Professional Documents
Culture Documents
• If key ratios are close to what they are expected to be, will be considered as ‘reliable’ and
‘accurate’ evidence.
• If a ratio is very different from what is expected, the auditor should investigate the reason
for the variation.
• Might be misstatement in the financial statements
2. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES: ISA 520
• Essential feature is ‘comparison’ – key relationship between figures.
• Comparison with prior accounting periods, expected results, industry average results and
comparable parts of the same entity.
• Limitations;
• Its usefulness depends on the quality of the underlying financial information.
• For comparison purposes, the information must be calculated on a consistent basis.
• The two figures used to calculate a ratio must be logically related.
• The auditor needs to understand the client’s business, so that he is able to understand the
potential significance of ratios, or reasons for differences.
2. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES: ISA 520
2.3 Analytical procedures in substantive testing
• Determine the suitability of particular substantive analytical procedures for given assertions (material
misstatement)
• Develop an expectation of recorded amounts or ratios and evaluate whether that expectation is sufficiently
precise to identify a misstatement.
• The accuracy with which the amounts can be predicted,
• The extent to which information can be disaggregated,
• The availability of information
• Evaluate the reliability of the data from which the expectation has been developed,
• The source of the information;
• comparability of the information available;
• the nature and relevance of the information available (not be suitable if they are goals rather than
expectations); and
• controls over the preparation of the data.
• determine what level of difference from expected amounts is acceptable without further investigation
2. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES: ISA 520
• The auditor will normally use analytical procedures to obtain supplementary audit
evidence.
• Substantive analytical procedures may provide sufficient appropriate audit
evidence for a particular assertion if:
• the assessed risk of material misstatement is not considered significant; and
• the outcome is sufficiently accurately predictable such that sufficient appropriate audit
evidence could be obtained through the use of substantive analytical procedures alone.
2. ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES: ISA 520
2.4 Investigation of fluctuations and relationships
• If the audit finds:
• fluctuations or relationships which are inconsistent with other information,
• unacceptable levels of differences from expected amounts