( ) ( )
Where in ( decreasing function in
must be replaced by their values from 96. It is easy to see that is a ( ) taking into account the hypothesis ( ) it follows that there
100
www.iiste.org
exists a unique
such that (
) if
(f) By the same argument, the equations 92,93 admit solutions ( [( ) )( ) ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ) )(

)
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)( ) (
)] (
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
) Where in ( )( must be replaced by their values from 96. It is easy to see that is a ( ) decreasing function in taking into account the hypothesis ( ) it follows that there exists a unique such that (( ) ) (g) By the same argument, the concatenated equations admit solutions ( [( ) )( ) ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ) )(
)
if
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)( ) (
)] (
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
( ) Where in must be replaced by their values from 96. It is easy to see that is a ( ) decreasing function in taking into account the hypothesis ( ) it follows that there exists a unique such that (( ) ) (h) By the same argument, the equations of modules admit solutions ( [( ) )( ) ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ) )(
)
if
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)( ) (
)] (
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
) Where in ( )( must be replaced by their values from 96. It is easy to see that is a ( ) decreasing function in taking into account the hypothesis ( ) it follows that there exists a unique such that (( ) ) (i) By the same argument, the equations (modules) admit solutions ( [( ) )( ) ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ) )(
)
if
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)( ) (
)] (
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
) Where in ( )( must be replaced by their values from 96. It is easy to see that is a ( ) decreasing function in taking into account the hypothesis ( ) it follows that there exists a unique such that (( ) ) (j) By the same argument, the equations (modules) admit solutions ( [( ) )( ) ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ) )(
)
if
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
)( ) (
)] (
)( ) (
)(
)( ) (
) Where in ( )( must be replaced by their values It is easy to see that is a ( ) decreasing function in taking into account the hypothesis ( ) it follows that there exists a unique such that ( ) Finally we obtain the unique solution of 89 to 94
101
www.iiste.org
(
( [( )( ) )( ) ( ( [( )( )
)
)( ) (
,
)]
( , ,
( [(
)
)( ) )( ) ( ( )( )
and
)( ) ( )]
)( ) (
)( ) (
)]
[(
)( ) (
)( )(
)]
Obviously, these values represent an equilibrium solution Finally we obtain the unique solution ((
( [( )( ) )( ) ( )] )( ) (
))
, , ,
( [(
(
)( ) (
)
)( ) )( ) (
and
)]
[(
( )( ) )( ) ( )( ) ((
) )]
[(
( )( ) )( ) ( )( ) ((
) )]
Obviously, these values represent an equilibrium solution Finally we obtain the unique solution ((
( [( )( ) )( ) ( )] )( ) (
))
, , ,
( [(
(
)( ) (
)
)( ) )( ) (
and
)]
[(
( )( ) )( ) ( )( ) (
)]
[(
( )( ) )( ) ( )( ) (
)]
Obviously, these values represent an equilibrium solution Finally we obtain the unique solution ( ) ,
)]
( , ,
and
)]
[(
( )( ) )( ) ( )( ) ( ( )( ) )( ) ( )( ) ((
[(
( )( ) )( ) ( )( ) (
[(
) )]
[(
( )( ) )( ) ( )( ) ((
) )]
Obviously, these values represent an equilibrium solution Finally we obtain the unique solution (( )) ,
)]
and
)]
[(
( )( ) )( ) ( )( ) ( ( )( ) )( ) ((
, ,
[(
( )( ) )( ) ( )( ) ( ( [( )( ) ( )( )
[(
)( ) (
) )]
)( ) ((
) )]
Obviously, these values represent an equilibrium solution Finally we obtain the unique solution
102
www.iiste.org
((
))
,
)]
and
)]
[(
( )( ) )( ) ( )( ) ( ( )( ) )( ) ((
, ,
[(
( )( ) )( ) ( )( ) ( ( [( )( ) ( )( )
[(
)( ) (
) )]
)( ) ((
) )]
Obviously, these values represent an equilibrium solution ASYMPTOTIC STABILITY ANALYSIS Theorem 4: If the conditions of the previous theorem are satisfied and if the functions ( Belong to ( ) ( ) then the above equilibrium point is asymptotically stable. Proof: Denote Definition of :,
( )( )
)(
)(
)(
)( )
Then taking into account equations (global) and neglecting the terms of power 2, we obtain (( (( (( (( (( (( )( )( )( )( )( )(
)
( ( ( ( ( (
)( ) ) )( ) ) )( ) ) )( ) ) )( ) ) )( ) )
( ( ( ( ( (
)( )( )( )( )( )(
)
( ( (
)( )( )( ( ( (
)( )
) ) ) )(
)
)( )
)( )
If the conditions of the previous theorem are satisfied and if the functions ( ( ) ( ) then the above equilibrium point is asymptotically stable Denote Definition of ,
( )( )
)(
Belong to
:-
)(
)( )
((
) )
taking into account equations (global)and neglecting the terms of power 2, we obtain (( (( )( )(
)
( (
)( ) ) )( ) )
( (
)( )(
( (
)( )(
103
www.iiste.org
(( (( (( ((
)( )( )( )(
( ( ( (
)( ) ) )( ) ) )( ) ) )( ) )
( ( ( (
)( )( )( )(
)
)( ( ( (
)( )
) ) ) )(
)
)( )
)( )
If the conditions of the previous theorem are satisfied and if the functions ( ( ) ( ) then the above equilibrium point is asymptotically stabl Denote Definition of :,
( )( )
)(
Belong to
)(
)( )
((
) )
)
( ( ( ( ( (
)( ) ) )( ) ) )( ) ) )( ) ) )( ) ) )( ) )
( ( ( ( ( (
)( )( )( )( )( )(
)
( ( (
)( )( )( ( ( (
)( )
) ) ) )(
)
)( )
)( )
If the conditions of the previous theorem are satisfied and if the functions ( ( ) ( ) then the above equilibrium point is asymptotically stabl Denote Definition of :,
( )( )
)(
Belong to
)(
)( )
((
) )
Then taking into account equations (global) and neglecting the terms of power 2, we obtain (( (( )( )(
)
( (
)( ) ) )( ) )
( (
)( )(
( (
)( )(
104
www.iiste.org
(( (( (( ((
)( )( )( )(
( ( ( (
)( ) ) )( ) ) )( ) ) )( ) )
( ( ( (
)( )( )( )(
)
)( ( ( (
)( )
) ) )
)( )
)( )
If the conditions of the previous theorem are satisfied and if the functions ( ( ) ( ) then the above equilibrium point is asymptotically stable Denote Definition of :,
( )( )
)(
)(
Belong to
)(
)( )
((
) )
)
( ( ( ( ( (
)( ) ) )( ) ) )( ) ) )( ) ) )( ) ) )( ) )
( ( ( ( ( (
)( )( )( )( )( )(
)
( ( (
)( )( )( ( ( (
)( )
) ) ) )(
)
)( )
)( )
If the conditions of the previous theorem are satisfied and if the functions ( ( ) ( ) then the above equilibrium point is asymptotically stable Denote Definition of :,
( )( )
)(
Belong to
)(
)( )
((
) )
Then taking into account equations(global) and neglecting the terms of power 2, we obtain (( )(
)
)( ) )
)(
)(
105
www.iiste.org
(( (( (( (( ((
)( )( )( )( )(
( ( ( ( (
)( ) ) )( ) ) )( ) ) )( ) ) )( ) )
( ( ( ( (
)( )( )( )( )(
)
( (
)( )( ( ( (
)( )
) ) )
)( )
)( )
The characteristic equation of this system is (( )(

)
(
)
)( ( (
(
)
)( ) ) (( )( ( ( )( ) )( )( ) ) ( (
( )(
(
)
)( ( (
( )( ) ( )(
) (
)( ) ) )(
)( ) )
[((( )( ((( )(
)
)( )( (
)
)(
)
)] )
)
((( )( ((( )(
)
)( )(
)
)( ) )( )( ) ) ( (
( ) )(
)(
)
( ( )(
)
)( ) ( )(
) ( )(
)(
)
) )
((( )( ) ) ((( )( ) ) ((( )( ) ) (( )( ((( )(

) )
(( (( (( ( ( )( )(
)
)( )(
)( )( (
( (
)
( (
)
)( ) ) ( ) ( ) ) )( ) ) ( ) ( ) ) (
)
)( ( )( ) (
)
)(
)
)(
)(
)( ) ) ( ) ( ) ) ( (
) ( )(
)( )( ) (
( (
)( ) ) (( )( ) )
( )(
)( (
)( ) (
)
)(
)(
+
(( )(
)
(
)
)( ( (
(
)
)( ) ) (( )( ( ( )( ) )( )( ) ) ( (
( )(
(
)
)( ( (
( )( ) ( )(
) (
)( ) ) )(
)( ) )
[((( )( ((( )(
)
)( )( (
)
)(
)
)] )
)
((( )( ((( )(
)
)( )(
)
)( ) )( )( ) ) (
( ) )(
)(
)
( ( )(
)
)( ) ( )(
) ( )(
)(
)
) )
((( )( ) )
((
)(
)(
)( ) ) ( ) ( ) )
106
www.iiste.org
((( )( ) ) ((( )( ) ) (( )( ((( )(

) )
(( (( ( )( )(
) )
)( )(
( (
)( )(
( (
)( )(
( (
)
)( ) ) ( )( ) ) )( ) ) ( ) ( ) ) ( (
) ( )(
)( )( ) (
( (
)( ) ) (( )( ) )
( )(
)( ) (
)
)( (
)( ) (
)
)(
)(
+
(( )(
)
(
)
)( ( (
(
)
)( ) ) (( )( ( ( )( ) )( )( ) ) ( (
) ( )(
(
)
)( ( (
( )( ) ( )(
) (
)( ) ) )(
)( ) )
[((( )( ((( )(
)
)( )( (
)
)(
)
)] )
)
((( )( ((( )(
)
)( )(
)
)( ) )( )( ) ) ( ( )( )( (
( ) )(
)(
)
( ( )(
)
)( ) ( )(
) ( )(
)(
)
) )
( (( ((
((( )( ) ) ((( )( ) ) ((( )( ) ) (( )( ((( )(

) )
)( )(
( (
)
( (
)
)( ) ) ( )( ) ) )( ) ) ( )( ) ) (
)
)( ( )( ) (
)
(( ( )( )(
) )
)( ( (
)(
)(
)( ) ) ( )( ) ) ( (
) ( )( )
)( )( ) (
)( ) ) (( )( ) )
( )(
)( (
)( ) ( )
)(
)(
+
(( )(
)
(
)
)( ( (
(
)
)( ) ) (( )( ( ( )( ) )( )( ) ) ( (
) ( )(
(
)
)( ( (
( )( ) ( )(
) (
)( ) ) )(
)( ) )
[((( )( ((( )(
)
)( )( (
)
)(
)
)] )
)
((( )( ((( )( ((( )( ) )
)( )(
)( ) )( )( ) ) )( (
) (
)(
)(
(
)
)( ) ( )(
) (
)(
)(
)
)
( (( ((
(
)
)(
(
)
(
)
)( (
(
)
)( ) ) ( )( ) ) ( )( ) ) ( ) ( ) )
((( )( ) )
)(
)(
)(
107
www.iiste.org
((( )( ) ) (( )( ((( )(
) )
(( ( )( )(
) )
)( ( (
)(
( )( ) (
)
)(
(
)
)( ) ) ( )( ) ) ( (
) ( )( )
)( )( ) (
)( ) ) (( )( ) )
( )(
)( (
)( ) ( )
)(
)(
+
(( )(
)
(
)
)( ( (
(
)
)( ) ) (( )( ( ( )( ) )( )( ) ) (
( )(
(
)
)( ( (
( )( ) ( )(
) (
)( ) ) )(
)( ) )
[((( )( ((( )(
)
)( )( (
)
)(
)
)] )
)
((( )( ((( )( ((( )( ) )
)( )(
)( ) )( )( ) ) )( ( (
) (
)(
)(
(
)
)( ) ( )(
) (
)(
)(
)
)
( (( (( (( (
(
)
(
)
)(
(
)
(
)
)( ( ( )( ) (
)
(
)
)( ) ) ( )( ) ) ( )( ) ) ( )( ) ) )( ) ) ( )( ) ) ( (
) ( )(
((( )( ) ) ((( )( ) ) (( )( ((( )(

) )
)( )(
)
)( )(
)( )(
(
)
)( )( ) (
)( )(
)
( (
)( ) ) (( )( ) )
( )(
)( (
)( ) (
)
)(
)(
+
(( )(
)
(
)
)( ( (
(
)
)( ) ) (( )( ( ( )( ) )( )( ) ) ( (
) ( )(
(
)
)( ( (
( )( ) ( )(
) (
)( ) ) )(
)( ) )
[((( )( ((( )(
)
)( )( (
)
)(
)
)] )
)
((( )( ((( )( ((( )( ) )
)( )(
)( ) )( )( ) ) )( (
) (
)(
)(
(
)
)( ) ( )(
) (
)(
)(
)
)
( (( ((
(
)
)(
(
)
(
)
)( (
(
)
)( ) ) ( )( ) ) ( )( ) ) ( ) ( ) )
((( )( ) )
)(
)(
)(
108
www.iiste.org
((( )( ) ) (( )( ((( )(
) )
(( ( )( )(
) )
)( ( (
)(
( )( ) (
)
)(
(
)
)( ) ) ( )( ) ) ( (
) ( )( )
)( )( ) (
)( ) ) (( )( ) )
( )(
)( (
)( ) ( )
)(
)(
And as one sees, all the coefficients are positive. It follows that all the roots have negative real part, and this proves the theorem.
Acknowledgments: The introduction is a collection of information from various articles, Books, News Paper reports, Home Pages Of authors, Journal Reviews, Nature s L:etters,Article Abstracts, Research papers, Abstracts Of Research Papers, Stanford Encyclopedia, Web Pages, Ask a Physicist Column, Deliberations with Professors, the internet including Wikipedia. We acknowledge all authors who have contributed to the same. In the eventuality of the fact that there has been any act of omission on the part of the authors, we regret with great deal of compunction, contrition, regret, trepidiation and remorse. As Newton said, it is only because erudite and eminent people allowed one to piggy ride on their backs; probably an attempt has been made to look slightly further. Once again, it is stated that the references are only illustrative and not comprehensive
REFERENCES
1.
Dr K N Prasanna Kumar, Prof B S Kiranagi, Prof C S Bagewadi - MEASUREMENT DISTURBS
EXPLANATION OF QUANTUM MECHANICAL STATES-A HIDDEN VARIABLE THEORY published at: "International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 2, Issue 5, May 2012 Edition". 2. DR K N PRASANNA KUMAR, PROF B S KIRANAGI and PROF C S BAGEWADI -CLASSIC 2
FLAVOUR COLOR SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND ORDINARY NUCLEAR MATTER-A NEW PARADIGM STATEMENT - published at: "International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 2, Issue 5, May 2012 Edition". 3. 4. 5. A HAIMOVICI: On the growth of a two species ecological system divided on age groups. Tensor, Vol 37 (1982),Commemoration volume dedicated to Professor Akitsugu Kawaguchi on his 80 th birthday FRTJOF CAPRA: The web of life Flamingo, Harper Collins See "Dissipative structures pages 172188 HEYLIGHEN F. (2001): "The Science of Self-organization and Adaptivity", in L. D. Kiel, (ed) . Knowledge Management, Organizational Intelligence and Learning, and Complexity, in: The Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems ((EOLSS), (Eolss Publishers, Oxford) [http://www.eolss.net MATSUI, T, H. Masunaga, S. M. Kreidenweis, R. A. Pielke Sr., W.-K. Tao, M. Chin, and Y. J Kaufman (2006), Satellite-based assessment of marine low cloud variability associated with aerosol, atmospheric stability, and the diurnal cycle, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D17204, doi:10.1029/2005JD006097 STEVENS, B, G. Feingold, W.R. Cotton and R.L. Walko, Elements of the microphysical structure of
6.
7.
109
www.iiste.org
numerically simulated nonprecipitating stratocumulus J. Atmos. Sci., 53, 980-1006 8. FEINGOLD, G, Koren, I; Wang, HL; Xue, HW; Brewer, WA (2010), Precipitation-generated oscillations in open cellular cloud fields Nature, 466 (7308) 849-852, doi: 10.1038/nature09314, Published 12-Aug 2010
110
www.iiste.org
(9)^ a b c Einstein, A. (1905), "Ist die Tr gheit eines K rpers von seinem Energieinhalt abh ngig?", Annalen der Physik 18: 639 Bibcode 1905AnP...323..639E,DOI:10.1002/andp.19053231314. See also the English translation.
(10)^ a b Paul Allen Tipler, Ralph A. Llewellyn (2003-01), Modern Physics, W. H. Freeman and Company,
pp. 8788, ISBN 0-7167-4345-0
(11)^ a b Rainville, S. et al. World Year of Physics: A direct test of E=mc2. Nature 438, 1096-1097 (22
December 2005) | doi: 10.1038/4381096a; Published online 21 December 2005.
(12)^ In F. Fernflores. The Equivalence of Mass and Energy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (13)^ Note that the relativistic mass, in contrast to the rest mass m0, is not a relativistic invariant, and that
the velocity is not a Minkowski four-vector, in contrast to the quantity , where is the differential of the proper time. However, the energy-momentum four-vector is a genuine Minkowski four-vector, and the intrinsic origin of the square-root in the definition of the relativistic mass is the distinction between d and dt.
(14)^ Relativity DeMystified, D. McMahon, Mc Graw Hill (USA), 2006, ISBN 0-07-145545-0 (15)^ Dynamics and Relativity, J.R. Forshaw, A.G. Smith, Wiley, 2009, ISBN 978-0-470-01460-8 (16)^ Hans, H. S.; Puri, S. P. (2003). Mechanics (2 ed.). Tata McGraw-Hill. p. 433. ISBN 0-07-0473609., Chapter 12 page 433
(17)^ E. F. Taylor and J. A. Wheeler, Spacetime Physics, W.H. Freeman and Co., NY. 1992.ISBN 0-71672327-1, see pp. 248-9 for discussion of mass remaining constant after detonation of nuclear bombs, until heat is allowed to escape.
(18)^ Mould, Richard A. (2002). Basic relativity (2 ed.). Springer. p. 126. ISBN 0-387-95210-1., Chapter 5
page 126
(19)^ Chow, Tail L. (2006). Introduction to electromagnetic theory: a modern perspective. Jones & Bartlett
Learning. p. 392. ISBN 0-7637-3827-1., Chapter 10 page 392
(20)^ [2] Cockcroft-Walton experiment (21)^ a b c Conversions used: 1956 International (Steam) Table (IT) values where one calorie 4.1868 J and
one BTU 1055.05585262 J. Weapons designers' conversion value of one gram TNT 1000 calories used.
111
www.iiste.org
1.
(22)^ Assuming the dam is generating at its peak capacity of 6,809 MW. (23)^ Assuming a 90/10 alloy of Pt/Ir by weight, a Cp of 25.9 for Pt and 25.1 for Ir, a Pt-dominated average Cp of 25.8, 5.134 moles of metal, and 132 J.K-1 for the prototype. A variation of picograms is of 1.5 course, much smaller than the actual uncertainty in the mass of the international prototype, which are micrograms. 2 (24)^ [3] Article on Earth rotation energy. Divided by c^2. (25)^ a b Earth's gravitational self-energy is 4.6 10-10 that of Earth's total mass, or 2.7 trillion metric tons. Citation: The Apache Point Observatory Lunar Laser-Ranging Operation (APOLLO), T. W. Murphy, Jr. et al. University of Washington, Dept. of Physics (132 kB PDF, here.). (26)^ There is usually more than one possible way to define a field energy, because any field can be made to couple to gravity in many different ways. By general scaling arguments, the correct answer at everyday distances, which are long compared to the quantum gravity scale, should be minimal coupling, which means that no powers of the curvature tensor appear. Any non-minimal couplings, along with other higher order terms, are presumably only determined by a theory of quantum gravity, and within string theory, they only start to contribute to experiments at the string scale. (27)^ G. 't Hooft, "Computation of the quantum effects due to a four-dimensional pseudoparticle", Physical Review D14:34323450 (1976). (28)^ A. Belavin, A. M. Polyakov, A. Schwarz, Yu. Tyupkin, "Pseudoparticle Solutions to Yang Mills Equations", Physics Letters 59B:85 (1975). (29)^ F. Klinkhammer, N. Manton, "A Saddle Point Solution in the Weinberg Salam Theory", Physical Review D 30:2212. (30)^ Rubakov V. A. "Monopole Catalysis of Proton Decay", Reports on Progress in Physics 51:189241 (1988). (31)^ S.W. Hawking "Black Holes Explosions?" Nature 248:30 (1974). (32)^ Einstein, A. (1905), "Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter K rper." (PDF), Annalen der Physik 17: 891 921, Bibcode 1905AnP...322..891E,DOI:10.1002/andp.19053221004. English translation.
112
www.iiste.org
(33)^ See e.g. Lev B.Okun, The concept of Mass, Physics Today 42 (6), June 1969, p. 31 36, http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-42/iss-6/vol42no6p31_36.pdf (34)^ Max Jammer (1999), Concepts of mass in contemporary physics and philosophy, Princeton University Press, p. 51, ISBN 0-691-01017-X (35)^ Eriksen, Erik; V yenli, Kjell (1976), "The classical and relativistic concepts of mass",Foundations of Physics (Springer) 6: 115124, Bibcode 1976FoPh....6..115E,DOI:10.1007/BF00708670 (36)^ a b Jannsen, M., Mecklenburg, M. (2007), From classical to relativistic mechanics: Electromagnetic models of the electron., in V. F. Hendricks, et al., , Interactions: Mathematics, Physics and Philosophy (Dordrecht: Springer): 65134 (37)^ a b Whittaker, E.T. (19511953), 2. Edition: A History of the theories of aether and electricity, vol. 1: The classical theories / vol. 2: The modern theories 19001926, London: Nelson (38)^ Miller, Arthur I. (1981), Albert Einstein's special theory of relativity. Emergence (1905) and early interpretation (19051911), Reading: AddisonWesley, ISBN 0-201-04679-2 (39)^ a b Darrigol, O. (2005), "The Genesis of the theory of relativity." (PDF), S minaire Poincar1: 122 (40)^ Philip Ball (Aug 23, 2011). "Did Einstein discover E = mc2?". Physics World. (41)^ Ives, Herbert E. (1952), "Derivation of the mass-energy relation", Journal of the Optical Society of America 42 (8): 540543, DOI:10.1364/JOSA.42.000540 (42)^ Jammer, Max (1961/1997). Concepts of Mass in Classical and Modern Physics. New York: Dover. ISBN 0-486-29998-8. (43)^ Stachel, John; Torretti, Roberto (1982), "Einstein's first derivation of mass-energy equivalence", American Journal of Physics 50 (8): 760 763, Bibcode1982AmJPh..50..760S, DOI:10.1119/1.12764 (44)^ Ohanian, Hans (2008), "Did Einstein prove E=mc2?", Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part B 40 (2): 167173, arXiv:0805.1400,DOI:10.1016/j.shpsb.2009.03.002 (45)^ Hecht, Eugene (2011), "How Einstein confirmed E0=mc2", American Journal of Physics 79 (6): 591 600, Bibcode 2011AmJPh..79..591H, DOI:10.1119/1.3549223 (46)^ Rohrlich, Fritz (1990), "An elementary derivation of E=mc2", American Journal of Physics 58 (4):
113
www.iiste.org
348349, Bibcode 1990AmJPh..58..348R, DOI:10.1119/1.16168 (47) (1996). Lise Meitner: A Life in Physics. California Studies in the History of Science. 13. Berkeley: University of California Press. pp. 236237. ISBN 0-520-20860-
114
www.iiste.org
(48)^ "consciousness". Merriam-Webster. Retrieved June 4, 2012. (49)^ Robert van Gulick (2004). "Consciousness". Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (50)^ Farthing G (1992). The Psychology of Consciousness. Prentice Hall. ISBN 978-0-13-728668-3. (51)^ John Searle (2005). "Consciousness". In Honderich T. The Oxford companion to philosophy. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-926479-7. (52)^ Susan Schneider and Max Velmans (2008). "Introduction". In Max Velmans, Susan Schneider. The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness. Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-75145-9. (53)^ G G ven zeldere (1997). Ned Block, Owen Flanagan, G G ven zeldere. ed. The Nature of Consciousness: Philosophical debates. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp. 167. (54)^ J. J. Fins, N. D. Schiff, and K. M. Foley (2007). "Late recovery from the minimally conscious state: ethical and policy implications". Neurology 68: 304307.PMID 17242341. (55)^ Locke, John. "An Essay Concerning Human Understanding (Chapter XXVII)". Australia: University of Adelaide. Retrieved August 20, 2010. (56)^ "Science & Technology: consciousness". Encyclopdia Britannica. Retrieved August 20, 2010. (57)^ Samuel Johnson (1756). A Dictionary of the English Language. Knapton. (58)^ C. S. Lewis (1990). "Ch. 8: Conscience and conscious". Studies in words. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-39831-2. (59)^ Thomas Hobbes (1904). Leviathan: or, the Matter, Forme & Power of a Commonwealth, Ecclesiastical and Civill. University Press. p. 39. (60)^ James Ussher, Charles Richard Elrington (1613). The whole works, Volume 2. Hodges and Smith. p. 417. (61)^ James Hastings and John A. Selbie (2003). Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics Part 7. Kessinger Publishing. p. 41. ISBN 0-7661-3677-9. (62)^ G. Melenaar. Mnemosyne, Fourth Series. 22. Brill. pp. 170180. (63)^ Boris Hennig (2007). "Cartesian Conscientia". British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15: 455
115
www.iiste.org
484. (64)^ Sara Hein maa (2007). Consciousness: from perception to reflection in the history of philosophy. Springer. pp. 205206. ISBN 978-1-4020-6081-6. (65)^ a b Stuart Sutherland (1989). "Consciousness". Macmillan Dictionary of Psychology. Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-333-38829-7. (66)^ Justin Sytsma and Edouard Machery (2010). "Two conceptions of subjective experience". Philosophical Studies 151: 299327. DOI: 10.1007/s11098-009-9439-x. (67)^ Gilbert Ryle (1949). The Concept of Mind. University of Chicago Press. pp. 156163.ISBN 978-0226-73296-1. (68)^ Michael V. Antony (2001). "Is consciousness ambiguous?". Journal of Consciousness Studies 8: 19 44. (69)^ Max Velmans (2009). "How to define consciousnessand how not to define consciousness". Journal of Consciousness Studies 16: 139156. (70)^ Ned Block (1998). "On a confusion about a function of consciousness". In N. Block, O. Flanagan, G. Guzeldere. The Nature of Consciousness: Philosophical Debates. MIT Press. pp. 375415. ISBN 978-0-26252210-6. (71)^ Daniel Dennett (2004). Consciousness Explained. Penguin. pp. 375.ISBN [[Special: BookSources/09713990376|09713990376]].
116
www.iiste.org
First Author: 1Mr. K. N.Prasanna Kumar has three doctorates one each in Mathematics, Economics, Political Science. Thesis was based on Mathematical Modeling. He was recently awarded D.litt. for his work on Mathematical Models in Political Science--- Department of studies in Mathematics, Kuvempu University, Shimoga, Karnataka, India Corresponding Author:drknpkumar@gmail.com Second Author: 2Prof. B.S Kiranagi is the Former Chairman of the Department of Studies in Mathematics, Manasa Gangotri and present Professor Emeritus of UGC in the Department. Professor Kiranagi has guided over 25 students and he has received many encomiums and laurels for his contribution to Co homology Groups and Mathematical Sciences. Known for his prolific writing, and one of the senior most Professors of the country, he has over 150 publications to his credit. A prolific writer and a prodigious thinker, he has to his credit several books on Lie Groups, Co Homology Groups, and other mathematical application topics, and excellent publication history.-- UGC Emeritus Professor (Department of studies in Mathematics), Manasagangotri, University of Mysore, Karnataka, India Third Author: 3Prof. C.S. Bagewadi is the present Chairman of Department of Mathematics and Department of Studies in Computer Science and has guided over 25 students. He has published articles in both national and international journals. Professor Bagewadi specializes in Differential Geometry and its wide-ranging ramifications. He has to his credit more than 159 research papers. Several Books on Differential Geometry, Differential Equations are coauthored by him--- Chairman, Department of studies in Mathematics and Computer science, Jnanasahyadri Kuvempu University, Shankarghatta, Shimoga district, Karnataka, India
117
This academic article was published by The International Institute for Science, Technology and Education (IISTE). The IISTE is a pioneer in the Open Access Publishing service based in the U.S. and Europe. The aim of the institute is Accelerating Global Knowledge Sharing. More information about the publisher can be found in the IISTEs homepage: http://www.iiste.org The IISTE is currently hosting more than 30 peer-reviewed academic journals and collaborating with academic institutions around the world. Prospective authors of IISTE journals can find the submission instruction on the following page: http://www.iiste.org/Journals/ The IISTE editorial team promises to the review and publish all the qualified submissions in a fast manner. All the journals articles are available online to the readers all over the world without financial, legal, or technical barriers other than those inseparable from gaining access to the internet itself. Printed version of the journals is also available upon request of readers and authors. IISTE Knowledge Sharing Partners EBSCO, Index Copernicus, Ulrich's Periodicals Directory, JournalTOCS, PKP Open Archives Harvester, Bielefeld Academic Search Engine, Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek EZB, Open J-Gate, OCLC WorldCat, Universe Digtial Library , NewJour, Google Scholar

Natures General Ledger

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Natures General Ledger

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Information and Knowledge Management ISSN 2224-5758 (Paper) ISSN 2224-896X (Online) Vol 2, No.

DR K N PRASANNA KUMAR, 2PROF B S KIRANAGI AND 3 PROF C S BAGEWADI

CONSCIOUSNESS AND PERCEPTION MODULE NUMBERED ONE

MASS AND ENERGY:MODULE NUMBERED FOUR: ============================================================================

: CATEGORY ONE OF MATTER

are Accentuation coefficients ( ( ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) )( )(

First augmentation factor First detritions factor

First augmentation factor First detritions factor

The differential system of this model is now (Module numbered Four) ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( )( ) ( )( ) (( )( )( )( )( )( )(

First augmentation factor First detritions factor

First augmentation factor

First detritions factor

First augmentation factor First detritions factor

HOLISTIC CONCATENATE SYTEMAL EQUATIONS HENCEFORTH REFERRED TO AS GLOBAL EQUATIONS

) are third augmentation coefficient for category 1, 2 and 3

) are first detrition coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3

) are second detrition coefficients for category 1,2 and 3

) are third detrition coefficients for category 1,2 and 3 (

) are first augmentation coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3

) are fourth augmentation coefficients for category 1, 2 and

) are first detrition coefficients for category 1, 2 and 3

Where we suppose (A) ( )(

)( ) are positive continuous increasing and bounded.

Definition of ( )( ( ( (C) ( Definition of ( Where ( )( ) ( )( ) ( (

are positive constants and

They satisfy Lipschitz condition: ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ) ) ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ) ) ( ( )(

)( ) : are positive constants

)( ) : )( ) which together )( ) and the constants

Where we suppose (F) (G) ( )(

)( ) are positive continuous increasing and bounded.

Definition of ( )( ( ( (H) )( ) ( )( ) ( ( ( Definition of ( Where ( )(

( )( ) are positive constants and

They satisfy Lipschitz condition: ( ( )( ) ( )( ) (( ) ) ( ) )( ) ( ( )( ) (( ) ( ) ) )( (

)( ) : are positive constants

Where we suppose (J) ( )(

)( ) are positive continuous increasing and bounded.

are positive constants and

They satisfy Lipschitz condition: ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ) ) ( ( )( ) ( )( ) ( ) ) ( ( )(

are positive constants

)( ) which together with

Where we suppose (L) (M) ( )(

)( ) are positive continuous increasing and bounded.

are positive constants and

They satisfy Lipschitz condition: ( ( )( ) ( )( ) (( ) ) ( ) )( ) ( ( )( ) (( ) ( ) ) )( (

Definition of ( (O) (P) ( )(

are positive constants

(T) ( Definition of ( Where ( )(

are positive constants and

They satisfy Lipschitz condition: ( ( )( ) ( )( ) (( ) ) ) ( ( )( ) ( )( ) (( ) ( ) ) )( (

are positive constants

Where we suppose ( )( (W)

( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) The functions ( )( ) ( )( ) are positive continuous increasing and bounded. Definition of ( )( ) ( )( ) : ( ( )( ) ( )( ) (( ) ) ) ( )(

are positive constants and

They satisfy Lipschitz condition: ( ( )( ) ( )( ) (( ) ) ( ) )( ) ( ( )( ) (( ) ( ) ) )( (

are positive constants

( ) ( ) defined on the space of sextuples of continuous functions

Proof: Consider operator which satisfy ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )(

is the integrand that is integrated over an interval (

Proof: Consider operator satisfy ( ) ( ) ( ) By ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) Where

defined on the space of sextuples of continuous functions ( )(

is the integrand that is integrated over an interval (

Proof: Consider operator satisfy

defined on the space of sextuples of continuous functions