Professional Documents
Culture Documents
http://www.uefap.com/writing/feature/objectiv.htm
Being objective suggests that you are
concerned about facts and are not influenced
as much by personal feelings or biases.
Example:
Instead of writing "I believe the model is valid,
based on these findings", write "These findings indicate
that the model is valid" or "The following section will
show how the model is validated by the findings".
The University of Sydney
06-Dec-2012
• Avoid evaluative words which are based on non-
technical judgments and feelings, such as "badly",
"disappointment", "amazing", etc.
• Instead use technical evaluations which related to
academic or discipline-specific criteria and values -
such as "valid", "inaccurate", "reliable", "clearly
demonstrates", "rigor", "out-dated", etc.
Example:
“ten” instead of “several”; “70%” instead of “most of
the population”;
Massey University
25 October, 2012
• Avoid intensifiers which can tend to exaggerate your
writing.
Example:
“awfully”, “very”, “really”.
Massey University
25 October, 2012
• Avoid the personal pronoun “I” but write more
impersonally.
Example:
Massey University
25 October, 2012
• Despite the fact that you are not encouraged to use
the personal pronoun “I” in academic writing, your
viewpoints and opinions will still come through.
• Although they may not be specifically attributed to
you, the fact that the comments you choose to
make are a part of your assignment tells the reader
that you believe what you are writing.
Massey University
25 October, 2012
• Stating “I think…” or “In my opinion…” weakens
the text and the strength of your argument. In
addition, adding such personal comments almost
seems to emphasize that the writing is just your
opinions or interpretations, rather than positions
that are supported by logic and the evidence.
• However, some lecturers and some styles of
academic writing (e.g. reflective writing) allow or
encourage the use of the personal pronoun.
Massey University
25 October, 2012
Samples
• Clearly this was far less true of France than ...
• This is where the disagreements and controversies begin ...
• The data indicates that ...
• This is not a view shared by everyone; Jones, for example,
claims that ...
• . . .very few people would claim ...
• It is worthwhile at this stage to consider ...
• Of course, more concrete evidence is needed before ...
• Several possibilities emerge ...
• A common solution is ...
Massey University
25 October, 2012
• Don't write:" In my opinion, this a very interesting
study."
• Write: "This is a very interesting study."
Massey University
25 October, 2012
Activity 1
Objective or subjective?
Do you think sentence a) or b) is more objective?
b) It has been argued by many (Hills, 2003; Smith & Jones, 2004; Andrews,
2004) that qualitative research is the most interesting aspect of the study of
malaria.
the answer is b).
'Interesting' is a subjective adjective (what is interesting for one person is deadly dull
for another). An important point to remember in academic writing is that any views
for which you do not give a citation are assumed to be your own so in sentence a)
you are clearly expressing a personal opinion about qualitative research. In sentence
b), however, you are reporting the fact that many others find it interesting - an
entirely objective observation.
Objective or subjective?
Do you think sentence a) or b) is more objective?
a) The student's excellent exam results enabled her to apply for a postgraduate
course.
b) The results were unexpected and may potentially change our thinking on this
topic.
http://mytekah.hubpages.com/hub/8-Characteristics-of-Academic-Writing
The grammatical aspect of the written
language is also different because we don’t
normally use in speaking so many subordinate
clauses and passives.
http://mytekah.hubpages.com/hub/8-Characteristics-of-Academic-Writing
FORMALITY
In close connection with complexity is
formality. Under no circumstances will
academic writing make use of colloquial
expression that we consider natural in daily
dialogues we have with friend or colleagues.
The degree of formality should thus be pretty
high.
http://mytekah.hubpages.com/hub/8-Characteristics-of-Academic-Writing
PRECISION
Academic writing should be very precise.
Factual information, figures or charts, should
all be provided and nothing written there
should leave room to interpretation.
http://mytekah.hubpages.com/hub/8-Characteristics-of-Academic-Writing
EXPLICITNESS
The author of an academic writing is
responsible for make it explicit and for making
clear how different parts of the text are
connected between them and why are they
relevant for the central theme. There are
certain words that can be used in order to
emphasis this connection and they are called
signaling words.
http://mytekah.hubpages.com/hub/8-Characteristics-of-Academic-Writing
This is best achieved by anticipating the reader's
questions. When revising your work before
submission, try to think what questions your reader
might want answers to if reading your assignment at
this stage;
Example:
http://mytekah.hubpages.com/hub/8-Characteristics-of-Academic-Writing
HEDGING
Some academic writers choose to use a
technique called hedge. This has to do with the
way that writer decides to approach a certain
subject and with how strong the claims he
makes are.
http://mytekah.hubpages.com/hub/8-Characteristics-of-Academic-Writing
How factual can you be?
It is often believed that academic writing, particularly
scientific writing, is factual, simply to convey facts and
information.
It is now recognised that an important feature of
academic writing is the concept of cautious language,
often called "hedging" or "vague language".
It is necessary to make decisions about your stance on a
particular subject, or the strength of the claims you are
making.
http://mail.humber.ca/~brett.reynolds/comm200/Hedging.ppt
Language used in hedging
• Certain modal verbs
• Certain modal auxiliary verbs
• Adverbs of frequency
• Modal adverbs
• Modal adjectives
• Modal nouns
• That clauses
http://mail.humber.ca/~brett.reynolds/comm200/Hedging.ppt
Identify the hedges
1. There is no difficulty in explaining how a structure such as an eye or a
feather contributes to survival and reproduction; the difficulty is in thinking
of a series of steps by which it could have arisen.
2. For example, it is possible to see that in January this person weighed 60.8
kg for eight days,
3. For example, it may be necessary for the spider to leave the branch on
which it is standing, climb up the stem, and walk out along another branch.
4. E-coli , when found in conjunction with urethritis, often indicate infection
higher in the uro-genital tract.
5. There is experimental work to show that a week or ten days may not be
long enough and a fortnight to three weeks is probably the best theoretical
period.
http://mail.humber.ca/~brett.reynolds/comm200/Hedging.ppt
Identify the hedges
6. Conceivably, different forms, changing at different rates and showing
contrasting combinations of characteristics, were present in different
areas.
7. One possibility is that generalized latent inhibition is likely to be weaker
than that produced by pre-exposure to the CS itself and thus is more
likely to be susceptible to the effect of the long interval.
8. For our present purpose, it is useful to distinguish two kinds of chemical
reaction, according to whether the reaction releases energy or requires it.
9. It appears to establish three categories: the first contains wordings
generally agreed to be acceptable, the second wordings which appear to
have been at some time problematic but are now acceptable, and the
third wordings which remain inadmissible.
RESPONSIBILIT
Y
Last, but not least, academic writing should
be treated with responsibility. Everything
stated should be accompanied by proofs and
justifications and no assumptions are allowed.
Sources should also be mentioned.
http://mytekah.hubpages.com/hub/8-Characteristics-of-Academic-Writing
Thank you for listening…
c
h
u
c
k