Regional Orientation on the

Revised Child-Friendly Local Governance Audit

 What is CFLGA
• It is a mandatory audit system for measuring local governance performance in
the delivery of services that would generate positive results for children.
 Objective
General
• To assess the performance of the LGU in implementing child-friendly policies,
programs, projects, and services.

Specific Objectives
• To determine the level of performance of the LGUs;
• To identify priority areas to improve the situation of children;
• To utilize CFLGA result as basis for planning and programming;
• To determine areas for technical and/or financial assistance; and
• To recognize good LGU performers
 What it means to be child-friendly
The LGU gives priority to children in planning, budgeting, legislation and delivery of
services and is able to assure that all children’s needs are addressed and their
rights to SURVIVAL, DEVELOPMENT, PROTECTION and PARTICIPATION are upheld.
 Indicators - Survival
2014-2018 Indicators
 Percentage reduction in the deaths among children below five years old
 Percentage reduction of stunting and wasting of children 0-72 months
 Philhealth accreditation in its main health facility or rural health unit for
the Maternal and Primary Care services
 Indicators - Survival

2019 Indicators
INDICATOR Score
Survival 15
1.1 Percentage coverage of Fully Immunized Children aged 12 months old 5.0
1.2 Prevalence of malnutrition among children aged 0-59 months old 5.0
1.3 Percentage coverage of pregnant adolescents provided with prenatal
and postpartum services
1.3.1 Percentage coverage of pregnant adolescents with prenatal services 3.0
1.3.2 Percentage coverage of pregnant adolescents with postpartum 2.0
services
 Indicator 1.1. Percentage coverage of Fully Immunized Children
aged 12 months old
-Fully immunized children are infants who received one Rating:
dose of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG), three doses each of Accomplishment (%) Point
oral polio vaccine (OPV), diphtheria, pentavalent vaccine, 95-100% 5.00
and two (2) doses of measles containing vaccine (MCV) at 90-94% 4.00
nine (9) months and twelve (12) months old. 85-89% 3.00
80-84% 2.00
Formula: Percentage Coverage =𝑎/𝑏 𝑥 100 below 80% 1.00

Where: MOV: Data from the Field Health Service

𝑎 = Number of Fully Immunized Children Information System (FHSIS) report of the
𝑏 = Total number of children aged 12 months local health unit
Scenario (1): In case the LGU reports the lack of supplies for immunization owing to
logistical concerns of the health system, the IMTF may give consideration provided the
LGU can show proof of received request for the supplies [vaccines] needed dated a
quarter prior to the audit.

Scenario (2): In instances wherein the child transfers to another LGU before being fully
immunized, the child is counted in the LGU where he/she completes the immunization.
The Target Client List (TCL) record in the Barangay Health Station (BHS) should be able
to show where the child’s immunizations were taken prior to his/her transfer. As to the
original LGU where the child came from, its total population should not include the
aforementioned child
 Indicator 1.2. Prevalence of malnutrition among children aged 0-
59 months old
- Operation Timbang (OPT) Plus is the annual weighing
and height measurement of all preschoolers 0-59
months old or below five years old in a community to
Rating:
identify and locate the malnourished children. Results
Target Accomplishment (%) Point
of OPT Plus provide information on the nutritional OPT Plus Coverage 80-110% 1.00
status of the preschoolers and the community in Less than 80% 0.00
general, thus, providing information on the
effectiveness of the local nutrition program. Condition: The OPT+ coverage should be at least 80%
to get succeeding points for the nutritional status
Formula: OPT Plus Coverage =𝑎/𝑏 𝑥 100 based on standards set by the National Nutrition
Council.
Where:
𝑎 = Actual number of 0-59 months measured
𝑏 = Total number of children aged 0-59 months
 Indicator 1.2. Prevalence of malnutrition among children aged 0-
59 months old
Formula: Prevalence = 𝑎1+𝑎2 𝑏 𝑥 100

Where:
𝑎1 = Actual number of stunted / wasted / overweight 0-59 months
𝑎2 = Actual number of severely stunted / severely wasted / obese
b = Actual number of 0-59 months old children measured MOV: Accomplished OPT Plus Form 2A:
City/Municipality Summary Report of the
Local Health/Nutrition Office
Rating:
Indices Cut-off Point
Stunting If prevalence is less than 14.39% 2.00
Wasting If prevalence is less than 4.40% 1.50
Overweight If prevalence is less than 3.50% 0.50
Note: If the prevalence is equal to or more than the indicated target, the LGU
automatically gets zero (0.00)
 Indicator 1.3. Percentage coverage of pregnant adolescents
provided with prenatal and postpartum services
Indicator 1.3.1. Percentage coverage of pregnant adolescents provided with prenatal services

-There should be at least four (4) prenatal visits as follows:

• 1st trimester = at least 1 check-up
• 2nd trimester = at least 1 check-up
• 3rd trimester = at least 2 check-ups

Formula: Coverage Prenatal = 𝑎1+𝑎2/𝑏1+𝑏2 𝑥 100

Where:
𝑎1 = Number of pregnant adolescents aged 10-14 years old with at least 4 prenatal check-ups
𝑎2 = Number of pregnant adolescents aged 15-19 years old with at least 4 prenatal check-ups
𝑏1 = Total number of pregnant adolescents aged 10-14 years old 𝑏 𝑏2 = Total number of pregnant adolescents
aged 15-19 years old
Indicator 1.3. Percentage coverage of pregnant adolescents
provided with prenatal and postpartum services
Indicator 1.3.1. Percentage coverage of pregnant adolescents provided with prenatal services

Rating:
Accomplishment (%) Point
80-100% 3.00
70-79.99% 2.00
60-69.99% 1.00
Below 60% 0.00

MOV: Data from the National Safe

Motherhood Program - Pregnancy
Tracking from the local health unit (refer
to Annex 4 for sample)
 Indicator 1.3. Percentage coverage of pregnant adolescents
provided with prenatal and postpartum services
Indicator 1.3.2. Percentage coverage of pregnant adolescents provided with postpartum services
-Postpartum check-ups refer to check-ups provided by the midwife / nurse / C/MHO to the mother together
with their newborn within 1 week after delivery.
• 1st postnatal check-up – before discharge of mother and child
• 2nd postnatal check-up – within seven (7) days after delivery/discharge.

Formula: Coverage (Postpartum)=𝑎1+𝑎2 /𝑏1+𝑏2 𝑥 100

Where:
α1 = Number of postpartum adolescents aged 10-14 years old together with their newborn who completed at
least 2 postpartum check-ups
α2 = Number of pregnant adolescents aged 15-19 years old together with their newborn who completed at
least 2 postpartum check-ups
b1 = Total number of pregnant adolescents aged 10-14 years old
b2 = Total number of pregnant adolescents aged 15-19 years old
 Indicator 1.3. Percentage coverage of pregnant adolescents
provided with prenatal and postpartum services
Indicator 1.3.2. Percentage coverage of pregnant adolescents provided with postpartum services

Rating:
Accomplishment (%) Point
80-100% 2.00
70-79.99% 1.00
Below 70% 0.00

MOV: Data from the National Safe

Motherhood Program - Pregnancy
Tracking from the local health unit (refer
to Annex 4 for sample)
 Indicators - Development
Text here 2014-2018 Indicators
 Percentage increase in the number of 3-4 year-old children attending center-based day care services
 Percentage increase in the completion rate for elementary schooling
 A Local School Board (LSB) Plan that is aligned with the School Improvement Plan (SIP)
 Completed at least 70% of its LSB Plan.
 Indicators - Development
2019 Indicators
INDICATOR Score
Development 15
2.1 Percentage coverage of children aged 3-4 years old provided with early childhood care and 5.0
development (ECCD) services, both public and privately managed, and may be center, home,
or community-based
2.2 Presence of ECCD services in all barangays, either private or publicly managed (center, home,
community, or other modalities)
2.2.1 Percentage of barangays with at least one (1) ECCD service 2.0
2.2.2 Percentage of accredited or recognized center-based ECCD services 3.0
2.3 Percentage of out-of-school children and youth (OCSY) assisted for enrolment/re-enrolment
to school, alternative learning system (ALS) or other flexible learning options
2.3.1 Percentage of children who have dropped out from school that were reintegrated in the 2.5
academic year being audited
2.3.2 Percentage of OSCY registered/enrolled to schools, ALS, or other flexible learning options 2.5
 Indicator 2.1. Percentage coverage of children aged 3-4 years old provided
with early childhood care and development (ECCD) services, both public and
privately managed, and may be center, home, or community-based.
-ECCD Program refers to the various services of health, Rating:
nutrition, early education, child protection, social services Accomplishment (%) Point
development and human development that may be 95-100% 5.00
conducted as center-based programs or home-based 90-94% 4.00
programs by various ECCD Service Providers. 85-89% 3.00
80-84% 2.00
Formula: Percentage Coverage =𝑎/𝑏 𝑥 100 below 80% 1.00

Where: MOV: Enrolment/Registration List from the

𝑎 = Number of children aged 3-4 years old enrolled in an LSWDO / ECCD Focal Person
ECCD service
𝑏 = Total number of children aged 3-4 years old
 Indicator 2.2. Presence of ECCD services in all barangays, either
private or publicly managed (center, home, community, or other
modalities)
Sub-Indicator 2.2.1. Percentage of barangays with at Rating:
least one (1) ECCD service. Accomplishment (%) Point
100% 5.00
Formula: Percentage Coverage =𝑎/𝑏 𝑥 100 95-99.99% 4.00
90-94.99% 3.00
Where: 85-89.99% 2.00
𝑎 = Number of barangays with at least one (1) ECCD below 85% 1.00
service b = Total number of barangays
MOV: Data from the LSWDO / ECCD Focal
Person

Condition: Presence of multiple centers in a

barangay is counted as one (1)
 Indicator 2.2. Presence of ECCD services in all barangays, either
private or publicly managed (center, home, community, or other
modalities)
Sub-Indicator 2.2.2 Percentage of accredited or recognized center-based ECCD services
-Government authority requires all CDCs/LCs to register and undergo an evaluation process for the
issuance of permit and recognition to ensure that quality care and early education programs to young
children, ages 0 to 4 years old are provided and maintained as stated in these standards.

Formula: Percentage Coverage =𝑎1+ 𝑎2/ 𝑏1+ 𝑏2 𝑥 100

Where:
𝑎1 = Number of accredited / recognized public center-based ECCD service
𝑎2 = Number of accredited / recognized private center-based ECCD service
b1 = Total number of public center-based ECCD service
b2 = Total number of private center-based ECCD service
Indicator 2.2. Presence of ECCD services in all barangays, either
private or publicly managed (center, home, community, or other
modalities)
Rating:
Accomplishment (%) Point
100% 3.00
90-99.99% 2.50
80-89.99% 2.00
70-79.99% 1.50
60-69.99% 1.00
50-59.99% 0.50
below 50% 0.00

MOV: Certificate of Accreditation or

Recognition from the LSWDO
Scenario: In cases wherein the LGU reports that the lack of recognized / accredited
CDCs/LCs is due to the lack of evaluators, the IMTF can look into the following MOVs:

• Result of the internal assessment conducted by the LSWDOO/ECCD Focal Person and
the CDT/W or Administrator/Principal/Director of the public or private CDC/LC,
respectively;
• Proof of request for the external assessment and reason for the delay in the site visit.
 Indicator 2.3. Percentage of out-of-school children and youth (OSCY)
assisted for enrolment/ re-enrolment to school, ALS, or other flexible
learning options
Sub-Indicator 2.3.1. Percentage of children who have Rating:
dropped out from school that were reintegrated in the Accomplishment (%) Point
academic year being audited 90-100% 2.50
-Simple Dropout Rate calculates the percentage of 80-89.99% 2.00
pupils/students who do not finish a particular grade/year level. 70-79.99% 1.50
It does not capture pupils/students who finish a grade/year 60-69.99% 1.00
level but do not enroll in the next grade/year level the 50-59.99% 0.50
following school year. below 50% 0.00

Formula: Percentage Coverage =𝑎/ 𝑏 𝑥 100
Where:
𝑎 = Total number of school dropouts reintegrated
b = Total number of school dropouts aged 5-17 years old
MOV: Simple Drop-out Rate from the
primary and secondary schools and/or as
reported in the Local School Board
Meeting/s
 Indicator 2.3. Percentage of out-of-school children and youth (OSCY)
assisted for enrolment/ re-enrolment to school, ALS, or other flexible
learning options
Sub-Indicator 2.3.2. Percentage of OSCY registered/enrolled Rating:
to schools, ALS, or other flexible learning options Accomplishment (%) Point
-For purposes of this audit, OCSY shall refer to persons aged 5 90-100% 2.50
to 17 years old who are not attending school both formal and 80-89.99% 2.00
non-formal. 70-79.99% 1.50
60-69.99% 1.00
Formula: Percentage Coverage =𝑎/ 𝑏 𝑥 100 50-59.99% 0.50
below 50% 0.00
Where:
𝑎 = Total number of OSCY assisted for registration/enrollment MOV: Data from the Local Social Welfare
b = Total number of OSCY aged 5-17 years old and Development Office (LSWDO
 Indicators - Protection
Text here 2014-2018 Indicators
 Absence of child labor or reduction in child labor cases
 Percentage reduction in the number of children victims of violence,
abuse, neglect and exploitation
 Indicators - Protection

2019 Indicators
INDICATOR Score
Protection 15
3.1 Management of reported cases of children in need of special
protection (CNSP)
3.1.1 Percentage coverage of Case Management 5.0
3.1.2 Case Management Report preparation 7.0
3.1.3 Established referral network 3.0
 Indicator 3.1. Management of reported cases of children in need
of special protection.
Rating:
Sub-Indicator 3.1.1. Percentage
Accomplishment (%) Point
Coverage of Case Management
100% 5.00
90-99.99% 4.00
Formula: Percentage Coverage =𝑎/ 𝑏 𝑥
80-89.99% 3.00
100
70-79.99% 2.00
60-69.99% 1.00
Where:
below 60% 0.00
𝑎 = Total number of Cases Managed
b = Total number of reported cases of
MOV: Case Management Report from the LSWDO. However,
CNSP
noting the confidentiality of said Reports, an alternative MOV is a
Summary Report certified by the LSWDO that lists the number and
type of reported cases and the actions taken for each.
Scenario: In case the LGU has no reported CNSP case, the IMTF should ask for the
following:

• VAWC Desk Officer Certification on the lack of reported cases; and

• LSWDO Certification on the lack of reported cases and the list of initiatives
implemented by the LGU that has contributed to this status
• Certification from the DOLE Provincial Office on the absence of child labor cases.
 Indicator 3.1. Management of reported cases of children in need
of special protection.
Rating:
Sub-Indicator 3.1.2. Case Management
Prepared and Signed by Point
Report Preparation
Trained Registered Social Worker 7.00
Registered Social Worker 4.00
-The Local Social Welfare and
Trained Public Social Development Worker 2.00
Development Officer serves as the case
manager who coordinates the provision
of needed services in collaboration
MOV: License of the Registered Social Worker (check expiration
with other local offices
date), Certificate on Case Management Training and/or Gender-
Responsive Case Management
 Indicator 3.1. Management of reported cases of children in need
of special protection.
Sub-Indicator 3.1.3. Established referral network
Rating: 3.00, all or nothing
-Having a referral network ensures that the person receiving
the report have clear guidance and training on when and MOV: Available flow chart with
how to refer the issue to whichever agency is responsible for accompanying referral procedures
coordinating the response. Intersectoral referrals may be (refer to Annex 4 for sample flow
made by trained professionals and administrators when chart) and Directory of
children are found to be in need of protection (immediate or agencies/organizations for referral of
longer term) and specialized support services. Professionals interventions/services.
working within the child protection system need to be
trained in inter-agency cooperation and protocols for
collaboration.
 Indicators - Participation
Text here 2014-2018 Indicators
 (sub-indicator in mainstreaming children’s rights in the LGU development agenda)
 Indicators - Participation
2019 Indicators
INDICATOR Score
Participation 15
4.1 Child representation in the Local Council for the Protection of Children
4.1.1 Child Representative in the City/Municipality LCPC 1.0
4.1.2 Child Representative Selection Process at the City/Municipal LCPC 4.0
4.1.3 Child Representative in the Barangay LCPC 3.0
4.2 Development of policy and programs, projects, and activity (PPAs) with children’s 7.0
participation in the planning, implementation or monitoring phase
Indicator 4.1. Child representation in the Local Council for the
Protection of Children
Sub-Indicator 4.1.1. Child Representative in the City/Municipal LCPC

Rating: 1.00, all or nothing

MOV: Executive Order on the [Re]Organization of the LCPC from

the Office of the Mayor and/or a Legislative Issuance from the
Sangguniang Bayan/ Panlungsod citing the name of the child
representative
 Indicator 4.1. Child representation in the Local Council for the
Protection of Children
Sub-Indicator 4.1.2. Child Representative Selection Process Based on
the Guidebook on Child Participation
-all BCPC Child Representatives will convene in a City/Municipal level
Rating:
assembly to select their representative to the City/Municipal LCPC. The
Selection Process Point
selected child will sit as official representative of the children sector. The
Children’s General Assembly 4.00
criteria for selecting a child representative is as follows:
Appointed/Designated 2.00
• Must be between 10-15 years old;
• Must be an active participant of the community;
MOV: Documentation of the
• Must be an active member of an accredited/recognized organization in
Children’s General Assembly from the
the barangay, school, or faith-based group;
LSWDO or concerned local office
• Must be able to articulate children’s issues and concerns;
• Must have at least a residency of one (1) year in the barangay;
• Must have good leadership skills; and
• Must have balanced views on gender, religion and ethnicity, and
disabilities
 Indicator 4.1. Child representation in the Local Council for the
Protection of Children
Rating:
Sub-Indicator 4.1.3. Child
Accomplishment (%) Point
Representative in the Barangay LCPC
90-100% 3.00
80-89.99% 2.00
Formula: Percentage Coverage =𝑎/ 𝑏 𝑥
70-79.99% 1.00
100
below 70% 0.00
Where:
MOV: Executive Order on the [Re]Organization of the BCPC citing
𝑎 = Total number of Barangay LCPCs
the name of the child representative as consolidated by the Office
with a Child Representative b = Total
of the Sangguniang Bayan/Panlungsod and/or the Local
number of Barangays
Government Operations Officer
 Indicator 4.2. Development of policy and programs, projects,
and activities (PPA) with children's participation in the planning,
implementation or monitoring phase
Rating (in terms of quality)
-Core programs where children can Accomplishment Point
participate in include crafting the Sectoral or Child-led Advocacy 4.00
Planning 3.00
Local Development Plan for Children (LDPC) Monitoring 2.00
and celebrating the National Children’s
Month (NCM). Rating (in terms of quantity)
Accomplishment Point
5 or more PPAs 3.00
3-4 PPAs 2.00
At least 2 PPAs 1.00

MOV: Documentation Report of the activities highlighting the role played by

the children from the organizer or concerned local office (refer to Annex for
different ways of child participation)
 Indicators - Governance
2014-2018 Indicators
Text
Safety
heremeasures for children in the community and schools.
 An ordinance establishing Barangay Violence Against Women and their Children (VAW/C)
Desks
 Extent of mainstreaming of children’s rights to survival, development, protection and
participation in the core development agenda of LGUs
o Availability of the AIP, LSCR, LCC
o Budget allocation and utilization
o LCPC Functionality
o Child representation in BCPCs
 Indicators - Governance
2019 Indicators
INDICATOR Score
Governance 40
5.1 Database on children
5.1.1 Established and updated database on children 5.0
5.1.2 Annual Local State of Children Report 2.0
5.2 Available and implemented local plans for children 6.0
5.3 Updated Local Code for Children contextualizing/adopting recently 5.0
issued national laws on children
 Indicators - Governance

2019 Indicators
INDICATOR Score
Governance 40
5.4 Budget allocated and utilized for children’s programs
5.4.1 Local Investment Program for Children 2.0
5.4.2 Budget allocation for children’s PPAs 4.0
5.4.3 Utilization of budget for children’s PPAs 4.0
5.5 Functional LCPCs
5.5.1 Functional City/Municipal LCPC 3.0
5.5.2 Functional Barangay LCPCs 5.0
5.6 Child-Friendly Facilities in all Barangays 4.0
 Indicator 5.1. Database on children
Sub-indicator 5.1.1. Established and updated
Rating: 5.00 points, all or nothing
database on children
MOV: Local State of Children Report or Summary
-The database should have the all of the following
Report with the aforementioned
disaggregated information to get full points: age,
details/information
sex, ethnicity, children with disability (CWD), OSCY.

Sub-Indicator 5.1.2. Annual Local State of Children Rating: 2.00 points, all or nothing
Report
MOV: Local State of Children Report as well as
-The Annual Local State of Children’s Report renders Documentation Report of the NCM
an accounting of the accomplishments of the past
year
Indicator 5.3. Updated Local Code for Children (LCC) contextualizing /
adopting recently issued national laws on children
-The Local Code for Children operationalizes and localizes national laws on
children as well as the provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Rating:
Rights of the Child (UNCRC). It provides for implementing and monitoring Accomplishment Point
mechanisms and sanctions for violations of child rights. Moreover, the LGU
LCC + 4 and above ordinances 5.00
is mandated to adopt national laws for children’s welfare. Some of the
legislations for adoption are as follows (refer to Annex for the list of
LCC + 3 ordinances 4.00
childfocused and child-related legislations): LCC + 2 ordinances 3.00
• Special Protection of Children in Situations of Armed Conflict Act (RA LCC + 1 ordinance only 2.00
11188) Ordinance only 1.00
• Kalusugan at Nutrisyon ng Magnanay Act (RA 11148)
• Masustansyang Pagkain para sa Batang Pilipino (RA 11037) MOV: Copy of the Ordinance/local
• National Mental Health Policy (RA 11036) issuance
• Children’s Emergency Relief and Protection Act (RA 10821)
• Children’s Safety on Motorcycles Act of 2015 (RA 10666)
• Early Years Act (EYA) of 2013 (RA 10410)
• Special Protection of Children Against Child Abuse, Exploitation and
Discrimination Act (RA 9231)
 Indicator 5.4. Budget allocation and utilization for children’s PPAs

Sub-Indicator 5.4.1. Approved Local Investment Rating: 2.00 points

Program for Children (LIPC) or an Annual Work and
Financial Plan for Children. MOV: Signed copy of the LIPC with supporting
-The LIPC is a planning tool used in implementing Resolution
the LDPC. It is a multi-layer listing of programs and
projects with cost estimates and sources of funds
for children’s PPAs.
 Indicator 5.4. Budget allocation and utilization for children’s PPAs
Sub-Indicator 5.4.2. Budget Allocation for Children’s Rating:
PPAs Accomplishment Point
10% and above 4.00
Formula: Allocation Rate =𝑎/ 𝑏 𝑥 100 7-9.99% 3.00
4-6.99% 2.00
Where: 1-3.99% 1.00
𝑎 = Total amount allocated for children’s PPAs by the Below 1% 0.00
LGU
b = Total LGU budget (includes the IRA and local
MOV: Annual Work and Financial Plan for Children
revenues from real property tax, business fees and
charges, and other income generating projects of the signed by the Local Chief Executive and Secretariat
LGU) and/or Annual Investment Program for Children signed
by the LCE and Budget Officer supported by a
Resolution from the Local Development Council
appropriating funds for the AIP.
 Indicator 5.4. Budget allocation and utilization for children’s PPAs
Sub-Indicator 5.4.3. Budget utilization of children’s Rating:
PPAs Accomplishment Point
100% 4.00
Formula: Allocation Rate =𝑎/ 𝑏 𝑥 100 90-99.99% 3.00
80-89.99% 2.00
Where: 70-79.99% 1.00
𝑎 = Total amount utilized for children’s PPAs Below 70% 0.00
b = Total amount allocated for children’s PPAs by the
LGU
MOV: Liquidation Report/s signed by the
City/Municipal Accountant from the Accounting Office
 Indicator 5.5. Functional LCPCs
Sub-Indicator 5.5.1. Functional City/Municipal LCPC

Rating:
Functionality Level Point
Ideal 3.00
Mature 2.00
Progressive, Basic 0.00

MOV: LCPC Functionality Assessment Report from the

City/Municipal Local Government Operations Officer
 Indicator 5.5. Functional LCPCs

Sub-Indicator 5.5.2. Functional BCPCs MOV: LCPC Functionality Assessment Report

from the City
Formula: BCPC Functionality =(𝑎1 𝑥 𝑐1/ 𝑏) + (𝑎2 𝑥 𝑐2/ 𝑏)
Note: Only BCPCs with ideal and mature
Where: functionality levels are being considered which
α1 = Total number of barangays with ideal functionality may lead to some difference against the total
α2 = Total number of barangays with mature functionality number of barangays. In the given example, the
b = Total number of barangays total number of barangays are 98 but the
c1 = 5.00, rating of barangay with ideal functionality reported ideal and mature BCPCs only sum up
c2 = 3.00, rating of barangay with mature functionality to 85. Meaning, other BCPCs have either a
progressive or basic functionality level.
 Indicator 5.6. Child-friendly facilities in all barangays

The Barangay Information and Reading

Center should be (i) located in a Rating:
designated area that is accessible to Accomplishment Point
residents especially children, (ii) has a All barangays have a designated play / recreational area 2.0
barangay reading center-incharge; (iii) All barangays have a Library / Reading Center 2.0
well-lighted and well-ventilated, (iv)
availability of updated reading materials, MOV: Monitoring Report on Barangay Facilities and Workers
reference books; and (v) has the following from the City/Municipal Local Government Operations Officer
minimum fixtures: reading table, chairs,
bookshelves. Meanwhile, the playground
or designated recreational area should be
located in a safe, well-lighted, well-
maintained and accessible area
 Minimum
Category Full Score
Requirement (80%)

Survival 15.00 12.00

Development 15.00 12.00

Passing Rate Protection 15.00 12.00

Participation 15.00 12.00

Governance 40.00 32.00