Essentials of

Organizational Behavior,
10/e
Stephen P. Robbins & Timothy A.
Judge

Chapter 9

Understanding Work
Teams
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9-1

After studying this chapter,

you should be able to:
1.

Contrast groups and teams, and analyze the

growing popularity of using teams in
organizations.

2.

Compare and contrast four types of teams.

3.

Identify the characteristics of effective teams.

4.

Show how organizations can create team players.

5.

Decide when to use individuals instead of teams.

6.

Show how the understanding of teams differs in

a global context.

Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9-2

Why Are Teams So Popular?

Increased competition forced
restructuring for efficiency and
effectiveness
Teams:
Better utilize employee talents
Are more flexible and responsive to change
Democratize and motivate

Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9-3

Groups and Teams

Work Group
A group who interacts primarily to share
information and to make decisions to
help one another perform within each
members area of responsibility

Work Team
Generates positive synergy through
coordinated effort; individual efforts
result in a level of performance that is
greater than the sum of those individual
inputs
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9-4

Comparing Work Groups

and Work Teams

Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9-5

Four Types of Teams

Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9-6

Problem-Solving Teams
Members often from
the same department
Share ideas or suggest
improvements
Rarely given authority
to unilaterally
implement any of their
suggested actions

Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9-7

Self-Managed Work Teams

10-15 employees in highly-related jobs
Team takes on supervisory
responsibilities:

Work planning and scheduling

Assigning tasks
Operating decisions/actions
Working with customers

May select and evaluate members

Effectiveness is situationally dependent
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9-8

Cross-Functional Teams
Members from same level, but diverse
areas within and between
organizations
Exchange information
Develop new ideas and solve
problems
Coordinate complex projects
Development may be time-consuming
due to complexity and diversity
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9-9

Virtual Teams
Computer technology
ties dispersed team
together
Special challenges:
Less social rapport
More task-oriented
Members less
satisfied
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9-10

Key Components of
Effective Teams
Context
Composition
Work Design
Process

Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9-11

Contextual Components
Presence of adequate resources
Effective leadership and structure
Climate of trust in the team
Performance evaluation and reward
system that reflects team
contributions

Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9-12

Team
Composition
Components

Abilities of members
Technical expertise
Problem-solving
Interpersonal

Personality
Conscientious and open-minded

Diversity
Size of teams
Member preferences
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9-13

Work Design Components

Freedom
Autonomy
Skill variety
Task identity
Task significance
Enhances motivation
and team effectiveness
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9-14

Process Components
Common plan and
purpose
Specific goals
Team efficacy
Common mental
models
Low levels of conflict
Minimized social
loafing
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9-15

Turning Individuals Into

Team Players
Selection
Need employees who have the interpersonal
as well as technical skills

Training
Workshops on problem-solving,
communications, negotiation, conflictmanagement and coaching skills

Rewards
Encourage cooperative efforts rather than
individual ones
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9-16

Teams Arent Always the

Answer: Three Tests
Complexity of Work:
Can the work be done better by more than one
person?

Common Purpose:
Does the work create a common purpose or set
of goals for the people in the group that is more
than the aggregate of individual goals?

Interdependence:
Are the members of the group interdependent?
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9-17

Global Implications
Teamwork is less pervasive in the
United States.
Self-managed teams may be difficult to
introduce globally power distance
problems.
Team cultural diversity creates
difficulties in the short run.
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9-18

Implications for Managers

Common characteristics of effective teams:
Have adequate resources, effective leadership,
a climate of trust, and suitable reward system
Composed of individuals with technical and
interpersonal skills
Work provides freedom, autonomy, and
opportunity to use skills
Members are committed to a common purpose

Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9-19

Keep in Mind
Proper selection of members
increases likelihood of effective teams
Team should be constructed based on
ability, skill, and applicable member
traits given the situation
Non-personal conflicts can lead to
better team decisions
Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9-20

Summary
1.

Contrasted groups and teams, and analyzed the

growing popularity of using teams in organizations.

2.

Compared and contrasted four types of teams.

3.

Identified the characteristics of effective teams.

4.

Showed how organizations could create team

players.

5.

Decided when to use individuals instead of teams.

6.

Showed how the understanding of teams differed in

a global context.

Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9-21

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may

be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or
transmitted, in any form or by any means,
electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording,
or otherwise, without the prior written permission
of the publisher. Printed in the United States of
America.

Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

9-22