71 2017 074 Embryology of the Upper Extremity EMBRYOGENESIS Limb development begins during embryogenesis with events that affect the position and orientation of each limb and the number of limbs that appear. The limb bud is first visualized at 26 days after fertilization when the embryo is about 4 mm in length (crown-rump length), or about the size of a piece of rice.62,66 The bud rapidly develops through 47 days of life until the embryo is close to 20 mm in length, or the size of a lima bean. Fifty-two to 53 days after gestation, the embryo is 22 to 24 mm long and the fingers are entirely separate.30 Eight weeks after fertilization, embryogenesis is complete and all limb structures are present condensation of the chondrogen creates dense plates between future bones.11 Joint cavitation further forms the articulation, although proper joint development requires motion for modeling of the ultimate joint surface. Most upper extremity congenital anomalies occur during this 4- to 8-week period of rapid and fragile limb development. After 8 weeks’ gestation, the fetal period commences, with differentiation, maturation, and enlargement of existing structures The limb bud represents an outgrowth of the mesoderm into the overlying ectoderm. Two sources of cells migrate from their origins into the limb bud.6,11 The cells from the lateral plate mesoderm become bone, cartilage, and tendon. The cells from the somatic mesoderm form the muscular, nervous, and vascular elements of the limb bud . families, the physician must appreciate the signaling centers that control the three spatial axes of limb development: proximodistal, anteroposterior, and dorsoventral.11 Each of these limb growth axes contains a signaling center (i.e., a group of cells) that is responsible for establishing the corresponding axes; they are the apical ectodermal ridge (AER), the zone of polarizing activity (ZPA), and the Wingless type (Wnt) signaling centers (Table 35.2). 5 A coordinated effort between the AER, ZPA, and Wnt pathways is necessary for proper limb patterning and axes development.11,22,36 The three signaling centers are interdependent, so that the loss of one signal results in compromise of the entire system.44 There is considerable cross talk between these signaling pathways during limb development development. Programmed cell death is an active process that is genetically controlled to eliminate unwanted cells during embryogenesis.10 Apoptotic cells undergo a degeneration process with DNA fragmentation and are eventually engulfed by phagocytic cells. Genetic control of cell death is necessary during limb bud formation. For example, the digits initially develop as webbed fingers. Extraneous tissue between fingers must undergo apoptosis and interdigital necrosis for finger separation. Failure of interdigital apoptosis results in syndactyly.65 Interestingly, bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), widely recognized for their role in chondrogenesis and osteogenesis, trigger apoptotic pathways of the interdigital mesenchyme to produce separated fingers.10 BMP antagonist can block BMP signaling and prevent apoptosis and interdigital necrosis. For example, bats have web limbs, and BMP is blocked during their limb embryogenesis.40 Similarly, altered signaling of fibroblast growth factors, such as occurs in Apert syndrome, can negate BMP-mediated apoptosis, resulting in syndactyly (Figure 35.2). Spatial Axes of Limb Development and Their Signaling Centers Proximodistal Limb Development The limb develops in a proximal to distal direction, with the shoulder forming before the elbow and the elbow before the wrist. This progression is controlled by the AER, a thickened layer of ectoderm that condenses over the limb bud.11 This signaling center guides the underlying mesoderm to differentiate into appropriate structures.6,49 Removal of the AER results in limb truncation, and ectopic implantation of the AER causes additional limbs to form (Figures 35.3 and 35.4).11,49,61,66 The secreted proteins within the AER that yield this effect are fibroblast growth factors.28,37 In fact, removal of the AER can be overcome by application of fibroblast growth factors (Figure 35.5). Mice deficient in various fibroblast growth factors have complete transverse limb defects.15,38,54 When explaining this to a parent, we can say that we know the AER was not physically removed. However, we do have evidence to suggest that bleeding or ischemia within the AER resulted in its failure to work properly.17 Transverse deficiencies are usually sporadic without any underlying reason. Concern for teratogen exposure is raised when multiple limbs are involved, suggesting a widespread insult to all developing limb buds. Transverse differences are not inheritable, and future children are unlikely to be affected. Anteroposterior Limb Development The limb also develops in an anteroposterior (i.e., radioulnar or preaxial-postaxial) direction. The ZPA resides within the posterior margin of the limb bud and functions as a signaling center for anterior to posterior limb development.6,48 This signaling pathway polarizes the limb into a radial margin and an ulnar border.60 The signaling molecule within this pathway is the sonic hedgehog compound.48 Transplantation of the ZPA or sonic hedgehog protein causes mirror duplication of the ulnar aspect of the limb (Figure 35.6).11 The extent of duplication is dose dependent, and greater transference results in more replication (Figure 35.7).59 This explains the variable numbers of fingers and different phenotypes of mirror hands (Table 35.3).3 Mutant mice that express sonic hedgehog protein in the anterior limb bud are polydactylous, with duplication of their ulnar digits.29 Triphalangeal thumbs arise secondary to point mutations resulting in ectopic sonic hedgehog compound at the anterior margin of the limb bud.23 Sonic hedgehog compound is also expressed in a gradient fashion, and the duration of exposure of a digit to it determines the identity of the digit. The anterior digits (index and long fingers) are exposed for the shortest time, and the small digit is exposed for the longest time.27,52 Dorsoventral Limb Development Dorsoventral limb development, or the process of differentiation between the dorsum of the finger with a fingernail and the volar surface abundant with pulp tissue, is not as well understood.11 The Wnt signaling pathway resides in the dorsal ectoderm and controls this spatial development. The pathway produces a transcription factor, Lmx-1, which induces the mesoderm to adopt dorsal characteristics.47 In the ventral ectoderm, the Wnt pathway is blocked by a product of the gene Engrailed-1 (En-1). Mice lacking the Wnt pathway have ventralization of the dorsalsurface (i.e., biventral limbs with palmar pads on both sides of the foot).20,43 In contrast, mice lacking Engrailed-1 develop dorsalization of the volar surface (i.e., bidorsal limbs).25 Differences affecting this pathway are relatively rare. Loss of Lmx-1 is associated with nail patella syndrome.14 Occasionally, children will present with anomalies that have an extraneous nail or abnormal pulp development. These abnormalities are related to the Wnt signaling pathway and occur sporadically without any definable cause.2 Musculoskeletal System Development The muscular blastema and the chondrogenic blastema form the muscles and bones, respectively.4 The chondrogenic blastema is located in the central portions,where the oxygen tension is relatively low. The muscular blastema resides in the periphery, where the oxygen tension is higher. The muscles form sequentially from proximal to distal, separating from the muscular blastema. The chondrogenic blastema also forms from proximal to distal, with the cartilage undergoing ossification to form bones The joints form in interzones between the ends of two blastemas. A joint capsule surrounds the interzone, and the intervening blastemas undergo cavitation within the center of the interzone to produce a joint space. Joint fluid is produced within this space and cartilage caps the two ends of the bones. Failure of this process results in synostosis across the intended joint, such as a proximal radioulnar joint or an ulnohumeral joint (Figure 35.8). Motion is necessary to form a mobile functioning joint. In the absence of movement, such as arthrogryposis, the joint space is infiltrated by fibrous tissue, yielding an immobile joint (Figure 35.9). Genes and Molecular Abnormalities The spatial axis of limb development is only one aspect of limb formation. Mutations encoding signaling proteins, receptor molecules, and transcription factors can alter the normal limb arrangement and yield anomalies. The number of congenital anomalies seen by the practicing hand surgeon identifiable at the molecular level increases each year. Despite the accelerated pace of discovery, only a small number of limb anomalies have been mapped to specific chromosomal segments and are less defined at the molecular level.6 Many of these differences, however, are genetically linked with variable patterns of inheritance. Accurate diagnosis is mandatory, and referral for genetic consultation warranted. Parents need appropriate counseling regarding the different expressions and phenotypes across the spectrum of a particular mutation. A continuing misconception is that an affected parent with a mild phenotype feels that his or her anomaly (heart and/or hand) is “not so bad and, therefore, my children will be fine like me.” Based on this misperception, he or she proceeds with pregnancy, naïve to the concept of variable expression and inconsistent phenotypes. Subsequently, the affected child may be considerably more affected and the parents are not prepared to handle such involvement. Appropriate counseling prior to pregnancy can alleviate this misconception and educate the parents as to the facts surrounding inheritance rates and possible clinical findings. The HOX and T-box genes encode transcription factors crucial for limb formation and exhibit some control over upper limb formation.6,19,32,35,50,63 Abnormalities in HOX and T-box gene production alter limb constitution. The extent of malformation is related to the number and extent of gene irregularities.6,13 HOX genes are important for the patterning of many tissues in the developing embryo. Mutations within the HOX gene locus have been identified as the cause of several types of human differences. Synpolydactyly and hand-foot- genital syndrome have been related to mutations within the HOX genes (Figures 35.10 and 35.11).18,31,33,64 Madelung deformity associated with Leri-Weill dyschondrosteosis has also been connected to HOX gene defects (Figure 35.12).51 These three entities are autosomal dominant conditions, although Leri-Weill dyschondrosteosis affects females more severely. This information is critical to relay to affected families and justifies genetic counseling. The T-box genes are a highly conserved family of transcription factors that govern both limb and organ system development.1,9 Altered expression of T- box products can affect the anteroposterior (i.e., radioulnar) development of the limb. The combination of a cardiac defect and radial deficiency (e.g., Holt- Oram syndrome) has been specifically linked to the production of transcription factor Tbx5.7,8,24 Holt-Oram syndrome is an autosomal dominant trait with variable phenotypes, and affected families would benefit from genetic counseling. T-box gene mutations have also been linked to limb anomalies associated with a variety of systemic syndromes, including ulnarmammary syndrome (Tbx3 mutation),which is associated with postaxial limb anomalies.5,6,46 The family of BMPs are expressed in the developing limb.11 Cartilage-derived morphogenetic protein appears paramount to digital length during embryogenesis. Deficiencies in a cartilage-derived morphogenetic protein are associated with various forms of brachydactyly. Grebe and Hunter- Thompson chondrodysplasias are associated with severe brachydactyly and have been directly related to a cartilage-derived morphogenetic protein deficiency (Figure 35.13).45,58 Systemic Considerations During the period of embryogenesis, other organ systems are also developing and maturing. Errors affecting limb formation can also disturb formation of these systems. Certain upper limb anomalies are associated with concomitant systemic disorders (e.g., radial deficiency).12,26 Other limb anomalies occur in isolation or are combined with other musculoskeletal problems (e.g., ulnar deficiency).53 Some limb anomalies, such as central deficiency, can be associated with a systemic condition (EEC syndrome: triad of ectrodactyly, ectodermal dysplasia, and facial clefting) or can be linked to other musculoskeletal anomalies, such as lower limb hemimelia. Identifying anomalies that occur in isolation and anomalies associated with systemic ailments is mandatory. Many of the systemic illnesses are more important than the limb anomaly and require accurate evaluation to prevent life-threatening consequences. The basic molecular events of hand formation are being discovered at a rapid rate. The complex interaction between signaling centers, genes, and molecular events complicates direct linkage between an abnormality and a particular limb difference. In addition, variable amounts of gene and molecular damage result in innumerable different phenotypes. Application of this basic science knowledge to the clinical setting is a necessary linkage. The National Institutes of Health website provides a mechanism for keeping abreast of current knowledge. Links to the Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man database offer valuable information regarding genes and disease. This information is readily available, frequently updated, and invaluable when evaluating children with congenital deficiencies.