This document discusses various theories of democracy. It begins by defining democracy and its key aspects such as adult franchise, periodic elections, and fundamental rights. It then outlines different theories of democracy such as classical liberal theory, elite theory, and Marxist theory. The classical liberal theory supports democratic ideals of individual rights and limited government. Elite theory, proposed by thinkers like Pareto, Mosca, and Michels, argues that society is inevitably ruled by a minority elite based on qualities like ability, knowledge, or wealth. Michels' "Iron Law of Oligarchy" states that all organizations will eventually develop into oligarchies dominated by leaders.
This document discusses various theories of democracy. It begins by defining democracy and its key aspects such as adult franchise, periodic elections, and fundamental rights. It then outlines different theories of democracy such as classical liberal theory, elite theory, and Marxist theory. The classical liberal theory supports democratic ideals of individual rights and limited government. Elite theory, proposed by thinkers like Pareto, Mosca, and Michels, argues that society is inevitably ruled by a minority elite based on qualities like ability, knowledge, or wealth. Michels' "Iron Law of Oligarchy" states that all organizations will eventually develop into oligarchies dominated by leaders.
This document discusses various theories of democracy. It begins by defining democracy and its key aspects such as adult franchise, periodic elections, and fundamental rights. It then outlines different theories of democracy such as classical liberal theory, elite theory, and Marxist theory. The classical liberal theory supports democratic ideals of individual rights and limited government. Elite theory, proposed by thinkers like Pareto, Mosca, and Michels, argues that society is inevitably ruled by a minority elite based on qualities like ability, knowledge, or wealth. Michels' "Iron Law of Oligarchy" states that all organizations will eventually develop into oligarchies dominated by leaders.
Assistant Professor Hidayatullah National Law University Raipur, Chhattisgarh Democracy One of the most cherished ideals in the civilized modern world One of the most controversial concepts which has been a victim of variety of interpretations Most popular form of government Second World War – Fight between democratic and dictatorial forces and the superiority of democratic forces over dictatorial forces Defining Democracy “That shall be democratic which shall be of the people, by the people and for the people.” – Ancient Greek Philosopher Cleon in 422 BC Democracy is that form of government which is “of the people, by the people and for the people”. A political system is characterised by adult franchise periodic elections at least two political parties independent judiciary representative and responsible government strong public opinion free press, and a constitution which incorporates some fundamental rights Broader Meaning of Democracy
An ideal – An end in itself rather
than a means to an end Democracy is unstable as a political system as long as it remains a political system and nothing more It should not only be a form of government, but a type of society and a manner of life which is in harmony with that type. Positive Aspects of Democracy Democratic in its thinking and behaviour Belief in liberty, equality and fraternity Belief in debates, discussion, persuasion and mutual exchange of views, rather than coercion and display of force Democracy – A way of life Democratic society Where each man can develop his personality Equality of opportunity Conditions for self-fulfillment Democratic Economic System Absence of any form of exploitation Narrow Meaning of Democracy Defined in terms of government and state In ancient period Greek Philosophers understood it as a political system In the modern period, i.e. in 17th and 18th century, democracy was concerned with ideals After the second world war, political aspects of democracy was emphasized dissociating it from the ideals and values Definitions of Democracy “Democracy is a form of government in which everyone has a share” – Seeley “A democratic system is one that makes government responsive and accountable and its effectiveness depends first and foremost on the efficiency and skill of its leadership” – Sartori “A democratic political system is one in which public policies are made, on a majority basis, by representatives subject to effective popular control at periodic elections which are conducted on the principle of political equality and under conditions of political freedom” – Mayo Democracy may be defined as a political system which supplies regular constitutional opportunities for changing the governing officials, and a social mechanism which permits the largest possible part of the population to influence major decisions by choosing among contenders for political office.” – Lipset Features of Democratic Political Systems Supremacy of the will of the people Representative Government duly elected by the people Periodic and free elections Adult franchise Responsible government Limited and Constitutional Government Aim of the government is service and social welfare Popular participation in the decision-making process Independent judiciary Political parties Pressure groups Existence of rights, liberty and equality of opportunity Freedom of opinion Free press Theories of Democracy
Liberal theory of democracy
Classical liberal theory of democracy Elite theory of democracy Pluralistic Theory of democracy Marxist theory of democracy Classical Liberal Theory It supported democratic ideals and values Faith in the worth of individual and his natural rights Emerged in the 17th century and continued till 20th century when it was challenged by many supporting elitist and pluralistic theories of democracy John Locke – constitutional government Individual had the right to resist the state and revolt against it if the latter failed to discharge its basic duty of safeguarding the life, liberty and property of1he former. He emphasized that the government, based on the consent of the individual, was limited in its authority. Montesquieu - Separation of powers He provided sufficient safeguards against the growth of dictatorship. Classical Liberal Theory Bentham – Greatest good of the greatest number Emphasised the importance of people's participation in the political process. Advocated universal adult franchise Government should encourage increased political participation on the part of individuals J S Mill – equality and political participation Emphasized the need for enhancing the quality of democracy by increasing the quality of political participation Believed that political participation would help the individual in fashioning his all-round development. Propounder of the "developmental theory of democracy". Salient Features Man at the centre of democracy. Democracy aims at defending and promoting the interest of man Government is constitutional, limited and responsible Democracy is the art of reaching compromise and consensus Respect for fundamental rights – freedom of expression Not only a form of government; but a way of life Elite Theory of Democracy Vilfredo Pareto (1848-1923) Gaetano Mosca (1858-1941) Robert Michels (1876-1936) C Wright Mills (1916-1962) Meaning of Elite It’s a microscopic minority of people who rule the society by virtue of their "superior" qualities. While some argue that the elites are superior to others in terms of quality, others attribute the so-called superiority of elites to their family and social backgrounds and the hierarchical organization of the society. The exponents of the elite theory do not believe in the concept of political equality They argue that the governors and governed can never be equal Aristotle – governors and the governed are determined by birth itself Supporters of elite theory do not accept inequality by birth. Instead they argue that the elites rule over the rest by their higher ability, knowledge, character, efficiency, skill or wealth Emergence of Elite Theory Marx – Class divided society – the economically dominant class is always the ruling class Originally conceived in opposition to the idea of social classes, elite theory was put forward by liberal sociologists in opposition to the Marxian view “Circulation of elites” – It is not a static concept Rejecting the Marxian idea of classes and classless society, they argued that in every society there will always be elites who will enjoy political power Two main undemocratic assumptions Basic inequality amongst the people on the basis of differences in terms of abilities The political power is shared by a minority (elite) rather than the majority (people) Pareto (1848-1923) “A small number of individuals, who in each sphere of activity, have succeeded and arrived at a higher echelon in the professional hierarchy." There are several elites in each sphere of activity - military elites, political elites, business elites and academic elites. In the narrow sense, Pareto means only the "governing elite which is that small number of individuals who have succeeded and who exercise ruling functions politically and socially." Pareto believes that elites possess superior psychological attributes than others in the society. Pareto’s Circulation of Elites Governing Elites Circulation of Elites Lion and Fox like qualities Elites tend decay Due to indulgence in power and luxury when one group of ruling elites neglect its primary duty or fails to cope up with the changing times and situations, it is likely to get replaced by another group of elites Mosca (1858-1941) In all societies, it is the organised minority which rules over the unorganised majority. "In all societies two classes of people appear – a class that rules and a class that is ruled.” The Political Class The first class, always the less numerous, performs all political functions, monopolizes power and enjoys the advantages that power brings The second, the more numerous class, is directed and controlled by the first… The domination of an organized minority over the unorganized majority is inevitable". Elites are distinguished from the masses by qualities which give them material, intellectual or even moral superiority. While Pareto argues that the qualities of elites are the same in all societies, Mosca claims that these qualities would differ from society to society. Cont… Does not have faith in the capacity of masses for self-government. He asserts that elite rule in any society is inevitable. Democracy – not a government by the people Opposed to the extension of franchise to all sections of people It must be confined to the middle class only Robert Michels (1876-1936) “Iron Law of Oligarchy” Political Parties (1911) Organization as key to power All forms of organization, regardless of how democratic or autocratic they may be at the start, will eventually and inevitably develop into oligarchies for a variety of reasons: the technical indispensability of leadership the tendency of the leaders to organize themselves and to consolidate their interests the gratitude of the led towards the leaders, and the general immobility and passivity of the masses. Cont… An oligarchy is a form of government in which power effectively rests with a small segment of society distinguished by royal, wealth, intellectual, family, military, or religious hegemony. Democracy is incoceivable without organization. For effectively expressing their views and promoting their interests, individuals need to join together and form organizations For coodination and in dealing with issues of complex nature, organizations need persons of specialized knowledge Any large organization is faced with problems of coordination that can be solved only by creating a buraucracy. A bureaucracy, by design, is hierarchically organized to achieve efficiancy - many decisions have to be made daily that cannot efficiently be made by large numbers of people. The effective functioning of an organization therefore requires the concentration of much power in the hands of a few. Those few, in turn - the oligarchy - will use all means necessary to preserve and further increase their power. C Wright Mills (1916-62) The Power Elite (1956) - USA is ruled by monolithic elite structure called power elites A power elite is a small group of people who control a disproportionate amount of wealth, privilege, and access to decision-making of global consequence. It describes the relationship between individuals at the pinnacles of political, military, and economic institutions, noting that these people share a common world view. It consists of members of the corporate community, academia, politicians, media editors, military service personnel, and high-profile journalists. The interests of these elites are complimentary to one another and they have similar values, beliefs, orientations due to similar socio-economic backgrounds, and exposure to similar learning processes. They occupy all commanding positions in the society Elements All need not be active in a democracy Should be drawn from all sections of people Should not neglect common people to whom they are accountable The elite structure should be open and anyone from below can enter it Criticism Anti-democratic in nature Are primariliy concerned with the mainteanance and stability of the system Pluralistic Theory of Democracy Oppose both Marxists and Elitist view of power being rested with the minority They contend that powers are concentrated; rather it is dispersed and diffused It is shared among all sections of people primarily through organizations formed to articulate their interests These groups and associations make make regular and intense efforts to influence government policies and decisions Some are overtly political and many others are potentially so Example - Political parties and pressure groups Cont… Political parties – interest aggregation – promote broader interests Pressure/interest groups – interest articulation – try to defend and promote sectional interests These associations (different service and occupational associations) are mostly affiliated to diiferent political parrties Cont… Class of interest – They act against one another This does not allow any single group to be dominat for a long time The group which manages to gain dominanance at a particualr point of time or on a particular issue faces strong challenge from others for continuing to stay at that position Cont… Despite their internal competition and tensions, these groups try to contain the tendency of the government to grow very powerful Though govermennt wields a lot of powers, it is hardly allowed to grow dictatorial completely eclipsing other groups and associations It does not lie exclusively with state or any of the associations; it is shared among them From the pluralist perspective, politics is seen as aprocess of competition and bargaining among these organizations and groups And governance is a process of mediation and compromise among them Cont… Robert Dahl – Power is dispersed among various interest groups and plurality of elites do not form a unified group of common interests Politics is a business of baraginaing and compromise with no one group dominating the process of taking decisions Elements of Pluralism Powers are dispersed and fragmented Not much possiblity of growth of dictatorship due to separation of powers Soverignty is not the exclusive possesion of either the state or any other groups or associations. Political organizations and other groups establish contact between people and the state They bridge the gap between the government and the people They contribute to improving the quality of governmental ddecisions by supplying their skills and interests Marxists Theory of Democracy
Western liberal democracy – legislature,
executive, judiciary, decentralization of power and separation of powers Marxist do not oppose democracy. However, they do not accept institutional view of democracy They believe in majority rule Government in communist states serves the interests of the majority whereas buregeoise governments promote the interests of a few Marxists Theory of Democracy
Do not regard democracy a political
system A system of values and a form of society – a process - a way of life As a political system, democracy is seen as a class oragnism. It is meant to serve the interests of a particular class