Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Learning/Thinking Styles and Multiple Intelligences
Learning/Thinking Styles and Multiple Intelligences
INTELLIGENCES
MODULE 5
INTRODUCTION
• One factor that brings about student diversity is
thinking/learning styles. Individual think and learn in
distinct ways. In any group of learners there will always
be different learning characteristics, particularly in the
learner’s manner of processing information. Some would
absorb the lesson better when they work with their hand
when they just listen. Other would prepare to watch a
video about a topic. Student, likewise, have preferred
ways of expressing their thoughts, feelings and ideas.
Some would prefer to write, others would draw or even
dance and sing. This preference involves thinking/
learning style and multiple intelligences.
Student Diversity
Scoring instructions: Add the number of responses for each letter and enter the total below. The area with
the highest number of respond is your primary mode of learning.
The inventory just answer reflects whether you are a visual, auditory or kinesthetic learner. This is only
but one way of describing the variation of learning and teaching styles. A Hilliard describes ''learning
style'' as the sum of the patterns of how individual develop habitual ways of responding to experience.
Howard Gardner identified nine kinds of intelligence that individuals may have.
Learning/Thinking Styles
Learning/Thinking Styles refer to the preferred way an individual process information. They describe a
person's typicaly modes of thinking, remembering or problem solving. Furthermore, styles are usually
considered to be a bipolar dimensions. For instance, your particular learning/thinking style would lie at a
point in a continuum. Having a particular learning/thinking styles simply denote a tendency to behave in
certain manner. Your style is usually described as a personality dimension which influences your attitudes,
values and social interaction.
There are several perspective about learning-thinking styles. We shall focus on sensory preference and
the global-analytic continuum.
Sensory preferences. Individuals tend to gravitate toward one or two types of sensory input and maintain
a dominance in which of the following types:
Visual Learners. This learners must see their teachers actions and facial expression to fully understand
the content of a lesson. They tend to prefer sitting in front so no one would block their view. They may
think in in pictures and learn best from visual aids including: diagrams, illustrated textbooks, overhead
transparencies, videos, flipcharts and hand-out. During a lecture or classroom discussion, visual learners
often prefer to take detailed notes to absorb the information.
Ri Charde further breaks down visual learners into: Visual-iconic and Visual-symbolic
• Visual-iconic. Those who prefer this form of input are more interested in visual imagery such as film,
graphic displays, or pictures in order to solidify learning. The usually have good “picture memory” a.k.a
iconic imagery and attend to pictorial detail. They would like to read a map better than to read a book.
• Visual-symbolic. Those who prefer this form of input feel comfortable with abstract symbolism such as
mathematical formulae or written words. They would prefer to read a book than a map and would like to
read about things done hear about them. They tend to be good abstract thinker who do not require
practical means for learning.
Auditory Learners. They learn best through verbal lectures, discussions talking things through and
listening to what others have to say. Auditory learners interpret the underlying meaning of speech through
listening to tone of voice, pitch, speed and other nuances. Written information may have little meaning until
it is heard. These learners often benefit from reading text aloud and using a tape recorder. They can attend
uaurally details, translate the spoken word easily into the written word, and are not easily distracted in the
listening ability.
Global-Analytic Continuum.
Analytic. Analytic thinkers towards the linear, step by step process of learning. May tend to see finite
elements of patterns rather than the whole; They are the “tree seers.” They are more comfortable in the
words of details and hierarchies of information.
Global. Global thinkers lean towards non-linear thought and tend to see the whole pattern rather than
particle elements. They are the “forest seers” who give attention only to the overall structure and
sometimes ignore details.
Several theorists have tied the global-analytic continuum to the left-
brain/right-brain continuum. In accord with Roger Sperry's model, the left-
brained dominant individual is portrayed as the linear (analytic), verbal,
mathematic thinker while the right-brained person is one who is view as
global, non-linear and holistic in thought preferences.
Both side of the brain can reason but through different strategies In an
individual, one side may be more dominant than the others. The left brain is
regarded as analytic in approach while the right is described as holistic or
global. A successive processor (left brain) prefers to learn in a step-by-step
sequencial format, beginning with detailes leading to conceptual
understanding of a skill. A smiltaneous processor (right brain) refer to the
learn beginning with the general concept and learn going on the specifics.
LEFT BRAIN (Analytic) RIGHT BRAIN (Global)
1. Visual 1. Visual
3.Sequential 3. Random
10. Prefers formal study design 10. Prefers sound/music background while studying
11.Prefers bright light while studying 11.Prefers frequent mobility while studying