10

20
30
40
50
60
70
27.73
A.P.
47.54
Arunachal
39.31
Assam
36.68
Bihar
42.55
Chattisgarh
43.66
Delhi
45.05
Goa
24.2
Gujarat
32.07
Haryana
22.78
H.P.
45.54
J&K
25.35
Jharkhand
23.29
Karnataka
32. 53 %

21.63
Kerala
NationalAverage

41.44
M.P.
34.12
Maharashtra
65.18
Manipur
16.73
Meghalaya
55.54
Mizoram
55
Nagaland
57.09
Orissa
25.96
Punjab
43.74
Rajasthan
54.99
Sikkim
17.16
T.N.
46.44
State-wise T&D Loss (%) 2003-04

Tripura
35.17
U.P.
1

49.23
Uttaranchal
31.01
W.B.
 91-92 22.83

92-93 21.8

93-94 21.41

94-95 21.13

95-96 22.27

96-97 24.53

24.79
97-98
26.45
98-99

99-00 30.93

00-01 32.86

01-02 33.98

32.54
T&D LOSS IN THE COUNTRY

02-03
(In %)

03-04 32.53
2
(Source : CEA)
 ANOMALIES IN T&D
LOSS COMPUTATION
• In absence of feeder metering in the past, substantial portion of
T&D loss, including theft of electricity gets attributed to
agricultural consumption. While, agricultural consumption is
around 20-25%, utilities were showing it as 35-40% and
correspondingly T&D losses shown as 20-25%.
• Also, T&D loss was being computed taking into account electricity
bills issued to consumers as accrued income & not on actual
collection. Therefore, T&D loss figures did not capture the major
gap between the billing and the collection, apart from large amount
of theft.
• To get over this problem, concept of Aggregate Technical &
Commercial (AT&C) loss was introduced.
3
 AT&C LOSS
 It is the difference between units input into the system and the units
for which the payment is collected.
 T&D Loss do not capture losses on account of non-realisation of
payments.
 AT&C Loss is the clearest measure of overall efficiency of the
distribution business as it measures technical as well as commercial
losses.

 AT&C Loss(%) = (Energy Input – Energy Realised)X100

Energy Input
 Energy Realised = Energy Billed X Collection Efficiency

 Collection Efficiency (%) = Amount Realised X100

Amount Billed 4
 26
APNPDCL

24
APSPDCL

27
APEPDCL

19
Tamilnadu

29
APCPDCL

28
Punjab

22
Meghalaya

2001-02
MESCOM 41
(Karnataka)

2002-03
31
Kerala

2003-04
BESCOM 41
(Karnataka)

23
Gujarat

32
Tripura

HESCOM 41
(Karnataka)

39
Chattisgarh
5

59
JVVNL (Rajasthan)
AT&C LOSS OF POWER UTILITIES %
 39
Pondicherry

35
West Bengal

53
JDVVNL (Rajasthan)

0
Uttaranchal

GESCOM(Karnataka) 41

46
Maharashtra

49
AVVNL (Rajasthan)

2001-02
Madhyanchal VVNL 47
(U.P.)

2002-03
48
NDPL (Delhi)

2003-04
48
BRPL

57
WESCO (Orissa)

49
Goa

41
DHBVNL (Haryana)

Poorvanchal VVNL 47
(U.P.)
6
AT&C LOSS OF POWER UTILITIES %

Pashchimanchal 47
VVNL (U.P.)
 NESCO (Orissa)

CESCO(Orissa)

SESCO (Orissa)

Madhya Pradesh

UHBVNL
(Haryana)

BYPL

Assam

Dakshinachal

2001-02
VVNL (U.P.)

Nagaland

2002-03
Jharkhand

2003-04
Jammu& Kashmir

Bihar

Mizoram

Manipur

Sikkim

Arunachal
Pradesh
7
AT&C LOSS OF POWER UTILITIES %

Himachal Pradesh
 AT&C LOSS BELOW 25%

State/Utility 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04

APNPDCL 26.14 26.84 10.41

APSPDCL 24.45 27.26 17.17

APEPDCL 27.29 19.32 17.79

Tamilnadu 19.26 20.50 18.00

APCPDCL 28.80 29.68 19.12

Punjab 27.66 26.52 22.39
Meghalaya 21.64 24.97 24.20
8
Utilities With AT&C Loss between 25-50%
State/Utility 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04
MESCOM (Kar) 40.50 26.66 26.01
Kerala 30.76 29.08 27.44
BESCOM (Kar) 40.50 26.05 29.20
Tripura 32.10 34.17 31.05
Gujarat 23.28 31.24 31.05
HESCOM (Kar) 40.50 34.35 31.82
Chattisgarh 39.03 37.47 35.40
JVVNL (Raj) 59.31 40.11 38.62
Pondicherry 38.97 41.67 41.01
JDVVNL (Raj) 52.77 42.17 41.56
GESCOM (Kar) 40.50 31.01 43.74
Maharashtra 45.70 45.13 44.18
AVVNL (Raj) 49.04 41.42 44.57
MVVNL (UP) 46.92 31.78 44.57
NDPL (Del) 48.10 47.79 44.86
BRPL (Del) 48.10 47.40 45.07
WESCO (Or) 57.18 47.30 46.18
Goa 48.52 46.38 48.39
DHBVNL (Har) 40.69 39.75 48.68
PoVVNL (UP) 46.92 31.78 48.82
PaVVNL (UP) 46.92 31.78 9 49.70
 Utilities With More Than 50% AT&C Loss
State/Utility 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04
CESCO (Orissa) 63.64 55.04 51.10
SESCO (Orissa) 52.80 49.76 51.56
BYPL (Delhi) 57.2 61.89 54.29
Assam 36.95 37.53 54.41
M.P. 40.32 49.92 52.56
UHBVNL (Haryana) 45.92 42.82 52.84
DVVNL (U.P.) 46.92 31.78 59.30
Nagaland 61.00 57.86 59.76
Jharkhand - 53.00 65.00
J&K 63.29 61.71 67.58
Bihar 69.10 68.64 68.50
Mizoram 79.74 75.15 72.41
Manipur 74.35 76.88 72.62
Sikkim 81.37 80.5 78.27

10
 91-92 3000

92-93 4560

93-94 5060

93-94 6125

(Source:Plg. Comm/ PFC)

95-96 8770

96-97 11305

13963
97-98

20860
98-99
SEBs/UTILITIES

99-2K 26353

2K-01 25259

01-02 27068
(WITHOUT SUBSIDY)

02-03
Fig Rs. in Crore

21064
11
TOTAL COMMERCIAL LOSSES OF

03-04 20623
TOTAL LOSS OF UTILITIES W/O SUBSIDY
(% OF TURN OVER)
41.29
37.17

33.00

26.22
24.61 24.57

15.79
13.59

96-97 97-98 98-99 99-00 00-01 01-02 02-03 03-04

(Source : Plng. Comm./PFC) 12
 ACS, ARR & REVENUE GAP
(Power Input Basis)

250

225

39.00
200
71.03
Paise

175

150

125

100

75
2000-01

2001-02
1995-96

1996-97

1997-98

1998-99

1999-00

2002-03

2003-04
ACS ARR

13
 REASONS FOR AT&C LOSSES
• Technical Losses:

– Overloading of existing lines and substation equipments

– Absence of up gradation of old lines and equipments
– Low HT: LT ratio
– Poor repair and Maintenance of equipments
– Non-installation of sufficient capacitors

• Commercial Losses:

– Low metering/billing/collection efficiency

– Theft & Pilferage and tampering of meters
– Low accountability of employees
– Absence of Energy Accounting & Auditing

14
Contd..
ONE OF THE MAIN REASON FOR INCREASE IN
LOSSES IN THE SECTOR IS LOW INVESTMENT IN
THE T&D IN COMPARISON TO THE GENERATION.

1.4
1.2
Investment in generation and T&D including RE should be 1:1
1
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
T&D + RE
0
1st 2nd 3rd Three 4th 5th Annual 6th 7th Annual Annula 8th 9th
PLAN PLAN PLAN Ann PLAN PLAN Plan PLAN PLAN Plan Plan PLAN PLAN

INVESTMENT/EXPENDITURE ON T&D AND RE Vs

15
INVESTMENT/EXPENDITURE ON GENERATION
 INITIATIVES TAKEN BY MINISTRY
FOR REDUCTION OF AT&C LOSS

1. CHIEF MINISTERS’ CONFERENCE:

Held in March 2001.
Main resolutions:

(A) Energy audit at all 11kV feeders:

97% feeder metering achieved.

(B) Full metering of all consumers:

87% consumer metering achieved.
Majority of un-metered connections
belong to flat rate category

16
Contd..
 INITIATIVES TAKEN …..
C) SERC:
23 states constituted and 4 states notified.
18 SERCs have issued tariff orders

D) Commercial Viability to be achieved through

• Profit Centre:
13 SEBs/EDs unbundled & corporatised. 9 are expected
shortly.
• Franchisees:
Adopted With different models in Assam, Karnataka, Orissa &
Nagaland and under active consideration of Andhra, Gujarat,
Bihar, W. Bengal.
• Privatisation :
• Delhi & Orissa. Uttar Pradesh has invited EOIs. 17
 STATUS OF REFORMS
STATE SERC Number of Feeder Metering Consumer Metering Energy Audit
T/O by SERC (%) (%) initiated

Andhra Pradesh 1999 6 100 91 

Delhi 1999 4 100 100 

Gujarat 1998 2 100 93 

Maharashtra 1999 3 100 87 

U.P. 1998 5 100 91

T.N. 1999 1 100 81 

W.B. 1999 3 100 97 

Karnataka 1999 4 100 82 

Haryana 1998 3 100 92

H.P. 2001 2 90 100

Goa 2002 100 97 

Assam 2001 2 100 90 

Punjab 1999 3 100 84 

Rajasthan 1999 2 100 94 

Jharkhand 2003 1 86 75 
18
 STATUS OF REFORMS
STATE SERC Number of Feeder Metering Consumer Metering Energy Audit
Const. T/O by SERC (%) (%) Initiated

Uttaranchal 2002 2 100 92 

Orissa 1996 5 95 81

M.P. 1998 3 100 72 

Kerala 2002 1 100 100

Bihar 2005 41 50 

Tripura 2004 100 81 

Chattisgarh 2001 1 91 68

J&K 2004 95 40

Sikkim Notified 49 87

Manipur Notified 21 82

Meghalaya Notified 100 50

Mizoram Notified 92 96

Nagaland 50 61

Arunachal 0 46

19
 INITIATIVES TAKEN …..
2. MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
States were to sign MOU for assistance from Govt of India and
mandate taking up reforms in the power sector. Key parameters are :
Obligation of the State Government
Setting up of SERC & Rationalisation of Tariffs
Reorganisation of State Electricity Boards
Metering of 11 kV feeders & of all consumers
Energy Audit at all level
100% Electrification of villages and hamlets

Support from Government of India

Supply of additional power wherever feasible: 4000 MW allocated to various states
Assistance for distribution system: APDRP
Funding for 100% rural electrification: Rajiv Gandhi Grameen Vidyutikaran Yojana
Strengthening & improvement of transmission network by POWERGRID:
2990 Ckt. Km added during 2004-05
Concessional financing by PFC: Interest rate for distribution work @ 8.25%
20
Contd..
 INITIATIVES TAKEN…..
3. Accelerated Power Development &
Reforms Programme
The programme aims at :
 Reduction of AT&C losses
 Bring about Commercial viability
 Reduce outages & interruptions
 Increase consumer satisfaction

The programme has two components:

INVESTMENT COMPONENT covers strengthening and

upgradation of sub-transmission & distribution

INCENTIVE COMPONENT is a grant for states / Utilities

towards reduction of cash losses with 2000-01 as the base 21
year
 INITIATIVES TAKEN…..
Investment Component

19489
19489
16603
14704

7166
5541
6709
5541
4113
3306
1756
587

2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06

Sanctions Releases Utilisation
22
Year Wise cumulative status of APDRP (As on 31.05.2005)
Investment Growth in Power Sector
• As per the report of Economic Intelligence Service-
Dec. 2004, the growth in power sector during the
previous year was 27.3% (as of Oct ’04) which includes
growth in generation 23% and in distribution 53%.

• The overall investment in Power Sector was Rs.

5,37,885 Cr. compared to Rs. 4,22,246 Cr. last year.
Whereas, the investment in distribution sector was Rs.
21,072 Cr. as compared to Rs. 13,764 Cr. last year.

Source: CMIE

23
 INITIATIVES TAKEN …..
Incentive Component
Sl. Name of States Year Reduction in Eligibility Incentive
Cash Loss for Incentive Released

1. Gujarat 2001-02 472.76 236.38 236.38

2. Haryana 2001-02 210.98 105.49 105.49
3. Maharashtra 2001-02 275.78 137.89 137.89
4. Rajasthan 2001-02 275.42 137.71 137.71
5. Andhra Pradesh 2002-03 530.22 265.11 265.11
6. West Bengal 2002-03 146.00 73.00 73.00
2003-04 605.52 302.76 302.76

7. Kerala 2002-03 129.88 64.94 64.94

Total 2942.66 1323.28 1323.28

24
Incentive claims of Gujarat & Punjab are pending for release with MOF Contd..
 INITIATIVES TAKEN …..
4. MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (MOA)
UNDER APDRP
•The Main features are:
 Constitution of Distribution Reform Committee for
monitoring of reforms, APDRP implementation etc.
 100% feeder & consumer metering
 Energy accounting and auditing
 Setting up of performance benchmark parameters
 Policy for franchisee & outsourcing
 Turnkey execution of APDRP schemes
 Operation of circle & feeder as profit centre

25
Contd..
 INITIATIVES TAKEN …..
Theft Control
5. ANTI-THEFT PROVISIONS IN ELECTRICITY
ACT- 2003 (Sec:135-137, 153)
– Provides legal frame work for making theft
of electricity a Cognizable offence.
– States to set up special courts & special
police stations
– To provide special powers to utility
personnel for checking the installations.
26
Contd..
ACTION TAKEN BY STATES FOR THEFT CONTROL
STATE Implementation Of Special Spl. Police Theft cases Cases Amount realised
theft provisions of courts Stations detected (Nos) convicted (Nos) (In Cr.)
Electricity Act ‘03
A.P Yes Yes 342620 7286 38.11
Chattisgarh Yes 9.17
Delhi Yes Yes 81.89
Goa 30 0.21
Gujarat Yes Yes 48510 50.75
Haryana Yes 30350 1656 13.09
H.P 239 0.15
J&K Yes
Jharkhand 3846 107 3.20
Karnataka Yes Yes Yes 26606 35.98
Kerala 3195 12.82
M.P Yes Yes 271094 63.45
Maharashtra Yes Yes 15288 186 15.66
Orissa Yes Yes Yes
Punjab 195641 104.93
Rajasthan Yes Yes Yes 9408 46.00
Tamilnadu 209112 23.80
Uttar Pradesh Yes Yes 4.40
Uttaranchal Yes Yes 109 27 0.01
West Bengal Yes Yes Yes 2348 2.46
 INITIATIVES TAKEN …..
6. Consumer Indexing for Energy audit

7. 11 kv Feeder Management required for Energy Audit

8. IT Initiatives to improve efficiency in metering, billing &

collection

9. Installation of Capacitors to improve power factor

10. High Voltage Distribution System (HVDS) for preventing

theft and pilferage, better power management

11. Consumer Care for improved consumer satisfaction – to

attend consumer grievances regarding metering, billing, no
28
power supply
 Other Initiatives By Utilities
STATE Feeder Consumer Consumer Spot Computerised HVDS SCADA under
Mgmt. Indexing Care Centre Billing Billing impl.
Initiated started started initiated started

A.P.       Hyderabad

Delhi       NDPL

Gujarat       Vadodara

Maharashtra       BEST, BSES

U.P.      

T.N.    Chennai

W.B.     

Karnataka      

Haryana     

H.P.    

Goa    
29
 Other Initiatives By Utilities
STATE Feeder Consumer Consumer Spot Computerised HVDS SCADA
Mgmt. Indexing Care Centre Billing Billing started under impl.
Initiated started started initiated

Assam     

Punjab   

Rajasthan    Jaipur

Jharkhand  

Uttaranchal     

Orissa     

M.P.    

Kerala    Trivendrum

Bihar   

Tripura 

J&K 

30
 INITIATIVES TAKEN …..
12. WORKSHOP ON BEST PRACTICES
• 3 days National level workshop in Dec. 2004 on Best
Practices adopted by State utilities in distribution sector was
organised covering consumer indexing, metering, billing,
revenue management, maintenance, project execution,
quality management, IT enabling, outsourcing, loss reduction,
MIS, customer satisfaction, HR initiatives etc.
13. CAPACITY BUILDING:
• Training of utility personnel undertaken to upgrade
knowledge in the areas of project formulation, project
management, operation & maintenance etc. PMI (NTPC) &
NPTI have trained more than 1800 personnel from various
utilities.
• Training of 25,000 utility personnel has been taken up under
DRUM Project in association with USAID. More than 350
31
personnel have been already trained Contd..
 State-wise participation In
PMI Training Programmes
Total Total
Sl State Sl State
Participants Participants
1 Gujarat 324 13 Kerala 38
2 Maharashtra 178 14 Himachal Pradesh 29
3 Madhya Pradesh 143 15 Chattisgarh 27
4 West Bengal 120 16 Andhra Pradesh 27
5 Rajasthan 117 17 Uttaranchal 18
6 Punjab 101 18 Meghalaya 16
7 Bihar 79 19 A&N 08
8 Karnataka 78 20 J&K 07
9 Tamilnadu 66 21 Jharkhand 07
10 Assam 57 22 Uttar Pradesh 06
11 Haryana 47
23 Nagaland 03
12 Goa 38
32
 INITIATIVES TAKEN …..
14. Distribution Reform Upgrades & Management
(DRUM) Project: In collaboration with USAID
• To adopt best commercial and technological practices to
improve quality and reliability of last mile power distribution
in 4 pilots projects in urban and rural areas.
• Aurangabad (Maharashtra),
• Delhi,
• Anand (Gujarat) &
• Doddballapura (Karnataka)

• Financial assistance of US $ 20 million.

33
 INITIATIVES TAKEN …..
15. RANKING OF UTILITIES:

To evaluate performance of utilities and to assess their

improvements. CRISIL & ICRA engaged
 Parameters
o External:
 State Govt. related : 19 points
 SERC related : 13 points
o Internal:
 Business Risk Analysis : 27 points
 Financial Risk Analysis : 20 points
o Attaining commercial viability : 16 points
o IT adoption etc : 05 points
Total : 100 Points

– Three Reports released

• JAN 2003,
• JAN 2004 AND
• MARCH 2005
34
Contd..
 INITIATIVES TAKEN …..
RANKING OF UTILITIES (Source ICRA/CRISIL)

State Mar 2005 Jan 2004

Points Rank Points Rank
Andhra Pradesh 57.03 1 56.75 2
Gujarat 53.61 2 50.99 4
Delhi 51.91 3 57.00 1
Karnataka 51.46 4 51.25 3
Tamilnadu 50.94 5 39.63 12
Goa 50.45 6 43.20 8
Himachal Pradesh 49.91 7 44.16 7
West Bengal 44.60 8 40.89 10
Uttar Pradesh 42.14 9 40.85 11
Chattisgarh 39.91 10 13.83 22
Rajasthan 37.50 11 41.83 9
Maharashtra 37.25 12 37.75 13
Punjab 36.82 13 46.00 6
Haryana 35.16 14 49.63 5
35
Contd..
 INITIATIVES TAKEN …..
RANKING OF UTILITIES (Source ICRA/CRISIL)

State Mar 2005 Jan 2004

Points Rank Points Rank
Tripura 31.65 15 12.60 23
Kerala 31.48 16 34.25 15
Assam 27.32 17 27.43 16
Meghalaya 26.72 18 23.03 18
Madhya Pradesh 22.79 19 24.75 17
Sikkim 19.07 20 15.87 20
Uttaranchal 18.60 21 37.75 14
Nagaland 15.80 22 14.13 21
Orissa 13.63 23 20.31 19
Jammu & Kashmir 9.43 24 8.50 27
Arunachal Pradesh 9.20 25 9.05 26
Mizoram 7.88 26 10.80 24
Manipur 6.55 27 - 11.90 29
Bihar 5.78 28 10.63 25
Jharkhand 3.00 29 0.00 28
There has been change in rating parameters in 2004 & 05 exercise with respect
to 2003 as earlier parameters were not capturing total performance. 36
Contd..
 INITIATIVES TAKEN …..
16. RELIABILITY INDEX (RI):
The Reliability Index of the power supply is being monitored for
select towns at 11kV feeder level. RI at Distribution transformer
level and consumer level to be established subsequently.

17. MONITORING BY MINISTRY OF POWER:

• APDRP Steering committee: 8 meetings held
• Frequent Reviews of Utilities at Regional/State level by
Minister, Secretary (Power) & JS (D);
• Review by state level Distribution Reform Committees;
• NTPC, POWERGRID & CEA for monitoring at the field level
• Dedicated APDRP Cell in the Ministry

37
AT&C LOSS: BEST 15 TOWNS (%)
Town 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04
Salem ( urban)` 9.45 9.28 7.52
Tiruchengode 8.92 8.86 7.79
Sherilingampally 9.28 8.36 7.83
Kakinada 8.92 7.61 7.98
Uppal 8.13 8.11 8.00
Ludhiana (West) 18.68 8.13 8.02
Kapra 8.07 8.07 8.04
Amalapuram 8.87 6.66 8.13
Chennai 8.68 8.59 8.22
Adilabad 44.56 19.82 8.23
Malkajigiri 8.35 8.35 8.30
Edapady 14.10 11.25 8.52
Bheemili 15.60 5.85 9.54
Erode (Urban) 10.48 11.33 9.95
Nizamabad 23.28 12.21 10.68
38
 AT&C LOSS: WORST 15 TOWNS (%)
Sl. Town 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04
1 Jamtara 83.33 81.26 80.35
2 Garwha 82.30 82.10 76.15
3 Latehar 75.58 75.66 74.54
4 Aizwal 88.39 77.08 73.70
5 Pakur 74.14 72.99 71.89
6 Naharlagun 84.27 71.37
7 Osmanabad 76.70 75.98 69.04
8 Daltonganj 80.03 66.00 68.20
9 Darbhanga 67.57
10 Pesu (West) 66.73
11 Sahibganj 69.67 70.32 66.23
12 Gaya 63.35
13 Dumka 69.86 65.27 62.30
14 Chhatarpur 62.09 40.16 60.01
15 Roorkee 52.50 53.93 59.85
39
AT&C LOSSES OF PRIVATE DISCOMS (%)
SL. DISCOM 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05

1 NOIDA POWER (UP) - 10.49

2 BSES (Maharashtra) - - 11.32

3 CESC (W. B.) 19.60 18.00 17.16

4 BYPL (Delhi) 61.89 54.29 33.79

5 WESCO (ORISSA) 47.30 46.18 40.60

6 BRPL (Delhi) 47.40 45.07 40.64

7 NESCO (ORISSA) 52.25 50.36 42.96

8 SOUTHCO (ORISSA) 49.76 51.56 45.71

9 CESCO (ORISSA) 55.04 51.10 49.37

10 NDPL (Delhi) 47.79 44.86 50.12

11 AEC (GUJRAT) 18.74 16.68 -

12 SEC (GUJRAT) 14.23 12.98 -

 DT FAILURE RATE: BEST 15 TOWNS (%)
Sl. Town 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04
1 Kakinada 0.70 0.65 0.63
2 Chengleputtu 6.00 4.00 0.68
3 Rajahmundry 0.93 0.87 0.82
4 Anakapalli 2.50 1.50 1.00
5 Anantapur 1.00 1.00 1.00
6 Alappuzha 4.00 3.00 1.00
7 Kollam 3.00 2.00 1.00
8 Kozhikkode 3.00 2.00 1.00
9 Bhusawal 8.00 8.00 1.00
10 Coimbatore (Metro) 2.10 1.03
11 Kancheepuram 1.80 1.11 1.06
12 Trichy 2.17 1.78 1.08
13 Kadiri 7.76 8.16 1.60
14 Tiruchengode 4.62 1.30 1.80
15 Vijaywada 2.35 1.93
41
DT FAILURE RATE: WORST 15 TOWNS (%)
Sl. Town 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04
1 Daltonganj 26.00 27.00 26.00
2 Ramchandrapuram 22.42 21.69 21.66
3 Suryapet 25.68 27.45 20.11
4 Nandayal 30.00 20.00 20.00
5 Deogarh 34.46 19.58
6 Jalgaon 14.51 19.48
7 Roorkee 20.59 15.74 19.10
8 Warangal 25.60 18.20 19.04
9 Latur 19.20 19.27 18.30
10 Surat 18.00
11 Alwar 28.93 34.04 17.76
12 Mysore 21.17 19.90 17.53
13 Kapra 21.60 20.80 17.50
14 Yellandu 30.00 15.20
15 Dhanbad 17.00 16.00 15.00
42
OUTAGE DURATION PER FEEDER (IN MIN.)
Sl. Town No. of Outage
11kV Duration Mar 2005
feeders Per Feeder
1. Mumbai (BSES) 590 5.88
2. Kolkata 1138 19.19
3. Thane 43 22.44
3. Thiruvanthapuram 53 27.28
4. Surat 309 27.35
5. Jabalpur 65 30.35
6. Mulund 27 33.51
7. Ahmedabad 664 40.57
8. Trichy 32 41.06
9. Coimbatore 50 46.28
10. Bhandup 39 64.98
11. Chennai 665 67.74
12. Madurai 39 67.75
13. Vishakapatnam 73 76.37
14. Amritsar 115 162.53
15. Hyderabad 464 163.41 43
TOTAL No. of TRIPPINGS Best 15 towns
March 2005
Sl. Town No. of 11kV No. of
feeders Trippings
1. Vishakapatnam 73 47
2. Surat 309 48
3. Trivandurm 53 62
3. Thane 43 64
4. Bhandup 39 72
5. Trichy 32 88
6. Mulund 27 93
7. Madurai 39 107
8. Kolkata 1138 146
9. Mumbai (sub) 590 185
10. Ahmedabad 664 224
11. Raipur 65 273
12. Jabalpur 65 307
13. Coimbatore 50 339
14. Delhi 548 606
15. Vijaywada 63 74444
45