Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Teams
PRESENTED TO: PRESENTED BY:
Sequence of actions:
1. Setting group direction
2. First phase of inertia
3. Halfway point transition
4. Major changes
5. Second phase of inertia
6. Accelerated activity
The Punctuated-Equilibrium
Model
Group Properties
1.Roles
2.Norms
3.Status
4.Size
5.Cohesiveness
1.ROLES
ROLES (CONTINUATION)
2.NORMS
Classes of Norms:
□ Performance norms
□ Appearance norms
□ Social arrangement norms
□ Allocation of resources norms
NORMS (CONTINUATION)
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
3.Status
Status Determinants:
✔ Power of person
• Status and Norms ✔ Person’s ability to
• Status and Group Interaction contribute to the group
• Status Inequity ✔ Individual’s characteristics.
• Status and Stigmatization
• Group Status
4.Size
Performance
d
te
)
ng
c
i
pe
f
oa
ol
Ex
t
(due
tual
Ac
Group Size
Reducing Social Loafing
• Set Up Goals
• Increase
Intergroup
Competition
• Engage In Peer
Evaluation REDUC Social
• Selection Of E Loafing
Members
• Rewards
5.Group Cohesiveness
Group cohesiveness: Degree of
motivation to stay in the group.
Increasing group
cohesiveness:
1. Make the group
smaller.
2. Encourage agreement with group
goals.
3. Increase time members spend
together.
4. Increase group status and admission
difficultly.
5. Stimulate competition with other
groups.
6. Give rewards to the group, not
individuals.
Relationship Between Group
Cohesiveness, Performance Norms,
and Productivity
6. DIVERSITY
Degree to which members of the group are similar
to or different from one another.
Limitations Benefits
Making
DECISION MAKING
• ACCURACY
•SPEED
•CREATIVITY
•ACCEPTANCE
• EXTENSIVE
• CONFLICTS
GROUP DECISION
MAKING
GROUPTHINK:
GROUPSHIFT:
A phenomenon in which the norm
for consensus overrides the realistic A change between a group’s decision
appraisal of alternative courses of and an individual decision that a
action. member within a group would make
Group Decision-Making Techniques
©The McGraw-
Hill Companies,
Inc., 2000
Irwin/McGraw-Hill
1
4
2
5
©The McGraw-
-
Hill Companies,
Inc., 2000
Meaning of Team
A group of people who share a common name,
mission, set of goals or objectives and
expectations
Formal group made up of interdependent
attainment of a goal
Why Teams?
⚫Good when performing complicated,
complex, interrelated and/or more
voluminous work than one person can handle
⚫Good when knowledge, talent, skills, and
abilities are dispersed across organizational
members
⚫Empowerment and collaboration; not power
and competition
⚫Basis for total quality efforts
Types of Teams
Problem Solving Teams:
Groups of 5 to 12
employees from the same
department who meet for
a few hours each week to
discuss ways of improving
quality, efficiency, and the
work environment.
Self-Managed Work Teams:
Groups of 10 to 15
employees who take on
responsibilities of their
former supervisors.
Types of Teams (cont’d)
Cross Functional
Team:
Employees from about the
same hierarchial level but
from different work areas
who come together to
accomplish a task.
Virtual Teams:
Teams that use computer
technology to tie together
physically dispersed
members in order to
achieve a common goal.
Types of Team (cont’d)