Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Legality of Consideration
and Object
Sec.10. Essentials to a contract
“All agreements are contracts, if they are made –
by free consent of the parties, competent to contract,
for a lawful consideration and
with a lawful object, and
not hereby expressly declared to be void.” -
2
S. 23 What considerations and objects are lawful, and what not
5
A, B and C enter into an agreement for the
division among them of gains acquired, or to
be acquired, by them by fraud.
The agreement is void, as its object is
unlawful.
6
A, being agent for a landed proprietor, agrees for
money, without the knowledge of his principal, to
obtain for B a lease of land belonging to his principal.
The agreement between A and B is void. as it
implies a fraud by concealment, by A, on his
principal.
A promises B to drop a prosecution which he has
instituted against B for robbery, and B promises to
restore the value of the things taken.
7
A's estate is sold for arrears of revenue under the
provisions of an Act of the Legislature, by which
the defaulter is prohibited from purchasing, the
estate.
8
A, who is B's mukhtar, promises to exercise his
influence, as such, with B in favour of C, and C promises
to pay 1,000 rupees to A.
The agreement is void, because it is immoral
9
Analysis of S. 23
Object or Consideration
The section covers legality of consideration and object as well.
Object and consideration sometimes may be different – both shall be
lawful
Eg. loan for child marriage – consideration lawful but object unlawful
10
Consideration
or object
Forbidden by law
Fraudulent
12
Defeat the provision of any law
• Object or consideration of an agreement is such that
though it is not directly prohibited, if permitted, would
defeat the provision of any law, such agreement is also
void.
• Sundersingh v. krishnasingh
agreement by the accused with surety for providing
security under Cr. P.C.– void
• Agreement to defeat the law of a friendly country is
also void
• Foster v. Driscoll – Agreement to buy whisky in Great
Britain & to smuggle it in to US
• led to commission of offence in a foreign & friendly country –
breach of international comity – hence void.
13
• But innocent violation of municipal or foreign law which
may not offend public conscience, may not make the
agreement void
Howard v. Shirlaster Container Transport Ltd
Owner of an aircraft agreed with the party for
successfully removing his aircraft from Nigerian
territorial airspace. He did so without permission of
the Nigerian authorities and landed it in Ivory coast.
He did so under the belief that there was imminent
danger to the lives of the clients in Nigeria. Later, he
sued the client for fees.
Held: allowed to recover. Although court would not
normally enforce a contract to enable a party to benefit
from his criminal conduct, because to do so, would
offend public conscience.
14
Fraudulent
15
Injury to person or property
• An agreement to injure the person or property of another is unlawful
and void
• Eg. A person borrowed a sum of Rs. 100 and agreed to serve A for 2 yrs
without pay and in case of default to pay the exorbitant interest and
principal at once.
Held, it involved slavery and unlawful and void
• agreement to commit assault, hurt, defamation, etc
• Eg. Agreement of insurance – insured committing suicide to help
dependents
• void.
16
Immoral
• Agreement tainted with immorality is not enforced
• “Immorality” depends on standards of morality
prevailing in a society at a given time and as
approved by courts.
• Instances of immorality-
1. Interference with marital relations
• Eg. Money lent to a married woman to enable her to
get divorce from her husband and promise to marry
the lender
• void
• Promise to marry a woman after her husband’s death
• void
17
Immoral
• Read
Fender v St John-Mildmay
18
2. Dealings with Prostitutes
• Always considered immoral
• Eg. sale/hiring of goods to a prostitute for enabling her to carry on her
business
• void
• Landlord knowingly letting his house for carrying on the business of
prostitution
• void
19
Opposed to public policy
20
These questions have to be decided by judges not as men
of legal learning but as experienced and enlightened
members of the community representing the highest
common factor of public sentiment and intelligence”
• Eg. Surrender of rights, sale of seats in public offices,
etc.
21
Heads of
Public Policy
Interference
Maintenance
with Shifting and
Course Prosecution Champerty
of justice 22
1. Trading with an enemy
23
2. Trafficking in Public offices
Interference
with course of Maintenance &
justice Champerty
25
4. Marriage brokerage contracts
26
5. Unfair and unreasonable dealings
Where-
• Parties economically are not on same footing
• Unequal bargaining power
• One in a position to exploit and the other is vulnerable
• Bargain is apparently unfair
27