You are on page 1of 46

5

INTERNATIONAL MARKETING
MGT 382
Dr Nasreen Gul

Lecture 5: International market entry


Recap
• Internationalisation is a necessity for many
companies seeking to maintain a competitive
advantage
• Environment analysis in international settings helps
organisations to identify opportunities and threats
and prioritise particular markets, identify target
market segments and develop knowledge to inform
strategic decisions
• With a decision on WHICH markets to enter, HOW
to enter becomes a question
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Where is Market Entry decision placed in


internationalisation strategy making

1. The decision to internationalise: should the


company stay in home country or expand abroad.
2. International market selection: which markets
should we enter?
3. Entry Mode Strategy
4. Designing the global marketing programme: global
marketing mix
5. Implementing and coordinating the global
marketing programme
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Objectives for today:


• Evaluate different market entry timing
strategy

• Examine, compare and contrast major


market entry modes

• Discuss criteria for entry modes selection


All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Basic Foreign
Entry Decisions
• A firm making the decision to expand into a
foreign market must consider the following
questions:
– Which markets do we enter?
– When should we enter this market?
– What is the scale of entry?
– Which is best mode of entry?
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Market entry timing

• When to enter a new market:


– First in: be the market pioneer - create the market
– Early in: during introduction / growth stage
– Late in: wait for market maturity

Which is best?
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

First/early entry

• Gains first mover advantage (FMA) for:


– Establishing strong brand and customer loyalty
before competitors
– Building sales volume and gaining a cost
advantage
– Creating switching costs making it difficult for
customers to move to a competitor

• BUT: high development costs


All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Late entry

• Late movers hold advantages for:


– Learning from mistakes of first mover(s)
– Having more time to research and develop the
product for the market
– Keeping development costs lower

• BUT: difficult to establish brand loyalty and


more difficult to establish high market share
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Market entry timing strategies

High Advanced
Advanced
countries
countries
Waterfall approach (“trickle-down”)
Developing
Developing
per capita

countries
countries
GNP

Less
Less developed
developed
countries
countries “Trickle-up”
Low
Time

Shower approach
(‘sprinkler’ strategy) Lymbersky (2008)
Advanced
Advanced Developing
Developing Less
Less developed
developed
Source: Keegan and Green (2011) countries
countries countries
countries countries
countries
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Types of Market Entry Modes


KEY TYPES:
 Wholly-owned subsidiary

Hierarchical
 Company acquisition
 Assembly operations
ENTRY MODE:  Joint venture

Levels of involvement
 Strategic alliance
an institutional

Intermediary
arrangement  Franchising
necessary for the entry  Licensing
of a company’s
products and services  Direct marketing
into a foreign market  Distributors and agents
 Sales force
 Trading companies
Export  Export management
companies
 Piggyback operations
 Domestic purchasing
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Hollensen’s classification (2010)

100% internalising Hierarchical modes


High control, high risk, low flexibility

Intermediate modes
Shared control and risk, split
(contractual modes)
ownership

100% externalising Export modes


Low control, low risk, high flexibility

In essence, entry mode decision is underpinned by


evaluation of risk versus control
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

1. Export Modes

Foreign
Overseas market X
Foreign sales
market Y subsidiary

Foreign
intermediaries
Indirect
Direct exporting
exporting

Home
intermediary

Piggyback
A
Source: based on Jiang (2007)
Home market
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

1.1 Indirect Export

 Company uses independent export representatives located in


own country
 Domestic operations
 Least cost (no need for distribution system) and risk but little
control
– Export by an agent – a representative assists a business in
transporting and/or selling their products in a foreign country
– Export Management Company (EMC) or Exporting Houses (EH);
– Trading companies
– The Piggyback solution - an indirect mode of export which
entails an inexperienced SME ‘riding’ on the capabilities of a
larger company already experienced in foreign markets
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

1.2 Direct Export

 Company uses intermediaries Criteria


located in overseas markets.
o Reputation / financial
 More investments, but more
control, more experience strength / resources
o Knowledge/ expertise /
 Own sales people abroad Or
contacts
foreign intermediaries o Attention/ effort / attitude
 Agents/distributors to new products
 Longer term commitment o Customer service
 80-85% of exports are direct o Future strategy
exports. o Relationship development
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Direct Export: Agent

 Individual (agent) acts on exporter’s behalf

 The agent will act on behalf of the manufacturer. The agent will not
stock the product, he will earn money from the turnover he creates for
the manufacturer and he will often earn a percentage of the turnover
the product makes (commission)

 Agent selection criteria: contacts with potential customers;


responsibilities to other companies; resources/salesforce etc.

 Advantages: market knowledge, complementary products

 Disadvantages: commitment? wants steady turnover? too small?


All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Direct Export: Distributor

 The distributor will act as the importer of the company’s product into the market and
will stock the product. Distributors have much more freedom to set own price and will
earn from the difference between the buying and selling price.

 Business partner with financial status, geographical area and market expertise,
technical knowledge

 Sole representative/exclusive rights

 Advantages: takes title to products; more committed/substantial investment e.g.


salesforce, technical support team

 Disadvantages: exclusivity problems?

 Selection  crucial. Distributor motivation?


All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Direct marketing
 Mail order, telephone marketing, media marketing, direct mail and
electronic commerce
 Low cost method with little risk: cost effective method of market entry
 Not depend on direct face-to-face contact
 Challenges
– need to build and maintain up-to-date databases
– need for sophisticated multilingual data processing
– to develop reliable credit control and secure payment systems.
– variety of methods in different markets
– Infrastructure - ?
 Advantages: global/flexible/cost savings; dis-intermediation (B-2-C);
convenience
 Disadvantages: language - ?; 24 hour support; payment; fulfilment house in
overseas markets
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Direct Export:
Management contracts

 Operational control of a company in a particular market is vested in


a separate enterprise that manages the company for a fee
 Business skills/management expertise; market knowledge
 Large construction projects; production; personnel management,
accounting, marketing, training, etc
 Widely utilised in airline, hospitality industries (e.g., Hilton Hotels
provides management services to hotels it does not own)
 Advantages: ease of entry; access to market knowledge
 Disadvantages: fee/low profit levels; exposing in-company
knowledge and know-how (trust?); management company remains
independent and can become your competitor – may be
detrimental to competitive advantage
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Direct Export: Overseas office

 When agents/distributors are difficult to find


 Local personnel, + resident sales/marketing managers
 After-sales provision; market research
 Used for large B2B contracts/revenue outweighs cost
 Advantages: project corporate image; obtain
feedback; avoid commission fees
 Disadvantage: unable to appreciate corporate systems
 Challenges: host country laws and government
favourable? CSR?
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

2. Intermediate Methods

• Licensing refers to the exchange of rights,


such as manufacturing rights, to another in
exchange for payment
• Special licensing arrangements:
– Contract manufacturing
– Company provides technical specifications to a
subcontractor or local manufacturer
– Allows company to specialize in product design while
contractors accept responsibility for manufacturing facilities
– Franchising
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Franchising

 Franchising is a rapidly growing form of licencing in which the


franchisor provides a standard package of products, systems and
management services, and the franchisee provides market
knowledge, capital and personal involvement in the management.
 Lends itself to rapid international expansion
 Limited degree of risk
 Suited to transition economies/provides structure
 Liked/favoured across countries
 Emphasis on standardisation
 Brand/product/service/business system
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Franchising agreement

(Coughlan et al 2006)
For franchisee: For franchisor:

• Surplus capital • United brand


• Ambition • Uphold image
• Independence • Control right
Franchising
• Freedom • Fast growing
agreement
• Easier start-up by using others’
• Effectiveness capital
• Professional help • Well-motivated
• On-going support partners
• Standard guard • Stable HR turnover

What term refers to a method in which a party grants the legal right to
another party to make use of the total business concept (incl. branding,
trademarks, products, method of operation) in return for a fee? _______
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Indicative franchise cost


Subway: £10, 000 plus 8% royalty fee and 4.5% advertising
fee
Avis: £25,000 + 10% Royalty
Burger King: £25,000 + 4% Royalty
+ 4% Advertising levy
Domino’s Pizza: £90,000 + 5.5% Royalty
+ 4% Advertising levy
McDonalds: £50,000 / £1m + 5% Royalty
+ 5% Advertising levy
Spar: £25,000 + 1.5% Royalty
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

An Example

• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5LL597q
a4s
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Licensing
Advantages:
• Entry to closed markets
• Avoid tariff barriers
• Limited capital investment
• Low exit costs
• Licensee’s market knowledge
• Bulky products (lowering transportation costs)

Disadvantages
• Quality control
• Contractual problems
• Lower profits?
• Licensee as competitor?
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Franchising
Advantages:
• Quick market entry
• Franchisor’s package/max. control. More control than with licensing
• Franchisee provides capital/market knowledge
• Less risk for both? Profitable for franchisor?

Disadvantages:
• Difficult to find competent franchisees
• Time-consuming
• Monitoring of quality/supervision

Challenges:
• Lack of franchising laws in some countries (Egypt)
• Control  technology infrastructures and support essential: internet, company intra-nets, video
conferences etc
• Cultural problems (or solutions?)
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

3. Hierarchical modes
 Cooperative modes: Joint Venture or Strategic Alliance (e.g., operation
with a partner/partners)

 Wholly owned subsidiaries

 Many hierarchical modes involve Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): the


purchase or establishment of income generating assets in foreign
country entailing control of the operation or organization (Buckley, 2001)

 Equity ranges from 100% to as little as 10-25%

 Highest level of involvement a company can make in an overseas market


All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

3.1 Joint ventures


• Refers to an equity partnership between two or more
partners whereby they create a new company through
sharing of complimentary expertise or resources
• Reasons:
– Complementary technology or management skills can lead to
new opportunities
– Firms with partners in host countries can increase speed of
market entry
– Less developed countries may restrict foreign ownership
– Costs of global operations in R&D and production can be shared
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Joint Venture Example


All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

3.1 Joint ventures


Advantages:
• Firms with partners in host countries can increase speed of market entry
• Complementary skills/resources or management skills can lead to new opportunities
• Market knowledge
• Overcome bureaucracy
• More profitable long term
• More control
• Less developed countries may restrict foreign ownership
• Costs of global operation in R&D and production can be shared.

Disadvantages:
• Different aims/objectives
• Culture clash, e.g.US vs Japanese J-Vs: individual vs group values
• Big investment (time, finance, other resources)
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

3.2 Strategic alliance


• Strategic alliances are voluntary (contractual)
arrangements between firms involving either a pooling
or trading of resources: partnership of equals
– Production/ distribution/ technology based

• Factor to consider:
– Equal partners
– Limited time span
– More strategic, global focus
– With specific functions
– Could well be competitors
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Strategic Alliances:

 Marketing: airlines

 R & D: pharmaceuticals

 Production: cars (manufacturer-supplier relationships)

 Technology sharing/exchange

 Distribution relationships

 Cross-licencing
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Strategic Alliance Example


in Airline Industry
Sky Team: https://www.flyingblue.com/skyteam/the-skyteam-alliance.html

 20 airline partners with HQs in four different continents

 Attuned timetables (e.g., more connections and


destinations); provision of customer lounges; loyalty
scheme operating across all partner airlines; co-operate
on fares, tickets, share information, etc.

 Response to global competition  enhanced customer


experience  differentiation and competitive advantage
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Reasons for strategic alliance

 Insufficient resources
 Pace of innovation and market diffusion
 High research and development costs
 Concentration of firms in mature industries
 Government co-operation
 Self protection
 Market access
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Choosing and Working


with a Partner

 Compatibility, capability, commitment


 Respect and equality
 Management of diversity/culture
 CEO/Chairman involvement
 Anticipating potential areas of conflict and strategizing
ahead on conflict management and resolution
(contingency planning)
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

3.3 Wholly-owned subsidiary

 Most expensive method of market entry


 Requires greatest amount of commitment, time and
resources
 Indicates the firm is taking the long term view 
Demonstrates commitment
 High risk
o Very significant investment
o Withdrawal from the market can be costly – not just in
financial outlay, but also in terms of the firms
reputation in the international and domestic market.
 An option when market assured
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Routes to establishing
wholly owned subsidiaries

Acquisition/ Greenfield
Take over investment
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Acquisition/take over

• Faster method vs setting up own subsidiary

• Availability of companies?

• Takes time to evaluate possible companies

• Advantages: trained labour force; brands; existing


customers; distribution

• Disadvantages: demotivated workers - ?; poor image or


reputation - ?; old products - ?; integration issues - ?;
responsible corporate behaviour - ?
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Greenfield investment

• Parent company builds up operations fully

• Advantages: maximum control; highest protection of know-


how; signals commitment to the market/country;
leveraging government stimulation (if these in place)

• Disadvantages: highest cost; investment into overcoming


established competition – they have advantage of time; exit
-?
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Reasons for overseas


production
• Product • Tariff barriers and quotas
o avoiding problems, e.g. • Government regulations
perishability
e.g. local investment
• Services • Government contacts
o dependant for success on local
intellectual property, knowledge • Market information
& sensitivity feedback
• Local manufacture • Preference of market
o faster response
o • Desire to be close to
just-in-time delivery
o proximity to raw materials foreign customers
• May benefit lower cost: • International culture in
o Transporting / warehousing firm
o Labour cost
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Evaluating main entry options


Entry Advantages Disadvantages
options
Exporting Least restrains, low cost Trade barriers, little control over agents,
structure little knowledge of foreign market /
customers
Licensing, Low costs and risks Little control over operation, quality
Franchising issue, on-going channel support
(franchising); future competitor
(licensing)
Joint Venture Shared costs and risks, access to Technology leak, not always in control,
partner’s existing channels possible conflicts, limited life-span
Strategic Easier access to alliance Potential threat from partner, interest
alliance partner’s distribution network conflict
Wholly Full control, protection of High risks and costs (short-term)
owned technology and know-how, fit
subsidiary into own global strategy
All images in this presentation are used for educational purposes. Fair dealing.

Criteria for entry


mode selection

• External environment:
– Trade barriers, government rules/ requirements
– Market size, nature and power of competition
– Intermediaries availability & suitability
• Company factors:
– Objectives, expectations (size/ value, speed, risk, cost/
control, resources, flexibility, payback pressure)
– Abilities, skills, attitudes of company management
– Existing foreign market involvement
– Nature of the product
Images attributions
[1] I-5 Design & Manufacture (2007). Copyright by I-5 Design & Manufacture [Photograph]. Retrieved 21
September, 2014, from Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/i5design/4886682532 Reproduced with permission
from the creator. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic
License. 
 
[2] Luke Zeme (2012). Copyright by Luke Zeme [Photograph]. Retrieved 21 September, 2014, from Flickr
https://www.flickr.com/photos/lukezemephotography/8233073411 Reproduced with permission from the creator.
Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic License.

[3] Emily Hoyer (2007). Copyright by Emily Hoyer [Photograph]. Retrieved 21 September, 2014, from Flickr
https://www.flickr.com/photos/flavor32/438222001 Reproduced with permission from the creator. Licensed under
the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic License.
 
[4] Dorli Photography (2012). Copyright by Dorli Photography [Photograph]. Retrieved 21 September, 2014, from
Flickr https://www.flickr.com/photos/dorlino/8660083757/in/photostream/ Reproduced with permission from the
creator. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic License.
 
[5] Angel Abril Ruiz (2012). Copyright by Angel Abril Ruiz [Photograph]. Retrieved 21 September, 2014, from Flickr
https://www.flickr.com/photos/aabrilru/6832155239 Reproduced with permission from the creator. Licensed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic License.
 
[6] Ahmad Nawawi (2011). Copyright by Ahmad Nawawi [Photograph]. Retrieved 21 September, 2014, from Flickr
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ahmadnawawi/6326052575 Reproduced with permission from the creator.
Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic License.
 
[7] hjl (2012). Copyright by Melina Stathopoulos [Photograph]. Retrieved 22 September, 2014, from Flickr
https://www.flickr.com/photos/hjl/7540743972 Reproduced with permission from the creator. Licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.0 Generic License
 
[8] The Sixth Ward (2013). Copyright by The Sixth Word [Photograph]. Retrieved 22 September, 2014, from The
Sixth Ward http://www.sixthward.us/2013/01/whos-knocking-at-your-door.html Reproduced with permission
from the creator. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.  
  
[9] Jerry Wong (2011). Copyright by Jerry Wong [Photograph]. Retrieved 21 September, 2014, from Flickr
https://www.flickr.com/photos/wongjunhao/6180716843 Reproduced with permission from the creator.
Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic License. 
 
[10] Otis Yang (2011). Copyright by Otis Yang [Photograph]. Retrieved 21 September, 2014, from Flickr
https://www.flickr.com/photos/otis0329/9123574165 Reproduced with permission from the creator. Licensed
under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic License.

[11] Maria Elena (2014). Copyright by Maria Elena [Photograph]. Retrieved 23 September, 2014, from Flickr
https://www.flickr.com/photos/melenita/15086864676 Reproduced with permission from the creator. Licensed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic License.
 
[12] Gordon Joly (2007). Copyright by Gordon Joly [Photograph]. Retrieved 21 September, 2014, from Flickr
https://www.flickr.com/photos/loopzilla/439516532 Reproduced with permission from the creator. Licensed
under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic License.

You might also like