You are on page 1of 6

ANATOMY OF SECURITIES SCAM, 1992

BREIF SUMMARY:
Introduction:
In April 1992, press reports indicated that there was a shortfall in the Government
Securities held by the State Bank of India. Investigations uncovered securities
scam, involving misappropriation of funds to the tune of over Rs. 3500 crores.

Mr. Harshad Mehta had triggered a rise in the Bombay Stock Exchange by
trading in shares at a premium across many segments. Taking advantages of the
loopholes in the banking system, Harshad and his associates triggered a securities
scam diverting funds from the banks to stockbrokers.

• He has siphoned off huge sums of money from several banks and millions of
investors were conned in the process.
CONTD…
• His scam was exposed, the markets crashed resulting in the
stock prices dropping by over 40%, wiping out market value
to the tune of Rs. 100,000 crores.

• Scam engulfed top executives of large nationalized banks,


foreign banks and financial institutions, brokers, bureaucrats
and Politicians

• The scam was in essence a diversion of funds from the


banking system (in particular the inter-bank market in
government securities) to brokers for financing their
operations in the stock market.
CONTD…
• The scam was made possible by a complete breakdown of
the control system both within the commercial banks as
well as the control system of the RBI itself.
What is the essence of the scam:
• The crucial mechanism through which the scam was effected was the
ready forward (RF) deal. It was this ready forward deal - channel
money from the banking system.
• A typical ready forward deal involved two banks brought together by a
broker in lieu of a commission. The broker handles neither the cash nor
the securities,
• Scam: In this settlement process, deliveries of securities and payments
were made through the broker. That is, the seller handed over the
securities to the broker, who passed them to the buyer, while the buyer
gave the cheque to the broker, who then made the payment to the seller.
• In this settlement process, the buyer and the seller might not even know
whom they had traded with, either being know only to the broker.
CONTD…
• Another instrument used in a big way was the bank receipt (BR). In a ready forward
deal, securities were not moved back and forth in actuality. Instead, the
borrower, i.e. the seller of securities, gave the buyer of the securities a BR.

• A BR “confirms the sale of securities. It acts as a receipt for the money


received by the selling bank. Hence the name - bank receipt. It promises to
deliver the securities to the buyer. It also states that in the mean time, the seller
holds the securities in trust of the buyer.”

• Mehta wanted banks which could issue fake BRs, or BRs not backed by any
government securities. “Two small and little known banks - the Bank of Karad
(BOK) and the Metorpolitan Co-operative Bank (MCB) - came in handy for
this purpose.

• Once these fake BRs were issued, they were passed on to other banks and the
banks in turn gave money to Mehta, obviously assuming that they were
lending against government securities.

You might also like