Managing Strategic Change • Unusual for an organization’s strategy to remain unchanged • Change is inevitable • The only question is how rapid the change will be • The process starts with diagnosis of change requirements Diagnosis: situation analysis for change
• A wide range of stimuli may lead an
organization’s managers to recognize the need for strategic change • The management of change starts with an understanding of three main considerations: – The type of change required – The wider context of the change – Forces facilitating and blocking change Types of change • Balogun and Hope Hailey, analyze change on two axes: • The scope of change is its extent – The measure of scope is whether or not the methods and assumptions of the existing paradigm must be replaced. – It results in realignment or transformation • The nature of change – Change may be incremental and built on existing methods and approaches, or it may require a 'big bang' approach if rapid response is required, as in times of crisis. Types of change Types of change • Adaptation: – It is the most common type of change. It does not require the development of a new paradigm and proceeds step by step. • Reconstruction: – It can also be undertaken within an existing paradigm but requires rapid and extensive action. It is a common response to a long-term decline in performance. Types of change • Evolution: – It is an incremental process that leads to a new paradigm. – It may arise from careful analysis and planning or may be the result of learning processes. – Its transformational nature may not be obvious while it is taking place. • Revolution: – It is rapid and wide ranging response to extreme pressures for change. – A long period of strategic drift may lead to a crisis that can only be dealt with in this way. – Revolution will be very obvious and is likely to affect most aspects of both what the organization does and how it does them. Context of Change • Balogun and Hope Hailey suggested 8 determinants of context of change for organizations. – Scope could be realignment or transformation – The time available may vary dramatically, but can often be quite limited when responding to competitive or regulatory pressure. – The preservation of some organizational characteristics and resources may be required. Context of Change – Diversity of general experience, opinion and practice is likely to ease the change process – The capability to manage and implement change. It depends on past experience of change projects – Capacity to undertake change. It depends on the availability of resources, particularly finance, and IS/IT, and management time and skill. – The degree of workforce readiness for change. Readiness may be contrasted with resistance to change – The power to effect change Questions • An examination of context leads to four questions. – Is the organization able to achieve the change required? – Does the context affect the means by which change should be achieved? – Should the context itself be restructured as a preliminary to strategic change? – Will constraints present in the context make it necessary to proceed in stages? Force-field Analysis • It consists of the identification of the factors that promote and hinder change. • Promoting forces should be exploited and the effect of hindering forces reduced. Force-field Analysis • A practical route to applying the force field analysis idea is: – Define the problem in terms of the current situation and the desired future state. – List the forces supporting and opposing the desired change and assess both the strength and the importance of each one – Draw the force-field diagram – Decide how to strengthen or weaken the more important forces as appropriate and agree with those concerned. Force-field Analysis – Decide how to strengthen or weaken the more important forces as appropriate and agree with those concerned. – Identify the resources needed – Make an action plan including event timing, milestones and responsibilities Force-field Analysis: Performance review of a public sector organizations