Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Call Blocking Rate Ot Pass Cell Analysis

    Uploaded by

    Septi Prasetyo Utomo
    7 views1 page
    The document discusses call blocking rates and code congestion issues at site 333C651G9_BanawaSln. Call blocking rates were up to 2.5% on some cells due to high code congestion numbers of up to 537. Analysis found availability issues at a neighboring site were contributing to problems at 333C651G9_BanawaSln. The root cause was identified as hygiene issues.

    Original Description:

    analysis

    Original Title

    Call Blocking Rate ot pass cell analysis_

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document discusses call blocking rates and code congestion issues at site 333C651G9_BanawaSln. Call blocking rates were up to 2.5% on some cells due to high code congestion numbers of up to 537. Analysis found availability issues at a neighboring site were contributing to problems at 333C651G9_BanawaSln. The root cause was identified as hygiene issues.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views1 page

    Call Blocking Rate Ot Pass Cell Analysis

    Uploaded by

    Septi Prasetyo Utomo
    The document discusses call blocking rates and code congestion issues at site 333C651G9_BanawaSln. Call blocking rates were up to 2.5% on some cells due to high code congestion numbers of up to 537. Analysis found availability issues at a neighboring site were contributing to problems at 333C651G9_BanawaSln. The root cause was identified as hygiene issues.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    3G RAN KPI | Call Blocking Rate

    333C651G9_BanawaSln

    Site Information : Call Blocking Rate (%) Code Congest (#)


    RAB.FailEstabCS.C 2.5 300 300
    NodeB Name Cell Name
    ode.Cong
    333C651G9_BanawaSln 3GPL429843 537 250 250
    2
    333C651G9_BanawaSln 3GPL429842 9

    Call Blocking rate (%)


    200 200
    333C651G9_BanawaSln 3GPL429841 0

    Code Congest
    1.5
    150 150

    Analysis: 1
    100 100
     Call Blocking rate degrade at site
    0.5
    333C651G9_BanawaSln due to code congestion, 50 50

    found increment user related availability issue at 0 0 0


    neighbor site 3312421G9_3G_Sarjo_MAMUJU 333C651G9_BanawaSln - Average of CALL BLOCKING RATE 333C651G9_BanawaSln - 3GPL429841 333C651G9_BanawaSln - 3GPL429842
    UTAR (alarm AC L1, AC L2, AC L2 failure) 333C651G9_BanawaSln - Sum of VS.RRC.Rej.Code.Cong 333C651G9_BanawaSln - 3GPL429843

    HSDPA.UE.Mean.Cell Availability (%) – Surrounding site


    100 120
    90
    100
    80
    70 80
    60
    50 60

    40
    40
    30
    20 20
    10
    0
    0
    3312421G9_3G_Sarjo_MAMUJU UTARA - 3GMM447431
    333C651G9_BanawaSln - 3GPL429841 333C651G9_BanawaSln - 3GPL429842 3312421G9_3G_Sarjo_MAMUJU UTARA - 3GMM447432
    333C651G9_BanawaSln - 3GPL429843 3312421G9_3G_Sarjo_MAMUJU UTARA - 3GMM447433

    Root Cause : Hygiene

    You might also like