- OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY To discuss the Comparative method of research and its importance in the field of Sociology
To understand the potential of this research method.
To discuss the Cross-sectional method of study and
the longitudinal method of study. RESEARCH QUESTIONS
Q.1) Explain the Comparative method of research and its
importance. Q.2) What are the potentials of this method of research ? Q.3) What are the problems faced by the sociologists on this method of research? Q.4) Discuss the Cross-sectional method of study and the longitudinal method of study. Q.5) What is the importance of these methods? Q.6) What are the advantages and disadvantages on this method of study? INTRODUCTION Research is an attempt to know new things, facts, information etc. in a scientific manner. L.V Redman and A.V.H Mory have stated “systematised effort to gain knowledge we call re-search.” The main function of research is to collect new facts, information etc and to establish new theories on the basis of these facts. SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Research has become the central point in sociology
According to Pauline V. Young “...sociological
research is a systematic method of exploring ,analysing and conceptualising social life in order to extend ,correct ,or verify knowledge, whether that knowledge aids on construction of a theory or in practice of an art.” COMPARATIVE METHOD OF RESEARCH The Comparative method refers to “the method of comparing different societies or groups within the same society to show whether and why they are similar or different in certain respects.” The comparisons drawn by this method of research from the similarities and the differences found in the ways of the life of people of different societies gives the clues of one’s social behaviour. Sociologist and social investigators like Comte, Durkheim, Taylor, Weber, Wheeler, Ginsberg, S.F. Nadal, G.P. Murdock and others have not only used this method but also made it popular. This method was used by the philologists to study different language in the 18th Century.
In the 19th Century, this method was used by the
sociologist to trace the common origins of different social institutions by drawing comparisons on the basis of the similarities and the differences between them. Montesquieu and Comte used and recommended this method to establish and to explain both the differences and similarities between the societies in the 19th Century. Emile Durkheim his work “Division of Labour in Society” compared the legal systems at the same time and at different levels of development. In this he used law as an index of the moral character of society. By comparison “he tested his hypothesis that an increase in the division of labour is accompanied by a change in the nature of social integration or solidarity.” Taylor used this method in the study of institutions connected with the family among primitive people and was able to show that practices of mother-in-law avoidance was co- related with the systems of matrilocal residence.
Through this method, one can explain the
significance of a custom or practice, though it varies from one society to another, by studying the motives behind it. SIGNIFICANCE Emile Durkheim set out clearly the significance of the Comparative method in his “The Rules of Sociological Method”. According to him, the ‘sociological explanation consists entirely in the establishment of casual connections.’ In the case of natural sciences, the casual connections could be more easily established because of facility of experiment. Since such direct experiments are out of question in sociology, we are compelled to use the method of indirect experiment, i.e., comparative method-says Durkheim. He also said that ‘in the absence of experimental method comparative method is the only method available to the sociological disciplines.’ This method of research is important as it helps to trace the common origins of different social institutions by drawing comparisons on the basis of the similarities and the differences between them. The comparative method of research is also significant as it helps to explain the importance of a custom or practice, though it varies from one society to another, by studying the motives by them This method of research also helps in understanding and explaining the ways in which different societies and cultural experiences and act upon social, economic and political changes, plus how these views relate to more general changes and thus shared experiences and actions in the face of similar concerns and pressures that in result enables to shape and act upon the future POTENTIAL The potential for the theoretical development is a strong component of comparative research.
This also allows us to reflect upon our social
systems and cultural ways of behaving. PROBLEMS One of the primary problems with comparative analysis is not only the ability of researchers to understand adequately cultures and societies which are different from their own, but more specifically, to generalise and explain the social relations across the societies and social contexts. The problem of language, the high costs of comparative survey and observational research are the many problems of the researchers CROSS-SECTIONAL METHOD OF STUDY A study which covers a broad area of observation at a single point of time is called Cross-sectional study. For example, Campbell, Converse, and Rodger’s study, The Quality of American Life (1976), reports interviews with a national sample of 2,700 households, inquiring as to their satisfactions and dissatisfactions. They found that married people are happier than single people, that prosperous people are happier than poor people, and made many other interesting observations The national public opinion polls are cross- sectional studies. A cross-sectional study may show differences between age groups, and this is often considered as an evidence of changing attitude and behaviour. For instances, studies have shown that young people are more lenient than older people about sex behaviour and drug use. IMPORTANCE
The purposes of this method is to assess the role
of cultural in shaping outcomes.
The cross-sectional research is important as it
helps in collecting the data of many different kinds of people in a relatively short period of time. ADVANTAGES The advantages are that this method of research is good for exploratory research. This method of research also helps in generating good hypothesis for the research. This method helps to collect data from large number of subjects at a shorter period of time. DISADVANTAGES
The disadvantages are that there is an increased
chance of error in this method of study This method of study is static and time bound and cannot measure change. Cross-sectional method of study is costly as it collects information from large number of subjects with each different location. It also has no control over any independent variable. LONGITUDINAL METHOD OF STUDY If the study extends over time, describing a trend or making a series of before-and-after observations, it is called Longitudinal study. For instances, Levine and Meyer (1977) studied changes in black and white enrolment in Kansas City public schools between 1960 and 1974. A retrospective study On other hand, a works backward in time, prospective study begins using data that are with the present and already recorded. For carries observations example, Wynder and forward over a period of Evarts [1950] used time. Thus, Dorn [1959] hospital records of 605 and Kahn [1966] lung cancer victims and followed the health found that all but eight history of 200,000 were cigarette smokers. veterans for eleven years, finding that the pack-a- day-or-more smokers were sixteen times as likely to die from lung cancer as were non smokers IMPORTANCE Longitudinal method of research is important as this study offers unique insight into process, change and continuity over time in phenomena ranging from individuals, families and institutions to societies.
Longitudinal method tells us what has happened
to a set of research cases over a longer period of time ADVANTAGES The advantage of this method is that the data used in this method is easy to collect and represent in graphs Another advantage is that the data collected is very easy to interpret. This method of study tells us about what has happened to a set of research cases over a longer period of time. DISADVANTAGES The disadvantage of this method is that the data collection may change over time. It is also difficult to show more variable at a time. The disadvantage of this method is that the data collection may change over time. It is also difficult to show more variable at a time. This method of study assumes that the present trends will continue unchanged. CONCLUSION It is seen that in spite of deficiencies, the Comparative method is used widely in sociological studies.
Because, as Durkheim said in the absence of
experimental method comparative method of study is the only method available to the Sociological disciplines. The progression of a research helps to determine which method of study is appropriate for a researcher in his project. Cross-sectional studies can be done more quickly than longitudinal studies That’s why a researcher might start with a cross- sectional study to first establish whether there are links or associations between certain variables. Then they would set up a longitudinal study to study cause and effect. BIBILOGRAPHY Horton Paul B. And Hunt Chester, Sociology (6th Edition, Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi, 2004) Rao C.N. Shankar, Sociology: Principles Of Sociology With An Introduction To Social Thought (7th Edition, S. Chand & Company Ltd., New Delhi, 2012 ) May Tim, Social Research: Issues, methods and process (3rd Edition, Rawat Publications, Jaipur, 2001) Alasuutari Pertti, Bickman Leonard, Brannen Julia, The Sage Handbook of Social Research Methods (1st Edition, Sage Publications India Pvt Ltd., New Delhi, 2008)