Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Module 18
Social Loafing: Many Hands
Make Diminished
Responsibility
Copyright ©2021 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
GROUP ASSETS
• MORE KNOWLEDGE
• MULTIPLE APPROACHES
• ACCEPTANCE BY MEMBERS
• BETTER UNDERSTANDING
© McGraw Hill 2
GROUP LIABILITIES
• EXCESSIVE CONFORMITY
• AGREEMENT MORE IMPORTANT THAN
ANSWER
• DOMINANT INDIVIDUAL CAN NEGATE
• EXCESSIVE COMMUNICATION-winning each
point more important
© McGraw Hill 3
Dominant Individuals tend to..
• Inhibit discussion
• Short-cut diagnosis
• Hinder disagreement
• Reduce creativity
• Curtail contributions of some members
© McGraw Hill 4
Individual vs. Group
The best individuals are usually better than groups as to accuracy, speed
and efficiency
The average individual is faster than most groups, but makes more
errors
Groups are more accurate but slower than most individuals
© McGraw Hill 5
Many Hands Make Light Work
Social loafing.
• Tendency for people to exert less effort when they pool their efforts
toward a common goal than when they are individually accountable.
Free riders.
• People who benefit from the group but give little in return. In
economics, refers to someone who benefits from resources, goods, or
services without paying for the cost of the benefit.
© McGraw Hill 6
Nature of Task
© McGraw Hill 7
Figure 18.1: Social Facilitation or Social Loafing?
© McGraw Hill 8
What makes people to loaf?
© McGraw Hill 9
How to reduce loafing?
Task importance. Studies have shown that when people think the task is
important they do less loafing. Zacarro (1984) found that groups
constructing ‘moon tents’ (don’t ask me!) worked harder if they thought
the relevance of the task was high, thought they were in competition with
another group and were encouraged to think the task was attractive.
Group importance. When the group is important to its members they
work harder. Worchel et al. (1998) had people building paper chains in
two groups, one which had name tags, matching coats and a sense of
competition. Compared to a group given none of these, they produced 5
more paper chains.
Decreasing the ‘sucker effect’. The sucker effect is that feeling of being
duped when you think that other people in the group are slacking off.
Reducing or eliminating this perception is another key to a productive
group.
© McGraw Hill 10
Social Loafing in Everyday Life 1
© McGraw Hill 11
Social Loafing in Everyday Life 2
Group members work hard when they:
• Are given challenging objectives.
• Are rewarded for group success.
• Have a spirit of commitment to the team.
© McGraw Hill 12
End of Main Content
www.mheducation.com
Copyright ©2021 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.