Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Instructor: Ashenafi N.
1
Chapter One
GENERAL INTRODUCTION
2
GENERAL
3
INTRODUCTION
OBJECTIVE
Define
project and project
Management
S
Within time
Within cost
At the desired performance/technology level/
While utilizing the assigned resources effectively
efficiently and
Accepted by the customer
Conti
…
9
It is goal oriented.
It is being pursued with a practical end or goal in mind.
A program is thus,
larger in scope,
activity oriented
not necessarily time bound and
its objectives are broader
Conti
…
27
Example,
The national goal: Poverty Eradication
Strategy: Increase productivity (in all sectors)
Development program: Increase agricultural
productivity
Activity
Classification of
Project
29
plant project
Medium term projects: Construction of a factory Short
term project: Exhibition,trade fair
Conti
…
32
PROJECT CYCLE
35
PROJECT CYCLE
36
LEARNIN
Decay (Clean
Level Inception
up )
of
effort Maturity or
Implementation
Time
Conti
…
39
its technical,
economic and
financial feasibilities have been established and it is ready for
appraisal.
Each stage follows the proceeding one and leads to the next
Identification
Preparation
Appraisal and Selection
Implementation
Evaluation
Later in 1978, the author has added additional two stages called
The European Commission/Europe Aid Approach
41
Programming
Identification
Appraisal
Financing
Implementation
Evaluation
The UNIDO Project Cycle
42
Identification
Pre-feasibilitystudy
Feasibility study
Selection and project design
Implementation
Ex-post evaluation
I. Identification
44
1. Macro-level
The commercial,
Technical,
Financial,
Economic and
Environment
Market analysis
Technical analysis
Organizational analysis
Financial analysis
Social – economic analysis, and
Environmental analysis
IV. Selection (project
appraisal)
58
The feasibility study would enable the project analyst to select the
most likely project out of several alternative projects. Selection
follows, and often overlaps with the feasibility analysis.
c) Commercial –
the way the necessary inputs for the project are supplied
and the arrangementsfor the supply of the products are
verified
Conti
…
61
The effects (positive and negative) are taken into account and
check if all are correctly valued
Conti
…
62
In this stage,
funds areactually disbursed to start the project and
keep running
contracts are signed
Conti
…
65
Once a project has been carried out the actual progress with the
plans should be evaluated in order to judge whether the
decisions and actions taken were responsible and useful.
PROJECT
IDENTIFICATION
75
PROJECT
IDENTIFICATION
76
Micro sources
LEARNIN
G
Conti
…
77
1. Generation of ideas
2. Monitoring the environment
3. Corporate appraisal (self-assessment)
4. Preliminary screening
5. Project rating index
3.1. Generation of ideas
80
1. Economic aspects
State of the economy
2. National policy
Sectoral policy
Government program
Tax policy
Government support
Financial policy
3. Technological factor
Availability of technology
Accessibility of the available
technology
Conti
…
85
6. Nature of input
supply Availability
Cost of raw material
3.3. Self assessment and scouting the project
idea
86
C. Availability of inputs
D. Adequacy of the market
E. Cost of the project
F. Acceptability of risk level: The desirability of the
project idea depends upon the level of risk associated with
it
Federal/Central or Regional
Governments
Bilateral and Multilateral Agreements
CHAPTER 4
FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
OF PROJECTS
4.1. Prelude
7-92
I. The traditional technique /Non discounted cash
flow Techniques:
Solution:
Calculation Pay-back Period with the help of "Cumulative
Cash Inflows"
Conti..
.
Year Annual cash inflows Br. Cumulative cash inflows Br.
1 16,000 16,000
2 14,000 30,000
3 8,000 38,000
4 6,000 44,000
Cont.
Decision rule:
Shorter is the payback period better is the project
Conti
…
The above Table shows that at the end of 4th years the cumulative
cash inflows exceeds the investment of Br. 40,000. Thus the pay-
back period is as follows:
= 3 years + Br.2,000
Br.6,000
= 3.33 years
Conti..
.
Illustration: From the following information advice the management
as to which project is preferable based on pay-back period. Two
projects X and Y, each project require an investment of Br 30,000.
The standard cut off period for the company is 5 years.
The ARR is found out by dividing the average profit after- tax by
the average investments.
Then compute the new profit for each year during the four
years.
Conti...
Br 15, 600
Br 38,000
Conti..
.
This is to mean that for an average of Br.1 invested in this
project, there is an average return of 41 cents in the form of net
profit per year over the entire four years of the life of the project.
Disadvantage
Obtain the difference between the sum of the cash inflows and
outflows.
Decision rule for the NPV
method:
If the projects, on the other hand, are mutually exclusive, the one
with the higher positive NPV should be accepted leading to the
rejection of the projects with lower positive NPV.
Conti..
.
Required:
A. What is the net present value (NPV) of the project?
B.How do you judge the acceptability of this project?
Solution. In the case of this project, there are annuity cash inflows
of 12,000 every year for five years and single cash out flow of
40,000 at time zero.
Conti..
.
The present value of the annuity cash outflows is:
Present value of annuity = (12,000) Annuity factor)
The annuity factor is 3.791
Solution. As you can see the cash flows from both projects are
not in annuity forms. The cash flows are irregular for both
projects.
Acceptance rule:
Accept if PI > 1.
Reject if PI < 1.
May Accept if PI = 1
Required: PI?
At IRR, the sum of the present values of all cash inflows is equal to
the sum of the present values of all cash outflows.
This process will be repeated until and unless the Net Present
Value becomes zero.
Conti..
.
Illustration:
To begin with let us try a rate of 18% and calculate the present
value of cash inflows on this rate. The following table will give
the calculations:
Thus, the net present value at 15% rate is zero. It indicates that
the present value of cash inflows is equal to the present value of
cash outflows.
Thus internal rate of return 15% for the project under review.
…cont’d
Decision Rule:
o Accept the project if the IRR is greater than
the cost of capital,
7. Project Benefits
Financial
Economic
Social
Environmental
Technological
8. Institutional Arrangement/ management
9. Duration of the project and outstanding issues