A PHENOMENOLOGICAL

STUDY OF
STUDENTS’
EXPERIENCES ON
SLEEP DEPRIVATION
 CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
 Background of the Study and
Locale
 Statement of the Problem
 Significance of the Study
 Scope and Delimitation
 Theoretical Framework
 Conceptual Framework
 Review of Relevant Scholarship
 Objectives of this Study
 CHAPTER 2
METHODS
Participants
Sampling Procedures
Sample Size
Instrument
Research Design
 CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION
 BACKGROUND OF THE
STUDY
 Anjum, Bajwa, & Saeed, (2014)
 Onyper, Thacher, Gilbert, & Gradess,
(2012)
 Wesensten (2012)
 Gilbert and Weaver (2010)
 Arceo-Dumlao (2014)
 Richter (2015)
 Mullin et.al (2016)
 Lahey (2014)
BACKGROUND OF
THE LOCALE
STATEMENT OF THE
PROBLEM
SIGNIFICANCE OF
THE STUDY
Students
Teachers
Parents
Future Researchers
SCOPE OF THE
STUDY
 THEORETICAL
FRAMEWORK

Hornes core versus

optional sleep theory
 CONCEPTUAL
FRAMEWORK
 The Input-Process-Output (IPO)
Model

Input

Process

Output
 REVIEW OF RELEVANT
SCHOLARSHIP
 Pietrangelo & Watson (2017)
 Wesensten(2012)

 National Sleep Foundation (2015)

 Rico, SánchezManzanares, Antino, and

Lau (2012)
 Schuman and Attarian (2012)

 McCubbin, Peach, Moore, & Pilcher,

(2012)
 Gilbert and Weaver (2010)
OBJECTIVES OF
THIS STUDY
 CHAPTER 2

METHODS
 PARTICIPANTS
Code Participants Age Sex Strand

P1 Participants 1 18 Male STEM

P2 Participants 2 16 Male STEM

P3 Participants 3 17 Male HUMSS

P4 Participants 4 16 Male ABM

P5 Participants 5 17 Male STEM

P6 Participants 6 17 Female ABM

P7 Participants 7 16 Female HUMSS

P8 Participants 8 17 Female HUMSS

P9 Participants 9 17 Male STEM

 SAMPLING
PROCEDURES

Purposive
Sampling
SAMPLE SIZE

Population

Sample Size
 INSTRUMENT
Data Gathering

Interview
RESEARCH DESIGN

Qualitative
Research