You are on page 1of 15

World’s Largest 4G Network

Feb, 2106
BS Subscriber
~1.1M 4G BSs ~360M 4G Subscribers

~720K@2014 ~90M@2014

Terminal Coverage
Sales volume 210M+
Types 1000+, Price <50$ ~1.2B pop (~86%), Reach Villages

~100M@2014 ~330 Cities@2014


Pg 2 |
5G Era: Rethink Fundamentals Green Communication Research
Center established in Oct. 2011,
initiated 5G Key Tech R&D.

Green To start a green journey of wireless systems

For no more “cells”

To make network application/load aware

Soft To make BS invisible

To enable wireless signal to “dress for the occasion ”

To enable Soft RAN via NGFI


Super Fast
To enable flexible configuration of diversified access points
and optimal baseband function split between BBU pool & RRS

“Towards Green & Soft: A 5G Perspective” IEEE Comm. Mag, Vol.52, Feb.2014
5G New Requirements

Immersive
Seamless

Tactile Ultra Dense

Massive
Ultra Reliable

Seamless Coverage, Hot Spot High Capacity, Low-power Massive-connection, Low-latency Ultra-reliable

Pg 4 | New design principles, new key technologies, …


E2E 5G System Key Technologies
Green and Soft

Core Network SDN/NFV

PTN Transportation PON


network

SDAI (enabled by MCD)

RAN

Seamless wide-area Hotspot & Low-power & Low-latency &


coverage high data rate massive-connections high-reliability
User Centric RAN (UCN): C-RAN a key enabler
Mobile mMTC
Internet

uMTC

HSS/AAA/PCC
Service Awareness
Smart Operation
CN Entity Internet/App

Autonomous CN-RAN Repartition


Network

Centralized
Radio Network Controller Radio Data Center
Network Slice Localized data,
Turbo Charged Edge service & forwarding
RAN Entity as a Service
Including C-RAN (Centralized and Cloud)

Signaling Data

Unified Access & Seamless RAN restructure


Next Generation Fronthaul Interface
Mobility 广覆盖通用信令层
(NGFI)
Macro signalling (data) 本地数据接入点
layer Local Data Access

Multi-Connectivity & Flexible


5G 4G WiFi Topology
D2D

Pg 6 | Framework of radio access network


Fronthaul challenges surfaced with C-RAN (2011)
C-RAN CMCC has conducted extensive trials to seek cost-

effecitive FH solutions in LTE era
Centralized Control and/or Processing
• Collaborative Radio
• Real-Time Cloud
• Clean System Target
Distributed BTS
Distributed BTS

Traditional
Traditional BTS
BTS

Fronthaul used to be an issue for LTE C-RAN:


CPRI Compression and WDM
Pg 7 |
Traditional FH solutions must be revisited in 5G era

Pg 8 |
NGFI (xHaul)

• The key to achieve FH interface redesign lies in the function re-split


b/w BBU and RRU
• The new NGFI will further lead to re-design of underlined transport
networks with packet switching capability
Pg 9 |
Decoupling Ant./Non-ant. Related Processing

The evaluation of the existing FH Interface


(CPRI, OBSAI):
The FH bandwidth is proportional to the
number of antennas.
The FH bandwidth is at least 2 orders
of magnitude higher than BH bandwidth.
Considering the C-RAN centralized deployment and the
technologies of 5G, FH is facing a bandwidth explosion.
Decoupling antenna/non-antenna related processing:
The number of Carriers The number of FH BW based on the existing
in C-RAN antennas FH Interface It is proposed that antenna related functions should be
moved from the BBU to the RRH.
100 8 1Tbps FH bandwidth will decrease significantly if the BBU/RRH
100 128 16Tbps function split can decouple the non-antenna related
processing and the antenna related processing.
Pg 10 |
Decoupling cell/UE Processing
The existing FH interface is a constant bit rate interface, which is load
independent and does not match with the features of mobile traffic.

Decoupling cell/UE processing:


Cell processing is irrelevant to traffic load and is fixed no matter how many UEs are active.
FH bandwidth will be lower and load dependent.
In C-RAN Mode, cell/UE processing decoupling can further help reduce power consumption.
 When the traffic load is low, part of C-RAN cloud resource can be shut down.
 When there is no active UE, BBU software can be switched to a dormant state
Pg 11 |
Decoupling UL/DL Processing
Some symmetrical BBU-RRU function There are many different aspects between UL
re-split solutions
( Taking LTE as an example ) and DL:
S1 Termination
Generally, the DL rate is not equal to the UL rate.
PDCP The bandwidth of UL and DL are not always in the
1"

RLC
same order of magnitude.
 The bit width of UL is usually larger than that of the
High MAC
DL.
1"

Low MAC
Decoupling UL/DL processing
2
Bit-level Bit-level
Processing Processing
 NGFI design should take into account the
3
IDFT &
Modulation
De-Modulation asymmetrical function split solutions.
Layer Mapping
& Precoding
Channel Estimation
& Equalization
For example, the function split solution 3 could be
4
Resource FFT &
used for UL while the solution 4 used for DL.
Mapping & IFFT Resource De-Mapping

5
To RRU From RRU

Pg 12 |
NGFI Progress
• Lead of IEEE 1914 (NGFI) WG in IEEE
• 1st NGFI WS held & NGFI WP released in June, 2015
- MoU signing with Broadcom, Intel, Alcatel-Lucent, HuaWei, ZTE,
Nokia, Xilinx & Altera
• Co-founder of IEEE 1904.3
• Leading the project of NGFI in CCSA
• NGFI as the key component in NGMN 5G WP, FuTURE 5G WP
• NGFI/FH promotion and study in ITU-T, IEEE and 3GPP
• NGFI Paper in IEEE Communication Magazine & GLOBECOM 2015
“Rethink Fronthaul for Soft RAN”, IEEE Comm. Mag. 2015
“NGFI, The xHaul”, GLOBECOM 2015

White Paper on NGFI released in June 2015


NGFI feasibility study with Xilinx
Pg 13 |
Challenges Ahead
 Mapping of FH to Ethernet packet, undergoing in IEEE 1904 WG
 Stage 1: CPRI encapsulation (applicable to 2G, 3G and 4G)
 Stage 2: NGFI encapsulation for 5G
 Latency
 To meet RT requirement of wireless communication
 Limited latency budget for FH (e.g. 250us defined in NGMN for LTE C-RAN)
 Synchronization
 LTE Frequency sync. of 0.05ppm & phase accuracy of +/-1.5us
 Higher in 5G
 Transport of FH packets
 Over IP, MPLS, etc.
 E2E QoS
O&M, protection etc.

Pg 14 |
IEEE NGFI (1914) WG
• Target: efficient & scalable FH for 7 Founding members
5G
• Officially approved: Feb. 2016
• Sponsor: IEEE COM/SDB
• 7 founding companies with more
than 50 subscribers so far from
~30 companies
• Scope of 1914.1 project:
- NGFI transport network
architecture
- Requirements
- Function split analysis for LTE

• http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1914/
• The first NGFI WG meeting, April 25-28,
San Jose, CA
Pg 15 |
Contact: huangjinri@chinamobile.com
Thank you
For more information, please contact
icl@chinamobile.com

Pg 16 |

You might also like