Final Presentation

The Northeastern
Pennsylvania Office Building
Christopher Havens
Penn State AE Senior Capstone Project

Construction Management
Spring 2012
Dr. Chimay Anumba – CM Advisor

The Northeastern Pennsylvania Office Building The Northeastern Pennsylvania Office Building
Christopher Havens | Construction Management Christopher Havens | Construction Management
Presentation Outline
I. Project Background
II. Analysis 1: Replacing the PEMB

I. Structural Breadth
III. Analysis 2: Design-Build Phase 2 & 3
IV. Analysis 3: Horizontal Expansion vs.

Vertical Expansion
V. Analysis 4: Geothermal System

I. Mechanical Breadth
VI. Recommendations
VII.Acknowledgements
Project Background
I. Project Background Building Information:
II. Analysis 1: Replacing the PEMB  Anonymous Project – Owner’s Request

I. Structural Breadth  Phase 1 of Multi-Phase Project
 $ 5.4 Million
 June 2011 – March 2012
IV. Analysis 3: Horizontal Expansion vs.  Two Buildings
Vertical Expansion  Office Building: ~11,000 SF
 50 Employees
V. Analysis 4: Geothermal System  Shop Building: ~14,000 SF
I. Mechanical Breadth  4 Work Bays, 1 Wash Bay
 Design-Bid-Build
VI. Recommendations
Replacing the Pre-Engineered Metal Building

I. Project Background Reason for Analysis:
II. Analysis 1: Replacing the PEMB  PEMB for Industrial/Commercial Project… But Why?
I. Structural Breadth  Cost?
 Schedule?
 Ease of Construction?
Standard Steel
Vertical Expansion  How Do Other Structural Systems Compare?
 Standard Steel
V. Analysis 4: Geothermal System  Cast-In-Place Concrete Cast-In-Place Concrete
I. Mechanical Breadth  Tilt-Up Concrete
Pre-Engineered Metal Building
VI. Recommendations
Tilt-Up Concrete

I. Project Background Criteria for Study:
II. Analysis 1: Replacing the PEMB  Schedule & Cost

I. Structural Breadth  Constructability
 Regional Constraints
 Delivery Issues
IV. Analysis 3: Horizontal Expansion vs.  Weather Constraints
Vertical Expansion  Typical Construction Projects
 Impact on Other Building Systems
V. Analysis 4: Geothermal System  Environmental Impact
VI. Recommendations
VII.Acknowledgements Pre-Engineered Metal Building


I. Project Background Criteria for Study: Results:
II. Analysis 1: Replacing the PEMB  Schedule & Cost  No Major Advantages/Disadvantages
I. Structural Breadth  Constructability  Schedule & Cost
 Regional Constraints  Constructability
 Delivery Issues  Impacts on Other Building Systems
IV. Analysis 3: Horizontal Expansion vs.  Weather Constraints
Vertical Expansion  Typical Construction Projects
 Impact on Other Building Systems
V. Analysis 4: Geothermal System  Environmental Impact
VI. Recommendations


I. Project Background Results:
Regional Constraints
II. Analysis 1: Replacing the PEMB  Higher $ to Heat Concrete
I. Structural Breadth  Cast-In-Place
 Tilt-Up
IV. Analysis 3: Horizontal Expansion vs.  Common Structures in Area

Vertical Expansion  Steel
V. Analysis 4: Geothermal System Environmental Impact

I. Mechanical Breadth  Fewer Harmful Emissions
 Steel
VI. Recommendations
 Lesser Depletion of Natural Resources
 Steel

Regional Constraints
II. Analysis 1: Replacing the PEMB  Higher $ to Heat Concrete
 Tilt-Up
IV. Analysis 3: Horizontal Expansion vs.  Common Structures in Area

Vertical Expansion  Steel

I. Mechanical Breadth  Fewer Harmful Emissions
 Steel
VI. Recommendations
 Steel

I. Project Background Results: Results:
Regional Constraints Standard Cast-In-Place Tilt-Up Precast
II. Analysis 1: Replacing the PEMB  Higher $ to Heat Concrete Steel Concrete Concrete
Schedule & Cost X X X
 Tilt-Up
III. Analysis 2: Design-Build Phase 2 & 3 Constructability X X X
IV. Analysis 3: Horizontal Expansion vs.  Common Structures in Area Regional Constraints X
Vertical Expansion  Steel Impact on Other X X X
Building Systems
I. Mechanical Breadth  Fewer Harmful Emissions Environmental X
 Steel Impact
VI. Recommendations
 Steel

I. Project Background Results: Results:
Regional Constraints Standard Cast-In-Place Tilt-Up Precast
II. Analysis 1: Replacing the PEMB  Higher $ to Heat Concrete Steel Concrete Concrete
Schedule & Cost X X X
 Tilt-Up
III. Analysis 2: Design-Build Phase 2 & 3 Constructability X X X
IV. Analysis 3: Horizontal Expansion vs.  Common Structures in Area Regional Constraints X
Vertical Expansion  Steel Impact on Other X X X
Building Systems
I. Mechanical Breadth  Fewer Harmful Emissions Environmental X
 Steel Impact
VI. Recommendations
 Lesser Depletion of Natural Resources Best Alternate Structure: Standard Steel
 Steel
Structural Breadth
I. Project Background Office Frame: Shop Frame:

I. Structural Breadth 40’
III. Analysis 2: Design-Build Phase 2 & 3 21’ 35’

17’
52’ 58’
Vertical Expansion

Superimposed – 2.69 PSF Tributary Width: 24’ Superimposed – 3.52 PSF Tributary Width: 40’
VI. Recommendations Pre-Engineered Metal Building Collateral – 10.0 PSF Collateral – 10.0 PSF
Snow – 30.0 PSF Snow – 30.0 PSF
VII.Acknowledgements Self-Weight (Assumed) – 8.0 PSF Self-Weight (Assumed) – 8.0 PSF
Structural Breadth
I. Project Background Load Combination:
1.2D + 1.6S

Vertical Expansion

VI. Recommendations Pre-Engineered Metal Building
Structural Breadth
1.2D + 1.6S
I. Structural Breadth Building Loads:
III. Analysis 2: Design-Build Phase 2 & 3 Multiply by Trib. Area to Find Distributed Load

Vertical Expansion

Structural Breadth
1.2D + 1.6S
IV. Analysis 3: Horizontal Expansion vs. Reactions:

Vertical Expansion Use Free Body Diagrams to Sum Forces & Moments
Structural Breadth
1.2D + 1.6S

V. Analysis 4: Geothermal System Max. Shear & Moment:
Use FBD’s to Sum Forces & Moments on Each Member
Structural Breadth
1.2D + 1.6S

Use FBD’s to Sum Forces & Moments on Each Member
Size Members:
Use Steel Manual Values to Determine Size of Each Member
Structural Breadth
I. Project Background Load Combination: Estimate Cost & Schedule:
1.2D + 1.6S Use RS Means Building Construction Cost Data 2012
Included in Structural Steel Estimate:
III. Analysis 2: Design-Build Phase 2 & 3 Multiply by Trib. Area to Find Distributed Load  Steel Members
 Bolts
 Base Plates
Vertical Expansion Use Free Body Diagrams to Sum Forces & Moments  Purlins
 Metal Siding/Roofing
Use FBD’s to Sum Forces & Moments on Each Member NOT Included in Estimate:
VI. Recommendations Pre-Engineered Metal Building  Design Fees
Size Members:  Fabrication Fees
VII.Acknowledgements  Documentation Fees
Use Steel Manual Values to Determine Size of Each Member


I. Structural Breadth PEMB Structural Steel
III. Analysis 2: Design-Build Phase 2 & 3 Schedule June 14– Nov. 16 June 14– Nov. 4
Cost $661,500 $682,500
Vertical Expansion
Note: Structural Steel Estimate Does Not Include:
V. Analysis 4: Geothermal System  Design Fees
I. Mechanical Breadth  Fabrication Fees
 Documentation Fees
VI. Recommendations


I. Project Background Results: Conclusion:
 Steel (Without Fees) is $21,000 > PEMB
I. Structural Breadth PEMB Structural Steel  Steel is 8 Days < PEMB
III. Analysis 2: Design-Build Phase 2 & 3 Schedule June 14– Nov. 16 June 14– Nov. 4
Cost $661,500 $682,500
Vertical Expansion
Note: Structural Steel Estimate Does Not Include: PEMB Should NOT Be Replaced By Standard Steel Structure
V. Analysis 4: Geothermal System  Design Fees Schedule Acceleration is Not Expected to Cover Additional Cost
I. Mechanical Breadth  Fabrication Fees
 Documentation Fees
VI. Recommendations

Design-Build Phase 2 & 3

II. Analysis 1: Replacing the PEMB  Phase 2 & 3 are Nearly Identical to Phase 1
 Could Later Phases Be Design-Build?
III.Analysis 2: Design-Build Phase 2
&3
 If So, What are the Benefits?
Vertical Expansion

VI. Recommendations

Design-Bid-Build:
Design Bid Build

I. Structural Breadth 4 Mon. 1 Mon. 9 Mon.

&3
4 Mon.
Vertical Expansion Design-Build:
V. Analysis 4: Geothermal System Build

Bid Design 8 Mon.
VI. Recommendations 1 Mon. 4 Mon.

Design-Bid-Build:
Design Bid Build

I. Structural Breadth 4 Mon. 1 Mon. 9 Mon.

&3
4 Mon.
V. Analysis 4: Geothermal System Build

Bid Design 8 Mon.

Design-Bid-Build: Conclusion:
Design Bid Build

II. Analysis 1: Replacing the PEMB  Each Phase Accelerated About 4 Months
I. Structural Breadth 4 Mon. 1 Mon. 9 Mon.  Fewer Change Orders
 Earlier Turnover Date
&3  Increased Revenue for Owner
4 Mon.
V. Analysis 4: Geothermal System Build Phase 2 & 3 SHOULD Be Delivered as Design-Build Projects
Bid Design 8 Mon.
Horizontal Expansion vs. Vertical Expansion

I. Project Background Reason for Analysis: Criteria for Study:
II. Analysis 1: Replacing the PEMB  Schematic Phase of Design Based on Owner Interview:
 Owner Wants to Double the Size of the Office Building 1.Schedule Impacts
2.Project Cost Impacts
IV. Analysis 3: Horizontal  Two Options for Expansion 3.Limiting Change Orders
Expansion vs. Vertical  Horizontal 4.Functionality
Expansion  Vertical 5.Aesthetics

Original Building
VI. Recommendations

Schedule:
 Horizontal
 June 14– Dec. 7
 Vertical
 June 14– Nov. 23
Project Cost:
 Horizontal
Horizontal Expansion  $176,000 Vertical Expansion
 Vertical
 $231,000 Original Building

Schedule:
 Horizontal
 June 14– Dec. 7
 Vertical
 June 14– Nov. 23
Project Cost:
 Horizontal
Horizontal Expansion  $176,000 Vertical Expansion
 Vertical
 $231,000 Original Building

Limiting Change Orders: Aesthetics:
 Repetition of Work  More Traditional

 Horizontal  Vertical
Functionality:
 Elongated Floorplan
 Horizontal
 Stacked Floorplan
Horizontal Expansion  Vertical Vertical Expansion
Original Building

Limiting Change Orders: Aesthetics:
 Repetition of Work  More Traditional

 Horizontal  Vertical
Functionality:
 Elongated Floorplan
 Horizontal
 Stacked Floorplan
Horizontal Expansion  Vertical Vertical Expansion
Original Building

I. Project Background Conclusion:
II. Analysis 1: Replacing the PEMB Owner’s Priorities Horizontal Vertical

Schedule Impacts X
III. Analysis 2: Design-Build Phase 2 & 3 Project Cost Impacts X
IV. Analysis 3: Horizontal Limiting Change Orders X
Expansion vs. Vertical Functionality X
 asdf
Expansion
Aesthesis X
Original Building
I. Mechanical Breadth VERTICAL EXPANSION Should Be Chosen Vertical Expansion
VI. Recommendations Shorter Schedule (#1 Owner Priority)
More Pleased Employees (Functionality & Aesthetics)
Geothermal System
II. Analysis 1: Replacing the PEMB  Geothermal System in Shop Building

I. Structural Breadth  Replace Gas-Fired Heaters
 Environmentally Friendly
Vertical Expansion

VI. Recommendations
Geothermal System
I. Project Background Reason for Analysis: System Components (From Mech. Breadth):
II. Analysis 1: Replacing the PEMB  Geothermal System in Shop Building  Horizontal Closed Loop System
I. Structural Breadth  Replace Gas-Fired Heaters  ~4,000 FT Buried 5 FT Below Grade
 Environmentally Friendly  20 TON ( 200 MBH) Heat Exchanger
Vertical Expansion  Terminal Units
 ‘Chilled Beams’
VI. Recommendations
Loop System Heat Exchanger Chilled Beams
Geothermal System
I. Project Background Cost & Schedule: Additional Factors:
II. Analysis 1: Replacing the PEMB  Payback Period

I. Structural Breadth Natural Gas Geothermal
 Low Price of Natural Gas
Cost $22,000 $41,000
Schedule 2 Weeks 5 Weeks  Cooling
IV. Analysis 3: Horizontal Expansion vs.  Overhead Doors
Vertical Expansion *Derived Using RS Means Building Construction Cost Data 2012
 Fewer Emissions
VI. Recommendations
Geothermal System
I. Project Background Cost & Schedule: Additional Factors:
II. Analysis 1: Replacing the PEMB  Payback Period

I. Structural Breadth Natural Gas Geothermal
 Low Price of Natural Gas
Cost $22,000 $41,000
Schedule 2 Weeks 5 Weeks  Cooling
IV. Analysis 3: Horizontal Expansion vs.  Overhead Doors
Vertical Expansion *Derived Using RS Means Building Construction Cost Data 2012
 Fewer Emissions
VI. Recommendations
Geothermal System
I. Project Background Conclusion:
II. Analysis 1: Replacing the PEMB  Geothermal System

I. Structural Breadth  More Expensive
 Longer Schedule
IV. Analysis 3: Horizontal Expansion vs.  Payback Period Does Not Justify Cost
Vertical Expansion
 Owner Will Not Want to Reduce Demand of Natural Gas
VI. Recommendations
Geothermal System Should NOT Be Chosen
Recommendations
I. Project Background Replacing the PEMB:
II. Analysis 1: Replacing the PEMB  Do Not Replace PEMB Structure

Design-Build Phase 2 & 3:
 Deliver Phase 2 & 3 as Design-Build Projects
Vertical Expansion
Horizontal Expansion vs. Vertical Expansion:
I. Mechanical Breadth  Choose Vertical Expansion Option
VI. Recommendations Geothermal System:
VII.Acknowledgements  Do Not Replace Gas Heaters with Geothermal System

Acknowledgements
Thank You:
II. Analysis 1: Replacing the PEMB Family & Friends

AE Faculty
III. Analysis 2: Design-Build Phase 2 & 3 Dr. Anumba
LeChase Construction
McClure Company
Vertical Expansion

VI. Recommendations Questions?


Final Presentation

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Final Presentation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

The Northeastern

Pennsylvania Office Building

Penn State AE Senior Capstone Project

Dr. Chimay Anumba – CM Advisor

Christopher Havens | Construction Management Christopher Havens | Construction Management

II. Analysis 1: Replacing the PEMB

III. Analysis 2: Design-Build Phase 2 & 3

IV. Analysis 3: Horizontal Expansion vs.

V. Analysis 4: Geothermal System

II. Analysis 1: Replacing the PEMB  Anonymous Project – Owner’s Request

Replacing the Pre-Engineered Metal Building

Replacing the Pre-Engineered Metal Building

II. Analysis 1: Replacing the PEMB  Schedule & Cost

VII.Acknowledgements Pre-Engineered Metal Building

Replacing the Pre-Engineered Metal Building

VII.Acknowledgements Pre-Engineered Metal Building

Replacing the Pre-Engineered Metal Building

IV. Analysis 3: Horizontal Expansion vs.  Common Structures in Area

V. Analysis 4: Geothermal System Environmental Impact

Replacing the Pre-Engineered Metal Building

IV. Analysis 3: Horizontal Expansion vs.  Common Structures in Area

V. Analysis 4: Geothermal System Environmental Impact

Replacing the Pre-Engineered Metal Building

Replacing the Pre-Engineered Metal Building

II. Analysis 1: Replacing the PEMB

III. Analysis 2: Design-Build Phase 2 & 3 21’ 35’

V. Analysis 4: Geothermal System

III. Analysis 2: Design-Build Phase 2 & 3

IV. Analysis 3: Horizontal Expansion vs.

V. Analysis 4: Geothermal System

VI. Recommendations Pre-Engineered Metal Building

IV. Analysis 3: Horizontal Expansion vs.

V. Analysis 4: Geothermal System

VI. Recommendations Pre-Engineered Metal Building

IV. Analysis 3: Horizontal Expansion vs. Reactions:

VI. Recommendations Pre-Engineered Metal Building

IV. Analysis 3: Horizontal Expansion vs. Reactions:

IV. Analysis 3: Horizontal Expansion vs. Reactions:

Replacing the Pre-Engineered Metal Building

II. Analysis 1: Replacing the PEMB

VII.Acknowledgements Pre-Engineered Metal Building

Replacing the Pre-Engineered Metal Building

VII.Acknowledgements Pre-Engineered Metal Building

Design-Build Phase 2 & 3

V. Analysis 4: Geothermal System

Design-Build Phase 2 & 3

Design Bid Build

III.Analysis 2: Design-Build Phase 2

V. Analysis 4: Geothermal System Build

Design-Build Phase 2 & 3

Design Bid Build

III.Analysis 2: Design-Build Phase 2

V. Analysis 4: Geothermal System Build

Design-Build Phase 2 & 3

Design Bid Build

Horizontal Expansion vs. Vertical Expansion

V. Analysis 4: Geothermal System

Horizontal Expansion vs. Vertical Expansion

Horizontal Expansion vs. Vertical Expansion

Horizontal Expansion vs. Vertical Expansion

Limiting Change Orders: Aesthetics:

 Repetition of Work  More Traditional