Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LOGIC
Part 2
Dr. Dalia Asseel
SENTENCE, STATEMENT,
UTTERANCE AND
PROPOSITION
Sentence
■ A sentence possesses this meaning exclusively by virtue of the words it contains, and their
grammatical arrangement.
■ Grammatical arrangement means how the grammar of a language is associated with rules which
tell us how to put together the meanings of the constituents of a construction to get the global
meaning of the construction.
■ Thus, in The big cat sat on the small mat
smallness is attributed to the mat and not to the cat,
a superior vertical position is attributed to the cat;
what sort of animal is involved,
and that only one of them would be intended as a referent in any actual use of the sentence.
Truth values ■ Matters of truth and logic are of more
importance in truth-conditional semantics
conditions
Truth values
■ Look at the following pair of sentences, which are paraphrases of each other.
(A) John sold the book to a grandson of W.B. Yeats
(B) A grandson of W.B. Yeats bought the book from John
It is not possible for (A) to be true while (B) is not (assuming that we are dealing with the same John and
the same grandson of W.B. Yeats).
Thus (A) has the same truth value as (B), so that if (A) is true, (B) is true, and vice versa; also, if (A) is
false, then (B) is false, and vice versa.
Therefore, It is assumed that every statement is either true or false and not both which is its truth value.
■ The meaning of a sentence will constrain the uses to which it can be put.
■ For example, How are things?, you will know it's my husband on the phone: that is not what How are things?, by
general convention, means.
■ A sentence outside of particular uses does not have a truth value, however, it does have truth conditions.
Truth conditions
■ Truth conditions are conditions which must hold for the sentence to be used to make a true statement.
■ Truth conditions are conditions that must be satisfied by the world if an utterance of a declarative sentence is
true.
■ For example, the utterance ‘There is a cat on the table’ is only true if in the world at the time of the utterance
there actually is a table with a cat on it.
■ Truth-conditional semantics is based on the notion that the core meaning of any sentence is its truth conditions.
■ Any speaker of the language knows these conditions.
■ If a sentence is true or false, what other sentences, expressing partly the same, partly different conditions, can
be judged by this sentence?
■ If a given sentence is true, does this make another sentence also true, or does it falsify the other sentence, or is
there no truth relation?
Propositional content
■ A simple proposition attributes some property to an entity, or a relation between two or more entities.
■ It is either true or false: truth or falsehood is a sign that at least one proposition has been expressed.
■ A proposition is not a specifically linguistic entity.
■ The same proposition may be expressed by an indefinitely large number of sentences:
John saw Mary.
John saw his sister.
Mary was seen by Peter's uncle.
These can all express the same proposition, provided, of course, that Mary is John's sister, and that John is Peter's uncle, and
so on.
Why, then, is The cat sat on the mat not a proposition?
1. It is neither true nor false. It becomes true or false when it is asserted of some specific cat and some specific mat.
2. Until definite referring expressions in a sentence have been assigned referents, it does not express a specific proposition.
3. A sentence like The cat sat on the mat can be used to express an indefinitely large number of different propositions (i.e.,
with reference to different cats and different mats) on different occasions of use.
Incomplete Propositions
■ Extra (i.e. covert) propositions are expected to be inferred by the hearer on the basis of contextual
information, but they go well beyond the mere filling out of missing bits in what is actually said.
■ Utterance meaning is the totality of what the speaker intends to convey by making an utterance,
within certain necessary limits.
E.g., the speaker's intention to convey the proposition that A is too late for supper:
A: Am I in time for supper?
B: I've cleared the table.
It would clearly be part of B's intended message that A is too late. Yet this cannot be obtained by
elaborating or completing the proposition expressed.
References