Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Considerations
Kenny Legleiter
Project Manager
Merrick & Company
Cost Considerations
Contracting mechanism
Writing of the specifications/statement of work
Entity doing the QA/QC of the data
Disk space needs
Client project management
Acquisition parameters
Acquisition sensors (LiDAR, Digital cameras,
hyperspectral, thermal)
Factors that Affect Price (cont.)
Square mileage of area (cheaper by the dozen)
Shape of the project area (square or rectangular
in shape is best)
Ground Sample Distance (GSD)
<1 meter
1 meter
2 meter
3 meter
Factors that Affect Price (cont.)
Final Product Deliverables
LiDAR only processed to bare
earth
LiDAR with breaklines
Contour intervals
Imagery / Digital Orthophotography
Map Accuracy Specifications
ASPRS – Class 1, 2 or 3
National Standard for Spatial Data
Accuracy (NSSDA)
FEMA
Number of QA/QC Points
LIDAR Cost Examples
Hydro- Total
LID meet NSSDA enforced LIDAR w/
Area AR specification LIDAR Breaklin Breakline
(square GSD for contour /Sq. es/Sq. s/Sq.
miles) (ft) Interval (ft) Mile Mile Mile
2 (18.5 cm vertical
100 4 RMSE) $500 $150 $650
2 (18.5 cm vertical
1,000 4 RMSE) $200 $140 $340
2 (18.5 cm vertical
5,000 4 RMSE) $125 $120 $245
2 (18.5 cm vertical
10,000 4 RMSE) $105 $100 $205
Contracts/Agreements
What factors
should be
considered
when
contracting
for LiDAR?
The Keys to a Successful
LiDAR Project
Understand your mapping requirements
and the purpose for completing a LIDAR
project prior to signing of the contract.
Utilize a qualification-based selection
process to select your LIDAR consultant.
Hire a LiDAR firm that owns a LIDAR
sensor.
Ask for quality control plan.
Dedicate the appropriate number of
internal resources to the project.
Determine who will lead the effort, act as a
Project Manager
Keys to a Successful
LiDAR Project (continued)
Know exactly how the quality control is going to be
performed by the consultant and internally.
Understand the differences in LIDAR technology. The
age of the sensor, pulse rate, roll compensation, field
of view are unique to each system.
Determine which accuracy specification is going to be
adhered to (i.e. ASPRS, NMAS, NSSDA, etc.).
Hybrid accuracy standards should only be used as long
as there is accurate LiDAR specifications and is
tailored to the project.
Keys to a Successful
LiDAR Project (continued)
Allows users to
understand “how
accurate is accurate”
Sources of Error in LiDAR Data
DGPS, Differential GPS
Position of the plane (lat, long,
elevation)
IMU, Inertial Measurement Unit
Attitude of the plane (pitch, roll,
heading)
LiDAR Sensor
Accuracy of ranging and
trajectories of shots.
Calibration of data
Relative accuracy of data which is
typically the greatest source of
error.
Ground control survey
Control creates absolute accuracy.
System Installation
System mounting
Flight Acquisition
Proper GPS and IMU collection
procedures
Data Processing Problems
GPS processing and LiDAR
boresighting
Filtering
Smoothing
Helpful Hints
Works upon analyzing control point elevations
compared to their vertical intersection point of the
LiDAR TIN, depending on the user defined classes
enabled and disabled
Only reports vertical accuracy
Contour Interval Wizard to choose from:
FGDC/NSSDA/FEMA
ASPRS Class 1, 2, or 3
NMAS
RMSEz or Vertical Accuracy requirement can by
manually input
Control is analyzed to TIN of DSM surface
Statistics report:
Average Z Error
Median Z Error
Minimum Z Error
Maximum Z Error
Standards report for PASS or FAIL for:
Average Z Error
RMSEz
Vertical Accuracy
Achievable Contour Interval report for:
FGDC/NSSDA/FEMA
ASPRS Class 1, 2, or 3
NMAS
Selectable classes to analyze from
Tabular readout of all control information
Export control report to Excel file
Export DSM data for the 3 points forming the TIN of
analysis for each control point
Contour Results