OPPORTUNISTIC VOID AVOIDANCE

ROUTING FOR UNDER WATER SENSOR

NETWORKS

NAME: V.NARESH KUMAR (M.E)

DEPT: ME/CSE

GUIDED BY:
Dr. M. SAYEE KUMAR, M.E.,Ph.D
06/13/2020 1
 ABSTRACT
• Opportunistic void avoidance routing (OVAR)
protocol has been proposed for UWSNs
• GEDAR switches to the recovery mode
procedure
• Topology control through the depth adjustment
of the void nodes
• Discover and maintain routing paths along
void regions

06/13/2020 2
 DOMAIN EXPLANATION
• The application of wireless sensor networks to the
underwater domain has huge potential for
monitoring the health of river and marine
environments
• The oceans alone cover 70% of our planet and
along with rivers and lakes are critical to our well-
being
• Monitoring these environments is difficult and
costly for humans

06/13/2020 3
 EXISTING SYSTEM
• Vector-Based Forwarding (VBF) protocol,
each packet carries the positions of the sender,
the target and the forwarder (i.e., the node
which transmits this packet)

• The forwarding path is specified by the routing

vector from the sender to the target

06/13/2020 4
 LIMITATION OF EXISTING ALGORITHM
• Communication void region problem

• It is a difficult and costly task to monitor and

discover the underwater environment

• GPS does not work in the underwater

environment

06/13/2020 5
 PROPOSED SYSTEM
• The Proposed routing protocol employs the greedy
forwarding strategy

• The position information of the current forwarder

node, its neighbours, and the known sonobuoys

• To determine the qualified neighbours to continue

forwarding the packet towards some sonobuoys

06/13/2020 6
 ADVANTAGES OF PROPOSED ALGORITHM

• It is compatibles in hard and difficult mobile

scenarios of very sparse and very dense networks
and for high network traffic loads
• Improves the network performance when
compared with existing underwater routing
protocols
• Improve the data routing in underwater sensor
networks

06/13/2020 7
 APPLICATION
• Monitoring of marine life
• Pollutant content
• Geological processes on the ocean floor, oil
fields, climate, tsunamis and seaquakes
• To collect ocean of graphic data, ocean and
offshore sampling, navigation assistance, and
mine recognition

06/13/2020 8
 MODULES
• Network creation
• Routing
• Topology control algorithm

06/13/2020 9
 REFERENCES
• Geographic and Opportunistic Routing for
Underwater Sensor Networks Rodolfo W.L.
Coutinho, Azzedine Boukerche, Luiz F.M. Vieira, and
Antonio A.F. Loureiro(2016)
• G. Trajcevski, F. Zhou, R. Tamassia, B. Avci, P.
Scheuermann, and A. Khokhar, “Bypassing holes in
sensor networks: Load-balance vs. latency”, IEEE
Global Telecommun. Conf.,(2011)
• X. Fang, H. Gao and S. Xiong, “RPR: High-reliable
low-cost geographical routing protocol in wireless
sensor networks”, J. Commun., (2012)
06/13/2020 10
 REFERENCES
• P. Huang, C. Wang, and L. Xiao, “Improving end-to-
end routing performance of greedy forwarding in
sensor networks”, IEEE Trans.Parallel Distrib. Syst.,
vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 556–563(2012)
• Y. Noh, U. Lee, P. Wang, B. S. C. Choi, and M. Gerla,
“VAPR: Void aware pressure routing for underwater
sensor networks”, IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol.
12, no. 5, pp. 895–908(2013)
• J. You, Q. Han, D. Lieckfeldt, J. Salzmann, and D.
Timmermann, “Virtual position based geographic
routing for wireless sensor networks”, Comput.
Commun., vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 1255–1265(2010)
06/13/2020 11
 THANK YOU

06/13/2020 12