DESIGN OF MEMBERS FOR

COMBINED FORCES

CE 470: Steel Design

By:
Amit H. Varma
Design of Members for Combined Forces
 Chapter H of the AISC Specification
 This chapter addresses members subject to axial force
and flexure about one or both axes.
 H1 - Doubly and singly symmetric members
 H1.1 Subject to flexure and compression
 The interaction of flexure and compression in doubly
symmetric members and singly symmetric members for
which 0.1  Iyc / Iy  0.9, that are constrained to bend about
a geometric axis (x and/or y) shall be limited by the
Equations shown below.
 Iyc is the moment of inertia about the y-axis referred to the
compression flange.
Design of Members for Combined Forces
Pr
For  0.2
Pc
Pr 8 M rx M ry 
 
  
 1.0
Pc 9 M cx M cy 
Pr
For  0.2
Pc
Pr M rx M ry 
 
  
 1.0
2Pc M cx M cy 
where,
 x = subscript relating symbol to strong axis bending

 y = subscript relating symbol to weak axis bending
Design of Members for Combined Forces
 Pr = required axial compressive strength using LRFD
load combinations
 Mr = required flexural strength using LRFD load
combinations
 Pc = c Pn = design axial compressive strength according
to Chapter E
 Mc = b Mn = design flexural strength according to
Chapter F.
 c = 0.90 and b = 0.90
Design of Members for Combined Forces
 H1.2 Doubly and singly symmetric members in flexure
and tension
 Use the same equations indicated earlier
 But, Pr = required tensile strength
 Pc = t Pn = design tensile strength according to Chapter
D, Section D2.
 t = 0.9
 For doubly symmetric members, Cb in Chapter F may be
𝛼𝑃𝑟
multiplied by 1+ for axial tension that acts
𝑃𝑒𝑦
concurrently with flexure
𝜋2 𝐸𝐼𝑦
• Where, 𝑃𝑒𝑦 =
𝐿2𝑏
; α=1(LRFD)
Design of Members for Combined Forces

 H1.3 Doubly symmetric rolled compact members in

single axis flexure and compression
 For doubly symmetric rolled compact members with
𝐾𝐿 𝑧 ≤ 𝐾𝐿 𝑦 in flexure and compression with moments
primarily about major axis, it is permissible to consider two
independent limit states separately, namely, (i) in-plane
instability, and (ii) out-of-plane or lateral-torsional buckling.
 This is instead of the combined approach of Section H1.1
𝑀𝑟𝑦
 For members with ൗ𝑀𝑐𝑦 ≥ 0.05, Section H1.1 shall be
followed.
Design of Members for Combined Forces
 For the limit state of in-plane instability, Equations H1-1
shall be used with Pc, Mrx, and Mcx determined in the
plane of bending.
 For the limit state of out-of-plane/lateral torsional buckling:
2
𝑃𝑟 𝑃𝑟 𝑀𝑟𝑥
1.5 − 0.5 + ≤ 1.0
𝑃𝑐𝑦 𝑃𝑐𝑦 𝐶𝑏 𝑀𝑐𝑥

where:
𝑃𝑐𝑦 = available compressive strength out of plane of bending
𝐶𝑏 = lateral torsional buckling modification factor (Section F1)
𝑀𝑐𝑥= available lateral-torsional strength for strong axis
flexure (Chapter F, using 𝐶𝑏 =1)
Design of Members for Combined Forces.
 The provisions of Section H1 apply to rolled wide-flange
shapes, channels, tee-shapes, round, square, and
rectangular tubes, and many other possible
combinations of doubly or singly symmetric sections
built-up from plates.

cPY

Section P-M interaction

For zero-length beam-column

cPY

bMp
 Design of Members for Combined Forces.
 P-M interaction curve according to Section H1.1

cPY

P-M interaction
Column axial load capacity  P
c n for zero length
accounting for x and y axis
buckling

P-M interaction
for full length

cPn

bMn bMp

Beam moment capacity

accounting for in-plane behavior
and lateral-torsional buckling
 Design of Members for Combined Forces.
 P-M interaction according to Section H1.3

cPY P-M interaction

for zero length

Column axial load capacity

P P-M interaction
accounting for x axis buckling c nx
In-plane, full length
Column axial load capacity
P
accounting for y axis buckling c ny P-M interaction
Out-plane, full length

cPnx

bMn bMp
Out-of-plane Beam moment capacity
accounting for lateral-torsional buckling
In-plane Beam moment capacity
accounting for flange local buckling
Design of Members for Combined Forces.
 Steel Beam-Column Selection Tables
 Table 6-1 W shapes in Combined Axial and Bending
1
p (kips) 1
c Pn
8
bx  (kip  ft ) 1
9b M nx
8
by  (kip  ft ) 1
9b M ny
 If pPr  0.2 : pPr  bx M rx  by M ry  1.0

 bx M rx  by M ry   1.0
pPr 9
If pPr  0.2 :
2 8
 The values of p and bx for each rolled W section is provided
in Table 6-1 for different unsupported lengths KLy or Lb.
 The Table also includes the values of by, ty, and tr for all the
rolled sections. These values are independent of length
Design of Members for Combined Forces.
 Table 6-1 is normally used with iteration to determine an
appropriate shape.
 After selecting a trial shape, the sum of the load ratios
reveals if that trial shape is close, conservative, or
unconservative with respect to 1.0.
 When the trial shape is unconservative, and axial load
effects dominate, the second trial shape should be one
with a larger value of p.
 Similarly, when the X-X or Y-Y axis flexural effects
dominate, the second trial shape should one with a larger
value of bx or by, respectively.
 This process should be repeated until an acceptable shape
is determined.
Estimating Required Forces - Analysis
 The beam-column interaction equation include both the
required axial forces and moments, and the available
capacities.
 The available capacities are based on column and beam
strengths, and the P-M interaction equations try to
account for their interactions.
 However, the required Pr and Mr forces are determined
from analysis of the structure. This poses a problem,
because the analysis SHOULD account for second-order
effects.
 1st order analysis DOES NOT account for second-order
effects.
 What is 1st order analysis and what are second-order
effects?
First-Order Analysis
 The most important assumption in 1st order analysis is
that FORCE EQUILIBRIUM is established in the
UNDEFORMED state.
 All the analysis techniques taught in CE270, CE371, and
CE474 are first-order.
 These analysis techniques assume that the deformation
of the member has NO INFLUENCE on the internal
forces (P, V, M etc.) calculated by the analysis.
 This is a significant assumption that DOES NOT work
when the applied axial forces are HIGH.
First-Order Analysis
Results from a 1st order analysis
M1 M2
P P

V1
-V1
Free Body M(x)
diagram In undeformed state
x
M(x) = M1+V1 x

M1 Moment diagram M2

Has no influence of deformations or axial forces

Second Order Effects
M1 M2
P P

V1
-V1
P M1
Free Body M(x) In deformed state
diagram V1 v(x) is the vertical deformation
x
M(x) = M1+V1 x + P v(x)

M1 Moment diagram M2

Includes effects of deformations & axial forces

Second Order Effects
Second Order Effects
 Clearly, there is a moment amplification due to second-
order effects. This amplification should be accounted for
in the results of the analysis.
 The design moments for a braced frame (or frame
restrained for sway) can be obtained from a first order
analysis.
 But, the first order moments will have to amplified to
account for second-order effects.
 According to the AISC specification, this amplification can
be achieved with the factor B1
Cm
B1   1.0
Pr
1
Pe1
Second Order Effects

Pe1 = 2EI/(K1L)2
I =moment of inertia in the plane of bending
K1=1.0 for braced case
Second Order Effects

Sign Convention for M1/M2

Further Moment Amplification
 This second-order effect accounts for the deflection of
the beam in between the two supported ends (that do
not translate).
 That is, the second-order effects due to the deflection from
the chord of the beam.
 When the frame is free to sway, then there are additional
second-order effects due to the deflection of the chord.
 The second-order effects associated with the sway of the
member () chord.
Further Moment Amplification
P
 Mo P Mmax
Mo

+ =

Mo
Mo
P
As you can see, there is a moment amplification due
to the sway of the beam chord by .
This is also referred as the story P- effect that
produces second-order moments in sway frames due
to inter-story drift.
All the beam-columns in the story will have P- effect
Further Moment Amplification
 The design moments for a sway frame (or unrestrained
frame) can be obtained from a first order analysis.
 But, the first order moments will have to amplified to
account for second-order P- effects.
 According to the AISC specification, this amplification can
be achieved with the factor B2
1
B2   1.0
Pstory
1
Pe story
Further Moment Amplification
The final understanding
 The required forces (Pr, Vr, and Mr) can be obtained from a
first-order analysis of the frame structure. But, they have to
be amplified to account for second-order effects.
 For the braced frame, only the P- effects of deflection from
the chord will be present.
 For the sway frame, both the P- and the P- effects of
deflection from and of the chord will be present.
 These second-order effects can be accounted for by the
following approach.
 Step 1 - Develop a model of the building structure, where the
sway or interstory drift is restrained at each story. Achieve
this by providing a horizontal reaction at each story
 Step 2 - Apply all the factored loads (D, L, W, etc.) acting on
the building structure to this restrained model.
The final understanding
 Step 3 - Analyze the restrained structure. The resulting forces
are referred as Pnt, Vnt, Mnt, where ‘nt’ stands for no
translation (restrained). The horizontal reactions at each story
have to be stored
 Step 4 - Go back to the original model, and remove the
restraints at each story. Apply the horizontal reactions at each
story with a negative sign as the new loading. DO NOT apply
any of the factored loads.
 Step 5 - Analyze the unrestrained structure. The resulting
forces are referred as Plt, Vlt, and Mlt, where ‘lt’ stands for
lateral translation (free).
 Step 6 - Calculate the required forces for design using
Pr = Pnt + B2 Plt
Vr = Vnt + B2 Vlt
Mr = B1 Mnt + B2 Mlt
Example