MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE
MEG DESIGN
DESIGN OF TILTING RUNNER
HANDLING ARRANGEMENT
PRESENTED BY:
Ms. MADHUSMITA SAHU
College of Engineering and
Technology, Bhubaneswar.
Bachelor in Technology,
Mechanical Engineering.
UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF:
Dr. PINAKI RAY
Head expert group (Design)
Mr. SOUMYAJIT MAITI,
Technologist, MEG Design
Mr. DAYA SHANKAR CHOUDHARY
Head, Mechanical Maintenance,
I-BLAST FURNACE
TATA STEEL LIMITED,
JAMSHEDPUR
•FOUNDED BY JAMSHEDJI TATA IN 1868, THE TATA GROUP IS A GLOBAL ENTERPRISE HEADQUARTERED IN INDIA.
•TATA STEEL WAS ESTABLISHED ON 26th August, 1907 AS ASIA’S FIRST INTEGRATED PRIVATE SECTOR STEEL COMPANY.
•ITS MAIN WORKS IS AT JAMSHEDPUR,IN SINGHBHUM DISTRICT, JHARKHAND.
•TATAS TEEL IS THE LOWEST COST STEEL PRODUCER IN THE WORLD
•TATA STEEL won Deming Grand Prize in 2008 (First Company to receive in Iron & Steel Sector)

COMMITTED SERVES CUSTOMERS IN AUTOMOTIVE,

TO ZERO LTI
(Loss time injury) CONSTRUCTION, CONSUMER GOODS,
ENGINEERING, PACKAGING, LIFTING AND
EXCAVATING, ENERGY AND POWER, AEROSPACE,
SHIP BUILDING, RAIL AND DEFENCE AND
SECURITY SECTOR

DRIVEN BY
VALUES,
DELIVERING
OF A VISION, PRODUCES IRON, SOFT IRON, CAST IRON,
DETERMINED
TO INNOVATE ALLOY, LOCOMOTIVE PARTS, AGRICULURAL
EQUIPMENT, MACHINERY, TINPLATE, CABLE
AND WIRE, AND REBARS

EMBRACING
RENEWABLE
RESOURCES IN FY17 TATA STEEL HAD A GLOBAL
OF ENERGY
FOR ENSURING
ANNUAL CRUDE STEEL DELIVERIES
SUSTAINABLE OF 27.5 MILLION TONNES
FUTURE
 CUSTOMER’S EXPECTATIONS OF RELIABILITY ARE MET FULLY
DESIGN FOR
THROUGHOUT THE LIFE OF THE PRODUCTS WITH LOW OVERALL
RELIABILITY LIFE CYCLE COSTS

DESIGN FOR DESIGNS ARE MODIFIED TO FIT THE WORKER, NOT THE OTHER WAY
SAFETY AND ROUND. ELIMINATE DISCOMFORT AND RISK OF INJURY DUE TO
ERGONOMICS WORK

PORTFOLIO
DESIGN
QUICK
SKILLED WORKERS AND ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY FACILITATES
RESTORATION IMMEDIATE RESTORATION IN CASE OF EQUIPMENT FAILURE
OF EQUIPMENT

PARTS WITH LONG LEAD TIME AND HIGHER COST REQUIRE

SPARE
ALTERNATIVE DESIGNS. THIS REDUCES DOWNTIME AND
DEVELOPMENT PRODUCTION LOSSES.

NEW DESIGN INVOLVES NEW DESIGN OF SPECIAL EQUIPMENTS SUITABLE FOR

DEVELOPMENT STEEL PLANT ( E.g. MATERIAL HANDLING EQUIPMENTS)
 BLAST FURNACE OVERVIEW
BLAST FURNACE IS A COUNTER CURRENT REACTOR
THE INPUTS, IRON ORE(sintered and pelletized), COKE AND LIME ARE CHARGED INTO FUNRACE TOP
THROUGH CHARGING CONVEYER, DESCEND THROUGH THE FURNACE.
HOT BLAST ENTERS THE FURNACE THROUGH MULTIPLE TUYURES AND ASCEND THROUGH THE
FURNACE.
THE REACTION BETWEEN RAW MATERIALS AND HOT BLAST PRODUCES HOT MOLTEN
METAL(LIQUID IRON) AND SLAG

CAST HOUSE
FLOOR
 PROBLEM STATEMENT
DESCRIPTION:
CURRENTLY, THE MAINTENANCE PROCEDURE FOR THE TILTING RUNNER IS CARRIED OUT IN THE
CAST HOUSE FLOOR ITSELF. The critical concerns are:
SAFETY ISSUES FOR THE OPERATORS
MAINTENANCE WORK IS IN SERIES WITH OTHER CAST HOUSE OPERATIONS
AFFECTS THE AVAILABILITY AND RELIABILITY OF CRANE

GOAL STATEMENT:
TO SUGGEST A SUITABLE ARRANGEMENT BY WHICH THE MAINTENANCE WORK CAN BE
PERFORMED AT AN ANOTHER SUITABLE SERVICE AREA RATHER THAN IN THE CAST HOUSE FLOOR.

BACKGROUND DETAILS OF TILTING RUNNER:

LOCATION : CAST HOUSE FLOOR OF BLAST FURNACE
POSITION : BETWEEN TWO HOT METAL TRACKS
FUNCTION : IT IS FIRST TILTED TO FILL THE HOT METAL LADLE ON ONE TRACK AND THEN
TILTED BACK TO FILL THE LADLE ON THE OTHER TRACK

PRESENT METHOD OF MAINTENANCE OF TILTING RUNNER:

THE CRANE THE
AFTER ACHIEVING CARRIES EACH MAINTENANCE JOB
THERE ARE FOUR
A PREDETERMINED TILTING RUNNER CONTINUES FOR 8-
TILTING RUNNERS
VOLUME OF HOT ONE BY ONE TO 10 hrs, DURING
AT THE CAST
METAL, 2 OUT OF THE WHICH THE
HOUSE FLOOR OF
FOUR TILTING MAINTENANCE OPERATORS HAVE
IBF. 2 OUT OF 4 ARE
RUNNERS ARE SET SITE IN THE SAME TO PERFORM ALL
OPERATED
FOR CAST HOUSE THE SERVICING
SIMULTANEOUSLY
MAINTENANCE. OPERATIONS IN
FLOOR.
THE SAME SITE
MUD GUN TAP HOLE

TROUGH

TILTING
RUNNER
 DESCRIPTION
•Cast house equipment
•Short and precisely fabricated iron
runners, reduced refractory and
maintenance cost
•Body material- Mild steel
•Lining material- Refractory
•Weight - 30tonnes
•Drive system- Pneumatic drive with
tie rod arrangement
•Rugged designs

WORKING
•Position - Between two hot metal
tracks for reliable and safe teeming
of hot metal cast
•Operation - First tilted to fill the hot
metal ladle on one track and then
tilted back to fill the ladle on the
other track
BENEFITS OF REFRACTORY
HOT METAL
TILTING RUNNER CAST HOUSE LINING:
LADLE
IN OPERATION FLOOR •Insulation to withstand high
temperatures
•Protect the tilting runner from
thermal shocks, abrasion and
chemical attack
 CRACKING AND
DIFFERENTIAL
PEELING OFF OF
THERMAL
REFRACTORY
EXPANSION
LINING DUE TO
OF METAL AND
HEATING AND
RFRACTORY
COOLING CYCLES

DEPOSITION OF
ABRASIVE WEAR
HOT METAL

OXIDATION AND
THERMAL FATIGUE
ALKALI ATTACK

A TILTING
RUNNER KEPT
HIGH SURFACE ON THE CAST
CAST HOUSE
OPERATING HOUSE FLOOR
TEMPERATURES FLOOR
FOR
PERFORMING
MAINTENANCE
WORK
 DRAWBACKS OF CURRENT MAINTENANCE METHOD

WORK ENVIRONMENT IS HAZARDOUS (PRESENCE OF CO GAS, HIGH TEMP.)

HARD AND MANUAL WORK CLOSE TO HIGH TEMPERATURE AREAS

MAN-MACHINE INTERFACE

RELIABILITY AND AVAILABILITY OF CRANE

BLOCKING OF ENTRANCES, EXITS AND PASSAGES

INTERFERES OTHER CAST HOUSE OPERATIONS

IN ORDER TO OVERCOME THE FOLLOWING DRAWBACKS, WE NEED TO PERFORM THE

MAINTENANCE WORK AT SOME OTHER SERVICE SITE INSTEAD OF CAST HOUSE FLOOR

FOR DOING THIS, WE NEED A TILTING RUNNER HANDLING ARRANGEMENT THAT CAN MOUNT
THE TILTING RUNNER AND THIS ASSEMBLY CAN BE CARRIED TO THE MAINTENANCE SITE
WITH THE HELP OF A TRAILER.
 REDUCTION OF MAN-
MACHINE INTERFACE AT
CAST HOUSE FLOOR
SAFETY

SAFETY IN TILTING RUNNER

MAINTENANCE PROCESS
MEAN TIME TO
KPI REPAIR

IMPROVEMENT IN CRANE
AVAILIBILTY AVAILIBILITY AT CAST
HOUSE
 MODEL DEVELOPMENT STAGES

1 2

The structure
clamped to the Four beams
trailer bed incorporated to fix
the structure onto
the floor

3 4

Support beams
Hydraulic jack incorporated to fix
and hand pump the structure onto
arrangement was the floor by screw
made nut mechanism
 DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
CONCEPT DEVELOPMENT 1.
2.
Selection of materials
Easy to install and dismantle
3. High strength to weight ratio
4. Shape, size, flexibility and maintenance
5. Load carrying members should have higher section modulus
STAGE 1: 6. Weight and cost
7. Thermal, manufacturing, environmental and aesthetics
A STRUCTURE TO MOUNT THE TILTING RUNNER SUPPORTING
LOAD CARRYING MEMBERS MEMBERS
FRAME DEVELOPMENT

FIXED TO GROUND
FOR HYDRAULIC JACK
TILTING RUNNER MOUNTED ON THE STRUCTURE FIXED TO TRAILER
BED

TILTING
FV TV
RUNNER
TRAILER
LOAD
CARRYING
MEMBERS

FIXED TO
FLOOR
FRAME
FIXED TO FOR HYDRAULIC TILTING
TRAILER BED JACK RUNNER
Continued..

SECTION DEVELOPMENT
Here, Z is the section modulus
1. FOR LOAD CARRYING MEMBERS:

B
ℍ
h
H

b/2

I -SECTION

BOX SECTION

H
h

b
Continued..

Higher is the section modulus Z , more is the strength of section

Thus, 250*300 BOX SECTION is preferred over I-SECTION for the load carrying members

2. FOR SUPPORTS FIXED TO THE GROUND

Since, during maintenance work, the

entire load will be carried by the supports,
BOX SECTION is preferred over I-section

3. OTHER SUPPORT BEAMS

I-SECTION, Since they should have high strength but weight of the structure should be kept minimum
Continued..

STAGE 2:
A CARRIAGE TO CARRY THE TILTING RUNNER MOUNTED ON THE STRUCTURE TO THE
MAINTENANCE SITE

SELECTION CRITERIA
1. Complexity of the site FV
TILTING
2. Lower centre of gravity
3. Effect of gravity, weight and centrifugal forces RUNNER
4. Optimum Velocity and turning radius

STRUCTURE
FRAME

1300

SUPPORT CLAMPING LIFTING/ LOWERING

FLAT BED TRAILER MECHANISM MECHANISM MECHANISM
STAGE 3:
1. CLAMPING MECHANISM : 2. SUPPORT MECHANISM: 3. LIFTING/LOWERING
MECHANISM
CONSIDERATIONS: CONSIDERATIONS: CONSIDERATIONS:
1. Clamping force should not be lower than the 1. Load should be distributed instead of
1. Capacity of hydraulic cylinder
friction between trailer and structure. point load
2. Stroke length and number of strokes
2. The stress developed should be within the 2. Reaction forces should balance the
required for lift
limiting value gravity
3. Force required at the hand pump
3. Higher load carrying capacity
Cylinder: Aeroboom ARR-3014
(4) TR 30*6 Trapezoidal thread (4) Screw nut arrangement, 30Ton CAP,
and 8.8 Grade bolt 368mm stroke length
lever operated
Hand Pump: Aeroboom P-175D
10000psi,
Oil o/p per stroke = 5.7cc
Handle force = 50.8Kg
 SOLIDWORKS MODELLING

LOAD CARRYING
MEMBER (2 IN NO’s) .
SITTING POSITION OF
TILTING RUNNER SUPPORT BEAMS FOR
TILTING RUNNER TO
PREVENT LINEAR OR
SUPPORT BEAMS ANGULAR MOTION
FOR
STRENGTHENING
THE STRUCTURE

CLAMPING SCREW
NUT ARRANGEMENT
(4 in NO’s) CLAMPING
MECHANISM VIA
SCREW NUT
POSITION OF HYDRAULIC JACK
(4 in NO’s). LIFTING OR
LOWERING MECHANISM
ALONG WITH HAND PUMP
WEIGHT OF EQUIPMENT =
5TON
WEIGHT OF TILTING
RUNNER = 30TON
TOTAL WEIGHT = 35TON
BASE PLATE
RESTING ON THE
STOOL
LOAD CARRYING MEMBER FOR
PLATFORM FOR THE ASSEMBLY WHEN PLACED
HAND PUMP ON THE FLOOR DURING
SERVICING(4 in NO’s). SUPPORT
MECHANISM VIA SCREW NUT
Continued..

FRONT VIEW
TOP VIEW

SIDE VIEW DIAMETRIC VIEW

 STRUCTURE FOR HANDLING
TILTING RUNNER IS PLACED ON
THE TRAILER BED CENTRE, WITH
THE HELP OF EOT CRANE
CLAMPING SCREW NUT IS
OPERATED BY A HAND LEVER AND
STRUCTURE IS CLAMPED TO THE
TRAILER BED
TILTING RUNNER IS PLACED ON
THE STRUCTURE CENTRE WITH
THE HELP OF EOT CRANE
TRAILER CARRIES THE TILTING
RUNNER MOUNTED ON THE
STRUCTURE TO THE SERVICE AREA
CLAMPING SCREW NUT IS
OPERATED TO DECLAMP THE
STRUCTURE FROM THE TRAILER
BED
STOOL IS PLACED UNDER ALL THE
FOUR HYDRAULIC JACKS
HAND PUMP IS OPERATED WITH
LOW PRESSURE SETTING THROUGH
VALVE TILL ITS BASE PLATE
TOUCHES THE STOOL
NOW HAND PUMP IS OPERATED WITH
HIGH PRESSURE SETTING THROUGH
VALVE AND THE STRUCTURE WITH
THE TILTING RUNNER IS LIFTED
THROUGH 100 mm
SLOWLY AND CAREFULLY THE
TRAILER CAN BE MOVED AND
RELEASED
HAND PUMP IS OPERATED AND
STRUCTURE IS LOWERED WITH PLACED AT ITS CENTRE
TILTING RUNNER TO 50mm APPROX. EQUIPMENT
SCREW NUT OF FOUR SUPPORTS ARE
OPERATED TO TRANSFER ALL THE
LOADS ONTO THE SUPPORT
ALL HYDRAULIC JACKS ARE
RELEASED AND STOOLS ARE
REMOVED AND ITILTING RUNNER IS
NOW READY FOR SERVICE STOOLS ARE PLACED
CLAMPED TO TRAILER BED AT
UNDER THIS
THIS POSITION
AFTER SERVICING THE REVERSE
PROCESS IS APPLIED
 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS (USING ANSYS)

Mass of the Tilting Runner = 35ton

Areas of application of
point load
CASE3:
Fixed to the floor
during maintenance
period (at all 4
positions)

Gravity = 9.8 m/s²

CASE1:
Position at which structure is
clamped to the trailer bed
(at all four positions)

CASE2:
Fixed on a stool and the
assembly is lifted by For structural steel :
application of pressure
(at all four positions) YIELD STRESS = 250 Mpa (min)
ULTIMATE TENSILE STRESS = 400-550 MPa
 EQUIVALENT STRESS

CASE 1: When the structure is clamped to the CASE 2: When the tilting runner is lifted or
trailer bed lowered using hydraulic jack and hand pump

CONCLUSION:
The stress acting on the load carrying members is within the permissible
value
⇒ OVERALL STRESS < 100MPa (much less than the yielding value)
Thus the design is safe under this condition of load and support! FOS = 2.8
CONCLUSION:
The stress acting on the load carrying members is within the
permissible value
⇒ OVERALL STRESS < 100MPa (much less than the yielding value)
Thus the design is safe under this condition of load and support! FOS = 5

CASE 3: When the structure is fixed onto the

floor during maintenance period

CONCLUSION:
The stress acting on the load carrying members
is within the permissible value
⇒ (OVERALL STRESS < 100MPa
NO RED ZONE ON THE LOAD much less than the yielding value)
CARRYING MEMBERS Thus the design is safe under this condition of
load and support! FOS = 4
 TOTAL DEFORMATION

CASE 1: When the structure is clamped to the CASE 2: When the tilting runner is lifted or
trailer bed lowered using hydraulic jack and hand pump

CONCLUSION:
CONCLUSION:
THRESHOLD LIMIT = Length/100 = 3570/100 = 35.7mm
THRESHOLD LIMIT = Length/100 = 3570/100 = 35.7mm
Since, Maximum deflection =1.3456mm << threshold limit
Since, Maximum deflection = 2.4804mm << threshold limit
⇒DESIGN IS SAFE! ⇒DESIGN IS SAFE!

CASE 3: When the structure is fixed onto the

floor during maintenance period

CONCLUSION:
THRESHOLD LIMIT = Length/100 = 3570/100 =
LOAD CARRYING MEMBERS
35.7mm
LENGTH = 3570mm Since, Maximum deflection =2.7mm << threshold limit
⇒DESIGN IS SAFE!
 REVIEW OF ANSYS EVALUATION

WHEN TILTING DURING LIFTING WHEN THE

CASES
RUNNER IS OR LOWERING STRUCTURE IS
CLAMPED TO OPERATION FIXED TO THE
PARAMETERS TRAILER FLOOR

STRESS ON LOAD
CARRYING 90MPa 50MPa 60MPa
MEMBERS

FOS 2.8 5 4

MAXIMUM
DEFORMATION 2.48mm 1.3456mm 2.7mm

COMMENTS:
For all the three cases stress on the load carrying members is within the limiting value of yield stress for structural
steel i.e 250MPa. Thus design is safe!

The FOS is higher when the structure is fixed to floor i.e. during maintenance than that when clamped to the trailer
⇒The structure is safe from design point of view.

The maximum deflection is highest when the fixed point are farthest from the load carrying members. But in all
three cases it is much less than its threshold value. Thus design is safe!
Total weight ‘W’ = Weight of tilting runner ‘Wt’ +
Weight of equipment ‘We’
=> (30000+5000)*9.8 = 343000 N
Frictional force F = (Friction coeff.) *W
=> 0.16*343000 = 54880 N
This frictional force ‘F ‘ is the limiting value for
clamping force i.e. Clamping force ‘Fc’ should be
greater than or equal to ‘F’ in order to avoid
LOCATION IN THE
coupling.. STRUCTURE
Taking Clamping force on one screw nut as Fc:-
Let Fc = F = 54880 N
Let d = bolt diameter = 30mm
Let k = nut factor = 0.17
Let T = bolt torque = Fc*K*d
=> T = 54880*0.17*30
= 2.79888*10^5
CLAMPING
POSITION
 Trapezoidal Thread used is TR 30*6
Thread specifications: d = nominal diameter = 30mm
P = pitch = 6mm
d3 = root diameter = 27mm
d2 = pitch diameter = 24mm
As= effective stress area of thread
=> {(22/7)*(d3 + d2)^2}/16
= 510.705 sq.mm
Bolt used is 4.6 GRADE BOLT
Bolt specifications : proof stress = 225 Mpa
yield stress = 240 Mpa (min)
tensile stress = 400 Mpa (min)
From above calculations:
Minimum stress developed in the screw nut = Fc/As
= 107.456MPa
Since the stress developed is less than the
limiting value for 4.6 grade bolt, design is safe!
We are using a 8.8 GRADE BOLT for this operation to have
higher clamping force; Its specifications are:
Tensile stress = 800MPa
Yield stress = 640MPa
When the tilting runner and structure are mounted on the trailer, and the trailer moves around a horizontal
circular path, centripetal force is provided by frictional force between trailer and the assembly
Thus the maximum centrifugal force ‘Fcg’ that can act on the system is same as friction ‘F’.

NOMENCLATURE:
M = mass of tilting runner + mass of equipment = 35000Kg
R = Turning radius in m
µ = Friction coefficient = 0.16
V = velocity of trailer in Km/hr
g = acceleration due to gravity= 9.8m/s²

F = 0.16*35000*9.8 = 54880 N
Fcg = (M* V²)/R
Condition for Safe loading
Fcg ≤ F

TRAILER BED
TO FIND OPTIMUM RANGE OF SPEED AND TURNING RADIUS
Comparison between velocity and turning radius:-

FORMULA USED Fcg = MV²/R

V
Velocity V Turning radius R Centrifugal force Fcg
(in km/hr) (in m) (in N) [Fcg ≤54880N]

10 20 13503.10
10 10 27006.20
10 5 54012.30
15 20 30381.90
15 15 40509.30 R
15 12 50636.60
15 11 55236.60 RECOMMENDATION-
OPTIMUM SPEED RANGE =
10km/hr – 15 km/hr
OPTIMUM TURNING RADIUS =
At V = 15 km/hr and R = 11m , Fc > F, which ≥12m
doesn’t satisfy the condition
Thus we conclude:
For V ≤ 15km/hr, R should be ≥11.5m
HYDRAULIC CYLINDER
SPECIFICATIONS HAND PUMP
Cylinder capacity = 30ton
SPECIFICATIONS
Type= double acting
Stroke length = 368mm Type - double acting
No. of cylinders required = 4 Oil output per stroke = 5.7
Total Load on all 4 cylinders = cc
35ton Handle force = 50.8Kg
Cylinder diameter= 85mm
Required lift = 100mm
LOCATION IN THE
STRUCTURE
Let R = radius of cylinder = 42.5mm PRINCIPLE OF HYDRAULIC JACK
Let H = required lift = 100mm
Volume of hydraulic cylinder V = Π*R²*H
⇒V = 5.67*10² cc
Net volume of 4 cylinders V’ = 2.2698*10³ cc
Pump output per stroke Po = 5.7 cc

Number of strokes required for 100 mm lift = V’/Po

= 398 strokes
Fourth side is
For lifting 35 ton, 50.8Kg handle force is required open to insert
⇒ For 9 ton (load on each cylinder), Handle force = the hydraulic
jack
(50.8/35)*9 = 13Kg Handle force
 ASSET TO TATA STEEL

•RISK OF ACCIDENTS DUE TO CRANE FAILURE WILL REDUCE

• LESS MAN-MACHINE INTERACTION WILL LEAD TO SAFER

MAINTENANCE PROCESS

• MTTR CAN BE SAVED UPTO 4 HRS

• IF SUCCESSFULLY INSTALLED AT IBF, CAN ALSO BE USED AT

OTHER BLAST FURNACES LIKE H-BF.
I would like to take this opportunity to express my gratitude to the “TATA STEEL MANAGEMENT”
for giving me this golden opportunity to work on this project.
My sincere thanks to Dr. Pinaki Ray, HEAD EXPERT, MEG DESIGN @TATA STEEL LTD. for his
immense support throughout these two months. Heartiest thanks to my guide- Mr. Soumyajit Maiti,
Technologist, MEG DESIGN, who provided me the right preparatory guidance. I am also thankful to
Mr. Rahul Kumar Karn, Senior Manager, MEG DESIGN for his immense help and guidance.
The Personnel of MEG DESIGN DEPARTMENT were very cooperative, their valuable suggestions
played a key role in the completion of my project.
I wish to express my sincere gratitude to Mr. Daya Shankar Choudhary, Head of Mechanical
maintenance, I-BLAST FURNACE and Mr. Kumar Sanu, Senior Manager, Mechanical
Maintenance, I-BLAST FURNACE for they made me acquainted with every important details of my
project . It was they who helped me frame the project in my mind despite their busy schedule so that I
could be able to come up with the idea.
Last but not the least, I would like to thanks My family and friends for their valuable support and co-
operation.
• [1] Rattan S.S. , “Strength of Materials”, TATA McGraw-Hill Education pvt Ltd., 2nd Edition, 2011
• [2] Bhandari V.B., “Design of Machine Elements”, TATA McGraw-Hill Education pvt Ltd., 3rd Edition,2015
• [3] Jalaludeen S.Md., “Design Data Handbook”, Anuradha Publications, 1 st Edition, 2009
• [4] THE BLAST FURNACE- IRON PRODUCTION- Technology Student
• [5] www.tatasteel.com
• [6] AEROBOOM- World Wide Hydraulic Solutions , Aeroboom.com
• [7] The Blast Furnace Cast house - Danieli Corus, www.danieli-corus.com
• [8] Khurmi R.S., “Theory of Structures”, S.Chand Publications, 2013
• [9] http://CamInstructor.com/solidworks-training-academic
• [10] http://www.Lynda.com/Solidworks-training-tutorials/1157-0.html
• [11] https://sites.ualberta.ca/~wmoussa/AnsysTutorial/BT/BT.html
• [12] Ispatguru.com – Blast Furnace Cast house and its Operation
• [13] Blast Furnace Trough and Runners, Cerameet.com
• [14] Indiamart.com – Tata trucks and Trailers
• [15] Engineersedge.com – Beam Deflection and Structural Analysis
THANK YOU

UNDER THE GUIDANCE OF:-

Dr. PINAKI RAY
Head Expert Group (Design)
Mr. SOUMYAJIT MAITI
Technologist, MEG Design
TATA STEEL LIMITED, JAMSHEDPUR.