Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Systems &
Operation
OBJECTIVES
To be able to:
Decarbonation
at 40%
KILN Clinker
Clinkerisation
Thursday, February 17, 20
22
The PRECALCINATION
Dehydration
A STACK OF CYCLONES...
Decarbonation
d ary e at 90%
econ ourc
S tS
a
He Clinker
KILN
Clinkerization Thursday, February 17, 20
22
REVIEW
PRECAL KILNS
Derived from preheater kilns
decarbonization is higher
separate vessel
through kiln
Qt = 4.11 Al2O3 + 6.47 MgO + 7.64 CaO - 5.11 SiO2 - 0.60 Fe2O3
40 µm
80 µm
100 µm
80
160 µm
60
40
20
0
0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15
Seconds
Disassociation or decarbonisation
slower than pure heat transfer
completed in seconds
Hot fluid
Temp (gas)
Cold fluid
(dust)
Thursday, February 17, 20
22
CYCLONES
Heat Transfer area
If:
Tgo is the temperature of gas at cyclone outlet
Tmo is the temperature of material at cyclone discharge
If:
Di is the dust load of gas at cyclone inlet
Do is the dust load of gas at cyclone outlet
Di - Do
Efficiency = x 100
Di
Typically
95% top cyclones
80-90% bottom stages - dependant on design
Oil Shale
2 Oil Burner
Tower
Fuel 2 Material
Precal
Cooler exhaust
Tertiary air
Fuel 1
Kiln By-pass
Clinker
Cooler
Tower
Precal Material
Fuel 1
By-pass
Kiln
Clinker
Cooler
Tower
Precal Material
Fuel 1
Kiln By-pass
Clinker
Cooler
Tower Tower
Precal
Material
Cooler exhaust Tertiary air Fuel 2
Fuel 1
Kiln By-pass
Clinker
Cooler
Tertiary Air
Meal
to kiln
Fuel
90+% calcined
Kiln Exit GasThursday,
22
February 17, 20
15 Mins
Disadvantages:
Planetary coolers are ruled out.
Some systems air flow has to be regulated (tertiary damper).
Slightly higher pressure loss.
Advantages:
System is very simple.
Any type cooler can be utilized.
Possibility of this system to cope with certain circulating
phenomena.
Substantial decrease of the thermal load of the burning zone
Improved lining life.
Disadvantages:
Maximum fuel input in the precalciner is not practical.
The bypass will be of same size as in conventional preheater kilns.
Burning in excess O2.
Precalcination
is performed in FLS
a separate IHI, Fuller (SF)
vessel Kawasaki (KSV)
Onoda/Kawasaki,
Allis Chalmers (RSP)
Mitsubishi (MFC, GG)
Kobe (DD)
Fives-Cail Babcock Fives-Cail Babcock
Thursday, February 17, 20
22
PRECALCINING
PERFORMANCE
3.5 s
2.5 s
3s
2s
4s
40
COMBUSTION 30
88 µ residue (%)
20
Particle size 10
Volatile matter
Air temperature 0
1 10 100
Volatile matter (%)
Unburnt material
hot spots
reducing condition
SO3 volatilization
buildups
Thursday, February 17, 20
22
BUILDUP ISSUE
Volatile elements
SO3
Cyclone design
poorly designed discharges
Temperature level
excessive calcination in bottom cyclones
60
SO2 trapped (%of total)
40
20
0
400 500 600 700 800 900 1000
Temperature (ºC)
Gamma detectors
Pressure taps
Tower temp. profile
Fluidization
Air Canons
Dust Load Increases
Colder Burning
Reduce Air Inleakage
Bypass
Sulfur/Alkali Ratio
Precal Fuel Percent
Material bypass
Gas bypass
Air inleakage
Gas to stage
above
Material Flow
Gas to stage
above
Feed from
Stage above
Splash
Plate
Tipping
Valve
Gas
Bypass
Counter-Weight
Combustion efficiency
Gas mixing
Flow measurements:
Tipping valve efficiency
Measured CCR
T(OC) 782
Measured CCR
T(OC) 628
C4
FF
Measured CCR
T(OC) 855
P(mbar)
Measured CCR
T(OC) 880
Measured
T(OC) 1045 875
P(mbar) -6 -5.6
O2 %
CO ppm
NOX
Measured CCR
T(OC) 1145 1025