Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Management
Topic 6 –
Project Management
(I&II)
Research Project
Controlling
Monitor, compare, revise 修订 ,
action
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 3–8
Project Planning,
Scheduling, and Controlling
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1
Figure 3.1
Budgets
Delayed activities report
Slack activities report 松弛活动
CPM/PERT
Gantt charts
Milestone charts
Cash flow schedules
Figure 3.1
Human Quality
Resources Marketing Finance Design Production
Mgt
Project 1 Project
Manager
Mechanical Test Technician
Engineer Engineer
Project 2 Project
Manager
Electrical Computer Technician
Engineer Engineer
Figure 3.2
Project 1
Project 2
Project 3
Project 4
Figure 3.3
Time
J F M A M J J A S
Design
Prototype
Test
Revise
Production
C and D cannot
A C begin until A A C
(d) and B have
both been
B D completed B D
C cannot begin
until both A and B
A C are completed; D A C
(e) cannot begin until Dummy activity
B is completed. A
B D dummy activity is
introduced in AOA B D
Figure 3.5
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 3 – 37
A Comparison of AON and
AOA Network Conventions
Activity on Activity Activity on
Node (AON) Meaning Arrow (AOA)
B and C cannot
begin until A is
completed. D
A B D cannot begin A B D
until both B and
(f) C are completed. Dummy
A dummy C
C activity
activity is again
introduced in
AOA.
Figure 3.5
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 3 – 38
Exercise 1:
Milwaukee Paper Manufacturing
Activities and Predecessors
Immediate
Activity Description Predecessors
A Build internal components —
B Modify roof and floor —
C Construct collection stack A
D Pour concrete and install frame A, B
E Build high-temperature burner C
F Install pollution control system C
G Install air pollution device D, E
H Inspect and test F, G
Table 3.1
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 3 – 39
AON Network for
Milwaukee Paper
Activity A
A (Build Internal Components)
Start
Activity B
Start B (Modify Roof and Floor)
Activity
Figure 3.6
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 3 – 40
AON Network for
Milwaukee Paper
Activity A Precedes Activity C
A C
Start
B D
Activities A and B
Precede Activity D Figure 3.7
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 3 – 41
AON Network for
Milwaukee Paper
F
A C
E
Start H
B D G
nt sta
s)
ne e r
(Build Burner)
o m ld A
ro ll
po Int
ls
)
H
C ui
Dummy 7
(B
1 6
E
Activity (Inspect/
Test)
Ro (M B G
of od l
/ F i fy t al n
s o
lo
or I( n luti e)
D o l ic
) 3 5 P ev
D
(Pour
Concrete/
Install Frame) Figure 3.9
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 3 – 43
Determining the Project
Schedule
Perform a Critical Path Analysis
执行关键路径分析
The critical path is the longest path
through the network
The critical path is the shortest time in
which the project can be completed
Any delay in critical path activities
delays the project
Critical path activities have no slack
time 关键路径活动没有懈怠的时间
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 3 – 44
Determining the Project Schedule
Latest LS LF Latest
Start 2 Finish
EF = ES + Activity time
ES EF = ES + Activity time
Start
0 0
2 EF of B =
ES ES of B + 3
0
Start
0 of B
B
0 0 3
3
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 3 – 52
ES/EF Network for
Milwaukee Paper
A C
0 2 2 4
2 2
Start
0 0
B
0 3
2 2
Start
0 0
= Max (2, 3) D
0
3 7
B
0 3
3
4
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 3 – 54
ES/EF Network for
Milwaukee Paper
A C
0 2 2 4
2 2
Start
0 0
B D
0 3 3 7
3 4
2 2 3
Start E H
0 0 4 8 13 15
0 4 2
B D G
0 3 3 7 8 13
3 4 5
Figure 3.11
LS = LF – Activity time
2 2 3
Start E H
0 0 4 8 13 15
13 15
0 4 2
B LS = LF
D – Activity time
G
0 3 3 7 8 13
3 4 5 LF = EF
of Project
Figure 3.12
10 13
2 2 3
Start E H
0 0
LF =4 Min(LS
8 of 13 15
following activity) 13 15
0 4 2
B D G
0 3 3 7 8 13
3 4 5
Figure 3.12
A C F
0 2 2 4 4 7
2 4 10 13
2 2 3
Start E H
0 0 4 8 13 15
4 8 13 15
0 4 2
B D G
0 3 3 7 8 13
8 13
3 4 5
Figure 3.12
0 2 2 4 10 13
2 2 3
Start E H
0 0 4 8 13 15
0 0 4 8 13 15
0 4 2
B D G
0 3 3 7 8 13
1 4 4 8 8 13
3 4 5
Figure 3.12
Slack = LS – ES or Slack = LF – EF
A 0 2 0 2 0 Yes
B 0 3 1 4 1 No
C 2 4 2 4 0 Yes
D 3 7 4 8 1 No
E 4 8 4 8 0 Yes
F 4 7 10 13 6 No
G 8 13 8 13 0 Yes
H 13 15 13 15 0 Yes
Table 3.3
0 2 2 4 10 13
2 2 3
Start E H
0 0 4 8 13 15
0 0 4 8 13 15
0 4 2
B D G
0 3 3 7 8 13
1 4 4 8 8 13
3 4 5
Figure 3.13
A Build internal
components
B Modify roof and floor
C Construct collection
stack
D Pour concrete and
install frame
E Build high-
temperature burner
F Install pollution
control system
G Install air pollution
device
H Inspect and test
A Build internal
components
B Modify roof and floor
C Construct collection
stack
D Pour concrete and
install frame
E Build high-
temperature burner
F Install pollution
control system
G Install air pollution
device
H Inspect and test
Activity
Time
A 1 2 3 2 .11
B 2 3 4 3 .11
C 1 2 3 2 .11
D 2 4 6 4 .44
E 1 4 7 4 1.00
F 1 2 9 3 1.78
G 3 4 11 5 1.78
H 1 2 3 2 .11
Table 3.4
= (variances of activities
on critical path)
15 Weeks
(Expected Completion Time)
Figure 3.15
15 16 Time
Weeks Weeks
Figure 3.16
$30,000 —
Normal
Normal —
Cost
| | |
1 2 3 Time (Weeks)
Figure 3.18
Crash Time Normal Time
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 3 – 88
Critical Path And Slack
Times For Milwaukee Paper
A C F
0 2 2 4 4 7
0 2 2 4 10 13
2 2 3
0 0 4 8 13 15
0 4 2
B D Slack = 0 G Slack = 0
0 3 3 7 8 13
1 4 4 8 8 13
3 4 5
A-C-E-G-H G= 1200 G= 3
C&D 2 2(1000) 6 12 12 10
B-D-G-H H= 3000 H= 1
=
B&C= B&C= 2
2500 2000
B&E= 2
B&E=
D&C= 2
3000
D&E= 2
D&C=
1000
D&E=
1500
A-C-E-G-H G= 1200 G= 3
G 1 1200 6 11 11 9
B-D-G-H H= 3000 H= 1
B&C= B&C= 1
2500
B&E= 2
B&E= ____
3000
3,450
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Inc. 3 – 90
Advantages of PERT/CPM
1. Especially useful when scheduling and
controlling large projects
2. Straightforward concept and not
mathematically complex
3. Graphical networks help to perceive
relationships among project activities
4. Critical path and slack time analyses help
pinpoint activities that need to be closely
watched