Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Organizations Structure
is the framework for
allocating tasks,
delegating authority,
coordinating activity
and channeling
communication
between individual and
groups in the
organization.
External
Internal
Stakeholders Connected Stakeholders
Lenders Stakeholders:- Shareholders
Suppliers
Non-executive Executive
Government
Customers
directors directors and senior
Local communities Employees managers
Key suppliers Other managers
General public,
Key customers and current
Interest groups
employees (Active).
and Pressure groups
Advantages:- Disadvantages:-
1. Enable Growth 1. Potential Loss of
2. Clear Responsibilty for Control
Product/Customer/Region 2. Lack of Goal
3. Top Management Free to Concentrate Congruence
on Strategic Matters.Mubashir Wasim (MSc. Economics, MBA3. Lack of Economies of
Marketing, MS-IT, MS HRD) Scale
Matrix Organization
Combination of Functional & Divisions
Ideal for Medium Size Organization with Projects/ Products
Project managers were appointed with overall responsibility for
individual projects. Project managers had to organize the efforts of
individuals in all the different functions.
At the same time, functional managers such as management of
engineering, production and sales and marketing, retained their
decision-making authority.
Disadvantages
1. Dual Command & Conflict
2. Time Consuming
3. Sharing of Resources Across
Projects
Tactical
Operational
Strengths:- Strengths:-
1. Better Control:- 1. Delegation of Authority:-
2. Smaller Group Better Social 2. Initiative & Creativity:-
Needs:- 3. Less Administrative Costs:-
3. Supervisor can Spare More 4. Flexible Supervision Style:-
Time for Instructing
Subordinates:- Weaknesses:-
4. More Influence of Supervisor:- 1. Weak Control:-
2. Larger Group Weak Social
Weaknesses:- Grouping:-
1. Lack of Delegation of 3. Supervisor Spare Less Time,
Authority:- More Learning from
2. Lack of Initiative & Creativity:- Coworkers:-
3. More Administrative Costs:- 4. Weak Influence of Supervisor:-
4. Rigid Supervision:-
Mubashir Wasim (MSc. Economics, MBA
Marketing, MS-IT, MS HRD)
Narrow Span Span of Control: Wide Span
Contingency Theory:-
Discuss the bases on
which an
organisation decide
to follow a
particular span of
control
1. Nature of Work
2. Nature of Worker
3. Nature of Supervisor
4. Location of Personnel
Span of
Problem of Grape Vine
Control
Mubashir Wasim (MSc. Economics, MBA
Marketing, MS-IT, MS HRD)
Formal Organization
Informal
Formal
Informal Organization
Informal
Formal
Independent research
& development
consulting firm
Virtual
Factories in
South Korea
Commission Sales
Mubashir Wasim (MSc. Economics, MBA
Representatives
Marketing, MS-IT, MS HRD)
Outsourcing
An entity does not need to carry out operations itself. Instead, it can
outsource work to a sub-contractor.
Outsourcing is very common
Entity’s fleet of motor vehicles,
Security services,
IT work
Some accountancy work (for example, payroll operations).
The reasons for outsourcing
Focus on core competencies,
Better focus on specialist area.
Further Specialization and more growth
Problems with outsourcing
The nature of the relationship with suppliers and communication.
Loss of control over the outsourced activities and they are not as
required.
Q.5 (a) Briefly explain the term Organizational Culture and its
significance for an organization. (03-Sep-09)
Schein- Cultural Factors
Chapter#4 / Gride : B
Types of Changes
External
Internal
(a) Analyse the above situation in the context of Lewin’s force field
analysis model of change. (03)
(b) Discuss the measures that Dr Mushtaq should take in terms of Lewin’s
force field analysis model of change stating the actions to be taken at
different stages of the change process. (06) [S17][10 March 2017 ]
Lewin: unfreeze, change, re-freeze
The change process then needs to go through three stages:
• unfreeze
• movement (change)
• re-freeze
Unfreeze
Individuals will not want to change anything if they think that the
current situation is acceptable. Recognize what is wrong with the
current system or current situation
Encourage employees to feel dissatisfaction with mention activity.
Clear vision about what changes they want to make,
They should encourage employees to want these changes to
happen.
Lewin: unfreeze, change, re-freeze
.
Movement (change)
The changes should then be made.
The support for change must be strong enough to overcome the
opposition.
Management should be given sufficient resources to implement the
changes
Get employees to participate in making the changes
Their participation can reduce resistance.
Re-freeze
The process of getting employees to carry on with the new system is
called refreezing.
There is risk that employees again use old ways
Employees should be encouraged to carry on with the new way of
doing things.
Reward employees for performance based on the desired
behaviour and results.
Q.4 The Linguist (TL), a learning language institute, has been offering
customized programs to the students. TL had gained recognition for its
services in terms of highly qualified teachers and competitive pricing.
However, in the past two years, student intake of TL has reduced
significantly as more students have enrolled with a competitor who is
offering online programs. To achieve cost efficiencies and to compete
effectively, the management of TL is considering to discontinue the
classroom teaching and to start offering online programs by connecting
students and teachers through video conferencing.
Required:
(a) List any four reasons because of which TL’s employees may resist the
above change. (02)
(b) Suggest how management of TL can implement the above change in
accordance with the change process suggested by Kurt Lewin. (06) [S18]
Solution
The management of TL can implement the change in accordance with the
change process presented by Kurt Lewin as follows:
(i) Unfreeze In the first stage, management of TL would have to
persuade employees that change is imminent. They should be
encouraged to feel dissatisfied with the current system i.e. ‘unfrozen’
out of their acceptance of the current situation. Further, the
management should also offer employees an attractive alternative for
the future that can be reached by changing the current situation.
(ii) Movement (change) In this stage, actual change is to be made.
Management of TL should make sufficient resources available to
implement the change. It should encourage employees affected by the
change, to participate throughout the change process it would help in
reducing the resistance to change.
(iii)Re-freeze This is the stage where change has been implemented. At
this stage, management should ensure that employees continue to
carry on with the new ways by rewarding them for performance based
on the desired behavior and results.
McKinsey 7S Model
The 7S Framework was first published in 1981 and was subsequently
adopted by the consultancy firm McKinsey.
McKinsey 7S Model
Hard Factors
Soft Factors
Strategy
Goals and objectives of the entity,
Plan for optimal use of resource
Structure
Allocate task & authority
Ensure coordination and Communication.
Systems
System that can best use of resources
Generate outstanding value
McKinsey 7S Model
Revitalise
Commitment for
Re-design the future. Find new
products and new
processes which markets and invent
create more value. new businesses.
Change the rule of
game.
The ‘change agent’
When a transformational change is implemented, there has to be a
‘change agent’ who drives the change and is responsible for its
successful implementation. Often the change agent is an outside
consultant. This individual must have certain skills.
He must explain the reasons for the change, and provide employees
with reliable information. This will help to reduce the risk of false
rumours spreading.
As far as possible, he should involve the individuals affected, and get
them to participate in making the changes. As a result they will not
resist.
He should maintain communications with employees at all time,
monitoring the progress of the change and providing information to
others about the progress.
Where appropriate, he should provide training to the employees
affected.
He should emphasise the benefits of the change to the individuals
affected. Not on the drawback
The ‘change agent’