You are on page 1of 60

Humphrey Visual Field Tests:

A workshop for beginners.

Natalio J. Izquierdo, M.D.


Presidente Electo Asociación Médica de PR
Introduction

 VF defects due to glaucoma


 Gold Standard Dx & Tx
 Full Threshold versus SITA
 Owner’s Manual
 My interpretation format

Page 4
Single Field Analysis

Page 7
Top of the Page

 Patient data
 Reliability indices
 Numeric results
 Gray tone results

Page 8
Lower Half of the Page

 Total deviation plot


 Pattern deviation plot
 Probability symbols
 Global Indices
 EOM (SITA)

Page 9
Patient Data

 Which eye?
 Patient’s name; ID; DOB
 Strategy & Stimulus
 Pupil size & Date
 VA & Refraction
Page 10
Reliability Indices

 Fixation losses
 False positives
 False negatives
 XX = unreliable

Page 11
Reliability Indices: Fixation Losses

 Pt did not fixate


 Losses per stimuli
 Exceed 20%
 XX sign

Page 11
Reliability Indices

Example 1
 Quantify Losses
 Is it Reliable?

Page 11
Reliability Indices

Example 2
 Quantify losses
 Is it reliable?

Page 11
Reliability Indices: False Positives

 40 points rechecked & >40dB


 Movement & Sound
 Answers without stimuli?
 XX sign when 15 - 33%
 Low reliability message

Page 12
False Positives Example 3
 If ≥ 40 dB in Numerical Threshold
 White in Gray tones graph

Page 12
Reliability Indices: False Negatives

 Shows a bright stimulus in an area


of known sensitivity.
 If Pt does not respond a False
Negative
response is recorded.
 Unreliable if > 33%

Page 13
False Negatives’ Causes

Inattentive patient
 Poor fixation

 Physical Condition
False Negatives
Example 4

Page 13
False Negative
Example 5

Page 14
Reliability Messages’ Summary

 XX = Unreliable
 If Fixation losses > 20%
 If false positives > 33%
 If false negatives > 33%
Reliability Clinical Pearls
Test is unreliable if:

 Full 30-2 takes > 550 questions


 Full Threshold lasts > 20 minutes
 If SITA lasts > 6-8 minutes

Pages 15-16
Reliability Clinical Pearls
Example 6: Questions Asked

Page 15
Reliability Clinical Pearls
Example 7: Test duration

Page 16
Gray Tone Threshold Printout
 10 shades of gray tone symbols
 Each tone represents dB changes
 0 dB Highest intensity
 Not in SITA

Page 17
Threshold Test Printouts
 Blind spot shown as a triangle in the
Numeric Threshold Printout

Page 18
Numeric Threshold Printout

 Numeric grid gives


thresholds in dB
 Rechecked if 5 dB

+/- than expected


 Rechecked value is

shown within ( )
Page 19
Numeric Threshold Printout
Example 9

Page 19
Numeric Threshold Printout
 < 0 = pt did not see stimulus at 0 dB
 0 = pt saw the stimulus at 0 dB
 Example 10

Page 20
Glaucoma Hemifield Test

Compares
upper & lower
hemi-fields

Page 21
Glaucoma Hemifield Test

 Identifies localized VFD as abnormal


 Within / Outside / Borderline

 Reduction or High Sensitivity


GHT Within Normal Limits
Example 11

Page 22
GHT Abnormal
Example 12

Page 23
GHT Borderline
Example 13

Page 24
GHT Reduction of Sensitivity
Example 14

Page 25
GHT High Sensitivity
Example 15

Page 26
Total deviation Plot

 Left Lower Half


 Upper: Numeric values
(Patient vs normal)
 Lower: Probability
(darker is less likely to
be normal)
 Color symbols as %

Page 28
Total deviation Plot

 Example 16
 < -5?
 Black squares?

Page 28
Pattern Deviation Plot

 Right Pair
 Adjusted for cataracts
 Shades = Probability
 Example 17

Page 29
Global Indices

 Far Right Side


 Mean Deviation (MD)
 Pattern Standard Deviation (PSD)
 Short-term Fluctuation (SF)
 Corrected Pattern Standard Deviation

Page 30
Global Indices

 Far Right Side

Page 30
Global Indices: Mean Deviation

 Average depression or elevation of a


Patient versus normal
 Normal = -2 to 2 dB

 If significantly outside population

normal a p value is given (p < 0.5%)

Page 30
Global Indices - Mean Deviation
MD Values (dB) Description

-2 to 2 Normal

-2 to -6 Mild

-6 to -12 Moderate

-12 to -16 Severe

< -16 Profound

Page 31
Global Indices - Mean Deviation
Example 17: ↓ MD

Page 31
Global Indices - Mean Deviation

 Example 18
 MD?

 Describe

 P value

Page 31
Global Indices - Mean Deviation
Example 19 - ↑ MD

Page 32
Global Indices:
Pattern Standard Deviation

 Pt’s VF departs from nl


 Normal: 0 to 4 dB

 Low PSD = smooth hill of vision

 High PSD = irregular hill

Page 33
Global Indices: PSD
 Example 20
 High PSD =

irregular hill

Page 33
Global Indices:
Short Term Fluctuation (SF)

 Index of consistency
 Points Tested twice
 Normal 0 to 2 dB
 Example 21: 3.20 dB

Page 34
Global Indices:
Corrected Pattern Standard Deviation

 How the shape of the pt’s hill of vision deviates


 Unreliable responses
 VF losses or
 Both
 Normal 0 to 4 dB
 Example 22

Page 35
Section 2
VF 2.1
Page 37
VF 2.2
Page 39
VF 2.3
Page 41
VF 2.4
Page 43
VF 2.5
Page 45
Progression: 5-7-9-11 @ Pattern

 New depression = 2 adjacent points ≥ 5 dB


 Deepening of an existing point ≥ 7 dB
 Enlargement with an adjacent point ≥ 9 dB
 Develop a new scotoma ≥ 11 dB

Page 48
Change Analysis Printout

 Box plot:
Median,
Elongation
 MD
 PSD

Page 49
Patient 3.2

Page 51-54
Patient 3.3

Pages 55 - 58
Neuro vs Glaucoma VFD?

 ON appearance
 Vertical Meridian

 Congruous

 Quad vs Hemianopsias

Page 60
Neuro vs Glaucoma: MRI?

 History

 Vertical
Meridian
 Bitemporal Hemianopia

 Quadrantanopsias

Page 60
Mrs. Rose

Page 61
Conclusions
 VF needed for Dx & Tx
 Single Field Analysis
 Progression
 Change Analysis
 Glaucoma vs Neuro
Thank you and Allergan

You might also like