You are on page 1of 31

Chapter 14

Labor
Markets

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved.


In this chapter you will learn to

1. Explain why wage differentials exist in both competitive


and noncompetitive labor markets.
2. Describe the effects of legislated minimum wages.

3. Explain why unions face a tradeoff between wages and


employment.
4. Describe facts and to recognize government policies related
to gender and race issues in the labor market.
5. Explain why the trend away from manufacturing jobs and
toward service jobs is not necessarily a problem for the
economy as a whole.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-2
Wage Differentials

Wage Differentials in Competitive Markets

In competitive labour markets, supply and demand set the


equilibrium wage and level of employment.

But wages will still differ across workers if there are


compensating differentials.

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-3


Wage Differentials

Even if all jobs are the same (no compensating differentials),


there may still be some equilibrium wage differentials:

- different working conditions

- inherited skills are different across workers and can


be important

- investment in human capital is costly, and the return


is usually in terms of higher future wages

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-4


Figure 14.1 Education and Earned
Income in the United States, 2005

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-5


Wage Differentials and Human Capital

Changes in the pattern of human-capital acquisition lead to


changes in the supply of high-skilled versus low-skilled
labour.
These changes erode the wage differentials.
But as long as human capital is costly to acquire, some
wage differentials will persist in equilibrium.

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-6


Wage Differentials in Noncompetitive
Markets

A Union in a Competitive Labor Market

A labor union has monopoly power:


- it can change the supply of labor
 driving up the wage

Firms are generally able to choose the level of employment,


once the wage is determined in negotiations.

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-7


Figure 14.2 A Union in a
Competitive Labor Market

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-8


Figure 14.3 Monopsony in a
Labor Market

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-9


Figure 14.4 Bilateral
Monopoly in a Labor Market

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-10


Bilateral Monopoly: Monopsony
with a Labor Union

MC The union can raise


wages and
Wage

S = AC
Rate

employment above
• the monopsony levels.
w0 • E0
E1 If the union pushes
w1 • wages up only to the
competitive level,
MRP employment would also
L1 L0 rise to the competitive
Quantity of Labor level.

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-11


Bilateral Monopoly: Monopsony
with a Labor Union

MC But if the union pushes


the wage up to w2,
Wage

S = AC
Rate

employment will fall


E2 x
w2 • • below the competitive
w0 • E0 level…
E1
w1 •

MRP
…and some
unemployment occur.
L1 L2 L0 L3
Quantity of Labor

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-12


Legislated Minimum Wages

Government policy can affect labor markets by legislating


minimum wages.

In a competitive market, a binding minimum wage reduces


employment and creates unemployment.

But in the presence of monopsony power, a binding minimum


wage may simultaneously increase wages and employment.

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-13


Figure 14.5 The Effects of
Legislated Minimum Wages

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-14


A Final Word

We have learned several explanations for why some


workers get paid more than others, including:
1. workers’ education and skills
2. job characteristics
3. structure of labor markets

APPLYING ECONOMIC CONCEPTS 14.1


Inequality and Shifts in the Labor Market

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-15


Labor Unions

Labor unions are not as important in the U.S. today than


they have been in the past. Only 7.8% of all private-sector
workers were members of a union in 2005, as compared
to almost 25% in the early 1970s.

LESSONS FROM HISTORY 14.1


Unions in the United States

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-16


Figure 14.6 U.S. Union
Membership by Industry, 2005

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-17


Collective Bargaining

In collective bargaining, the firm and the union typically


bargain over wages and other working conditions.

The firm usually retains the right to choose the level of


employment.

The more successful a union is at raising wages, the fewer


union members will be employed.

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-18


Union Wage Premium

Unionized workers earn, on average, between 10 and 20


percent higher wages than non-unionized workers with similar
characteristics.

But there is little empirical evidence that firms hire fewer


workers as a result of the higher wages.

Some economists explain this apparent contradiction with the


concept of featherbedding.

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-19


Figure 14.7 The Union
Employment Effect

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-20


Unanswered Questions

Unions may reduce long-run productivity through a process


known as the hold-up of capital.
Much physical capital, once installed, has a very inelastic
supply, and the union may hold up the firm by forcing it to
pay higher wages.
If firms are forward-looking, they will anticipate this behavior,
and might reduce investment.
Lower investment may reduce productivity growth in the
industry.

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-21


Gender and Race in the Labor Market

In 2005, black workers on average earned 70% and Hispanic


workers earned 63% of non-Hispanic whites. Female workers
earned about 69% of what male workers earned.

Possible explanations for the observed disparity:


- differences in education and human capital
- occupational segregation
Policies to eliminate discrimination:
- equal opportunity and access in the workplace
- affirmative action
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-22
Figure 14.8 The Effects of Gender,
Race, and Ethnicity on Income, 2005

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-23


Figure 14.9 The Effect of
Discrimination on Wages

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-24


Policies to Eliminate Discrimination

Prior to the civil rights movement of the 1960s, discrimination


was tolerated and in some cases even promoted.
In the 1960s, two types of policies were introduced to counter
the effects of discrimination:

1. Equal opportunity and access (Equal Pay Act of


1963 and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act

2. Affirmative action policies

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-25


The “Good Jobs–Bad Jobs” Debate

In 1945, the goods-producing sector accounted for 40% of


U.S. employment, and services accounted for less than
50%. Today the numbers are 17% for goods and over 70%
for services.

One concern is that many of the “good jobs” in the


manufacturing sector appear to have been replaced by
“bad jobs” in the service sector.

Is the shift toward services a problem?

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-26


Figure 14.10 Nonfarm
Employment Shares

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-27


Table 14.1 The Importance of
Service-Sector Employment, 2004

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-28


Five Observations

1. Real income per hour worked has been rising throughout


the past century. As a nation, we are getting wealthier.

2. Low-paying service-sector jobs play an important role in


the U.S. economy, especially for young workers.

3. The fall in manufacturing’s employment share is partly due


to that sector’s dynamism.

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-29


Five Observations

4. As income grows, demand naturally switches to many


services.

5. Increases in the quality of services lead to rising living


standards.

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-30


A Mixed Blessing?

The transition of workers from agriculture to manufacturing to


services can be difficult for the individuals involved.

This suggests a role for government to maintain the income of


those who are temporarily unemployed.

The goal is to ease such transitions, not block them.

Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. 14-31

You might also like