Professional Documents
Culture Documents
OBSERVATIONAL
STUDY
Individual Group
participants participants
Non-comparative Comparative
study study Ecological study
Descriptive Analytical
Compare
Why the control?
So appear phenomenon in
single group regardless of high
prevalence, we can not put a
relation until we look for other
group without exposure .
Prospective Cohort study
2018 Design (2 groups) 2023
Already drinking Liver cirrhosis
Compare
Already not
drinking Liver cirrhosis
Non exposed
No Liver cirrhosis
Prospective Cohort study
Go forward
The strongest
observational study
to get evidence
Advantages Prospective Cohort study
Establish
Causality
Advantages Prospective Cohort study
Outcomes
Allow studying
multiple
outcomes for 1
exposure
Advantages Prospective Cohort study
Exposure
Total
Yes No Incidence
Yes d1 d0 d1+d0 d1/d1+d0
Disease
No h1 h0 h1+h0 h1/h1+h0
Total n=d1+d0+
d1+h1 d0+ho h1+h0
d = disease h = healthy 1 = exposed 0 = unexposed
Interpretation of Relative risk (RR)
The risk ratio indicates the increased (or decreased) risk of disease
associated with the exposure of interest.
Lung cancer
Total Smoking
NO Yes
100 40 60 Yes
100 90 10 No
200 130 70 Total
Disadvantages Prospective Cohort study
Follow-up
(Dropouts)
1500 900
Disadvantages Prospective Cohort study
Expensive