Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Value to Customer
› Many customers try to align parameters between different vendors, but is the value in
the optimization of parameters or does it lie inherently in the vendors implementation
1
Ericsson vs. Huawei
Parameter settings and SIB
Information
Version 1: Trial Network
3
How was the comparison performed?
6
› Differences in
SIB 2 (1)
– NumberOfRA-Preambles (range: n4 to n64)
› Ericsson: 64
› Huawei: 52
› Comment: Higher number leads to higher chance of success
– maxHARQ-Msg3Tx (range1 to 8)
› Ericsson: 4
› Huawei: 5
› Comment: Maximum number of Msg3 HARQ transmissions used
for contention based random access
– referenceSignalPower
› Ericsson: 12
› Huawei: 20
› Comment: A UE may assume downlink cell-specific RS EPRE is
constant across the downlink system bandwidth and constant
across all subframes until different cell-specific RS power
information is received. The downlink cell-specific reference-
signal EPRE can be derived from the downlink reference-signal
transmit power given by the parameter referenceSignalPower
provided by higher layers.
– soundingRS-UL-ConfigCommon
› Ericsson: Release (Null)
› Huawei: Setup (used)
8 › Comment: Huawei is using Sounding Reference Signals.
Ericsson does not have UL Frequency Selective Scheduling in
SIB 2 (3)
› Differences in
– p0-nominalPUSCH (range: -126 to 24 dBm)
› Ericsson: -93
› Huawei: -67
› Comment: Higher value increases effective cell
range and throughput, but also increases offered UL
Interference. Lower value limits cell range and
throughput, but also prevents excessive UL
interference. Due to superior Ericsson UL, a lower
value can be used that helps showcase better Cell
Range and Throughputs.
9
PUSCH – Effect of pZeroNominalPusch
› The following graph shows how approximate levels of the average received power per resource
block, depends on the power control target and cell range
Adding more Rx
Antenna Ports
(Diversity) also
improves P0
increasing cell
range
Higher P0 settings
Lower P0 settings mean larger cell
mean smaller cell range, but also
range, but also more offered
less offered interference
interference
› As can be seen average received power per resource block increases with a higher setting of P 0 and
decreases with the cell range
› The region to the left where the average RX power does not change with the attenuation represent
cells in which all UE reach the power control target and are received with the same SINR.
10
SIB 2 (4)
› Differences in
– t300 (Transmission of RRCConnectionRequest timer)
› Ericsson: 1000ms
› Huawei: 200ms
– t310 (Upon detecting physical layer problems i.e. upon receiving N310
consecutive out-of-sync indications from lower layers timer)
› Ericsson: 2000ms
› Huawei: 200ms
13
RRC Reconfiguration (1)
› Differences in
› Differences in
– SRB bucketSizeDuration
(Bucket Size Duration for
logical channel
prioritization)
› Ericsson: 50ms
› Huawei: 300ms
14
RRC
Reconfiguration (2)
› Differences in
– discardTimer (for PDCP SDU)
› Ericsson: Infinity
› Huawei: 1500ms
– T-PollRetransmit (Timer for RLC AM)
› Ericsson: 50ms
› Huawei: 40ms
– pollPDU
› Ericsson: 4
› Huawei: 32
– pollByte
› Ericsson: Infinity
› Huawei: 25kB
– T-Reordering
› Ericsson: 35ms
› Huawei: 50ms
– T-StatusProhibit
› Ericsson: 25ms
› Huawei: 50ms
– Priority
› Ericsson: 12
› Huawei: 11
– prioritizedBitRate:
› Ericsson: Infinity
› Huawei: 64kbps
– bucketSizeDuration
› Ericsson: 50ms
› Huawei: 300ms
– logicalChannelGroup
› Ericsson: 1
› Huawei: 3
15
Key Parameter differences
Ericsson
Ericsson Default Deployed Value Huawei
MO Class Name Parameter Name Value (L11B) Deployed Value Unit
EUtranCellFDD qRxLevMin -140 -60 -64 dBm
SIB3 qHyst 4 4 4 dB
SIB3 threshServingLow 0 2 0 dB
16
Key Conclusions
› Huawei appear to be “pushing” more coverage than Ericsson in the trial
network
– Lower qRxLevMin values than Ericsson (translates to 4 dB “extra” idle mode
coverage)
– Higher p0-nominalPUSCH and p0-nominalPUCCH compared to Ericsson
› All things being equal, higher values for these settings offer larger cell ranges but
also higher levels of interference
› Huawei are not implementing/communicating DRX configuration settings
compared to Ericsson
– Leads to power in-efficiencies in the UE
– Will this be the case in the commercial network as well?
› Huawei have developed features that are not aligned with UE Device roadmap
– E.g. support for 64 QAM on Uplink despite Category 5 UEs only being available in
late 2013