Rank/Position: Administrative Officer School/Agency: Pangasinan State University –Binmaley Campus Length of Service wit the Department: Baccalaureate Course: Background of the Study • This study aims to determine the effectiveness of Job Enrichment as an Organizational Development Intervention (ODI) on improving employee Job Satisfaction at Pangasinan State University- Binmaley Campus, Binmaley, Pangasinan. • In PSU Binmaley, the researcher has foreseen employees who are leaving the university due to numerous reasons such as, but not limited to, limited career growth. • Opportunities to climb the ladder and grow the career are not that apparent in the university. Monotonous work causes some of the employees to experience boredom. Bored-and unchallenged employees experience little incentive to concern themselves with workplace productivity. Background of the Study • It is the vision of the institution to become an ASEAN Premier State University in 2020, thus, employees from the Top Management down to the front-liners need to get satisfied to be able to give quality service towards the institution’s stakeholders. This encouraged the researcher to improve employee satisfaction of the non-teaching staff through the use of Job Enrichment. • Job enrichment is a job-design strategy for enhancing job content by building into it more motivating potential (Lunenburg 2011). It is an attempt to motivate employees by giving them the opportunity to use their abilities (Pillai, Mashood, Amoodi,Husain 2012; Razag and Nawaz, 2011). Summary • The study’s main objective is to determine the effectiveness of Job Enrichment as an Organizational Development Intervention (ODI) on improving employee Job Satisfaction at Pangasinan State University- Binmaley Campus, Binmaley, Pangasinan. • Specifically, it sought to answer the following questions: • 1. What is the level of satisfaction of the respondents before the implementation of Job Enrichment as Organizational Development Intervention program? ; • 2. What is the level of satisfaction of the respondents after the implementation of Job Enrichment as Organizational Development Intervention program?; and ; • 3. Is their significant difference between the pre-evaluation and post evaluation results of the respondents after the utilization of Job Enrichment? Summary • Based on the result of the study, the researcher found out that the result of the pre-evaluation revealed that the respondents neither agree nor disagree that the institutions met their expectation and satisfaction in reference to their current job design or responsibilities. • After the implementation of the intervention program, the researcher found out that most of the respondents were enjoying their enhanced job design and were able to learn new things and acquired new knowledge. The respondents’ level of job satisfaction increased and their performance as well. Many of the respondents gained an increased of self-esteem and confidence that their professional goals are in line with the institutional vision. Summary • It was also found out there is a highly significant difference between the results of the survey before and after the intervention program with 0.00 lower than the expected value of 0.05 with a t-value of 21.67. This could be attributed to the fact that the respondents’ job satisfaction was improved due to Job Enrichment. Thus, the hypothesis stating no significant difference between the job satisfaction of the respondents before and after the intervention program is rejected. Thank you!