ED PILES 6.1 pile lateral load response 6.2 the p-y method for long pile 6.3 the resistance of short piles 6.4 load tests 6.1 PILE LATERAL LOAD RESPO NSE For applied loads that are smaller than the ul timate load, the pile head will deflect either as a result of pile deformation(in the case of long piles) or rigid body motion(in the case of short piles). It is usually more important for us to be able to estimate lateral displacements than to cal culate ultimate loads, as serviceability limit states are more commonly critical. This can be done in one of two way: 1. by treating the soil mass around the pile a s a continuum(fig.13-34a) 2. by substituting springs located at discrete points along the pile for the soil (fig.13-34b) 3. when nonlinear springs are used ,the seco nd approach is generally known as the p-y m ethod (fig.13-34c) The following Figure 13-35 shows, qualitatively, the deflected shape, bending moments, and she ar forces for moderately long piles with the foll owing combinations of boundary conditions some important points For all boundary conditions and a sufficiently large load, the pile is deformed along practic ally its entire length The bending moment changes sign(which hap pened when the distorted pile shape has an i nflection point)for the fixed head-fixed base boundary conditions. All the curves shown do exhibit some pile def ormation all the way down to the base or to points near the pile base. We can contrast th at with what we observe in fig.13-36 for long pile. figure 13-36 6.2 THE P-Y METHOD FOR LONG PILE P-Y METHOD p-y Method: Advantages • Simple • Used routinely SOURCES OF THE SOIL LATERAL RESISTANCE P P-Y CURVES 6.3 LIMIT RESISTANCE OF SHOR T PILES For short piles , the limit lateral load appli ed at the pile head can be calculated relativ ely simply. Broms (1964a,1964b) defined shor t piles as those satisfying the following criter ion: L for sandy soils T 2 L (13.120)
R for clayey soils
Where Lis the pile length, 1/5 (13.121) EP I P T k g For sands,and 1/4 EP I P R k 0 (13.122) For clays,where kg=dk0/dz is the depth gradien t of the initial subgrade reaction modulus in k0 sands(given in fig.13-17 as a function of the in situ, initial relative density DR of the soil and t he position of the water table; note that varia tions of the initial modulus of subgrade reactio n of sands with stress are much more pronounc ed for higher than for lower relative densities) K0 in clays is assumed to be uniform with dept h. An estimate of k0 can be made by relying on information contained in API(1993), which su ggests we may assume the lateral deflection y50 corresponding to a soil resistance equal t o 50% of the limit resistance to be roughly eq ual to y 50 2.5 50 B Where 50 is the axial strain observed in an un drained triaxial compression test on a sample of the clay at a shear stress equal to one half the final shear strength su of the sample.the value of p corresponding to y50 is 0.5pl. So the modulus of subgrade reaction k0 can b e found by dividing 0.5pl by y50: pL (13.123) k0 5 50 B Where values of 5 0 vary from 0.005 for clays with su≥100KPa to 0.015 for clays with small shear strength. Let us consider b oth the case of fr ee-headed(13-38 a)and fixed-head ed short piles in s and13-38b)w We wish to deter mine the values o f Qhl that will ca use unlimited mo vement According to brom’s method, the limit lateral load of a short pile in sand is given by 1 N L3 for the free-headed pile 2 e L QhL = B B 3 NBL2 for the free-headed pile 2 Where γis the material (wet) unit weight of soil abov e the water table, and N is the flow number, given b y (4.25) 1 sin N 1 sin EXAMPLE Taking moment aroun d point O and requirin g that they add up to zero and also that the re is lateral equilibriu m,we arrive at the fol lowing expression for Qhl: EXAMPLE 6.4 LOAD TESTS Mechanism of Load Transfer • Consider two piles of equal diameter and e qual length installed in the same soil profile to the same depth • One is a displacement pile and the other i s a non-displacement pile