Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Wilkerson Company Case Study: Managerial Accounting
Wilkerson Company Case Study: Managerial Accounting
Wilkerson Company
Case Study
Group 10
Roadmap
1 3 5 5
2 4 6
2
Introduction
Company Overview
▪ A mid sized manufacturing company for
water purification system
▪ It specializes in Producing of 3 products:
Valves
Pump
Flow Controller Issues to address
3
Analysis of competitive situation
Wilkinson company
Despite the fact that they can match Wilkerson's quality, there is no evidence of price competition at this time.
Wilkerson should, however, be prepared to compete on pricing in the long run.
Wilkerson is analysing its overhead expenses due to existing (pumps) and potential (valves) price competition, as
there are no cost-cutting reserves remaining in its supply chain as both customer and suppliers agreed to just-in-
time delivery
4
Existing Cost System
Wilkerson implements volume based full costing
Direct materials Standard price of material
labor costs Standard price of labour
Allocated to cost objects (products) in proportion to
Indirect cost (overhead)
direct labor cost at the rate of 300%.
5
New Costing Method
● Direct costing and contribution analysis are adequate for short-term decision making.
● In the long-run under price competition, however, the company needs to be sure that each product is at a minimum break
even.
● Direct costing would provide highly unreliable information for decision-making overheads are significant
6
Activity Cost Cost Driver Cost Driver
Activity
Pool
Cost Driver
Quantity 2. Activity Based Costing
Rate
7
Unit Costs Under Activity Based Costing
Cost Items/Products Valves Pumps Flow Controllers
Direct Cost
Direct Material $16.00 $20.00 $22.00
Direct Labor $10.00 $12.00 $10.00
Overheads
Machine-related expenses $15.00 $15.00 $9.00
Setup Labor $0.33 $1.00 $6.25
Receiving And Production Control $1.50 $4.50 $28.13
Engineering $2.66 $2.40 $12.50
Packaging And Shipping $0.67 $2.80 $27.50
Activity-based costing provides much accurate information about product cost and their
gross margins. Customized product (flow controllers) appear to be much less attractive for
the company that standardized valves and pumps. Actually, flow controllers generate
negative gross margin (under assumption made), while valves and pumps are much more
profitable than the company initially believed.
8
Product Profitability: Volume Based Costing VS Activity Based Costing
9
Correction for unused capacity
● Our cost drivers and product cost calculations prevent us from exposing the
differences between unique flow controllers, despite the fact that we know they
are customised.
● As a result, their unit prices are averages that may vary greatly depending on
the configuration (cost of manufacture) or the client (cost of delivery).
● We are unable to handle the influence of product volume variations on unit
costs since regular study of product profitability based on activity-based
costing is a costly exercise.
● In this case, we'll suppose that capacity utilisation estimations are done for a
representative (typical) month.
● For a particular time horizon of decisions based on calculations, we also
assume that resource costs (including cost driver rates for overheads) are
constant.
11
Recommendations
Examples:
13
Thank you
Group 10