You are on page 1of 35

Chapter 2:

Protecting the Ozone Layer


1. Why do we need to do to
protect the ozone layer?
2. Isn’t ozone hazardous to
human health?
3. Why is the ozone layer
getting smaller?
4. What can we do (if anything)
to
help stop the depletion of our
ozone layer?

Catatan: Diambil dari berbagai sumber


Ozone Formation
Energy + 3 O2 2 O3

Energy must be absorbed


(endothermic) for this reaction to
occur.
Ozone is an allotropic form of
oxygen. The name ozone comes
from a Greek word meaning “to
smell”
An allotrope is two or more forms of the same element that differ in
their chemical structure and therefore their properties.
Element Allotropes
oxygen O2, O3
carbon graphite, diamond, buckminister fullerenes 2.1
-The sum of the protons
Mass number (A) and neutrons.
16.00
O
8
Atomic number (Z) -The number of protons.
(nuclear charge)

2.2
2.2
The electrons in the outermost energy levels are called
valence electrons.
The group number (of the representative elements) on the
periodic table tells you the number of valence electrons.
Group 1A: 1 valence electron

1A Group 3A: 3 valence electrons 8A

2A 3A 4A 5A 6A 7A

2.2
Isotopes are two or more forms of the same element
(same number of protons) whose atoms differ in
number of neutrons, and hence in mass.
Isotopes of carbon: • Carbon 14 ( 6C)
C-12, C-13, C-14 – Used in dating old materials
also written as: 12C – Atomic number: 6
13
C 14C – Atomic mass: 14
– # of neutrons = Atomic mass-
Atomic #
– 6 protons, 6 electrons, 8 neutrons

*The average mass is very close to 12.000 b/c 6C is by far the most abundant
isotope.

2.2
Representing molecules with Lewis structures:

Consider water, H2O: H O H

1. Find sum of valence electrons:


1 O atom x 6 valence electrons per atom = 6
+ 2 H atoms x 1 valence electron per atom = +2
8 valence electrons
2. Arrange the electrons in pairs; use whatever electron pairs
needed to connect the atoms, then distribute the remaining
electron pairs so that the octet rule is satisfied:

lone pair
O
H H
bonding pair
2.3
Representing molecules with Lewis structures:
Typical valence for selected atoms = the # of bonds an atom typically forms

Element Typical Classification


valence
H, 1 monovalent
X (X= F, Cl, Br, I)
O 2 divalent

N 3 trivalent

C 4 tetravalent

2.3
Representing molecules with Lewis structures:

Multiple bonds

O O H C C H
Double bond Triple bond

Occasionally a single Lewis structure does not adequately represent


the true structure of a molecule, so we use resonance forms:

O O O

N N N
O O O O O O

2.3
The Nature of Light

Low E

High E

Wavelength () = distance traveled between successive peaks (nm).


Frequency () = number of waves passing a fixed point in one second
(waves/s or 1/s or s-1 or Hz). 2.4
The Electromagnetic Spectrum

The various types of radiation seem different to our senses, yet they differ only
in their respective  and  2.4
Visible:  = 700 - 400 nm

M MUDAS I R
Decreasing wavelength

Infrared (IR) : longest of the visible


spectrum, heat ray absorptions cause
molecules to bend and stretch.

Microwaves: cause molecules to rotate.

Short range: includes UV (ultraviolet),


X-rays, and gamma rays.

2.4
The wavelength and frequency of electromagnetic
radiation are related by: c = 
where c = 3 x 108 m/s (the speed of light)

The energy of a photon of electromagnetic radiation


is calculated by: E = h 
where h = 6.63 x 10-34 J.s (Plank’s constant)

Energy and frequency are directly related-


higher frequency means higher energy.

2.5
What is the energy associated with a photon of light with a wavelength of 240 nm?

C =  E=h
 =C E = (6.63 x 10-34 J.s) (1.3 x 1015 s-1)

E = 8.6 x 10-19 J
x 108 m/s
10 -9
m = 1.3 x 1015 s-1
240 nm x
nm

UV radiation has sufficient energy to cause molecular bonds to break

2.5
2.6
The Chapman Cycle

≤

≤

A steady state
condition
2.6
Factors influencing steady-state
concentration of O3
• Intensity of UV radiation
– Expect O3 concentration will depend on season and
sun cycle
• Concentration of O2 and other reacting species
• Temperature
• Reaction rates (some of the steps are faster
than others)
• *Many of these factors depend on altitude, so O3
concentrations also depend on altitude.
Biological Effects of Ultraviolet Radiation
The consequences depend primarily on:
1. The energy associated with the radiation.
2. The length of time of the exposure.
3. The sensitivity of the organism to that radiation.
The most deadly form of skin cancer, melanoma, is
linked with the intensity of UV radiation and the latitude
at which you live.

As  decreases, damage
to DNA increases.

Note the logarithmic An Australian product uses


scale on the y-axis. “smart bottle” technology;
bottle color changes from
white to blue when exposed
to UV light.

2.7
O3 concentrations vs. altitude
O3 concentrations over time

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/cgi-
bin/texis/webinator/printall?/Library/Ozone/ozone_2.html

1 Dobson unit (DU) = 1 O3 molecule per 1 billion (109) molecules of air


320 Du is average ozone level over the northern hemisphere
250 DU is typical at the equator
“hole” is the area over Antarctica with < 220 DU
Natural causes of O3 destruction
1) Reactions with water vapor and its breakdown products:
H2O + UV photon  H• + •OH
These free radical products can
participate in reactions that convert O3 to O2:
Free radicals very
O3 + H•  O2 + •OH reactive b/c they
have unpaired e-
Octet Rule is NOT
O3 + •OH  2O2 + H• satisfied

Example of a chain reaction. Free radicals are very


destructive
2) Reactions with stratospheric nitrogen
• Formation of natural NO: N O + O 
2 monoxide (NO)
2NO
– N2O produced by microorganisms
• Formation of man-made NO: N2 + O2
+ energy  NO energy
– Energy is from lightning or high-
temp engines of supersonic
transport airplanes (like the
Concorde) that are designed to
fly at altitudes of 15-20 km (the
region of the ozone layer)
• Lewis dot structure of NO?
• Turns out that NO is also a free
radical…

Source of VOC and NO in the Upper


• However, these natural causes do not
Atmosphere leading to Tropospheric Air
explain the amount of ozone destruction
Pollution Chemistry
seen in recent years…
CFCs seem to be the culprit

Properties and uses of CFC • Originally developed as refrigerants to


• Stable replace the toxic ones that had previously
• Nontoxic been used (SO2 and ammonia—NH3)
• Nonflammable • Also used as:
• Low boiling point (makes it a – Solvent for computer chips
good refrigerant) – Propellants for aerosol cans
• Cheap – Styrofoam
• Widely available – Fire extinguishers
Before we knew about the ozone hole…
• Two scientists, Roland & • ~ 5 years after release in
Molina, set out to study fate of troposphere, CFCs make
atmospheric CFC molecules their way into the
• The reactions they stratosphere.
hypothesized would occur • A high-energy photon
suggested that CFCs could corresponding to
wavelengths  220 nm has
destroy significant amounts of enough energy to break the
O3 chlorine-carbon bond:
– The destruction of O3 by CCl2F2 + photon  •CClF2 +
CFCs later shown by •Cl
scientific experiments.

Revolutionized modern life! Throughout the 1960s and 70s, cheap air
conditioning using CFCs helped spur the booming growth of Southern
cities such as Atlanta, Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston.
Reactions with •Cl Removal of •Cl
•Cl +O3  O2 + •OCl
• Carried to lower
•OCl + O  •Cl + O2 atmosphere by winds—
O3 + O  2O2 once in lower atmosphere,
there are many other
You can see that once •Cl is created compounds for •Cl to react
that it begins a chain reaction—it can with.
destroy many (~ 100,000!) O3
• If it encounters another •Cl
molecules.
the following reaction may
•Cl is acting as a catalyst—it is not occur: •Cl + •Cl  Cl2
used up in the reaction
• May react with other
The presence of •Cl will affect the species to form stable
Chapman cycle balance!!!
compounds such as HCl
and ClONO2
Proof of relationship b/w ozone
depletion and stratospheric Cl
• 75-85% is from human activity
– CFCs
– Rocket fuel from space
shuttles (<1%)
• 15-20% is from methyl chloride
– Most from natural sources
and burning of biomass
• ~2% - Large, explosive volcanoes
– Increase amount of HCl
which can be converted to •Cl
– Only a few volcanoes have
enough explosive power to
project material into the
stratosphere.
Why is the hole over Antarctica?
• A special mechanism appears to be in effect here, related to the fact that
the lower stratosphere over the South Pole is the coldest spot on Earth.
– During the Antarctic winter (June to September), a strong circumpolar
wind develops in the middle to lower atmosphere
• keeps warmer new air (w/ new O3) from entering
– Temps can get as low as -90oC!
– At temps < 80oC, clouds of ice
crystals containing sulfates and
nitric acid can develop in the
stratosphere.
• In spring, when the sun comes out,
chemical reactions occurring on the
surface of these cloud particles convert
otherwise safe (non-ozone depleting)
molecules to more reactive species.
– ClONO2 & HCl converted to HOCl & http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Study/Tango/
Cl2
– HOCl •Cl + •OH ; Cl2 2 •Cl
UV light UV light
Summer conditions replenish hole
• In summer, sunlight warms
the atmosphere
– Ice crystals evaporate summer
• No ice crystals means the
conversion of ClONO2 & HCl
to more reactive species halts.
– Air from lower latitudes
flows into the polar regions,
replenishing depleted ozone
levels.
– Thus, “Ozone Hole” is spring
largely replenished by the
end of summer.

• Same process is developing in the Arctic


The Global Response
• CFCs in spray cans banned in North America in
1978, and use as foaming agents for plastics
discontinued in 1990.
• 1987 Montreal Protocol—established a schedule to
reduce production & consumption of CFCs.
• The US and 140 other countries
agreed to a complete ban on CFC
production after Dec. 31, 1995.
• Other ozone depleting compounds to
be eliminated b/w 2002-2010:
•CFBr compounds (fire-fighting)
•CCl4 (an industrial solvent)
•CH3Br (agricultural fumigant)

Global production of CFCs, 1950-2000


Black-market CFCs
• While the protocols set dates for the halt
of production, sale of existing stockpiles
will remain legal.
– US govt. is promoting conversion to less
harmful substitute refrigerants by imposing
a tax of $5.35/lb on CFCs
• Price of CFCs has risen $1/lb in 1989 to $15/lb
(as of 2003)
• Creates a black-market for CFCs, which are 2nd
only to illegal drugs as the most lucrative illegal
import.
• “Freon busts” in 1997 led to the confiscation of
12 million lbs of illegal CFCs
Ban on CFCs is making a What to use
difference--slowly instead?
• Stratospheric concentration • DON’T want to go back to
of chlorine peaked at 4.1 previous technologies
ppb in the mid-90s and is (NH3, SO2 as refrigerants)!
now declining.
• Need to balance 3
• However, the stratospheric
chlorine is not expected to undesirable properties and
reach 2 ppb* until 2050 or come up with the best
2075. compromise
• *Antarctic ozone hole first – Toxicity
appeared when chlorine – Flammability
levels reached 2 ppb.
– Extreme Stability
Fluorocarbons (FCs)
• Made of only carbon and fluorine
– Non-toxic
– Nonflammable
– Don’t decompose in the stratosphere
• Why? The C-F bond is stronger—the energy
requirement to break this bond is higher than
that of a UV photon.
• The negative: No destruction pathways
—the molecules will accumulate in the
atmosphere and contribute to the
greenhouse effect by absorbing IR
radiation.
Hydrochlorofluorocarbons
(HCFCs)
• Replacing one or more of the halogen atoms
with hydrogen makes the compound more
reactive
– Compounds decompose long before
reaching stratosphere
• However:
– Too many H atoms increases flammability
– Too many Cl atoms increases toxicity
Suitable HCFCs
Decompose in the
troposphere more
readily than CFCs

• HCFC-22 is the most widely-used HCFC


– Used in air-conditioners and in the production of
foamed fast food containers
– 5% ozone depleting potential of CFC-12 CFC-12

• HCFC-141b used to form foam insulation


– 250 million lbs produced worldwide in 1996 for
this purpose
• Montreal Protocol calls for a production ban of
HCFCs by 2030.
Hydroflurocarbons (HFCs)
H

• Example: HFC-134a C C H

• Has no Cl atoms to
interact with ozone
US Emissions
• The 2 H atoms facilitate
decomposition in the
lower atmosphere,
without making it
flammable under normal
conditions.
http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/vr98rpt/chapter6.html
Timeline
• 1928 – CFCs invented
• 1950s-1970s – Consumption and use of CFCs rises rapidly
• 1971 – CFCs measured in the atmosphere
• 1974 – Rowland & Molina link CFCs with ozone depletion
• 1985 – First scientific assessment of stratospheric ozone levels
• 1987 – “Smoking gun” evidence linking decreasing ozone levels
with increasing stratospheric chlorine levels
– Montreal Protocol established a schedule to reduce
production & consumption of CFCs.
• 1991 – Multinational fund established to provide financial and
technical assistance to developing countries to enable
them to comply with control measures.
- B/w 1991 & 2004 $1.6 billion given to more than 100 countries
• 1995 – Production ban of CFCs in US and 140 other countries
goes into effect
– Rowland & Molina win Nobel Prize for their work
• 2030 – Production ban of HCFCs goes into effect

You might also like