5 CFLGA Assessment Criteria

Orientation on the
Revised Child-Friendly Local Governance Audit

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA
Indicator - Survival
Indicators for 2022
Text here
 Percentage coverage of Fully Immunized Children (FIC) aged 12 months old
 Prevalence of malnutrition among children 0-59 months
 Percentage coverage of pregnant adolescents provided with pre-natal and
postpartum services
1.1 Percentage coverage of Fully Immunized Children (FIC) aged 12 months old
Formula: Percentage Coverage =
Where:
a = Number of Fully Immunized Children aged 12 months
b = Total number of children aged 12 months
Rating:
Accomplishment (%) Point
95-100% 5.00
90-94% 4.00
85-89% 3.00
80-84% 2.00
below 80% 1.00
1.1 Percentage coverage of Fully Immunized Children (FIC) aged 12 months old
MOV: Data from the Field Health Service Information System (FHSIS)
report of the local health unit
Scenario:
LGU reports lack of supplies for immunization owing to
logistical concerns of the health system. IMTF may give
consideration provided the LGU can show proof of received
request for the supplies (vaccines) needed dated a quarter prior
to the audit.
1.2 Prevalence of malnutrition among children 0-59 months
Formula: OPT Plus Coverage =
Where:
a = Actual number of 0-59 months measured
b = Total number of children aged 0-59 months
Rating:
Target Accomplishment (%) Point

OPT Plus Coverage 80-110% 1.00
Less than 80% 0.00
MOV: Accomplished OPT Plus Form 2A: City/Municipal Summary
Report of the local health/nutrition office
Condition: The OPT Plus Coverage should be at least 80% to get succeeding
points for the nutritional status based on standards set by the
NNC.
Formula: Prevalence =
Where:
a1 = Actual number of stunted/wasted/overweight 0-59 months
a2 = Actual number of severely stunted/severely wasted/obese
0-59 months
b = Total number of children aged 0-59 months
Rating:
Indices Cut-off Point
Stunting If prevalence is less than 14.39% 2.00
Wasting If prevalence is less than 4.40% 1.50
Overweight If prevalence is less than 3.50% 0.50
MOV: Accomplished OPT Plus Form 2A: City/Municipal Summary
Report of the local health/nutrition office
1.3 Percentage coverage of pregnant adolescents provided with pre-natal and
postpartum services
For this indicator, data will use the DOH bracket of 10-14 and 15-19 years
old.
1.3.1 Percentage coverage of pregnant adolescents provided with pre-natal

services
There should be at least four (4) prenatal visits as follows:
• 1st trimester = at least 1 check-up
• 2nd trimester = at least 1 check-up
• 3rd trimester = at least 2 check-ups
Formula: Coverage (prenatal) =
Where:
a1 = Number of pregnant adolescents aged 10-14 yo w/ at least 4 prenatal check-ups
a2 = Number of pregnant adolescents aged 15-19 yo w/ at least 4 prenatal check-ups
b1 = Total number of pregnant adolescents aged 10-14 yo
1.3.1 Percentage coverage of pregnant adolescents provided with pre-natal services
Rating:
80-100% 3.00
70-79.99% 2.00
60-69.99% 1.00
Below 60% 0.00
MOV: Data from the National Safe Motherhood Program – Pregnancy

Tracking from the local health unit
1.3.2 Percentage coverage of pregnant adolescents provided with postpartum services
Postpartum check-ups refer to check-ups provided by the midwife / nurse /
C/MHO to the mother together with their newborn within 1 week after
delivery.
• 1st postnatal check-up – before discharge of mother and child
• 2nd postnatal check-up – within seven (7) days after delivery/discharge.
1.3.2 Percentage coverage of pregnant adolescents provided with postpartum services
Formula: Coverage (postpartum) =
Where:
a1 = Number of pregnant adolescents aged 10-14 yo together w/ their newborn
who completed at least 2 postpartum check-ups
a2 = Number of pregnant adolescents aged 15-19 yo together w/ their newborn
who completed at least 2 postpartum check-ups
1.3.2 Percentage coverage of pregnant adolescents provided with postpartum
Rating: services
80-100% 2.00
70-79.99% 1.00
Below 70% 0.00
MOV: Data from the National Safe Motherhood Program – Pregnancy

Tracking from the local health unit
Indicator - Development
Indicators for 2022
Text here coverage of children aged 3-4 years old provided with early
 Percentage
childhood care and development (ECCD) services
 Presence of ECCD services in all barangays, either private or publicly-
managed, in any modality
o Percentage of barangays with at least one (1) ECCD service
o Percentage of accredited or recognized center-based ECCD services
 Percentage of out-of-school children and youth assisted for [re]enrolment to
school or other flexible learning options
2.1 Percentage coverage of children aged 3-4 years old provided with early
ECCD Program refers to the various services of health, nutrition, early education, child
protection, social services development and human development that may be conducted as
center-based programs or home-based programs by various ECCD Service Providers.
• Center-based programs – child development service, community or church-based early

childhood education programs initiated by NGOs or people’s organizations, workplace-
related child care and education programs, child-minding centers and stations.
• Home-based programs – neighborhood-based play groups, family child care programs,
parent education and home visiting programs.
Where:
a = Number of children aged 3-4 yo enrolled in an ECCD service
b = Total number of children aged 3-4 yo
Rating: Accomplishment (%) Point
100% 5.00
95-99.99% 4.00
90-94.99% 3.00
85-89.99% 2.00
80-84.99% 1.00
Below 80% 0.00
MOV: Enrolment/Registration List from the LSWDO/ECCD Focal Person
2.2 Presence of ECCD services in all barangays, either private or publicly-
managed, in any of the following modality - center/facility, home, community,
or other modalities
Child Development Center/Learning Center (CDC/LC) is an early
learning center, public or private, that offers early education
and/or child care program for the 0 to 4 years old children who are
taught by a Child Development Teacher/Worker (CDT/CDW).
2.2.1 Percentage of barangays with at least one (1) ECCD service.
Where:
a = Number of barangays with at least (1) ECCD service
b = Total number of barangays
Rating:
100% 2.00
95-99.99% 1.50
90-94.99% 1.00
85-89.99% 0.50
Below 85% 0.00
2.2.1 Percentage of barangays with at least one (1) ECCD service.
MOV: Data from the LSWDO / ECCD Focal Person
Condition: Presence of multiple centers in a barangay is counted as one (1)

2.2.2 Percentage of accredited or recognized center-based ECCD services
Government authority requires all CDCs/LCs to register and
undergo an evaluation process for the issuance of permit and
recognition to ensure that quality care and early education
programs to young children, ages 0 to 4 years old are provided and
maintained as stated in these standards.
Formula: Percentage =
Where:
a1 = Number of accredited/recognized public center-based ECCD service
a2 = Number of accredited/recognized private center-based ECCD service
b1 = Total number of public center-based ECCD service
b2 = Total number of private center-based ECCD service
Rating:
100% 3.00
90-99.99% 2.50
80-89.99% 2.00
70-79.99% 1.50
60-69.99% 1.00
50-59.99% 0.50
Below 50% 0.00
MOV: ECCD-issued Certificate of Accreditation or Recognition
2.3 Percentage of out-of-school children and youth (OSCY) assisted for
enrolment/ re-enrolment to school, ALS, or other flexible learning options
Out-of-school children and youth are considered more at-risk to abuse, neglect and
exploitation, thus, requiring special attention.
Flexible learning options, currently called alternative delivery mode (ADM), include Open
High School Program (OHSP), Instructional Management by Parents, Community and Teachers
(IMPACT), modified in-school/off-school approach (MISOSA), rural farm schools, and the like.
Alternative learning system (ALS) is another mode of learning to cater to OSCY who cannot
afford to pay tuition fees in regular schools.
2.3.1 Percentage of children who have dropped out from school that were
reintegrated in the academic year being audited
Simple Dropout Rate calculates the percentage of pupils/students

who do not finish a particular grade/year level. It does not capture
pupils/students who finish a grade/year level but do not enroll in
the next grade/year level the following school year.

Where:
a = Total number of school dropouts reintegrated
b = Total number of school dropouts aged 5-17 yo
90-100% 2.50
80-89.99% 2.00
70-79.99% 1.50
60-69.99% 1.00
50-59.99% 0.50
Below 50% 0.00
MOV: Simple Drop-out Rate from the primary and secondary schools
and/or as reported in the LSB Meetings
2.3.2 Percentage of OSCY registered/enrolled to schools, ALS, or other flexible
learning options
For purposes of this audit, OCSY shall refer to persons aged 5 to 17
years old who are not attending school both formal and non-
formal.
learning options
Where:
a = Total number of OSCY assisted for registration/enrollment
b = Total number of OSCY aged 5-17 yo
learning options
90-100% 2.50
80-89.99% 2.00
70-79.99% 1.50
60-69.99% 1.00
50-59.99% 0.50
Below 50% 0.00
MOV: Data from the LSWDO and/or LYDO

Indicator - Protection
Text here Indicators for 2022
 Management of reported cases of children in need of special protection
(CNSP)
o Case Management Coverage
o Case management preparation
o Established referral network

3.1 Management of reported cases of children in need of special protection.
• a procedure to plan, seek, and monitor services from different social agencies
and staff on behalf of a client.
• A case file containing all information and notes [on the case] shall be kept by
the LSWDO and the WCPD which must be treated with utmost confidentiality.
• Detailed documentation related to such cases shall only be shared with the
authorities and concerned agencies following strict and confidentiality
protocols.
3.1 Management of reported cases of children in need of special protection.
The LGU shall ensure provision of appropriate, immediate and long-term interventions,
including but not limited to the following:
• Medical assistance; • Educational assistance;

• Counseling; • Family tracing and reunification services;
• Psychosocial services; • Livelihood and skills training;
• Protective custody; • Employment facilitation; and
• Emergency or temporary shelter; • Free legal assistance.
• Residential care and other alternative
parental care;
3.1.1 Percentage Coverage of Case Management
Where:
a = Total number of Cases Managed
b = Total number of reported cases of CNSP

100% 5.00
90-99.99% 4.00
80-89.99% 3.00
70-79.99% 2.00
60-69.99% 1.00
Below 60% 0.00
learning options
MOV: Case Management Report from the LSWDO. However, noting the
confidentiality of said Reports, an alternative MOV is a Summary
Report certified by the LSWDO that lists the number and type of
reported cases and the actions taken for each.
Scenario: In case the LGU has no reported CNSP case, the IMTF should ask
for the following:
• VAWC Desk Officer Certification on the lack of reported cases; and
• LSWDO Certification on the lack of reported cases and the list of
initiatives implemented by the LGU that has contributed to this status
• Certification from the DOLE Provincial Office on the absence of child
labor cases.
3.1.2 Case Management Report Preparation
The Local Social Welfare and Development Officer serves as the case
manager who coordinates the provision of needed services in collaboration
with other local offices.
Rating: Prepared and Signed by Point
Registered Social Worker 7.00
Trained Social Worker 4.00
Trained staff (not a SW) 2.00
MOV: License of the Registered Social Worker (check expiration date),
Certificate on Case Management Training and/or Gender-
Responsive Case Management
3.1.3 Established referral network
Having a referral network ensures that the person receiving the report have
clear guidance and training on when and how to refer the issue to whichever
agency is responsible for coordinating the response. Intersectoral referrals may
be made by trained professionals and administrators when children are found
to be in need of protection (immediate or longer term) and specialized support
services. Professionals working within the child protection system need to be
trained in inter-agency cooperation and protocols for collaboration.
Rating: 3.00, all or nothing
MOV: Available flow chart with accompanying referral procedures and
Directory of agencies/ organizations for referral of interventions/
services.
Indicator - Participation
Indicators for 2022
Text representation
 Child here in the Local Council for the Protection of Children
o Child Representative in the City/Municipality CPC
o Child Representative Selection Process at the City/Municipal level
o Child Representative in the BCPC
 Development of policy and programs, projects, and activity (PPAs) with
children's participation in the planning, implementation or monitoring phase
4.1 Child representation in the Local Council for the Protection of Children.
Child Participation
• children taking part in a process or playing a role in a process at
their level, according to their evolving capacities, thinking for
themselves, expressing their views effectively, and interacting in
a positive way with other people.
• involving children in decision-making on matters that affect their
lives, the lives of the community, and the larger society in which
they live.
4.1.1 Child Representative in the City/Municipal LCPC
Rating: 1.00, all or nothing
MOV: Executive Order on the [Re]Organization of the LCPC from the

Office of the Mayor and/or a Legislative Issuance from the
Sangguniang Bayan/ Panlungsod citing the name of the child
representative
4.1.2 Child Representative Selection Process
The criteria for selecting a child representative is as follows:
• Must be between 10-15 years old;
• Must be an active participant of the community;
• Must be an active member of an accredited/recognized organization in the
barangay, school, or faith-based group;
• Must be able to articulate children’s issues and concerns;
• Must have at least a residency of one (1) year in the barangay;
• Must have good leadership skills; and
• Must have balanced views on gender, religion and ethnicity, and disabilities
4.1.2 Child Representative Selection Process
Rating:
Selection Process Point
Thru Children’s General Assembly 4.00
Appointed/Designated 2.00
MOV: Documentation of the Children’s General Assembly from the

LSWDO or concerned local office
4.1.3 Child Representative in the Barangay LCPC
Where:
a = Total number of Barangay LCPCs with a Child Representative
b = Total number of Barangays

90-100% 3.00
80-89.99% 2.00
70-79.99% 1.00
Below 70% 0.00
4.1.3 Child Representative in the Barangay LCPC
MOV: Executive Order on the [Re]Organization of the BCPC citing the
name of the child representative as consolidated by the Office of
the Sangguniang Bayan/Panlungsod and/or the Local Government
Operations Officer
4.2. Development of policy and programs, projects, and activities (PPA) with
Core programs where children can participate in include crafting the Sectoral
or Local Development Plan for Children (LDPC) and celebrating the National
Children’s Month (NCM).
Rating:
In terms of quality, In terms of quantity,
Accomplishment Point Accomplishment Point
Child-led Advocacy 4.00 5 or more PPAs 3.00
Planning 3.00 3-4 PPAs 2.00
Monitoring 2.00 At least 2 PPAs 1.00
Attendance 1.00
MOV: Documentation Report of the activities highlighting the role played

by the children from the organizer or concerned local office (refer
to Annex for different ways of child participation)
Indicator - Governance
Indicators for 2022
 Text here and updated database on children
Established
 Available and implemented local plans for children
 Updated Local Code for Children contextualizing recent laws on children
 Budget allocation and utilization
 Functional LCPCs
 Child-Friendly Facilities in all Barangays
5.1 Database on children
5.1.1. Established and updated database on children
The database should have the all of the following disaggregated information
to get full points: age, sex, ethnicity, children with disability (CWD), OSCY.
Rating: 5.00 points, all or nothing
MOV: Local State of Children Report or Summary Report with the

aforementioned details/information
5.1.2 Annual Local State of Children Report
The Annual Local State of Children’s Report renders an accounting of the
accomplishments of the past year, the implementation of the
programs/projects for children as well as the Local Code for Children, the
present status of children in the locality and the priorities of the local chief
executive for the succeeding year. The Report should have been delivered
during the NCM to get full points.
Rating: 2.00 points, all or nothing
MOV: Local State of Children Report as well as Documentation Report of

the NCM
5.2 Available and implemented Local Plans
• Local Development Plan for Children (LDPC) integrated in the
Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP) or a Local Action Plan for
Children.
• Comprehensive Local Juvenile Intervention Program (CLJIP)
• Integration of the Comprehensive Emergency Program for Children (CEPC)

in the Local Disaster Risk Reduction and Management (LDRRM) Plan and
budget.
5.2 Available and implemented Local Plans
Rating: 2.00 points for each plan (maximum of 6.00 points for this
indicator)
MOV: Signed copy of the abovementioned Plans

5.3 Updated Local Code for Children (LCC) contextualizing / adopting recently
issued national laws on children
The Local Code for Children operationalizes and localizes national laws
on children as well as the provisions of the United Nations Convention
on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). It provides for implementing and
monitoring mechanisms and sanctions for violations of child rights.
Moreover, the LGU is mandated to adopt national laws for children’s
welfare.
Some of the legislations for adoption are as follows:
• Special Protection of Children in Situations of Armed Conflict Act (RA 11188)
• Kalusugan at Nutrisyon ng Magnanay Act (RA 11148)41
• Masustansyang Pagkain para sa Batang Pilipino (RA 11037)42
• National Mental Health Policy (RA 11036)43
• Children’s Emergency Relief and Protection Act (RA 10821)
• Children’s Safety on Motorcycles Act of 2015 (RA 10666) 44
• Early Years Act (EYA) of 2013 (RA 10410)
• Special Protection of Children Against Child Abuse, Exploitation and Discrimination
Act (RA 9231)
LCC + 4 and above ordinances 5.00
LCC + 3 ordinances 4.00
Ordinance only 1.00
MOV: Copy of the Ordinance/local issuance

Scenario: LGUs that practice the codification of laws shall identify and present the
specific section/s and provision/s that have been integrated in the
[Omnibus] Local Code for Children.
Note: Commonly identified issuances that have been credited in the past audit will
no longer be considered. This includes, but not limited to, the following:
curfew for minors; prohibition/regulation of sale of alcoholic beverages,
substances, cigarettes and firecrackers to minors; regulation of seating
capacities of public utility vehicles (PUVs), computer/internet shops as well
as billiards/gaming centers; establishment of VAWC desks; and the like.
5.4 Budget allocation and utilization for children’s PPAs
The Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act states that one (1) percent of the Internal
Revenue Allotment (IRA) of barangays, municipalities, and cities shall be
allocated for the strengthening and implementation of the programs of the LCPC.
5.4.1. Approved Local Investment Program for Children (LIPC) or an Annual
Work and Financial Plan for Children.
The LIPC is a planning tool used in implementing the LDPC. It is a multi-layer
listing of programs and projects with cost estimates and sources of funds for
children’s PPAs.
Rating: 2.00 points
MOV: Signed copy of the LIPC with supporting Resolution

For audit purposes, only programs and projects included in the Annual
Investment Plan or the Annual Work and Financial Plan that are directly
benefitting children and funded solely by the LGU will be considered.
The following is a menu of PPAs that may be included in computing for the
budget allocated for children:
• On health and nutrition,
• Supplemental feeding
• Immunization
• Micronutrient supplementation which includes Vitamin A, etc.
• HIV/AIDS prevention and promotion of responsible sexual and
reproductive health among adolescents
• Maternal, newborn, and child health and nutrition (MNCHN) initiatives
especially for adolescents
• On education,
• Scholarship programs
• Provision of learning materials in schools and other learning centers
• LGU-funded educational and sports activities
• On child protection,
• Advocacy initiatives
• Universal birth registration
• Intervention and diversion programs for children-in-conflict with the law
• Promoting responsible parenting through seminars / education, e.g.
counselling, Parent Effectiveness Seminar (PES), Family Development
Session (FDS), ERPAT
• Disability-awareness and sensitivity seminars for parents with children
with disabilities (CWDs)
• On participation,
• Support to the conduct of children’s assemblies and leadership trainings
• In terms of human resource,

• Continuous professional development or capacity building of service
providers for children
• Provision of salaries and honorarium for service providers for children, i.e.
LGU paid non-teaching personnel, child development workers, health
workers and social workers
• In terms of facilities,
• Establishment / improvement of child development centers, school
buildings and premises
• Establishment / improvement of health centers and nutrition posts
• Establishment / improvement of access to water, sanitation and hygiene
(WASH) facilities
• Construction / maintenance of community infrastructures, i.e. children’s
playground and library and youth centers
• For the operation and strengthening of the LCPC,
• Conduct of regular and special meetings
• Preparation of plans and policies foremost of which are the LDPC, LIPC,
AWFPC, LCC, and LSCR
• Establishment, maintenance and updating of a database on children which
can generate children’s profile
• Enforcement and monitoring of national and local laws on children
5.4.2 Budget Allocation for Children’s PPAs
Formula: Allocation Rate =

Where:
a = Total amount allocated for children’s PPAs by the LGU
b = Total LGU Budget (includes the IRA and local revenues from RPT,
business fees and charges, and other income generating projects of
the LGU)
5.4.2 Budget Allocation for Children’s PPAs
10% and above 4.00
7-9.99% 3.00
4-6.99% 2.00
1-3.99% 1.00
Below 1% 0.00
MOV: Annual Work and Financial Plan for Children signed by the Local Chief
Executive and Secretariat and/or Annual Investment Program for
Children signed by the LCE and Budget Officer supported by a
Resolution from the Local Development Council appropriating funds
for the AIP.
5.4.3 Budget utilization of children’s PPAs
Formula: Utilization Rate =

Where:
a = Total amount utilized for children’s PPAs
b = Total amount allocated for children’s PPAs by the LGU
5.5 Functional LCPCs
100% 4.00
90-99.99% 3.00
80-89.99% 2.00
70-79.99% 1.00
Below 70% 0.00
MOV: Liquidation Report/s signed by the City/Municipal Accountant from the

Accounting Office
5.5 Functional LCPCs
The Local Council for the Protection of Children is an inter-agency and multi-
sectorial institutional mechanism that is in charge of planning, monitoring,
and implementing local development plans for children to ensure their
safety and protection.
5.5.1 Functional City/Municipal LCPC
Rating: Functionality Level Point
Ideal 3.00
Mature 2.00
Progressive, Basic 0.00
MOV: LCPC Functionality Assessment Report from the City/Municipal Local

Government Operations Officer
5.5.2 Functional BCPCs
Formula: BCPC functionality = (

Where:
a1 = Total number of barangays with ideal functionality
a2 = Total number of barangays with mature functionality
b = Total number of barangays
c1 = 5.00, rating of barangay with ideal functionality
c2 = 3.00, rating of barangay with mature functionality
MOV: LCPC Functionality Assessment Report from the City/Municipal

Local Government Operations Officer
5.5.2 Functional BCPCs
Note: Only BCPCs with ideal and mature functionality levels are being
considered which may lead to some difference against the total
number of barangays. In the given example, the total number of
barangays are 98 but the reported ideal and mature BCPCs only sum
up to 85. Meaning, other BCPCs have either a progressive or basic
functionality level.
5.6 Child-friendly facilities in all barangays
The Barangay Information and Reading Center should be (i) located in a

designated area that is accessible to residents especially children, (ii) has a
barangay reading center-in-charge; (iii) well-lighted and well-ventilated, (iv)
availability of updated reading materials, reference books; and (v) has the
following minimum fixtures: reading table, chairs, bookshelves. Meanwhile,
the playground or designated recreational area should be located in a safe,
well-lighted, well-maintained and accessible area.
5.6 Child-friendly facilities in all barangays
Rating:
Accomplishment Point
All barangays have a designated play/recreational area 2.00
All barangays have a Library/Reading Center 2.00
MOV: Monitoring Report on Barangay Facilities and Workers from the

City/Municipal Local Government Operations Officer
Minimum
Category Full Score
Requirement
Survival 15.00 12.00
Development 15.00 12.00
Passing Rate Protection 15.00 12.00
Participation 15.00 12.00
Governance 40.00 32.00
Total 100.00 80.00

Thank you 
Level/Office
Ways Forward
Responsible Activity Duration Schedule
DILG-NBOO
Regional Orientation 1 month July 08-26, 2019
CFLGA Core Group
Regional and City and Municipal
1 month August 2019
Provincial IMTF Level Orientation
City/Mun-IMTF
City/Mun LCPC Data gathering 15 working days Sep. 2-20, 2019
Provincial-IMTF Review and Sep. 23 to
20 working days
2019 Ways PCPC
Regional-IMTF
RC/SCWC
Validation
Review, Validation,
and Endorsement
20 working days
Oct. 18, 2019
Oct. 21 to
Nov. 15, 2019
Forward CWC Secretariat
Review and
Preparation of SCFLG 20 working days
Nov. 18 to
Dec. 13, 2019
Eligibles List
CWC TMG Endorsement 1 working day Dec. 16-20, 2019
Approval and
CWC Board Conferment of the 1 working day Dec. 16-20, 2019
SCFLG

5 CFLGA Assessment Criteria

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

5 CFLGA Assessment Criteria

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Orientation on the

Revised Child-Friendly Local Governance Audit

Target Accomplishment (%) Point

1.3.1 Percentage coverage of pregnant adolescents provided with pre-natal

MOV: Data from the National Safe Motherhood Program – Pregnancy

MOV: Data from the National Safe Motherhood Program – Pregnancy

• Center-based programs – child development service, community or church-based early

Condition: Presence of multiple centers in a barangay is counted as one (1)

Simple Dropout Rate calculates the percentage of pupils/students

Formula: Percentage Coverage =

MOV: Data from the LSWDO and/or LYDO

• Medical assistance; • Educational assistance;

Rating: Accomplishment (%) Point

MOV: Executive Order on the [Re]Organization of the LCPC from the

MOV: Documentation of the Children’s General Assembly from the

Rating: Accomplishment (%) Point

MOV: Documentation Report of the activities highlighting the role played

Rating: 5.00 points, all or nothing

MOV: Local State of Children Report or Summary Report with the

Rating: 2.00 points, all or nothing

MOV: Local State of Children Report as well as Documentation Report of

• Comprehensive Local Juvenile Intervention Program (CLJIP)

• Integration of the Comprehensive Emergency Program for Children (CEPC)

MOV: Signed copy of the abovementioned Plans

MOV: Copy of the Ordinance/local issuance

Rating: 2.00 points

MOV: Signed copy of the LIPC with supporting Resolution

• In terms of human resource,

Formula: Allocation Rate =

Formula: Utilization Rate =

MOV: Liquidation Report/s signed by the City/Municipal Accountant from the

MOV: LCPC Functionality Assessment Report from the City/Municipal Local

Formula: BCPC functionality = (

MOV: LCPC Functionality Assessment Report from the City/Municipal

The Barangay Information and Reading Center should be (i) located in a

MOV: Monitoring Report on Barangay Facilities and Workers from the

Development 15.00 12.00

Passing Rate Protection 15.00 12.00

Participation 15.00 12.00

Governance 40.00 32.00

Total 100.00 80.00

You might also like