PRNDP (2018 – 2022)

Provincial Road Network Development Plan

PROVINCE OF SULU

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

 AUTONOMOUSREGION IN MUSLIM MINDANAO
PROVINCE OF SULU
OFFICE OF THE SANGGUNIANG PANLALAWIGAN
Patikul, SULU

EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE ____ REGULAR SESSION OF THE

____ SANGGUNIANG PANLALAWIGAN OF SULU HELD AT SANGGUNIANG
PANLALAWIGAN SESSION HALL, PATIKUL, SULU.

Present:

RESOLUTION NO. ____

Series of 2018

A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LOCAL ROAD NETWORK DEVELOPMENT

PLAN 2018-2024 OF THE PROVINCE OF SULU

WHEREAS, the technical working group of this province has submitted for
consideration of the Sangguniang Panlalawigan the proposed Local Road
Network Development Plan (LRNDP) 2018-2024 of the province of SULU.

WHEREAS, Local Road Network Development Plan (LRNDP) 2018-2024 is a

program of the National Government through Department of Interior and Local
Government, Local Government and Department of Budget and Management in
order to fund the local roads development. This is a propose national program
allocated for road developments of the country.

WHEREAS, Local Government Units are required to prepare their Local Road
Network Development Plan (LRND) in order to participate in the said
program.
WHEREAS, the LRNDP which covers the period from 2018-2024 shall serve as
a development guide for more specific Local Road Network Development Plan
(LRNDP) of the province of SULU.

WHEREAS, after a careful study and evaluation on the said Local Road
Network Development Plan (LRNDP), the Sanggniang Panlalawiganhas found
the same to be advantageous and beneficial to the province.

WHEREFORE, upon joint sponsorship of all the members present, the

Sangguniang Panlalawigan of Sulu in session assembled

RESOLVED, as it hereby resolves to approve, as it hereby approves the Local

Road Network Development Plan (LRNDP) 2018-2024 of the province of
SULU

RESOLVED, FINALLY, that copies of this resolution be furnished to Honorable

Governor ________________, Province of SULU, the Department of the Interior
and Local Government and other concerned for their information and guidance.

UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.

I HEREBY CERTIFY to the correctness of the above-qouted resolution

_______________________
Secretary to SP

ATTESTED BY:

________________________
Presiding Officer/Vice Governor

CONCURRED:

ALL BOARD MEMBERS

APPROVED BY:

_______________________
Provincial Governor
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents i
Acronyms ii
List of Tables iii
List of Figures v
List of Maps vi

1. Executive Summary
2. Introduction
3. Provincial Spatial Direction and Spatial Framework

4. Situational Analysis

A Economic Drivers
B Road Investments Selection
C Road Investments Prioritization
D Provincial Road Inventory Survey

Development Issues, Problems and Service Gaps in the

5. Road
Sector
6. Objectives, and Targets for the Road Sector
7. Road Network Development Strategies
8. Investment Program, 2018-2022
9. Monitoring and Evaluation Framework

ACRONYMS

AIP Annual Investment Program

AM Assistance to Municipalities

MDIP Municipal Development Investment Program

CABZ Cacao Agri-Business Zone (

CMGP Conditional Matching Grant to Provinces for Road Repair,

Rehabilitation, and Improvement

DA Department of Agriculture
DAR Department of Agrarian Reform

DENR Department of Environment and Natural Resources,

DILG Department of Interior and Local Government

DOT Department of Tourism

DPWH Department of Public Works and Highways

DTI Department of Industry and Trade

E-VSA Expanded – Vulnerability and Sustainability Assessment

FALGU Financial Assistance to Local Government Units

LFC Local Finance Committee

LGU Local Government Unit

LRMT Local Road Management Team

LRNDP Local Road Network Development Plan

MISO Management and Information Systems Office

MT Metric Tons

MTPDIP Medium-Term Philippine Development Investment Program

MTRDIP Medium-Term Regional Development Investment Program
NAMRIA National Mapping and Resource Information Authority
NEDA National Economic Development Authority

PCA Philippine Coconut Authority,

PCIP Provincial Commodities Investment Plan

PDIP Provincial Development Investment Program

PDP Philippine Development Plan

PDPFP Provincial Development and Physical Framework Plan

PEO Provincial Engineering Office

PLGU Provincial Local Government Unit

PPDO Provincial Planning and Development Office

PRDP Philippine Rural Development Project

PSA) Philippine Statistics Authority

RDC Regional Development Council

RDP Regional Development Plan

ROLL-IT Road Leveraging and Linkages for Industry and Trade

SGFH Seal of Good Financial Housekeeping

SGLG Seal of Good Local Governance

SLRF Special Local Road Fund

TRIP Tourism Road Infrastructure Program

TWG Technical Working Group

VCA Value Chain Analysis
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Crafting of the Local Road Network Development Plan (LRNDP) for the
period 2018–2024 was first introduced during the Seminar‐Workshop on the
Updating of the Local Road Network Development Plan (LRNDP) for LGUs
Following the issuance of Department of Interior and Local Government (DILG)
Memorandum Circular (MC) No. 2017‐159, dated November 21, 2017,
provinces have been officially directed to craft the LRNDP as the successor plan
of the Provincial Road Network Development Plan (PRNDP), 2017‐2019, and
adopted as the required plan document for continued availment of funding for
roads development under the Conditional Matching Grant to Provinces for
Road Repair, Rehabilitation, and Improvement, or the CMGP for brevity.

It’s worth noting that the implementation of the PRNDP in 2015‐2016 was
solely focused on the repair, rehabilitation, and improvement of provincial
roads. Its investment requirement was sourced from the earlier KALSADA
(Konkreto at Ayos na LanSAngan and DAan Tungo sa Pangkahalatang
Kaunlaran) Program, which, starting in 2017, was renamed CMGP.

Its focused areas now widens to include city, municipal and barangay roads,
including national road networks, in the province. Provincial roads identified in
the PRNDP will continue to be prioritized for funding for repair, rehabilitation,
and improvement under the CMGP, and other nationally coordinated
programs/projects that best respond to the profile or role of the prioritized
provincial road in the entire development of the province.

Such is the case of provincial roads found to be technically, socially and

environmentally feasible for funding under the World Bank‐funded Philippine
Rural Development Project (PRDP) of the Department of Agriculture (DA). These
are mainly provincial roads assessed and validated to support the development
and promotion of any or more of the province’s major commodities that are
included in Sulu enhanced Provincial Commodities Investment Plan, namely,
Abaca, Cassava, Coffee and Seaweeds. Such, is equally true for provincial, city
and/or municipal roads that qualify for funding under the Road Leveraging
and Linkages for Industry and Trade (ROLL‐IT) Program of the and Department
of Trade and Industry (DTI) and Department of Public Works and Highways
(DPWH), the Tourism Road Infrastructure Program (TRIP) of the Department of
Tourism (DOT) and DPWH, and programs supportive of roads development of
the Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR). The ROLL‐IT Program is aimed at
enhancing connectivity of industry and business stakeholders among each
other, thus ensures the inclusive growth of the trade and industry sector in the
province. On the other hand, the TRIP extends support in tapping development
potentials for tourism in the province’s local government units, thru better
roads connectivity to ease movement of local and foreign tourists, people and
goods. In particular, under the approved 2018 GAA, development of local road
networks can be funded under the Financial Assistance to Local Government
Units (FALGU), and Assistance to Municipalities (AM). As in any development
endeavor, the crafting of the LRNDP, 2018‐2022, is faced with a few setbacks
or issues hinder the crafting of a comprehensive LRNDP as required under
DILG MC 2017‐159. The first issue relates to the lack of significant data at the
provincial and sub‐ provincial levels, among which, is an updated inventory of
road assets, and reliable historical data of how much the road assets
deteriorated in the past, thus, insufficiency in road conditions information. The
absence of an updated roads inventory resulted to issues in the overlapping of
national and barangay roads, and between provincial roads and municipal
roads, requiring further validation with the concerned LGUs, and DPWH.

2. INTRODUCTION
The Sulu Local Road Network Development Plan (LRNDP) is an integrated five
year (2018-2022) development plan. It is a planning document that supports
road development by prioritizing road development activities over a rolling five-
year period through a participatory process involving government agencies,
community stakeholders as well as key provincial government officials. The
Sulu LRNDP is considered a planning tool that supports the efforts of the
province in increasing economic activities, improves public access to
infrastructure and basic social services and eventually improves peace and
order condition.

The LRNDP is guided by the objectives of the Sulu Provincial Development and
Physical Framework Plan (PDPFP) that is intended to serve as a technical guide
for the strategic directions for development of the province. It will support the
attainment of the goals and objectives in the PDPFP by improving and
rehabilitating the road network within the province. It contains an Investment
Plan as reference and guidance for decision making of the Local Chief
Executive and the Sangguniang Panlalawigan.

The LRNDP is a key link to one of the national government’s priority sector
under the Ambisyon Natin 2040, which is CONNECTIVITY. Connectivity thru
roads and bridges, is among the focused sub‐sectors, along with ports,
airports, transport, and communication. The development of all these
connectivity sub‐sectors bring to fruition enhanced economic and social
connectedness, one of the three (3) priority measures under the national
government’s goal of MATATAG, MAGINHAWA, AT PANATAG NA BUHAY PARA
SA LAHAT by 2040.

The LRNDP is firmly linked to President Duterte’s 0+10 Socio‐ Economic

Agenda, specifically agendum number 4 on: Accelerate infrastructure spending.
Furthermore, this is extensively laid out on Accelerating Infrastructure
Development under the Philippine Development Plan (PDP), as well as the
Regional Development Plan (RDP) for the period 2017‐2022.

3. PROVINCIAL SPATIAL DIRECTION AND SPATIAL FRAMEWORK

PROVINCIAL DEVELOPMENT VISION

“A progressive and peaceful Sulu steered by competent and dynamic

leaders driven by empowered and morally upright citizenry, living in a
disaster-resilient communities and proud of its cultural heritage”
 3 – VISION, GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

Guided by the vision statement of the province, the LRNDP envisions a

well maintained and safe road network managed by competent leaders
and responsible community.

Its goal is to develop a sustainable provincial road network while its

objectives are to improve physical access of the populace to economic
opportunities and basic social services and
construct/upgrade/rehabilitate provincial roads of internal circulation
routes.

EXISTING SITUATIONS

Location and Composition

Historically, the Province of Sulu was one of the prominent and flourishing
provinces of the Philippines. Its capital, the town of Jolo, was once an
important center of power and trade in the southern part of the Philippines. It
also had a prominent and influential form of government known as the
Sultanate of Sulu. Sulu is one of the five (5) provinces in the Autonomous
Region in Muslim

Mindanao (ARMM). These are the provinces of Sulu, Basilan, Tawi-Tawi,

Maguindanao and Lanao del Sur. It is situated in the southern part of the
Philippines and lies approximately between latitudes 5 o 25’ and 6o 30’ North
and between longitudes 119o 35’ and 122o 0’ East, bounded by the Sulu Sea
on the North and Celebes Sea on the East (Figure 4.1).
Figure 1. Mindanao Map

Figure 2. Provincial Map

Land Area

Based on National Mapping and Resources Information Authority (NAMRIA)

data, Sulu has a total land area of 167,376 hectares or 1,673.76 square
kilometers (sq km). It accounts for about 13 percent of the total land area of
ARMM. Among the municipalities, Pangutaran has the biggest land area
with around 25,810 hectares or 258.10 sq km, which is 15.4 percent of the
total land area of Sulu. Jolo is the smallest at 16.60 sq km, or 1.0 percent of
the total land area of the province.
Table 1. Land Area by Municipality
Municipality Area Municipality Area
(ha) (ha)
Haji Panglima Tahil 4,950 Panglima Estino 4,500
Indanan 10,190 Pangutaran 25,810
Jolo 1,660 Parang 9,740
Kalingalan Caluang 5,583 Pata 5,860
Lugus (including Omar) 3,540 Patikul 17,930
Luuk 16,712 Siasi 10,252
Maimbung 4,790 Talipao 14,100
Panamao 5,110 Tapul 5,550
Pandami 8,699 Banguingi (Tongkil) 12,400
Total 167,376

Political Subdivision
Pangutaran, Maimbung,
The province of Sulu is divided Panglima Tahil, Patikul and
into two (2) congressional Talipao. The second district is
districts, nineteen (19) composed of the municipalities
municipalities and 410 of Luuk, Siasi, Kalingalan
barangays. The first district is Caluang, Panglima Estino,
composed of the municipalities Tapul, Panamao, Lugus, Pata,
of Jolo, Parang, Indanan, Pandami, Baguingi (formerly
Tongkil) and Omar.
 Table 2 Number of Barangays by Major Island Groups
Table 2 Number of Barangays by Major Island Groups
Percent
Major Island Number of

District Share
Groups/Municipalities Barangays
(%)
Jolo Group
Jolo 1 8 2
Indanan 1 34 8.3
Luuk 2 12 2.9
Maimbung 1 27 6.6
Panglima Tahil 1 5 1.2
Panamao 2 31 7.6
Parang 1 40 9.8
Pata 2 14 3.4
Patikul 1 30 7.3
Tapul 2 15 3.7
Lugus 2 17 4.1
Kalingalan Caluang 2 9 2.1
Panglima Estino 2 12 2.9
Omar 2 8 2
Talipao 1 52 12.7
Siasi Group
Siasi 2 50 12.2
Pandami 2 16 3.9
Pangutaran Group
Pangutaran 2 16 3.9
Samales Group
Banguigui 2 14 3.4

Population

As of the 2015 Census of Population and Housing, Sulu had a population of

824,731 persons, which is the third largest among the provinces of the ARMM.
The Table below shows the population by municipality. From 2010 to 2015,
Sulu’s population grew at annual growth rate of 2.66%.
Table 3. Population by Municipality (2010 & 2015)

MUNICIPALITY NO. OF 2010 POPULATION 2015 POPULATION

BARANGAYS
INDANAN 34 65,858 80,883
JOLO (CAPITAL) 8 118,307 125,564
KALINGALAN-CALUANG 9 26,848 31,567

LUUK 20 29,897 32,162

MAIMBUNG 27 28,445 37,914
HADJI PANGLIMA
TAHIL 5 5,850 6,375
(MARUNGAS)
PANAMAO 31 37,933 40.998
PANGUTARAN 16 28,461 30,613
PARANG 40 58,028 62,172
PATA 14 14,918 22,163
PATIKUL 30 42,036 62,287
SIASI 50 64,229 67,705
TALIPAO 52 75,173 80,255
TAPUL 15 16,370 18,197
TONGKIL 14 17,802 24,161
PANGLIMA ESTINO 12 27,724 28,817
LUGUS 17 19,839 21,897
PANDAMI 16 22,474 25,885
OMAR 8 18,098 25,116
SULU 410 718,290 824,731

Physical Resources

General Land and Water Characteristics and Resources

Topography and Slope

Sulu is generally mountainous with volcanic origin, has ten (10) mountains
scattered throughout the island but do not form mountain ranges Of the 10
mountains nine (9) are located in the mainland and the

remaining one is in the

island municipality of Siasi. Name
Table 4. of
ListPeak Approximate
of Existing Mountains andHeight (Feet)
Location
The highest among the ten Location
mountains is BudBud Tumantangis Indanan 2,600
Tumantangis located in
Bud Dahu Patikul 2,247
Indanan (literally meansBud Tukay Parang 1,984
“weeping mountain) with a Bud Gomo Siasi 1,584
height of 805 meters and the Bud Dakut Tapul 1,555
lowest are Bud Urot and Bud Bud Talipao Talipao 1,315
Dakulah with 405.6 meters Bud Urot Luuk 1,310
the Bud Dakulah Panamao 1,310
each located in
Bud Parang Luuk 1,276
municipalities of Luuk and
Source: PPDO-SEP
Panamao, respectively. Small
Bud Daho National Park—Lot No. 980, cad. 99,
pockets of valleys and wide Mt. Dajo Cadastre
stretches of undulating to • Proclamation No. 261 dated March 1972
rolling lands are formed and • Area---222.6310 hectares
utilized as farming areas.

Hilly lands account for 36.5 percent (8-30%) while the remaining 3.3
percent are extremely steep and rugged terrain and are within the
protection- oriented slope range of 30 percent

Climate

➢ Type

Based on the Modified Corona’s Classification of Climate, the climate of

Sulu province is classified as belonging to Type IV, i.e., rainfall is more or
less evenly distributed throughout the year.

➢ Rainfall Distribution
Records of rainfall distribution in Sulu during the last five years (2010 – 2014)
show that the province had an average annual precipitation of 1,483.07 The
heaviest rain falls were experienced in 2013 at 1,938.5 mm while the lightest
were in 2014 at 1,072.6 mm. The period of precipitation starts from January to
March. However, heavier downpours are expected from July to December.

Figure 4: Tracks of Tropical Storms

➢ Temperature

Generally, the temperature of the province is relatively stable with respect to

season. Records on the mean monthly temperature indicate that the cold
months fall from January to March, while the hot months fall from April to
May
 Figure 5

Humidity

The average relative humidity in the province as observed in 2014 was 81

percent. For the same year, the monthly relative humidity values were
almost uniform with high a 84 and 85 percent in September and October
and a low 76 and 77 percent in March and February, respectively.

Prevailing Winds

The general direction and velocity of winds in the Zamboanga peninsula and
Sulu vary according to geographical location and time. The prevailing wind
direction is northeasterly in Dipolog , southeasterly in Jolo, and westerly in
Zamboanga, at a velocity of 3 knots for Dipolog and Jolo and 4 knots for
Zamboanga.

DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT

The Philippines is subject to various types of hazards due to its geographical

location and physical environment being in the “Pacific Ring of Fire”. This
ring is a zone of frequent earthquakes and volcanic eruptions that encircles
the basin of the Pacific Ocean. Thus, the Philippines is prone to landslides;
active volcanoes; destructive earthquakes and tsunamis.
 The province of Sulu is fortunate since it lies outside the typhoon and
earthquake belt. However, Bud Dahu which is located in the Municipality of
Patikul is a volcano that has two small eruptions in 1641 and 1897. It is
considered a protected area being a national park under Proclamation no.
261 dated March 1972. There were no data or information that tells us if
there were damages in terms of lives and properties brought about by these
eruptions.
Many of the people are not aware that Bud Dahu is a volcano that could still
erupt like Mt. Pinatubo which has been dormant. Bud Dahu is historically
known that in March 1906 thousand of civilians were massacred under Major
General Leonard Wood, the first American military governor in Sulu.

Another major hazard threats is the flooding in the capital town of Jolo
due to poor drainage system.

Presently, there is no clear policy on disaster preparedness, planning,

management and implementation. The consideration of natural hazards
as constraints in development seems to be weak and inadequate even at
the national level. In most instances, local government appears to be
reactive and not proactive in dealing with hazards. Most of the disasters
that are happening in the province are mostly man-made.

Land Classification

Sulu’s total land area is recorded at 1,673.76 sq km of which 29.8 percent or

498.78 sq km are classified as alienable and disposable (A&D) lands, 70.2
percent or 1,174.98 sq km are forest lands. Of these, 70.06 percent or 1,172.75
sq km are unclassified forest lands while the remaining 0.14 percent or 2.23 sq
km are classified as National Park pursuant to Presidential Proclamation No.
261 by then President Marcos dated March 1972. (Table 4.6)
If these unclassified forest lands will continue to remain as such, while
population and economic activities are increasing overtime.

congestion is likely to Table 6 Land Classsification, 1991

become a serious Percent

Area in
Classification square
concern by the province. kilometers Share
However there is an 29.
498.78 8
ongoing Forest Land Alienable and Disposable
Boundary Delineation Forest Lands 1,174.98 70.2
Survey by DENR to Unclassified 1,172.75 70.06
determine the National Park 2.23 0.14
classification of land. Total 1,673.76 100

Source of Basic Data: National Mapping and Resource Information

Authority (NAMRIA)

Health and Education

The health system in the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) is

managed by the Integrated Provincial Health Offices or IPHOs as the
implementing entities of DOH-ARMM in their respective provinces. For faster
and effective delivery of health services in the province, the IPHOs adopted a
district health system.

In Sulu, six district offices were established with corresponding catchment area
and facilities. These are in Jolo, Parang, Luuk, Siasi, Panamao and
Pangutaran. The Jolo district consists of the Provincial Hospital and the Rural
Health Units (RHUs) of Jolo, Patikul, Talipao, Indanan and Hadji P. Tahil.
Parang district includes the Parang district hospital and the RHUs of Parang,
Maimbung and Pata. Luuk district consists of the Luuk district hospital and the
RHUs of Luuk, Omar, K. Caluang and Panglima Estino. Siasi district includes
the Siasi district hospital and the RHUs of Siasi, Lugus and Pandami. The
Panamao and Pangutaran districts consist of their own district hospital and
RHU. While the municipalities of Tongkil and Tapul, though not within the
catchment area of any of the districts have their own municipal hospitals and
RHUs.

Health Facilities

Bed Other Facilities/

No.
Hospitals Capacity health personnel

SuluProvincial Hospital 100 Rural Health Units 18

Sulu Sanitarium 100 Barangay Health Stations 43
Luuk District Hospital 25
Parang District Hospital 25 Total 60
Siasi District Hospital 25

Pangutaran District Hospital 25

Panamao District Hospital 25 Registered Physicians 32
Tapul District Hospital 10 Registered Nurses 60
Tongkil District Hospital 10 Dentist 7
Midwives 59

Total 320 Total 157

Sulu’s literacy rate in SY 2012-2013(76.60 percent) was the lowest compared to

other provinces in the country and lower by about 6 and 21 percentage points
compared to the region and the nation, respectively. Further analysis disclosed
that male students are more literate than females. Within the province, the
municipality of Jolo had the highest at 95.5 percent and the lowest was the
municipality of Siasi with only 65.3 percent. Twelve (12) out of the province’s
19 municipalities have literacy rate lower than province. To a large extent this
could be attributed to: 1) geographic characteristics of the province;

Poor access to educational facilities due to inadequate roads and

transportations; 3) insufficient income (poverty); 4) lack of textbooks,
classrooms teachers and visual aids; and 5) unstable peace and order
conditions in some areas of the province. There are 392 public and private
elementary schools, 40 public and private secondary schools and 6 colleges

Transportation, Access and Circulation

Transportation impacts on every economic and social activity, population, and

other resources of the province. It facilitates easier and faster movement of
people, goods and services to and from the production centers to the market
centers. As an archipelagic province, the principal modes of transportation in
Sulu are land, air and water.

External Linkages

Water and air access routes are the only external linkages of Sulu being an
archipelagic province. These routes comprise of the Jolo- Zamboanga air access
route, Jolo-Zamboanga water access route and Jolo - Bongao water access
route in the province of Tawi - Tawi via Siasi, Sulu.. In terms facilities, the
province of Sulu has one airport located in Jolo, two major ports one in Jolo
and one in Siasi and one RORO port in Maimbung.

Jolo-Zamboanga air access route

The Jolo-Zamboanga air access route is very vital to the residents of Sulu as it
is the only route that provides easier and faster mobility of people, goods and
services to and from the provincial capital and the city of Zamboanga via air
transportation. This route is back’-up’ by the Jolo Airport and the Zamboanga
International Airport. The Jolo Airport is paved with concrete and is classified
as a secondary airport. It has a length of 1,830 lineal meters and a width of 30
meters with a load capacity that can accommodate airbus 320. This airport is
utilized as a commercial and military airport. Presently, there is only one
airline (Platinum Skies) operating daily except Sunday, the Zamboanga-Jolo-
Zamboanga route. The construction of the new terminal building and other
amenities of the foregoing airport is almost complete. The resumption of
commercials flights like Philippine Airlines is expected this year (2017).

Jolo-Zamboanga water access route

The Jolo-Zamboanga water access route is very important to the residents of

Sulu, since this route is the most economical physical link of the province to
the rest of the country via Zamboanga City. It serves as a trade and service
access route as such; passengers and commercial cargoes from Sulu are
loaded in a ship at the Port of Jolo and are unloaded in the Zamboanga City
Pier. At present, fifteen (15) watercrafts are servicing this route: four (4) of
these are exclusively for passengers (one fast craft and three (3) motor
launches) while the eleven (11) others are motor vessels or boats that cater to
passengers and cargoes. With this number of vessels that call on this port and
the volume of passengers and cargoes that are loaded daily, this facility is now
experiencing port congestion, especially during the peak hours of cargo
loading. Largely, this could be attributed to the limited berthing space at only
330 ln mtr and back up area of only 1,640 sq mtr and thus, some of the
cargoes are stock filed on the working apron before loading into the boat. To
ease this situation, the following measures are recommended: 1) improvement
of port management, especially on the system of loading and unloading of
passengers and cargoes; 2) extension of berthing space and expansion of back
up areas; 3) improvement/upgrading of passengers’ terminal building; and 4)
encourage shipping lines to utilize the RORO Port in Maimbung as alternate
port of the province. All roads that link to the municipality of Maimbung must
be given priority for rehabilitation, improvement and upgrading.

Table 7. External Linkage, Sea Transportation

Table 3.42 External Linkage, Sea Transportation

Name of Ship/
Route Mode of Service Provided
Shipping Lines
Weesam Express/ Jolo-Zamboanga- Vice- Versa
Passengers
SNR Shipping Lines Jolo-Zamboanga- Sandakan Vice- Versa

MV Kristel Jane
Jolo-Zamboanga- Vice- Versa Passengers / Cargoes
MV Mary Joy 3
MV Mary Joy 1
Ever Shipping Lines
Jolo-Zamboanga- Siasi-Tawi-Tawi Vice- Versa Passengers / Cargoes
MV Ever Queen
Ebenezzer Shipping Lines
MV KC Beatriz Jolo-Zamboanga- Vice- Versa Passengers / Cargoes
MV Mama Mia
MV Bounty Cruise Jolo-Zamboanga- Vice- Versa Passengers / Cargoes
 MV Grandiflora Jolo-Zamboanga- Siasi-Tawi-Tawi Vice- Versa Passengers / Cargoes
ML Katrina 2,3 Jolo-Zamboanga- Vice- Versa Passengers
Source: PPA, MARINA, 2015

Jolo - Bongao water access route

To the residents of Sulu, this route is not as important as the Jolo -

Zamboanga water access route since most of the transactions are taking place
in the city of Zamboanga and not in Bongao, Tawi-Tawi. If there are any, these
are very minimal. In addition, Zamboanga City is considered as the second
home base to a great number of Sulu residents especially parents whose
children are studying in colleges and/or universities in the city. The Jolo-Siasi-
Bongao water access route also functions as trade and service access route but
on a lesser scale compared to the Jolo-Zamboanga route. At present, three (3)
motor vessels are servicing this route alternately. Each vessel start – off from
Zamboanga City, passes to the port of Jolo, in Jolo, Sulu and goes to Bongao,
Tawi-Tawi via the port of Siasi in the municipality of Siasi, province of Sulu.
Just like the port of Jolo, the port of Siasi has limited berthing space with only
37 ln mtr and too small working apron to provide easy movement of cargoes. To
ease this situation, there is need to undertake a study for the expansion of the
said port and if found feasible work for its immediate implementation.

The Internal Circulation

As an archipelagic province, the internal circulation of Sulu are land and water
routes, hence roads, municipal wharves and/or berths are its support
infrastructures. The latest reports from the district offices of DPWH and PEO
indicate that the province has a total road length of roughly 1,029.5 kilometers
consisting of national, provincial, municipal, barangay or farm - to – market
roads (FMRs). Given this length, the province road density is estimated at only
0.61 km per sq km of arable land which is way below the standard of 1.5 kms
per sq km of arable land. The latest record from the PPDO also shows that
Sulu has about 40 municipal wharves or berths. Twelve (12) of these are
located in the municipalities of Sulu Mainland, i.e. Luuk, K. Kaluang and Jolo;
ten (10) in Siasi and the remaining eighteen (18) are scattered in the other
island municipalities of the province. The principal function of these wharves
or berths is to provide areas for light watercrafts to dock for loading and
unloading of passengers and cargoes. Passengers and cargoes of island
municipalities that are closer to Sulu Mainland are ferried either to
Luuk, K. Kaluang or Jolo, whichever is nearer; while those of the Siasi
Group Island Municipalities are ferried to the Municipality of Siasi where
some central service functions are available, e.g., wholesale/retail trade,
basic health service, education, market, among others.

Given the situation, where Luuk, Jolo and Kalingalan Caluang as entry points
of people and agricultural products from the island municipalities and the
current situation of Jolo, Indanan and Patikul as metropolitanizing area, there
is need to compared to the design a “circulation network” as strategy and
requisite for the realization of the desired urban form: a metropolitan area
comprising of the foregoing municipalities. This involves designing certain road
links to perform certain principal functions such as arterials, collectors and
distributors.

Arterials - are road links that connect two or more municipalities. At present,
roads that link Jolo (the provincial capital) to the rest of the mainland
municipalities perform arterial functions. To date, the most important arterial
road is the Jolo – Luuk National Highway. It bisects the mainland into its
northern and southern sections. From Jolo, it connects to Luuk in the
northeastern section of the mainland traversing the municipalities of Talipao
and Panamao over a distance of 50.7 kilometers. It should be noted however,
that its present condition is not capable of handling all types of vehicular
traffic. Upgrading of this road entails widening, surfacing and concreting.
Another important arterial road is the Jolo – Maimbung and Jolo- Parang
National Highway. From Jolo, it connects to the municipality of Maimbung and
Parang in the southwestern section of the main land passing through the
municipality of Indanan. This road also needs upgrading to handle all types of
vehicular traffic.
Collectors – are usually loops connecting two (2) points of other arterials,
serving as alternate routes. Given this definition, the Jolo – Patikul – Panamao
Junction loop is the only collector road in the Sulu mainland at present. This
loop serves as a detour road in case the Jolo – Talipao section of the Jolo –
Luuk National Highway becomes impassable for reasons or the other.
Distributors – complement the road network by connecting either the arterials
or collectors to development areas or to centers of population. An example of
this type of road is the Indanan Junction – Maimbung Road. All barangay or
farm – to – market roads that are link to arterials or collectors can be classified
as distributor roads.

Access

For the island municipalities other than those within the Saisi group of islands,
Jolo; the administrative, commercial, financial and educational center of the
province can be accessed by water and land transportation. From the islands,
passengers and cargoes are ferried by light watercrafts either to Luuk,
Kalingalan Caluang or Jolo for unloading, whichever is nearer. From these
municipalities, passengers can take a public utility jeep (PUJ) for the Jolo town
center while the cargoes mostly agricultural products can either be loaded on
PUJ or on cargo trucks for hire. However, for faster mobility, a passenger can
have a choice by taking a motorcycle for hire, commonly known as “habal –
habal”, but is more costly in terms of fare compared to PUJ. The administrative
and service center of the province in the southwestern section is the
municipality of Siasi. It is also the exit point to other areas outside the
province, as such; passengers and cargoes from the Siasi group of islands are
ferried to Siasi by light watercrafts for unloading either for sale to the local
businessmen in Siasi, in the case of agricultural products or for transshipment
to other markets outside the province, like Zamboanga City.

4. Economic Driver

Major crops

The major agricultural crops in Sulu are coconut,cassava,abaca,

coffee,banana, mango and exotic fruits like durian, lanzones,mangosteen,
etc. Rice, cornand vegetables are also produced in the province.
Intercropping and multi-cropping are commonly practiced especially
in coco-based farms. The estimates on areas planted to various crops,
therefore, may not be simply added but understood to mean
equivalent hectare specific crops.

Table 6. Existing Crops with total area of production

Total Land Agricultural

Municipality
Area (Has.) Land (Has.)
Indanan 10,190 8,759
Jolo 1,660 -

K.Caluang 5,583 3,350

Lugus 3,540 2,422
Luuk 16,712 11,610

Maimbung 4,790 3,520

Panglima Tahil 4,950 128
Panamao 5,110 2,300
Pandami 8,699 3,619
 Panglima Estino 4,500 1,000

Pangutaran 25,810 2,687

Parang 9,740 5,827
Pata 5,860 5,508

Patikul 17,930 15,750

Siasi 10,252 4,875
Talipao 14,100 12,690

Tapul 5,550 3,015

Banguingui
12,400 7,440
(Tongkil)
Total 167,376 94,500

Seaweeds

In Sulu, the seaweed industry is considered as one of the major industries

that Benefit the majority of the coastal fisherfolk. Two of the potential seaweed
species being cultured in the seaweed farms are the Eucheuma and the
Cappiphycus spp. Ninety (90) percent of the total coastal water in
Sulu is suitable for seaweed culture. Sulu contributes 40% of the export on
carrageenan, one of the world’s foremost food and industrial additives today
Table 8. Seaweeds production

Seaweed Production Potential

Area
Municipality
Area
(Has.) (M .T.)
(Has.)

Indanan 223 1,070.40 160

Kalinggalan
348 1,670.40 160
Caluang

Lugus 315 1,512 140

Luuk 238 1,142.40 170
Maimbung 306 1,468.80 200

Panamao 288 1,382.40 176

Pandami 333 1,598.40 380
Panglima 264 1,267.20 70
Estino
 Panglima Tahil 432 2,073.60 360
Pangutaran 355 1,704.60 170

Parang 299 1,435.20 220

Pata 356 1,574.40 180

Patikul 218 1,046.40 150
Siasi 361 1,832.80 600

Talipao 250 1,200 100

Tapul 320 1,545.60 150
Banguingi
351 1,684.40 400
(Tongkil)
Omar 364 1,747.20
TOTAL 5,621 26,956.20 3,786

Road Network Existing Situations

Sulu has a total road length of 1,029.507 kilometers. Of this length, roughly
353.644 kms or 34.35 percent is of concrete surface, 28.34 kms or 2.75
percent is asphalt, 411. 36 kms or 39.95 percent is earth surface, while the
remaining 236.163 kms or 22.9 percent is graveled This shows, that roughly
62 percent of the total road length

Table 8. Road Network

 Length of Pavement (km)
Classification Concrete Asphalt Earth Gravel Total Percent
to total
National -
st
1 District 81.386 0.220 7.743 89.349 8.68%
nd
2 District 45.188 - - 45.188 4.39%
Provincial 196.450 - - 70.960 267.410 25.97%
Municipal 0.22 2.62 16.12 0.53 19.49 1.89%
Barangay 30.40 25.50 395.24 156.93 608.07 59.06%
Total 353.644 28.34 411.36 236.163 1,029.507 100%

Source: DPWH, PEO

There are still unpaved which can easily be destroyed or become muddy
resulting from heavy rains and thus, making it difficult for four (4) wheels
vehicles to pass. Likewise, the road density of the province is computed at only
0.61 km per sq km of arable land compared to the standard of 1.5 kms per sq
km indicating that the province’s road network is still very much inadequate to
meet the requirements of the local residents. This situation is further
aggravated by the inadequacy of public utility vehicles (PUVs). The province
has no buses but only few PUJs and cargo trucks for hire that are servicing the
municipalities of mainland Sulu. Within the town proper, pedi-cabs and
tricycles are also available for hire more particularly in the municipality of Jolo
where market goers, students and employees usually took as their
transportation in going to the markets, schools and places of works,
respectively.

Existing and proposed roads for improvement

In consideration of population and settlement trends, physical resources,
production areas and priority industries identified, the following roads are
identified as priority for improvement and/or upgrading:

1) Jolo-Talipao-Luuk National Road

2) Jolo-Taglibi-Panamao-Tiptipon National Road

3) Jolo-Danag-Talipao National Road

4. Jolo-Indanan-Silangkan Road

5) Jolo Circumferential Road

Table 9. Distances of Mainland Municipalities to Jolo

Municipality Distance Travel Time

(kilometers) (minutes)
Indanan 12.2 20
Luuk 50.7 45
Maimbung 15.4 35
Panamao 36.0 40
Parang 22.6 37
Patikul 13.5 25
Talipao 22.0 30
Kalingalan Caluang 47.6 90
Panglima Estino 36.0 50

Table 10. Distances of Major Island Municipalities to Jolo (In Nautical Miles)

Island Municipality Nearest Point Farthest point

Panglima Tahil 4.35 14.29
Pangutaran 20.50 80.79
 Pata 14.29 22.37
Tapul/Lugus 21.75 26.12
Siasi/Pandami 32.31 51.57
Tongkil 34.79 57.78

5. DEVELOPMENT ISSUES, PROBLEMS and SERVICE GAPS in the

ROAD SECTOR

Development of infrastructure, particularly the road and bridge sectors, play

important and vital roles in the growth of an LGU’s economy. The road and
bridge sectors are proven, time and again, to lend steady and firm support in
improving accessibility and connectivity within and outside the province, to
places of interests between schools and residences, between production areas
and market centers and/or processing facilities, and access to health and
social services, and more.

With better roads and bridges, efficiency in agricultural and fishery production,
and transport to market or trading centers is enhanced; with improved access
to health centers and potable and safe sources of water, health and sanitation
among households are secured; and with stable power supply that light
barangay streets and households, heighten education of school children, and
encourage small businesses to flourish.

Poor road access, and public transport utilities to remote areas in the
province

The economic development of an LGU largely depends on the availability of

infrastructures, and the extent to which these are implemented, developed,
packaged, monitored and maintained. Basically, it is the infrastructure sector
that catalyzes the growth and development of the other sectors in the economy.
This brings to the fore the need to further improve the overall quality of service,
and maintenance standards of the sector. The basic access to farms, sources of
livelihood, markets and social services remain inadequate. Limited budget of an
LGU is a major concern that affects investments in the operations and
maintenance for infrastructure projects, like farm to market and feeder roads,
and bridges that, connect production areas to market, and processing centers.

Issues and Concern

- Lack of reliable data generated on a regular basis to establish value of

the province’s road assets, and how much of these assets have
deteriorated on an annual bases for decision making in the areas of
planning, investment programming, prioritization, and spending road
projects;

- Poor access of road ( Road classification and condition)

- Encroachment of settlements along the road‐ right‐ of‐ way (RROW) of

road networks;

- Absence in participation of barangay government and community in road

planning, implementation and monitoring.

- Insufficient fund allocation for roads/bridges maintenance is inadequate

to cover the required investment requirement for the entire provincial
road network

- Lack of skills/capacitated staff in planning Specially in DED preparation,

GIS Based Road Mapping, and Monitoring.

6. OBJECTIVES, AND TARGETS FOR THE ROAD SECTOR

Specifically, road and bridge improvement are aimed at:

1. Improving connectivity and access to and from key production areas, built‐
up areas, industrial / commercial areas, and settlement areas in the entire
province; and delivery of basic government support, assistance and services to
remote areas in the province;

2. Enhancing productivity levels in the agricultural and fishery sectors due

improved access to markets, trade centers, and processing facilities; and
reduced travel time and transport cost in bringing the produce to the markets;

3. Opening more economic and livelihood opportunities for the people due to
the inflow of private investment for the development of eco/agri‐tourism areas,
and trade and industry opportunities;

4. Improving booking/accounting of road assets thru an institutionalized road

inventory/survey in aid of decision making in planning, investment
programming, prioritization, and management of roads and bridges;

5. Improving real property tax collection, and increasing local revenue

generation due to improved increased income of people following increased
yields, production of value‐added commodities, establishment of more
economic activities, and employment opportunities.
7. ROAD NETWORK DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES

Transportation, Access and Circulation

- Construct all weather farm to market roads to our remote agricultural

lands for easy access and deliveries of agricultural products and inputs;

- Upgrading/improvement, rehabilitation, expansion and maintenance of

existing national, provincial, inter‐provincial, farm to markets roads and
bridges;

- Practically connect all major urban centers;

- Enhance adequate transport systems and minimize public

inconveniences;

- LGU and the community shall assist and take part on proper
maintenance of roads;
 - More linkages and connectivity to the municipalities and far flung areas
of the province;

7.2 Prioritization Using the Provincial Core Road Network Selection Criteria

CRITERIA WEIGHT
ECONIMIC 50
1. Access road to farm production areas 25
2. Access road for farmers to Market Centers 25
SOCIAL SERVICES 20
1. Access road to health facilities 10
2. Access road to school facilities 10
ENVIRONMMENT 20
1. Don’t construct within Protection and 10
Conservation Area/Protected Areas
2. Don’t established road with in Geo Hazard (Flood 10
or Landslide ) Area
CONNECTIVITY 10
1. Linkage to municipal/provincial access 10
road/national roads

The road section will be rated according to the criteria as stated above. The
total score of 100.0% will be priority number 1. The 5.0% score will be the least
priority for consideration.
8. INVESTMENT PROGRAM

  TIME FRAME
Len Tot
Name of Project gth (cost in million pesos) al
(in 201 20 20 20 20
kms) 8 19 20 21 22
1. Improvement Rehab. of Maimbung Ipil-Bilaan (Datag
1.50 30 - - - - 30
Limbun) Road
2. Improvement Rehab of Pagsalipangan-Maimbung
1.50 30 - - - - 30
(Poblacion) Road
3. Improvement Rehab of Pagsalipangan-Maimbung
1.50 30 - - - - 30
(Tanduh Patong) Road
3. Repair/Improvement Rehab of Jolo-Pantao (Anuling)
1.50 30 - - - - 30
Road
4. Repair/Improvement Rehab of Jolo-Gandasuli 1.36 27.3 27.3
- - - -
Kaunayan Road 9 89 89
5. Rehabilitation of Kaumpang
4.00 - 20 20 20 20 80
Maligay Road
6. Rehabilitation of Jolo Batu-Batu
4.00 - 20 20 20 20 80
Silangkan Road
7. Rehabilitation of Indanan Lapa
3.00 - - 20 20 20 60
Road
8. Rehabilitation of Maimbung
2.00 - 20 20 - - 40
Ipil Road
9. Rehabilitation of Simbahan Pangutaran Niyog-Niyog
4.00 - 20 20 20 20 80
Road
10. Rehabilitation of Simbahan
4.00 - 20 20 20 20 80
Tanguso Road
11. Rehabilitation of Kasulutan
0.41 - - - 8.2 - 8.2
Road
12. Rehabilitation of Pitogo
4.00 - 20 20 20 20 80
Sucuban Road
13. Rehabilitation of Sucuban Lahing- 4.00 - 20 20 20 20 80
Lahing Road
14. Rehabilitation of Saisi Sablay
5.00 20 20 20 20 20 100
Musoh Road
15. Rehabilitation of Siasi Buan
3.20 - 20 20 14 10 64
Road
16. Improvement of Kakuyagan
2.00 -   - - 20 20
Road
17. Improvement of Tagbak Bud
3.00 - 15 15 - - 30
Datu Road
18. Improvement of Capitol
3.00 - 15 15   - 30
Circumferential Road
19. Improvement of Jolo
1.00 - - - - 10 10
Kasanyangan Road
20. Repair/Improvement of Liang
0.60 6 - - - - 6
Spring Road
21. Repair/Improvement of Jnct. Kulay-Kulay Karungdong
6.00 - - 20 20 20 60
Road
                         
9. MONITORING AND EVALUATION FRAMEWORK

The Provincial Government of Sulu has created Local Road Network

Management Team (LRMT) thru Executive Order (EO) No. 17‐015, and further
reconstituted pursuance to EO No.17‐071, series of 2017, for the development,
planning, investment programming, management, and monitoring, including
road assets assessment of the province’s road network (Figure 4). Providing
support to the LRMT are two (2) bodies created by the provincial leadership,
namely, Provincial CMGP‐TWG (Figure 5), and the Provincial Project Monitoring
Committee (PPMC). These movements however, did not, in any way, affect the
operation of neither the LRMT, nor the Provincial CMGP‐TWG Equally
important unit that helps in the monitoring and evaluation of provincial roads,
is the composite team comprising of personnel from the PEO, Provincial
General Services Office (PGSO), and the Provincial Accounting Office (PAO),
task to undertake road inventory or survey in compliance to pertinent COA
circulars on the matter. The team at the moment is composed of personnel
doing multi‐tasking jobs, hence, somehow affect the timeliness of the outcome
of the inventory conducted. Geo‐tagging during the survey is sometimes
affected too. This is one area that the provincial government needs to
strengthen since the outcome should have provided the value of the road
assets based on its present attributes.

ANNEXES
 L Ca N N
e F rria Aver Te u u
n o ge age rr m m
C gt r wa Surfa Traffi Ro ai b b
Ro l h m y Surface Types ce c ad n er er
Road
ad a ( ( (wi T T U Cond V % Im Ty C B
Name
ID s k w dth T T T 4 5 T nk ition P H po pe ul ri
s m id ) 1 2 3 6 no D ea rta v d
) th w vy nc er g
) n e ts e
s
15 Mayor
NS Salih 0. 1 0. G 1
0 Fl
UL Yusah St. 1 5 1. 11.         5     oo 1 0 3 0 0
% at
00 (Serantes 7 0 00 7 d 0
1 St.) 0 0 0
15 Salih
NS Ututalum 0. 1 0. G 1
0 Fl
UL St. 1 6 1. 8.0         6     oo 1 0 3 2 1
% at
00 (Moore 2 0 0 2 d 0
2 Avenue) 0 0 0
Gov.
15
Arolas
NS 0. 1 0. G 1
Tulawie 0 Fl
UL 1 3 1. 8.8         3     oo 1 0 2 0 0
St. % at
00 0 8 0 0 d 0
(Sanches
3 0 0 0
St.)
15
NS 0. 1 0. G 1
General 0 Fl
UL 1 6 1. 8.8         6     oo 1 0 3 0 1
Arolas St. % at
00 9 8 0 9 d 0
4 0 0 0
15
NS Sulu 0. 0. G 1
9. 0 Fl
UL Hospital 1 1 6.1         1     oo 1 0 2 1 0
1 % at
00 Road 4 0 4 d 0
5 0
0 0
15
NS Hadjil 0. 1 0. G 1
0 Fl
UL Butu 1 5 3. 10.         5     oo 1 0 3 1 0
% at
00 Road 8 2 20 8 d 0
6 0 0 0
15
Shiek
NS 0. 0. G 1
Mustafa 9. 0 Fl
UL 1 7 6.1         7     oo 1 0 2 3 1
(Camp 1 % at
00 5 0 5 d 0
Asturias) 0
7 0 0
15
Jolo-Bus
NS 3. 3. G 1
Bus- 9. 0 Fl
UL 1 8 6.1         8     oo 1 0 3 1 0
Lambayo 1 % at
00 5 0 5 d 0
ng Road 0
8 0 0
15 Jolo 1           G 1 1 0 3 Fl 5 0
NS Gandasuli 8. 9. 6.1 8. - oo 0 % at
UL 6 6
Kaunayan 1
00 6 0 6 d 0
Road 0
9 0 0
15
NS Jolo 4. 4. G 1
9. 0 Fl
UL Kasanyan 1 7 6.1         7   oo 1 0 3 0 0
1 - % at
01 gan Road 5 0 5 d 0
0 0
0 0
15 New
NS Capitol 0. 0. G 1
9. 0 Hil
UL Circumfer 1 4 6.1         4     oo 1 0 3 4 0
1 % ly
01 ential 0 0 0 d 0
1 Road 0
0 0
15
NS Liang 0. 0. G 1
9. 0 Hil
UL Spring 1 6 6.1         6     oo 1 0 3 0 0
1 % ly
01 Road 0 0 0 d 0
2 0
0 0
15 Jolo-
1 1 Un
NS Pantao G 1
0. 9. 0. 0 du
UL Road 1 6.1           oo 1 0 3 3 1
7 1 7 - % lati
01 (Pangima 0 d 0
0 0 0 ng
3 Hayudini)
0 0
15
NS Kaumpan 4. 4. <
9. B 75 Hil
UL g Maligay 3 5 6.1       5       4 2 3 0 0
1 ad % ly
01 Road 0 0 0 5
4 0
0 0
15
NS Capitol 0. 0. G 1
9. 0 Fl
UL Diamond 1 4 6.1         4     oo 1 0 3 0 0
1 % at
01 Road 3 0 3 d 0
5 0
0 0
15
Capitol
NS 3. 3. <
Circumfer 9. Fa 25 Fl
UL 2 9 6.1         9     2 7 2 5 0
ential 1 ir % at
01 0 0 0 5
Road 0
6 0 0
15
NS Tagbak 3. 3. <
9. Fa 25 Hil
UL Bud Datu 2 3 6.1         3     2 7 2 0 0
1 ir % ly
01 Road 0 0 0 5
7 0
0 0
15
NS Jolo 1 1 <
8. Fa 25 Fl 1
UL Batobato- 2 9. 9.       1.     2 7 2 0
6.1 0 ir % at 1
01 Silangkan 2 1 1 5
0 7
8 0 0 3
0
0 0
15 Indanan- 2           Fa 2 < 25 2 Fl 0 0
NS Silangkan 1 9. 6.1 8. 1 ir 7 % at
UL Road 8. 1 0 0 0. 5
01 4 0 0 4
 0 0
9 0
0 0
15
NS Indanan- 8. 2. 6. <
9. Fa 25 Fl
UL Lapa 2 3 6.1       0 3   2 7 2 2 0
1 - ir % at
02 Road 0 0 0 0 5
0 0
0 0 0
15
NS Parang- 1 1 <
3. 9. 3. Fa 25 Fl
UL Maimbun 2 6.1           2 7 2 0 2
2 1 2 - ir % at
02 g Road 0 5
1 0 0 0
0 0
15
Pagsalipa
NS 8. 8. <
ngan- 9. Fa 25 Fl
UL 2 8 6.1         8   2 7 2 3 1
Maimbun 1 - ir % at
02 0 0 0 5
g Road 0
2 0 0
15
Maimbun 1 1
NS <
g-Ipil- 2. 9. 2. Fa 25 Fl
UL 2 2.0             2 7 2 0 1
Bilaan 0 1 0 ir % at
02 0 5
Road 0 0 0
3
0 0
15
Sapah-
NS 4. 4. <
Bunuan- 9. Fa 25 Hil
UL 2 7 2.0         7     2 7 2 1 1
Kabungko 1 ir % ly
02 0 0 0 5
l Road 0
4 0 0
15
NS 5. 5. <
Punay 9. Fa 25 Fl
UL 2 0 2.0         0     2 7 2 1 0
Seit Road 1 ir % at
02 0 0 0 5
5 0
0 0
15 Seit
NS Kansipat- 1 <
5. 5. Fa 25 Fl
UL Tanduh 2 0. 9.           2 7 2 3 0
2.0 6 1 ir % at
02 Bato 8 1 5
0 6 4
6 Road 0 0
0 0
0
15
NS Seit- 0. 0. <
9. Fa 25 Hil
UL Camp- 2 8 2.0         8     2 7 2 1 0
1 ir % ly
02 Seit Road 0 0 0 5
7 0
0 0
15 Jct.-
NS Kulaykula 6. 6. <
9. Fa 25 Fl
UL y 2 0 2.0         0     2 7 2 0 0
1 ir % at
02 Karungdo 0 0 0 5
8 ng Rd 0
0 0
15 Karungdo 2           Fa 2 < 25 2 Fl 4 0
NS ng-Pitogo 5. 9. 2.0 1. 3. ir 7 % at
UL Road 3 1 0 6 6 5
02 0 0 4 6
 9 0 0 0
15
NS Pitogo- 5. 3. 2. <
9. Fa 25 hill
UL Sucuban 2 0 2.0       0 0     2 7 2 0 0
1 ir % y
03 Road 0 0 0 0 5
0 0
0 0 0
15
Karungdo
NS 9. 3. 6. <
ng-Niyug 9. Fa 25 Fl
UL 2 9 2.0       4 4     2 7 2 0 0
Niyog 1 ir % at
03 0 0 5 5 5
Road 0
1 0 0 0
15
Sucuban- 1 1
NS 4. <
Lahing 6. 9. 1. Fa 25 Fl
UL 2 2.0       5     2 7 2 3 0
Lahing 5 1 9 ir % at
03 0 2 5
road 0 0 8
2 0
0 0
15
Camp
NS 7. 7. <
Andres- 9. Fa 25 Fl
UL 2 1 2.0         1     2 7 2 0 0
Sucuban 1 ir % at
03 0 0 0 5
Road 0
3 0 0
15 Camp
NS Andres- 1 1 <
6. 9. 6. Fa 25 Hil
UL Lahing 2 4.0           2 7 2 6 1
5 1 5 - ir % ly
03 Lahing 0 5
4 Road 0 0 0
0 0
15
Siasi-
NS 6. 4. 2. <
Sablay 9. Fa 25 Fl
UL 2 0 4.0       0 0   2 7 2 3 0
Musoh 1 - ir % at
03 0 0 0 0 5
Road 0
5 0 0 0
15
NS Siasi- 1 1 <
2. Fa 25 Fl
UL Tausan 2 2. 9.       0.     2 7 2 3 0
2.0 0 ir % at
03 Road 9 1 9 5
0 0
6 0 0 0
0
0 0
15
NS Siasi- 7. 7. G 1
9. 0 Fl
UL Buan 1 2 4.0         2     oo 1 0 3 0 0
1 % at
03 Road 0 0 0 d 0
7 0
0 0
15
Simbahan 1
NS 9. 2. <
-Niyog- 1. 9. Fa 25 Fl
UL 2 2.0       4 0     2 7 2 0 0
Niyog 5 1 ir % at
03 0 5 5 5
Road 0 0
8 0 0
0
15 Simbahan 2           Fa 2 < 25 2 Fl 0 0
NS -Tanguso 1 9. 2.0 1 1. ir 7 % at
UL Road 2. 1 0 0. 5 5
03 0 0 4 5
 0 5
9 0
0 0
15
NS 2. 2. G 1
Kakuyaga 9. 0 Fl
UL 1 5 4.0         5     oo 1 0 3 0 0
n Road 1 % at
04 5 0 5 d 0
0 0
0 0
15
NS 1. 1. G 1
Kasalama 9. 0 Fl
UL 1 7 4.0         7   oo 1 0 3 6 1
tan Road 1 - % at
04 0 0 0 d 0
1 0
0 0