This document discusses strategy evaluation and control. It defines strategy evaluation and control as determining the effectiveness of a strategy in achieving organizational objectives and taking corrective actions. The process of evaluating strategies involves determining what to measure, establishing standards, measuring performance, identifying deviations from standards, and taking corrective actions. An example of MTR Foods evaluating its strategy and sales targets is provided to illustrate the process.
This document discusses strategy evaluation and control. It defines strategy evaluation and control as determining the effectiveness of a strategy in achieving organizational objectives and taking corrective actions. The process of evaluating strategies involves determining what to measure, establishing standards, measuring performance, identifying deviations from standards, and taking corrective actions. An example of MTR Foods evaluating its strategy and sales targets is provided to illustrate the process.
This document discusses strategy evaluation and control. It defines strategy evaluation and control as determining the effectiveness of a strategy in achieving organizational objectives and taking corrective actions. The process of evaluating strategies involves determining what to measure, establishing standards, measuring performance, identifying deviations from standards, and taking corrective actions. An example of MTR Foods evaluating its strategy and sales targets is provided to illustrate the process.
Organizations are most vulnerable when they are at the peak of their success
-- R.T. Lenz --
2 Bộ môn Quản trị chiến lược 06/18/2020
7.1 Definition of Strategy Evaluation Definition: Strategic evaluation and control could be define as the process of determining the effectiveness of a given strategy in achieving the organisational objectives and taking corrective actions wherever required.
3 Bộ môn Quản trị chiến lược 06/18/2020
Strategy evaluation Three basic activities: (1) Examining the underlying bases of a firm’s strategy, (2) Comparing expected results with actual results, and (3) Taking corrective actions to ensure that performance conforms to plans
4 Bộ môn Quản trị chiến lược 06/18/2020
Criteria for strategic evaluation
5 Bộ môn Quản trị chiến lược 06/18/2020
Criteria for strategic evaluation Consistency Strategy should not present inconsistent goals & policies
Consonance Need for strategies to examine sets of
trends
Feasibility Neither overtax resources or create
unsolvable sub-problems
Advantage Creation or maintenance of competitive
advantage
6 Bộ môn Quản trị chiến lược 06/18/2020
7.2 The Process of Evaluating Strategies
7 Bộ môn Quản trị chiến lược 06/18/2020
The Process of Evaluating Strategies Determine what to top-level and operational managers need to identify the measure implementation processes and results that will be monitored and evaluated Establish of Strategists must establish performance targets, standards and standards tolenance limits for organizational objectices, strategy and implementation plans. Standards can pertain to quality, cost and time Measure Measuring actual performance may involve measurements in performance qualitative and quantitative terms and in terms of time and cost. Managers may accordingly ask for performance reports from their employees. Performance Actual performance must be objectively compared against deviations predetermined standards. Deviations, if any, must be identified. If the actual oerformance is within the desired tolerance range, the evaluation is stopped. Take corrective If an organization’s actual performance falls outsite the desired actions tolerance range, corrective action must be taken to correct deviations. This may require resetting of goals or objectives or revision of plans, policies and standards. Corrective steps must be taken at the right time to achieve organizational objectives. 8 Bộ môn Quản trị chiến lược 06/18/2020 Example : MTR Foods 1 Determine what to measure: Sales of MTR products in India
Establish standards: Target to generate sales worth Rs. 1000 crore in 2015 2
Measure performance: Sales in 2015 were RS. 700 crores
3
9 Bộ môn Quản trị chiến lược 06/18/2020
Example : MTR Foods Performance deviations: Difference of Rs. 300 crore 4 Unfavourable economic environment, inflation in food prices, lowers than expected new consumer acquisitions, lack of presence other than offline
5 Take corrective actions:
- To remain relevant and be consumers’s preferred choice, MTR is lauching innovations and rebranding its products. - considering the dynamic industry environment and changing consumer behavior, MTR has introduced 44 innovations in three years, with plans to introduce more in line with its ongoing strategies. - Further, many products have become commoditized in the last two years. To distinguish itself, MTR plans to expand product lines to appeal to different ethnic groups. - Marketing: MTR currently runs multiple consumer-related programmes in line with its belief that it is important for consumers to taste products in the food business. - MTR has a reach of 200 000 outlines and is witnessing a 30% increase in sales from rural areas annually, with 10%-15% of its sales coming from rural areas. - MTR’s new sales target is Rs 2000 crore by 2020 10 Bộ môn Quản trị chiến lược 06/18/2020