Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Carotid Endarterectomy Final
Carotid Endarterectomy Final
Barnett HJ, et al. "Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis".
The New England Journal of Medicine. 1998. 339(20):1415-25.
Definitions and indications (Cont’d):
• Those with ≥70% stenosis received such a dramatic benefit that this
study arm was prematurely stopped and all patients with severe
stenosis were subsequently referred for CEA.
Comparisons are CEA vs. medical management
Primary Outcomes:
Secondary Outcomes
Death or stroke at 30 days
With 50-69% stenosis
33.2% vs. 43.3% (RR 0.77; P=0.005), NNT 10
With <50% stenosis
36.2% vs. 37% (RR 0.98; P=0.97)
Definitions and indications (Cont’d):
• Bottom line: CEA reduces the 5-year risk of death or stroke by 29%
among patients with symptomatic high-moderate (50-69%) carotid
stenosis.
Definitions and indications (Cont’d):
• ECST trial (1998): European Carotid Surgery Trial
• CEA significantly reduced the rate of major stroke or death compared
to usual medical care (14.9% vs. 26.5%; NNT=9) for >80% stenosis
• CEA did not appear to benefit patients with <80% stenosis.
• The ECST criteria have been found to overestimate stenosis severity
relative to NASCET criteria
Definitions and indications (Cont’d):
AHA/ASA Guidelines for Symptomatic CEA (2014, adapted)
•For patients with a TIA or ischemic stroke within the past 6 months and ipsilateral severe (70-99%)
carotid artery stenosis as documented by noninvasive imaging, CEA is recommended if the perioperative
morbidity and mortality risk is estimated to be <6% (Class 1A)
•For patients with recent TIA or stroke and ipsilateral moderate (50-69%) carotid stenosis as documented
by catheter-based imaging or noninvasive imaging with corroboration (MRA or CTA), CEA is recommended
depending on patient-specific factors such as age, sex, and comorbidities if perioperative morbidity and
mortality risk is estimated to be <6% (Class 1B)
•When the degree of stenosis is <50%, CEA and CAS are not recommended (Class IIIA)
Definitions and indications (Cont’d):
• ACAS (1995): Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study
• 1st study examining carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients
with carotid narrowing 60-99%
• Showed that over 5 years the risk of stroke or stroke and death was
reduced from 11% to 5.1%.
• There was no evidence of any more or less benefit as the narrowing
approached 99%.
Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid
Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA. 1995. 10;273(18):1421–8.
Definitions and indications (Cont’d):
• ACST: Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial
• Comparing patients without symptoms allocated immediate carotid
endarterectomy (for 60-99% stenosis) versus all those allocated non-
surgical management the net 5 year risk was 6.4% (with surgery)
versus 11.8% (only medical treatment).
• In men under the age of 75 years the benefit of surgery was clear cut
(8.2% decrease in 5 year risk of stroke with surgery).
• Follow up studies indicate there is a clear benefit for women which
appears close to or equivalent to the benefits for men.
Halliday A, et al. "10-year stroke prevention after successful carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis (ACST-1):
a multicentre randomised trial". The Lancet. 2010. 376(9746):1074-1084.
Definitions and indications (Cont’d):
• Patients with asymptomatic carotid atherosclerosis should receive
intensive medical therapy:
• statin therapy
• antiplatelet therapy
• blood pressure control
• and lifestyle modification consisting of smoking cessation, limited
alcohol consumption, weight control, regular aerobic physical activity,
and a Mediterranean diet
Definitions and indications (Cont’d):
• For medically stable patients who have a life expectancy of at least
five years and a high grade (≥80 percent) asymptomatic carotid
stenosis at baseline or have progression to ≥80 percent stenosis
despite intensive medical therapy while under observation, carotid
endarterectomy (CEA) is recommended, provided the combined
perioperative risk of stroke and death is less than 3 percent for the
surgeon and center (grade 2b)
• Repair the dominant side first if the patient has equally tight carotid
stenosis bilaterally
• Use a shunt during CEA for stump pressures < 50 or if contralateral side is
tight, some always use a shunt.
• For maximum benefit patients should be operated on soon after a TIA or
stroke, preferably within the first 2 weeks as recommended by the
National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines.
Definitions and indications (Cont’d):
• The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial
(CREST) funded by the National Institute of Health (NIH) reported that
the results of stents and endarterectomy were comparable.
Brott TG, et al. "Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Treatment of Carotid-Artery Stenosis". The New England Journal of
Medicine. 2010. 363(1):11-23.
Definitions and indications (Cont’d):
• Endarterectomy remains the preferred method of revascularization
for most patients with symptomatic carotid atherosclerosis who have
standard surgical risk.
• CAS and CEA provide similar long-term outcomes for patients with
asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid occlusive disease, while the
periprocedural risk of stroke and death may be higher with CAS.
Definitions and indications (Cont’d):
• The 2011 AHA/ACCF guidelines recommend stenting as a reasonable
alternative to CEA among symptomatic patients with stenosis >70%
and low risk of periprocedural complications (class I)
• CEA might be preferred among older patients or those with anatomy
not amenable to stenting (class IIa).
• Prophylactic stenting for select asymptomatic patients with stenosis
>70% by Doppler may be reasonable (class IIb).
High risk criteria for CEA include the following:
• glossopharyngeal nerve:
impairment of swallowing and
recurrent aspiration
• 2 to 7 days
• Hyperperfusion: 2% to 3%