Professional Documents
Culture Documents
RCC, which accounts for 2% to 3% of all adult malignant neoplasms, is the most
lethal of the common urologic cancers
Primarily a disease of older adults, with typical presentation between 55 and 75
years of age
The majority of cases of RCC are sporadic; only 4% to 6% are believed to be
familial
The incidence of RCC has increased since the 1970s by an average of 3% per
year, largely related to more prevalent use of ultrasonography and CT for the
evaluation of a variety of nonspecific abdominal complaints
Etiology
RCCs arise primarily from the proximal convoluted tubule for the clear cell and
papillary variants.
Other histologic subtypes of RCC, such as chromophobe RCC and collecting duct
carcinoma, are derived from the more distal components of the nephron.
Risk Factors
Tobacco exposure (1.4-2.5)
Obesity (1.07)
Hypertension
Familial Renal Cell Carcinoma Subtypes
MRI can be reserved primarily for patients with locally advanced malignant
disease, equivocal venous involvement, or allergy to intravenous contrast material
MRI is still the premier study for evaluation of invasion of tumor into adjacent
structures and for surgical planning in these challenging cases
The sensitivities of CT for detection of renal venous tumor thrombus and IVC
involvement are 78% and 96%, respectively
Metastatic evaluation in all cases should include a routine chest radiograph,
systematic review of the abdominal and pelvic CT or MRI, and liver function tests
PROGNOSIS
Overall, tumor-related factors such as pathologic stage, tumor size, nuclear grade,
and histologic subtype have the greatest individual predictive ability.
Clinical findings that suggest a compromised prognosis in patients with presumed
localized RCC include symptomatic presentation, unintended weight loss of more
than 10% of body weight, and poor performance status
Pathologic stage has proved to be the single most important prognostic factor for
RCC
PROGNOSIS
Other important prognostic factors for patients with systemic metastases include
performance status, number and sites of metastases, anemia, hypercalcemia,
elevated alkaline phosphatase or lactate dehydrogenase levels, thrombocytosis,
and sarcomatoid histology
Radical Nephrectomy
TA, including renal cryosurgery and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), are now
established as alternate nephronsparing treatments for patients with localized RCC
Both can be administered percutaneously and thus offer the potential for reduced
morbidity
The traditional candidates for TA have been patients with reasonable life
expectancy despite advanced age or significant comorbidities who prefer a
proactive approach but are not optimal candidates for conventional surgery
Tumor size is another important factor in patient selection
Success rates appear to be highest for tumors smaller than 2.5 to 3.0 cm, and
complication rates are also lower in this setting
Active Surveilance
Local recurrences of RCC can occur after RN and nephron-sparing surgery and
present unique challenges.
Local recurrence of RCC after RN, which includes recurrence in the renal fossa,
ipsilateral adrenal gland, renal vein stump or adjacent IVC, or ipsilateral
retroperitoneal lymph nodes, is an uncommon event, occurring in 2% to 4% of
cases
Risk factors include locally advanced or nodepositive disease and adverse
histopathologic Features
Surgical resection of isolated local recurrence of RCC after RN should be
considered, because it can provide long-term cancer-free status for 30% to 40% of
patients
Local recurrence in the remnant kidney after PN for RCC has been reported in
1.4% to 10% of patients, and the main risk factors are advanced T stage or high
tumor grade