Professional Documents
Culture Documents
standards
Shared
Learning
Awards
Centres & support services
Health Health &
Clinical Practice Technology
Evaluation Social Care
Technology
Clinical Appraisals Quality Standards
Guidelines
Surgical Implementation
interventions
Medicines and NICE pathways
Prescribing
Centre
Devices and
Diagnostics
Business, Planning
Social Care
Safe staffing
guidelines
& resources
PASL
Prevention
Scientific Advice
R&D
NICE International
Accreditation
Funding Expenditure
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Annual Report and Accounts 2013/14
NICE’s core principles
Scientific
Rigour
Timeliness Inclusiveness
Accountability
Support for Transparency
implementation for
reasonableness
Review Independence
Challenge
NICE GUIDELINES AND
QUALITY STANDARDS
10
Why NICE clinical guidelines
and quality standards?
• Variation in care and health outcomes across
the country – “postcode lottery”
– “Different organisations set different standards, using different
methods [and] evidence… not clear which standards must be
followed and which are optional” Sir Liam Donaldson, previous
Chief Medical Officer
• NICE given responsibility to develop guidance:
– To promote cost-effective use of NHS resources
– Based on best available evidence and participatory process
11
What are NICE Clinical Guidelines?
• Broad guidance covering
management of a particular
condition
• Considers clinical and cost-
effectiveness, and patient/carer
perspective
• Incorporates other relevant NICE
guidance (e.g. Technology
Appraisals for specific drugs)
• Recommendations are advisory,
not mandatory… but can be used to
develop quality standards
What are NICE guidelines and
quality standards?
A comprehensive set of recommendations for a particular
disease or condition
Evidence
(e.g. clinical trials, Evidence-based Quality
health economic Clinical Guidelines Standards
studies)
Proportion of
services
Standard of
services Unsafe Sub- Adequate Good Excellent
standard
15
NICE guideline development brings together many
different stakeholders
NICE
• Define process and methods
• Quality assure NCCs’ work Stakeholders
• Manage stakeholder consultation and dissemination
• Accountable for the final guideline
National Collaborating
NCC Mental
NICE NCC Women
& Children’s
Centres
•
•
Convene GDGs
Provide technical input
Health Health to facilitate GDG
• Draft the guideline
Guideline
Development Guideline development
National Group groups (GDG)
Clinical • Review evidence base
NCC Cancer and make
Guidelines Guideline recommendations
Centre Development • Respond to consultation
Group
comments
Guideline development is a systematic process
with stakeholder participation throughout
Draft scope
4 months Stakeholder comments
Final scope
Scoping
Pre-publication check
NICE
Legal and DECISIONS
policy
constraints
Other social
values: ethics,
equity, rights
Practicalities of
implementation
Developing guidelines –
some challenges….
• Scope
– What to include/exclude?
• Timeliness
• Taking into account cost-effectiveness
– Selecting topics for economic modelling
– When to rely on published data
• Keeping guidelines up to date
Helping compliance /implementation
• There has been a steady increase in the proportion of adult admissions risked
assessed for VTE in all providers of NHS funded acute care, from 47% in July
2010 to 94% in December 2012.
NICE International is NICE’s non-profit
programme since 2008
• Supporting foreign governments to make better
policy decisions for better health
o Technical support: HTA, guidelines and quality
standards
o Advice on process and governance: transparency,
public and stakeholder involvement
• Practical support projects (clinical pathways,
quality standards) with country partners,
including: China, India, Vietnam
Vietnam: QS for Stroke developed over 14 month, country-
owned process
Undertake situation analysis
Recruit a QS Committee
33
QS: a model of national/international
partnership?
• Effective partnership
– Convened policymakers and stroke clinicians for the first time
with direct policy impact
• Stronger institutions
– MoH incorporated QS in Hospital Quality Criteria
– Pilot QS implementation funded through World Bank project
• Better decisions
– Focus on low cost, high impact interventions: prevention,
joint working across disciplines, early diagnosis and
rehabilitation
– Full implementation could lead to improved care for 115,000
patients, and net savings of US$2.8m per year
34