Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Frank R. Leslie,
BSEE, MS Space Technology
5/25/2002, Rev. 1.7
f.leslie@ieee.org; (321) 768-6629
1.1 020302
Renewable Energy (Continued)
Fuel combustion produces “greenhouse gases” that are believed to
lead to climate change (global warming), thus combustion of
biomass is not as desirable as other forms
Biomass combustion is also renewable, but emits CO2 and
pollutants
Biomass can be heated with water under pressure to create
synthetic fuel gas; but burning biomass creates pollution and
CO2
Nonrenewable energy comes from fossil fuels and nuclear
radioactivity (process of fossilization still occurring but trivial)
Nuclear energy is not renewable, but sometimes is treated as
though it were because of the long depletion period
1.1 020402
The eventual decline
of fossil fuels
1.2 020412
Economics
Cost of installation, operation, removal and restoration
Compare cost/watt & cost/watt-hour vs. other sources
Relative total costs compared to other sources
Externality costs aren’t included in most assessments
Cost of money (inflation) must be included (2 to 5%/year)
Life of energy plant varies and treated as linear depreciation to zero
Tax incentives or credits offset the hidden subsidies to fossil fuel
and nuclear industry
Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) require early funding to
justify permitting
1.3 020402
Ocean Energy
The tidal forces and thermal storage of the ocean provide a major
energy source
Wave action adds to the extractable surface energy
Major ocean currents (like the Gulf Stream) may be exploited to
extract energy with underwater rotors (turbines)
The oceans are the World’s largest solar collectors (71% of
surface)
Thermal differences between surface and deep waters can drive
heat engines
Over or in proximity to the ocean surface, the wind moves at higher
speeds over water than over land roughness
2.0 020329
Wave Energy
2.0 020402
Ocean Energy: Wave Energy
Figures in kW/m
Source: Wave Energy paper. IMechE, 1991 and
European Directory of Renewable Energy (Suppliers and Services) 1991
2.0 20329
Concepts of Wave Energy
Conversion
2.1 020402
Salter “Ducks”
Scottish physicist Prof. Stephen
Salter invented “Nodding Duck”
energy converter in 1970
Salter “ducks” rock up and down as
the wave passes beneath it. This
oscillating mechanical energy is
converted to electrical energy
Destroyed by storm
A floating two-tank version drives
hydraulic rams that send pressurized
oil to a hydraulic motor that drives a
generator, and a cable conducts
electricity to shore
Ref.: www.fujita.com/archive-frr/ TidalPower.html
©1996 Ramage
http://acre.murdoch.edu.au/ago/ocean/wave.html
2.2.1 020402
Fluid-Driven Wave Turbines
Waves can be funneled and channeled into a rising chute to charge
a reservoir over a weir or through a swing-gate
Water passes through waterwheel or turbine back to the ocean
Algerian V-channel [Kotch, p.228]
Wave forces require an extremely strong structure and mechanism
to preclude damage
The Ocean Power Delivery wave energy converter Pelamis has
articulated sections that stream from an anchor towards the shore
Waves passing overhead produce hydraulic pressure in rams
between sections
This pressure drives hydraulic motors that spin generators, and
power is conducted to shore by cable
750 kW produced by a group 150m long and 3.5m diameter
2.2.2.1 020402
Fluid-Driven Wave Turbines
2.2.2.1 020402
Air-Driven Wave Turbines (Con’t)
Photo by Wavegen
3.1 020402
Tidal Energy (continued)
3.1 020402
Tidal Water Turbines
3.2 020402
Tidal Flow: Rance River, France
3.3 020329
Tidal Flow: Passamaquoddy, Lower
Bay of Fundy, New Brunswick, Canada
[Ref.: Harder]
3.3 020329
Other Tidal Flow Plants under
Study
3.3 020402
Other Tidal Flow Plants under
Study (continued)
Severn River, Great Britain: range of 47 feet (14.5 m)
calculated output of 2.4 MWh annually. Proposed at
$15B, but not economic.
Chansey Islands:20 miles off Saint Malo, France; 34
billion kWh per year; not economic; environmental
problems; project shelved in 1980
San Jose, Argentina: potential of 75 billion kWh/year;
tidal range of 20 feet (6m)
China built several plants in the 1950s
Korean potential sites (Garolim Bay)
3.3 0203402
Hydraulic Pressure Absorbers
http://www.bfi.org/Trimtab/summer01/oceanWave.htm
4.0 020402
Ocean Thermal Energy:
OTEC (Ocean Thermal Electric Conversion)
Ref.: http://www.nrel.gov/otec/achievements.html
5.0 020402
Wind Energy Equations
(also applies to water turbines)
6.1 020402
Wind Energy Equations
(continued)
6.1 020402
Generic Trades in Energy
Energy trade-offs required to
make rational decisions
PV is expensive ($4 to 5 per Ref.: www.freefoto.com/
pictures/general/
watt for hardware + $5 per watt windfarm/index.asp?i=2
www.strawbilt.org/systems/ details.solar_electric.html
7.2 020402
Energy
Transmission
Electricity and hydrogen are energy carriers, not natural fuels
Electric transmission lines lose energy in heat (~2% to 5%); trades
loss vs. cost
Line flow directional analysis can show where new energy plants are
required to reduce energy transmission
Hydrogen is made by electrolysis of water, cracking of natural gas,
or from bacterial action (lab experiment level)
Oil and gas pipelines carry storable energy
Pipelines (36” or larger) can transport hydrogen without appreciable
energy loss due to low density and viscosity
More efficient than 500 kV transmission line and is out of view
7.3 020402
Legal aspects and other
complications
PURPA: Public Utility Regulatory Policy Act of 1978. Utility
purchase from and sale of power to qualified facilities; avoided
costs offsetting basis of purchases
Energy Policy Act of 1992 leads to deregulation
“NIMBYs” rally to shrilly insist “Not In My Backyard”!
Investment taxes and subsidies favor fossil and nuclear power
High initial cost dissuades potential users; future is uncertain
Lack of uniform state-level net metering hinders offsetting costs
Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) require extensive and
expensive research and trade studies
Numerous “public interest” advocacy groups are well-funded and
ready to sue to stop projects
7.4 020402
Conclusion
Renewable energy offers a long-
term approach to the World’s
energy needs
Economics drives the energy
selection process and short-term
(first cost) thinking leads to
disregard of long-term, overall
cost
Wave and tidal energy are more
expensive than wind and solar
energy, the present leaders
Increasing oil, gas, and coal
prices will ensure that the
transition to renewable energy
occurs
Offshore and shoreline wind
energy plants offer a logical
approach to part of future energy
supplies
8.0 0201402
References: Books, etc.
General:
Sørensen, Bent. Renewable Energy, Second Edition. San Diego: Academic Press, 2000, 911 pp. ISBN 0-12-
656152-4.
Henry, J. Glenn and Gary W. Heinke. Environmental Science and Engineering. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall,
728pp., 1989. 0-13-283177-5, TD146.H45, 620.8-dc19
Brower, Michael. Cool Energy. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press, 1992. 0-262-02349-0, TJ807.9.U6B76,
333.79’4’0973.
Di Lavore, Philip. Energy: Insights from Physics. NY: John Wiley & Sons, 414pp., 1984. 0-471-89683-7l,
TJ163.2.D54, 621.042.
Bowditch, Nathaniel. American Practical Navigator. Washington:USGPO, H.O. Pub. No. 9.
Harder, Edwin L. Fundamentals of Energy Production. NY: John Wiley & Sons, 368pp., 1982. 0-471-08356-9,
TJ163.9.H37, 333.79. Tidal Energy, pp. 111-129.
Wind:
Patel, Mukund R. Wind and Solar Power Systems. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1999, 351 pp. ISBN 0-8493-1605-7,
TK1541.P38 1999, 621.31’2136
Gipe, Paul. Wind Energy for Home & Business. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green Pub. Co., 1993. 0-
930031-64-4, TJ820.G57, 621.4’5
Johnson, Gary L, Wind Energy Systems. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc. TK 1541.J64 1985. 621.4’5; 0-13-
957754-8.
Waves:
Smith, Douglas J. “Big Plans for Ocean Power Hinges on Funding and Additional R&D”. Power Engineering, Nov. 2001,
p. 91.
Kotch, William J., Rear Admiral, USN, Retired. Weather for the Mariner. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1983. 551.5,
QC994.K64, Chap. 11, Wind, Waves, and Swell.
Solar:
Duffie, John and William A. Beckman. Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes. NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 920
pp., 1991.
9.1 020402
References: Internet
General:
http://www.google.com/search?q=%22renewable+energy+course%22
http://www.ferc.gov/ Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
http://solstice.crest.org/
http://dataweb.usbr.gov/html/powerplant_selection.html
http://mailto:energyresources@egroups.com
http://www.dieoff.org. Site devoted to the decline of energy and effects upon population
Tidal:
http://www.unep.or.kr/energy/ocean/oc_intro.htm
http://www.bluenergy.com/technology/prototypes.html
http://www.iclei.org/efacts/tidal.htm
http://zebu.uoregon.edu/1996/ph162/l17b.html
Waves:
http://www.env.qld.gov.au/sustainable_energy/publicat/ocean.htm
http://www.bfi.org/Trimtab/summer01/oceanWave.htm
http://www.oceanpd.com/
http://www.newenergy.org.cn/english/ocean/overview/status.htm
http://www.energy.org.uk/EFWave.htm
http://www.earthsci.org/esa/energy/wavpwr/wavepwr.html
9.2 020329
References: Internet
Thermal:
http://www.nrel.gov/otec/what.html
http://www.hawaii.gov/dbedt/ert/otec_hi.html#anchor349152 on OTEC systems
Wind:
http://awea-windnet@yahoogroups.com. Wind Energy elist
http://awea-wind-home@yahoogroups.com. Wind energy home powersite elist
http://telosnet.com/wind/20th.html
9.2 020329
Units and Constants
Units:
Power in watts (joules/second)
Energy (power x time) in watt-hours
Constants:
1 m = 0.3048 ft exactly by definition
1 mile = 1.609 km; 1m/s = 2.204 mi/h (mph)
1 mile2 = 27878400 ft2 = 2589988.11 m2
1 ft2 = 0.09290304 m2; 1 m2 = 10.76391042 ft2
1 ft3 = 28.32 L = 7.34 gallon = 0.02832 m 3; 1 m3 = 264.17 US gallons
1 m3/s = 15850.32 US gallons/minute
g = 32.2 ft/s2 = 9.81 m/s2; 1 kg = 2.2 pounds
Air density, ρ (rho), is 1.225 kg/m3 or 0.0158 pounds/ft3 at 20ºC at sea level
Solar Constant: 1368 W/m2 exoatmospheric or 342 W/m2 surface (80 to 240
W/m2)
1 HP = 550 ft-lbs/s = 42.42 BTU/min = = 746 W (J/s)
1 BTU = 252 cal = 0.293 Wh = 1.055 kJ
1 atmosphere = 14.696 psi = 33.9 ft water = 101.325 kPa = 76 cm Hg =1013.25
mbar
1 boe (42- gallon barrel of oil equivalent) = 1700 kWh
9.3 020402
Energy Equations
Electricity:
E=IR; P=I2 R; P=E2/R, where R is resistance in ohms, E is volts,
I is current in amperes, and P is power in watts
Energy = P t, where t is time in hours
Turbines:
Pa = ½ ρ A2 u3, where ρ (rho) is the fluid density, A = rotor area
in m2, and u is wind speed in m/s
P = R ρ T, where P = pressure (Nm-2 = Pascal)
Torque, T = P/ω, in Nm/rad, where P = mechanical power in
watts, ω is angular velocity in rad/sec
Pumps:
Pm = gQmh/ήp W, where g=9.81 N/kg, Qm is mass capacity in
kg/s, h is head in m, and ήp is pump mechanical efficiency
9.4 020402