Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Modeling Application
Thermal
Power
Station
Condenser
Distribution
Valve passing Condenser Water Flow
Condenser Duty
Line Loss
Condenser effectiveness
Auxiliaries
CWP Performance
BFP Performance
CEP Performance
FD/PA/ID Performance
2.64E08
0.07 P T 39.46
Duty kcal/h
534.61 W H 532.38
LPST
1.20 P T 28.99
47628 W H 28.95
COND
CWIN
CWOUT
1.20 P T 34.54
47628 W H 34.48
CNDPMP
0.07 P T 39.46
534.61 W H 39.40
Gresik Steam
Model Simulation 3/4 Condenser
of Condenser Performance Curves
Performance
100
90
Des36
80
Des33
70 Des30
mmHg
Des27
60
Cal36
50 Cal33
Cal30
40
Cal27
30
20
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140
% Design Heat Duty
12-Oct-07
19-Oct-07
22-Oct-07
24-Oct-07
5-Nov-07
11-Nov-07
18-Nov-07
Condenser Exit pressure
29-Nov-07
1-Dec-07
1-Dec-07
5-Dec-07
Condenser (Actual/N&C)
8-Dec-07
12-Dec-07
16-Dec-07
15-Feb-08
Condenser performance is better than the new and clean performance.
20-Feb-08
22-Feb-08
26-Feb-08
26-Feb-08
28-Feb-08
Condensor performance benchmarking ..
1.19
1.17 CCP2 40K CI
1.15 22th~30th May
1.13
1.11
1.09
1.07
1.05
1.03
1.01
0.99
2-Jul
1-Jan
4-Jun
16-Jul
30-Jul
15-Jan
18-Jun
7-May
29-Jan
26-Feb
12-Feb
12-Mar
26-Mar
21-May
9-Apr
13-Aug
27-Aug
23-Apr
Plant
Plant
Data Data Reconciliation
Data
Heat Balances
Performance Models
Theoretical Analysis
Historical Archive &
Interpretation
Reports
Shaft Power)
)
%
.08
(0
INL
SS
ET
LO
A IR
(1. IP TURB POWER (6.68%)
PE
45
)
LP TURB POWER (10.87%)
PI
%)
35
SS
CONDENSER LOSS 33.53%
.
(0
04 LO
SS
SS
RADIATION LOSS (0.06%)
09 LO
(0. ION
LO
%)
RADIATION LOSS
T
(0. ION
%)
AT
C
CHEMICAL (0.34%)
U
DI
D
AT
ENERGY
RA
DI
(97.32%) HP STEAM (34.39%)
RA
IP STEAM (8.6%)
LP STEAM (4.03%)
STACK LOSS (8.97%)
T
EA
H
% E
00 BL
1. SI
N
SE
EL
FU