Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Tri Wrahatnolo
Dept. of Electrical Engineering
State University of Surabaya
triwrahatnolo@unesa.ac.id
History, cont’d – 1990’s &
2000’s
• Major opening of industry to competition occurred as a
result of National Energy Policy Act of 1992
• This act mandated that utilities provide “nondiscriminatory”
access to the high voltage transmission
• Goal was to set up true competition in generation
• Result over the last few years has been a dramatic
restructuring of electric utility industry (for better or worse!)
• Energy Bill 2005 repealed PUHCA; modified PURPA
Electricity Prices, 1960-2010
Sources: EIA, Annual Energy Review, 2010, Figure 8.10; 2015, Fig 9
Utility Restructuring
• Driven by significant regional variations in electric
rates
• Goal of competition is to reduce rates through the
introduction of competition
• Eventual goal is to allow consumers to choose their
electricity supplier
State Variation in Electric
Rates
The Goal: Customer Choice
The Result for California in
2000/1
OFF
OFF
The California-Enron Effect
WA
MT ND VT ME
MN
OR NH
ID SD WI NY MA
WY MI RI
IA PA CT
NV NE NJ
IN OH DE
UT IL W MD
DC
CO VA VA
CA KS MO KY
AZ TN NC
OK
NM AR SC
MS AL GA
TX
LA
AK
FL
HI
Source: http://www.dsireusa.org/
Power System Modeling and Time Frames
• Much of class covers power system models. An important quote to keep in
mind is
• “Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful. However, the
approximate nature of the model must always be borne in mind.” G.E.P.
Box, N.R. Draper, Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces, Wiley,
1987, p. 424.
• Power systems covers many different time frames, with essentially no models
valid for all of them
Image: Sauer, P.W., M. A. Pai, Power System Dynamics and Stability, Stripes Publishing, 2007
Review of Phasors
Goal of phasor analysis is to simplify the analysis of
constant frequency ac systems
1T 2 Vmax
� v(t ) dt =
T0 2
Phasor Representation
Euler's Identity: e jq = cosq + j sin q
(Note: Some texts use “boldface” type for complex numbers, or “bars on
the top”)
Advantages of Phasor Analysis
Device Time Analysis Phasor
Resistor v(t ) = Ri(t ) V = RI
di (t )
Inductor v(t ) = L V = jw LI
dt
1t 1
Capacitor � i (t ) dt + v(0) V = I
C0 jw C
Z = Impedance = R + jX = Z �f
R = Resistance
X = Reactance (Note: Z is a
X complex number but
Z = R2 + X 2 f =arctan( )
R not a phasor)
RL Circuit Example
V (t ) = 2 100cos(w t + 30)
f = 60Hz
R = 4 X = wL = 3
Z = 42 + 32 = 5 f = 36.9
V 10030
I = =
Z 536.9
= 20 6.9 Amps
i(t) = 20 2 cos(w t 6.9)
Complex Power
Power
p (t ) = v(t ) i (t )
v(t) = Vmax cos(w t + qV )
i (t) = I max cos(w t + q I )
1
cos cos = [cos( ) + cos( + )]
2
1
p (t ) = Vmax I max [cos(qV q I ) +
2
cos(2w t + qV + q I )]
Complex Power, cont’d
Average Power
1
p (t ) = Vmax I max [cos(qV q I ) + cos(2wt + qV + q I )]
2
T
1
Pavg = �p (t )dt
T0
1
= Vmax I max cos(qV q I )
2
= V I cos(qV q I )
= V I*
P = Real Power (W, kW, MW)
Q = Reactive Power (var, kvar, Mvar)
S = Complex power (VA, kVA, MVA)
Power Factor (pf) = cosf
If current leads voltage then pf is leading
If current lags voltage then pf is lagging
Complex Power, cont’d
Relationships between real, reactive and complex power
P = S cos f
Q = S sin f = � S 1 pf 2
Earlier we found
I = 20-6.9 amps
V I * =а 100 30 20 6.9
S ==а�а 2000 36.9 VA
f = 36.9� pf = 0.8 lagging
VR I *��а
SR ==�� 4 20 6.9 20 6.9
2
PR = 1600W = I R (Q R = 0)
VL I *��а
SL ==�� 3 j 20 6.9 20 6.9
2
Q L = 1200 var = I X (PL = 0)